Commons:Администраторы
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
Category:Commons guidelines/ru
Эта страница рассказывает о роле администраторов (иногда их называют админами или сисопами) на Викискладе. Обратите внимание на то, что подробности того, чем они занимаются, и того, каким образом назначаются, могут отличаться от других сайтов.
Если вы хотите обратиться за помощью к администраторам, пожалуйста, напишите на доске объявлений администраторов.
В настоящее время на Викискладе — 178 администраторов.
Кто такой администратор?
Administrators as of май 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 178
If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Общее
Администраторы — это участники Викисклада, которые имеют техническую возможность:
- удалять и восстанавливать изображения и другие загруженные файлы, просматривать и восстанавливать их удалённые версии
- удалять и восстанавливать страницы, просматривать и восстанавливать удалённые версии страниц
- устанавливать и снимать защиту страниц, редактировать защищённые страницы, которые могут редактировать только администраторы
- блокировать и разблокировать участников, отдельные IP-адреса и диапазоны IP-адресов
- редактировать некоторые интерфейсные сообщения (см. также Викисклад:Администраторы интерфейса)
- переименовывать файлы
- добавлять и удалять группы участников
- настраивать кампании «Мастера загрузки» (Upload Wizard)
- удалять и восстанавливать отдельные записи журналов и версии страниц
- импортировать страницы из других вики
- объединять историю страниц
- изменять фильтры злоупотреблений
- не создавать перенаправления с исходных страниц при их переименовании
- переопределять проверки злоупотреблений (spoofing checks), а также чёрные списки заголовков или имён участников
- отправлять сообщение нескольким участникам одновременно (массовая рассылка)
- использовать более высокие лимиты в API-запросах
Всё вместе это известно как средства администрирования.
Роль в сообществе
Администраторы — опытные и надёжные члены сообщества Викисклада, которые взяли на себя дополнительную работу по техническому обслуживанию и которым на основе общественного консенсуса/голосования для этого были предоставлены средства администрирования. Разные администраторы имеют различные области интересов и разный опыт, но типичные задачи администратора включают в себя определение и закрытие запросов на удаление, удаление файлов, имеющих нарушения авторских прав, восстановления файлов (в случае необходимости), защиту Викисклада от вандализма и работу над шаблонами и другими защищёнными страницами. Конечно, некоторые из этих задач также могут делать и участники без прав администратора.
Администраторы должны понимать цели данного проекта и быть готовыми работать конструктивно с другими участниками для достижения этих целей. Администраторы также должны понимать и следовать правилам Викисклада, а когда требуется — уважать консенсус сообщества.
Помимо ситуаций, требующих использования инструментов администратора, администраторы не имеют специальных редакторских полномочий в силу своей позиции, и в ходе обсуждений и публичных голосований их вклад рассматривается так же, как и у любых обычных редакторов. Некоторые администраторы могут стать более влиятельными не из-за своего положения как такового, а из-за личного доверия со стороны сообщества.
Инструкции для администраторов
Пожалуйста, прочитайте данную страницу.
Снятие прав администратора
Согласно правилам снятия прав администраторов, права могут быть сняты по неактивности или злоупотреблению полномочиями. В заявке на снятие статуса администратора не применяются обычные стандарты определения консенсуса на ЗСА. Вместо этого используется «консенсус большинства», то есть для снятия статуса достаточно не менее 50% голосов.
Заявка на получение статуса администратора
Все предполагающие администраторы должны пройти через этот процесс и представить себя RFA, включая всех бывший администраторов, которые стремятся вернутся к своей предыдущей роли.
Во-первых, перейдите на Commons:Administrators/Howto и почитайте информацию там. Потом возвращайтесь сюда и сделайте запрос в разделе ниже.
- После нажатия на соответствующую кнопку, и создания подстраницы, скопируйте ссылку на подстраницу, например, "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", измените Commons:Administrators/Requests и вставьте это название в верхней секции, а затем заключите его в фигурные скобки (например {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) для её включения. Запросите уведомление в списках наблюдения через MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice или отредактируйте MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice, чтобы добавить ссылку, если вы являетесь администратором.
- Если кто-то другой выдвинул кандидатуру, пожалуйста, примите кандидатуру, написав "Я принимаю" или что-то подобное, и подпишите ниже самой кандидатуры.
Используйте поле ниже, замените Имя участника на ваше имя участника: |
Голосование
Обратите внимание, что любой зарегистрированный участник может проголосовать здесь, хотя голос тех, кто имеет мало правок или их вообще нет, не может быть полностью учтён. Желательно написать причину для голоса Support или
Oppose, так как это поможет бюрократу в его решении для закрытия голосования. Большее значение придается аргументации, с подтверждающими доказательствами, если это необходимо, чем простому голосу.
Для продвижения обычно требуется не менее 75% голосов, при этом минимум 8 голосов поддержки. Голоса незарегистрированных пользователей не учитываются. Тем не менее, закрывающий бюрократ имеет дискреционные полномочия в оценке консенсуса сообщества, и решение не обязательно будет основываться на исходных цифрах. Бюрократы могут по своему усмотрению продлевать голосование, если считают, что это поможет в большей мере отразить консенсус сообщества.
Комментарии Neutral не учитываются в итоговых итогах голосования для целей расчета процента голосов за/против. Однако такие комментарии являются частью дискуссии, могут убедить других и способствовать заключительному пониманию бюрократом консенсуса.
Очистить кэш Используйте ссылку редактирования для редактирования страниц-включений.
Заявки на статус администратора
По завершении, страницы должны быть заархивированы в Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Пожалуйста, прочтите Commons:Администраторы перед тем, как публиковать здесь сообщения или голосовать. Любой зарегистрированный участник может голосовать, хотя голоса тех, у кого мало или совсем нет правок ранее, могут быть учтены не в полной мере.
Ziv
Ziv (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 12:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Good day everyone
I thought about how I could contribute more here and I've decided to run for administrator.
About me: I'm from Switzerland, already over 50 years old, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2008. My main account is on the German Wikipedia, but since November of last year, I've been primarily active on Commons. Since December, I've been a file mover, having already moved over 11,000 files. My specialty is renaming coats of arms from German-speaking countries, as well as renaming files with meaningless names. I don't shy away from manually editing in all language versions, even if I can't read the language. However, I can converse fluently with anyone in German and Swiss German, and I have knowledge of English, Italian, French, and Hebrew.
I'm active almost every day, and I'm also good at finding copyvios; occasionally, I even submit deletion requests.
This is the first time I've applied for such a position at Wikipedia. Because of my calm and matter-of-fact manner, I've been approached before to become an administrator on the German-language Wikipedia. However, I wasn't particularly interested at the time and didn't know exactly how I could contribute as an administrator to the German-language Wikipedia.
Here at Commons, however, I do see potential where I could contribute.
Where I could certainly help as an admin and where a backlog I can often see:
- Processing open deletion requests
- Processing speedy deletion requests
I'll leave any further areas of activity open for now, as I probably need to find my way around first.
Whether the Commons community will place its trust in me remains to be seen now. Of course, it could also be that many of you don't know me that well yet and I still have to prove myself a bit more. But I hope I'm worthy of becoming an administrator.
Thanks to everyone who voted, even if your vote was negative. It shows me that you're taking notice and have gotten to know me a little better.
Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support safe! Shalom aus München --Mateus2019 (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --TenWhile6 13:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, valuable contributor. Suitable for being a sysop. Good luck.--Kadı Message 14:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Krorokeroro (talk) 16:11, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for proposing yourself. --Yann (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support She has "Make (Wiki)Love Not War" on a userpage. --A.Savin 17:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support thanks for volunteering All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support thank you for volunteering. Jianhui67 T★C 18:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Incall talk 04:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 10:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. The mop is waiting you! Taivo (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- I am a but unsure if all of your files moves are really covered by the renaming policy. Especially moves es like or . GPSLeo (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @GPSLeo: The Disney logos represented a harmonization of an entire file set, see Category:Disney Jr. logos, and the example you mentioned was the last one to remain in the requests list for a day or two. However, other Filemovers and admins were also involved in the name changes. Second: The old name File:George Simion cu media 04·05·2025 (6).jpg only mentioned George Simion, but three people are shown. You're right, I certainly could have been more specific, such as adding the first names to the suggestion and including the date. Greetings, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 14:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Заявки на статус бюрократа
По завершении, страницы должны быть заархивированы в Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Пожалуйста, прочтите Commons:Бюрократы перед тем, как публиковать здесь сообщения или голосовать. Любой зарегистрированный участник может голосовать, хотя голоса тех, у кого мало или совсем нет правок ранее, могут быть учтены не в полной мере.
No current requests.
Запросы на получение права проверяющего участников
По завершении, страницы должны быть заархивированы в Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Пожалуйста, прочтите Commons:Проверяющие участников перед тем, как публиковать здесь сообщения или голосовать. Любой зарегистрированный участник может голосовать, хотя голоса тех, у кого мало или совсем нет правок ранее, могут быть учтены не в полной мере.
Lymantria
Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.
We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.
Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- im
ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 00:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Nemoralis (talk) 00:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support as above. 〈興華街〉📅❓ 09:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 21:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uschoen (talk) 08:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Msb (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support per Kadi. I know them from Wikidata and they are very active and experienced there. Jianhui67 T★C 18:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Incall talk 18:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak support--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Haven't interacted with them much (if at all). But, already CU at other project, I don't see any issue why they can't be a good one here as well. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak support. — ArtSmir (talk) 19:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 07:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Rkieferbaum (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support GPSLeo (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Seems competent and trustworthy, and cross-wiki capacity is useful. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Pafsanias (talk) 16:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Can this checkuser handle such cases like the sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1? 〈興華街〉📅❓ 09:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well, that has not been a straightforward CU-request and it is clear why the complexity of this CU-request led to a discussion, which I think led to a good outcome. The complexity is not so much in the CU part itself (the sockpuppetry seems to be quite clearly visible), but in the judging if this sockpuppetry is to be considered disruptive or not (commons and wikidata do not have exactly the same standards on that), the deletion of uploads and the long history. I certainly would be able to take up such a case, but not without trying to discuss with my colleague checkusers and/or ask them for advice. All by all these tasks are meant to serve the community as well as possible and should not be solo projects.--Lymantria (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment No opposition, but I am wondering about your level of activity with only 13 admin actions during last month. Yann (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- no access to https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/commons.wikimedia.org/Lymantria/4 .
- without that, then I found that there were fewer than 5 edits to all 4 Commons:Administrators' noticeboards in the last 3 years.
- https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/commons.wikimedia.org/Lymantria/4/Requests%20for%20checkuser .--RoyZuo (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Запросы на получение прав ревизора
По завершении, страницы должны быть заархивированы в Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Пожалуйста, прочтите Commons:Ревизоры перед тем, как голосовать здесь. Любой зарегистрированный участник может голосовать, хотя голоса тех, у кого мало или совсем нет правок ранее, могут быть учтены не в полной мере.
No current requests.
Задачи
См. также
- Commons:User access levels
- Викисклад:Администраторы/Раздел бездействия
- Commons:Administrators/Nominations
- Commons:Administrators' noticeboard