Commons:Administrators/pl

Shortcuts: COM:A COM:ADMIN COM:SYSOP

Category:Commons guidelines/pl

This page explains the role of administrators (sometimes called admins or sysops) on Wikimedia Commons. Note that details of the role, and the way in which administrators are appointed, may differ from other sites.

Jeżeli potrzebujesz pomocy administratora możesz to zgłosić tutaj: Administrators' noticeboard.

Obecnie na Commons jest 178 administratorów.

Kim jest administrator?

Administrators as of maj 2025
Listing by: LanguageDateActivity [+/−]

Number of Admins: 178

  1. 1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3
  2. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  3. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  4. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  5. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  6. Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1
  7. Abzeronow, en, fr-1
  8. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  9. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  10. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1
  11. Aka, de, en-3
  12. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  13. Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2
  14. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  15. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  16. Anthere, fr, en-3
  17. AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward)
  18. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  19. Auntof6, en, es-2, fr-1
  20. Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1
  21. Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1
  22. Billinghurst, en
  23. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  24. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  25. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  26. Captain-tucker, en
  27. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2
  28. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  29. Common Good, en
  30. CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat)
  31. Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1
  32. Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1
  33. DaB., de, en-1
  34. DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  35. Davepape, en
  36. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  37. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  38. DMacks, en
  39. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  40. Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1
  41. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  42. Ebrahim, en-3
  43. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  44. Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1
  45. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  46. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1
  47. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  48. Explicit, en, es, ko-2
  49. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  50. Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2
  51. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  52. Gbawden, en-3, af-1
  53. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  54. Geni, en
  55. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  56. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  57. Gnangarra, en, nys-1
  58. Gnom, de, en-3, fr-2, it-2, es-1
  59. GPSLeo, de, en-2
  60. GreenMeansGo, en
  61. Grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  62. Hekerui, de, en-4
  63. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  64. Holly Cheng, en, ja-2
  65. Huntster, en
  66. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  67. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  68. IronGargoyle, en, de-1
  69. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  70. Jaqen, it, en-2
  71. Jarekt, pl, en
  72. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  73. Jdforrester, en
  74. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  75. Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2
  76. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  77. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  78. JoKalliauer, de, en-3
  79. Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward)
  80. Josve05a, sv, en-3
  81. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1
  82. Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2
  83. Kaganer, ru, en-1
  84. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  85. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
  86. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  87. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  88. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  89. Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1
  90. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  91. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  92. Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2
  93. Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  94. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2
  95. Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  96. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1
  97. Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
  98. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  99. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  100. Matrix, en, ta-2
  101. MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1
  102. Mdaniels5757, en, es-1
  103. MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1
  104. Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1
  105. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  106. Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1
  107. Minorax, en, zh (oversighter)
  108. Missvain, en
  109. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  110. Miya, ja, en-2
  111. Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
  112. Morgankevinj, en
  113. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  114. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  115. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3
  116. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  117. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1
  118. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  119. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  120. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  121. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  122. Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
  123. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  124. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  125. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  126. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  127. Pyb, fr, en-2
  128. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  129. Racconish, fr, en-4
  130. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  131. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  132. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  133. Ratekreel, ks, en-3, ur-3
  134. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  135. Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1
  136. Regasterios, hu, en-1
  137. Rehman, en, si-1
  138. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  139. Revi C., ko, en-3
  140. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  141. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  142. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  143. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  144. RP88, en, de-1
  145. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  146. Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
  147. Sadads, en, es-3
  148. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  149. Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1
  150. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  151. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  152. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1
  153. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  154. Strakhov, es, en-2
  155. TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  156. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  157. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2
  158. Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
  159. The Squirrel Conspiracy, en
  160. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1
  161. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  162. Triplec85, de, en-3, fr-1, hr-1, la-1
  163. Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1
  164. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  165. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  166. Wdwd, de, en-2
  167. Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
  168. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1
  169. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  170. Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
  171. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  172. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  173. Yuval CT, he, en-3
  174. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  175. علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward)
  176. Abuse filter, (automated account)
  177. CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request
  178. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.

Technikalia

Administratorzy to użytkownicy Wikimedia Commons, którzy mają techniczne możliwości do:

  • usuwania i przywracania zdjęć lub innych załadowanych plików oraz usuwania i przywracania usuniętych wersji
  • usuwania i przywracania stron oraz usuwania i przywracania usuniętych wersji
  • modyfikacji zabezpieczeń stron oraz do edycji stron w pełni zabezpieczonych
  • blokowania i odblokowywania użytkowników oraz adresów IP
  • zmiany nazw plików

Są to tzw. narzędzia administratora.

Rola społecznościowa

Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community who have taken on additional maintenance work and have been entrusted with the admin tools by public consensus/vote. Different admins have different areas of interest and expertise, but typical admin tasks include determining and closing deletion requests, deleting copyright violations, undeleting files where necessary, protecting Commons against vandalism, and working on templates and other protected pages. Of course, some of these tasks can be done by non-admins as well.

Administrators are expected to understand the goals of this project, and be prepared to work constructively with others towards those ends. Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate, respect community consensus.

Apart from roles which require use of the admin tools, administrators have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Some admins may become more influential, not due to their position as such, but from the personal trust they may have gained from the community.

Sugestie dla administratorów

Przeczytaj przewodnik administratorów.

Utrata uprawnień administratora

Under the de-admin policy, administrator rights may be revoked due to inactivity or misuse of sysop tools.

In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.

Wniosek o przyznanie uprawnień administratora

All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.

Po pierwsze przeczytaj informacje umieszczone na stronie: Commons:Administrators/Howto. Następnie wróć tutaj o złóż wniosek w odpowiedniej sekcji poniżej.

  • If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.


Use the box below, replacing Username with your username:

Głosowanie

Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable you give reasons for both Support and Oppose votes as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.

Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Bureaucrats may, at their discretion, extend the period of an RfA if they feel that it will be helpful in better determining community consensus.

 Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However, such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.

Wyczyść pamięć podręczną Użyj tego linku aby edytować transkludowaną stronę.

Wnioski o przyznanie uprawnień administratora

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Ziv

Related requests:

Vote

Ziv (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 12:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Good day everyone

I thought about how I could contribute more here and I've decided to run for administrator.

About me: I'm from Switzerland, already over 50 years old, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2008. My main account is on the German Wikipedia, but since November of last year, I've been primarily active on Commons. Since December, I've been a file mover, having already moved over 11,000 files. My specialty is renaming coats of arms from German-speaking countries, as well as renaming files with meaningless names. I don't shy away from manually editing in all language versions, even if I can't read the language. However, I can converse fluently with anyone in German and Swiss German, and I have knowledge of English, Italian, French, and Hebrew.

I'm active almost every day, and I'm also good at finding copyvios; occasionally, I even submit deletion requests.

This is the first time I've applied for such a position at Wikipedia. Because of my calm and matter-of-fact manner, I've been approached before to become an administrator on the German-language Wikipedia. However, I wasn't particularly interested at the time and didn't know exactly how I could contribute as an administrator to the German-language Wikipedia.

Here at Commons, however, I do see potential where I could contribute.

Where I could certainly help as an admin and where a backlog I can often see:

  • Processing open deletion requests
  • Processing speedy deletion requests

I'll leave any further areas of activity open for now, as I probably need to find my way around first.

Whether the Commons community will place its trust in me remains to be seen now. Of course, it could also be that many of you don't know me that well yet and I still have to prove myself a bit more. But I hope I'm worthy of becoming an administrator.

Thanks to everyone who voted, even if your vote was negative. It shows me that you're taking notice and have gotten to know me a little better.

Best regards, זיו「Ziv」For love letters and other notes 12:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Votes

  •  Support safe! Shalom aus München --Mateus2019 (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --TenWhile6 13:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support, valuable contributor. Suitable for being a sysop. Good luck.--Kadı Message 14:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Krorokeroro (talk) 16:11, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks for proposing yourself. --Yann (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support She has "Make (Wiki)Love Not War" on a userpage. --A.Savin 17:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support thanks for volunteering All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support thank you for volunteering. Jianhui67 TC 18:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. Incall talk 04:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. —— Eric LiuTalk 10:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. The mop is waiting you! Taivo (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • I am a but unsure if all of your files moves are really covered by the renaming policy. Especially moves es like or . GPSLeo (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
    Hi @GPSLeo: The Disney logos represented a harmonization of an entire file set, see Category:Disney Jr. logos, and the example you mentioned was the last one to remain in the requests list for a day or two. However, other Filemovers and admins were also involved in the name changes. Second: The old name File:George Simion cu media 04·05·2025 (6).jpg only mentioned George Simion, but three people are shown. You're right, I certainly could have been more specific, such as adding the first names to the suggestion and including the date. Greetings, זיו「Ziv」For love letters and other notes 14:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Wnioski o przyznanie uprawnień biurokraty

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Wnioski o przyznanie uprawnień checkusera

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.


Lymantria

Vote

Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.

We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.

Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.

  • Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Votes

  •  Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
  • im  ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
    • @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
      • @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
      • @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support זיו「Ziv」For love letters and other notes 00:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Nemoralis (talk) 00:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support as above. 📅 09:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  SupportYahya (talkcontribs.) 21:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Uschoen (talk) 08:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Msb (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Strong support per Kadi. I know them from Wikidata and they are very active and experienced there. Jianhui67 TC 18:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. Incall talk 18:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Haven't interacted with them much (if at all). But, already CU at other project, I don't see any issue why they can't be a good one here as well. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support. — ArtSmir (talk) 19:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. —— Eric LiuTalk 07:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. Rkieferbaum (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support GPSLeo (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Seems competent and trustworthy, and cross-wiki capacity is useful. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Pafsanias (talk) 16:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Can this checkuser handle such cases like the sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1? 📅 09:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Well, that has not been a straightforward CU-request and it is clear why the complexity of this CU-request led to a discussion, which I think led to a good outcome. The complexity is not so much in the CU part itself (the sockpuppetry seems to be quite clearly visible), but in the judging if this sockpuppetry is to be considered disruptive or not (commons and wikidata do not have exactly the same standards on that), the deletion of uploads and the long history. I certainly would be able to take up such a case, but not without trying to discuss with my colleague checkusers and/or ask them for advice. All by all these tasks are meant to serve the community as well as possible and should not be solo projects.--Lymantria (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment No opposition, but I am wondering about your level of activity with only 13 admin actions during last month. Yann (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
    • I may not have been very active on the admin side (and I have been on holidays for a week during last month), I think my edit count shows that I am active at commons, be it that I am more active at wikidata. --Lymantria (talk) 13:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  1. no access to https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/commons.wikimedia.org/Lymantria/4 .
  2. without that, then I found that there were fewer than 5 edits to all 4 Commons:Administrators' noticeboards in the last 3 years.
  3. https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/commons.wikimedia.org/Lymantria/4/Requests%20for%20checkuser .--RoyZuo (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for Oversight rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Tasks

purge Admin backlog


Copyright:

  • Copyright violations: ~82
  • Unfree Flickr files: ~0
  • Recent unfree Flickr images: ~5
  • Media uploaded without a license as of 2025-05: ~237

Other:

  • Duplicates: ~502
  • Advertisements/spam: ~1
  • Personal photos/selfies: ~46
  • Other speedy deletions: ~55
  • Categories for discussion: 84 months
  • Media requiring a split up: ~0
  • Requests for unblock: ~4
  • Undeletion requests: ~24

Protected edit requests:

  • Full protection: ~5
  • Interface admin: ~13
  • Technical: ~0
  • Template protection: ~4
  • Protection level: ~0

See also: DR, HMS,

Zobacz też

Category:Commons administrators/pl#/Translations}}%7C* Category:User permissions/pl#/Translations}}
Category:Commons administrators/pl Category:Commons guidelines/pl Category:User permissions/pl