Algorithms

Support - well laid out, good content even if not complete, great narrative. Webaware ^talk 05:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral Another book that is a bit thin on content. Even a "quicksort" was missing. RobinH 08:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Support There certainly are plenty of algorithms out there that aren't included in this book, but it has decent formatting and some good background. I worry that the current format isn't upwardly scalable to cover all the major algorithms that are worth covering, they are going to have to add new pages or risk having the current pages become gigantic. Look at Knuth's "The art of computer programming" which is so gigantically huge that it was broken into several volumes. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 17:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose I understand nothing from this book. I don't even know who it's targetted towards, what it's about and what most of the abbreviations and jargon means. Xania ^talk 01:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Support Vote changed to support. See my comments further below for brief rationale. Xania ^talk 22:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Support See comments below -- Kowey 06:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose there are to many red links see featured books criterion #9. Zginder 20:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

To be fair, I havent found a single redlink yet in reading through the book (except for one that pointed to another book that has since been moved. I fixed that). --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 12:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Support As per above. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zginder (talk • contribs) 09:51, October 11, 2007.

Done 5 support votes, 1 neutral, no outstanding oppose votes. This book is now featured. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 16:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)