Wikimore

Rotterdam Convention
Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade
	The logo of the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat
Type	United Nations treaty
Signed	10 September 1998
Location	Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Effective	24 February 2004
Condition	Ninety days after the ratification by at least 50 signatory states
Signatories	72
Parties	161
Depositary	Secretary-General of the United Nations
Languages	Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish
	http://www.pic.int/

Category:Articles with short description Category:Short description matches Wikidata

Category:Use dmy dates from December 2020

The Rotterdam Convention (formally, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade) is a multilateral treaty to promote shared responsibilities in relation to importation of hazardous chemicals. The convention promotes open exchange of information and calls on exporters of hazardous chemicals to use proper labeling, include directions on safe handling, and inform purchasers of any known restrictions or bans. Signatory nations can decide whether to allow or ban the importation of chemicals listed in the treaty, and exporting countries are obliged to make sure that producers within their jurisdiction comply.

In 2012, the Secretariats of the Basel and Stockholm conventions, as well as the UNEP-part of the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat, merged to a single Secretariat with a matrix structure serving the three conventions.^[1] The three conventions now hold back to back Conferences of the Parties as part of their joint synergies decisions.

The ninth meeting of the Rotterdam Conference^[2] was held from 29 April to 10 May 2019 in Geneva, Switzerland.

Substances covered under the Convention

The following chemicals are listed in Annex III to the convention:^[3]

2,4,5-T and its salts and esters
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Asbestos – Actinolite, Anthophyllite, Amosite, Crocidolite, and Tremolite only
Benomyl (certain formulations)
Binapacryl
Captafol
Carbofuran (certain formulations)
Chlordane
Chlordimeform
Chlorobenzilate
DDT
Dieldrin
Dinitro-ortho-cresol (DNOC) and its salts
Dinoseb and its salts and esters
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB)
Endosulfan
Ethylene dichloride
Ethylene oxide
Fluoroacetamide
Hexachlorocyclohexane (mixed isomers)
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene
Lindane
Mercury compounds including inorganic and organometallic mercury compounds
Methamidophos (certain formulations)
Methyl parathion (certain formulations)
Monocrotophos
Parathion
Pentachlorophenol and its salts and esters
Phosphamidon (certain formulations)
Polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polychlorinated terphenyls (PCTs)
Terbufos
Tetraethyl lead
Tetramethyl lead
Thiram (certain formulations)
Toxaphene
Tributyltin compounds
Trichlorfon
Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate (TRIS)

Substances recommended for addition to the Convention

The Chemical Review Committee of the Rotterdam Convention decided to recommend to the conference of the parties meeting that it consider the listing of the following chemicals in Annex III to the convention:^[4]

Carbosulfan
Chrysotile asbestos
Fenthion (ultra low volume (ULV) formulations at or above 640 g active ingredient/L)
Liquid formulations (emulsifiable concentrate and soluble concentrate) containing paraquat dichloride at or above 276 g/L, corresponding to paraquat ion at or above 200 g/L
Acetochlor
Iprodione

State parties

As of October 2018, the convention has 161 parties, which includes 158 UN member states, the Cook Islands, the State of Palestine, and the European Union. Non-member states include the United States.

Discussion about chrysotile asbestos

At the 2011 meeting of the Rotterdam Convention in Geneva, the Canadian delegation surprised many with a refusal to allow the addition of chrysotile asbestos fibers to the Rotterdam Convention.^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8] Hearings are scheduled in the EU in the near future to evaluate the position of Canada and decide on the possibility of a punitive course of action.^[9]^[10]^[11]

In continuing its objection, Canada is the only G8 country objecting to the listing. Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Ukraine also objected. Vietnam had also raised an objection, but missed a follow-up meeting on the issue.^[12] In taking its position, the Canadian Government contrasted with India, which withdrew its long-standing objection to the addition of chrysotile to the list just prior to the 2011 conference. (India later reversed this position in 2013.)^[13]

Numerous non-governmental organizations have publicly expressed criticism of Canada's decision to block this addition.^[14]^[15]^[16]^[17]^[18]

In September 2012, Canadian Industry minister Christian Paradis announced the Canadian government would no longer oppose inclusion of chrysotile in the convention.^[19]

Eight of the largest chrysotile producing and exporting countries opposed such a move at the Rotterdam Conference of Parties in 2015: Russia, Kazakhstan, India, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Cuba, and Zimbabwe.^[13]

References

↑ "Joint Portal of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions > Secretariat > Overview". brsmeas.org. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
↑ "Meetings of the conferences of the Parties to the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions".
↑ "Annex III Chemicals". pic.int. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
↑ "Recommended for listing". www.pic.int. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
↑ Canadian Cancer Society Reacts to Conservative Harper Administration's Position on Chrysotile Archived 27 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine Category:Webarchive template wayback links, 23 June 2011
↑ Canadian comedienne fails to see humor in Canadian position on treaty Category:All articles with dead external links Category:Articles with dead external links from February 2022 Category:Articles with permanently dead external links^{[permanent dead link]}
↑ UN Delegates Shocked at Canadian Stand on Chrysotile Category:All articles with dead external links Category:Articles with dead external links from February 2022 Category:Articles with permanently dead external links^{[permanent dead link]}, 24 June 2011
↑ Canadian Physicians criticize own government
↑ O'Neil, Peter (8 June 2011). "European Parliament slams Canada's oilsands, asbestos, sealing industries". Canada.com. Retrieved 10 August 2011.
↑ "MEPs favour EU-Canada trade deal, but worry about seals, tar sand oil and asbestos". Europa (web portal). Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2011.
↑ "UPDATE: European Parliament to be asked to take sanctions against Canada on asbestos, June 30". Council of Canadians. 29 June 2011. Archived from the original on 3 August 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2011.
↑ Canada Wins 2-year Stay on Potential Ban of Exports of Chrysotile Asbestos to India
1 2 "India's contentious stand on Chrysotile asbestos is a cause for concern for environmentalists". Hindustan Times. 3 May 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2018.
↑ "Women In Europe for a Concerned Future criticize Canada's stance in 2011". Archived from the original on 31 March 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2011.
↑ "2011 Rotterdam Convention Decision criticized by environmental groups". Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved 10 July 2011.
↑ "Canadian Cancer Society denounces decision by Canadian Government". Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved 10 July 2011.
↑ International Ban Asbestos Secretariat issues statement critical of Canadian decision
↑ "Indian Center for Science and Environment issues statement criticizing Canada". Archived from the original on 22 May 2011. Retrieved 10 July 2011.
↑ "Canada won't oppose asbestos limits". CBC News. CBC/Radio-Canada. 14 September 2012. Retrieved 14 September 2012.

External links

[1] "Joint Portal of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions > Secretariat > Overview". brsmeas.org. Retrieved 17 June 2016.

[2] "Meetings of the conferences of the Parties to the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions".

[3] "Annex III Chemicals". pic.int. Retrieved 31 July 2020.

[4] "Recommended for listing". www.pic.int. Retrieved 19 October 2023.

[5] Canadian Cancer Society Reacts to Conservative Harper Administration's Position on Chrysotile Archived 27 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine Category:Webarchive template wayback links, 23 June 2011

[6] Canadian comedienne fails to see humor in Canadian position on treaty Category:All articles with dead external links Category:Articles with dead external links from February 2022 Category:Articles with permanently dead external links^{[permanent dead link]}

[7] UN Delegates Shocked at Canadian Stand on Chrysotile Category:All articles with dead external links Category:Articles with dead external links from February 2022 Category:Articles with permanently dead external links^{[permanent dead link]}, 24 June 2011

[8] Canadian Physicians criticize own government

[9] O'Neil, Peter (8 June 2011). "European Parliament slams Canada's oilsands, asbestos, sealing industries". Canada.com. Retrieved 10 August 2011.

[10] "MEPs favour EU-Canada trade deal, but worry about seals, tar sand oil and asbestos". Europa (web portal). Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2011.

[11] "UPDATE: European Parliament to be asked to take sanctions against Canada on asbestos, June 30". Council of Canadians. 29 June 2011. Archived from the original on 3 August 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2011.

[12] Canada Wins 2-year Stay on Potential Ban of Exports of Chrysotile Asbestos to India

[india-13] 1 2 "India's contentious stand on Chrysotile asbestos is a cause for concern for environmentalists". Hindustan Times. 3 May 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2018.

[14] "Women In Europe for a Concerned Future criticize Canada's stance in 2011". Archived from the original on 31 March 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2011.

[15] "2011 Rotterdam Convention Decision criticized by environmental groups". Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved 10 July 2011.

[16] "Canadian Cancer Society denounces decision by Canadian Government". Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved 10 July 2011.

[17] International Ban Asbestos Secretariat issues statement critical of Canadian decision

[18] "Indian Center for Science and Environment issues statement criticizing Canada". Archived from the original on 22 May 2011. Retrieved 10 July 2011.

[19] "Canada won't oppose asbestos limits". CBC News. CBC/Radio-Canada. 14 September 2012. Retrieved 14 September 2012.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

Pollution
History
Air	Acid rain Air quality index Air pollution measurement Atmospheric dispersion modeling Chlorofluorocarbon Combustion Biofuel Biomass Coal Joss paper Open burning of waste Construction Renovation Demolition Exhaust gas Diesel exhaust Haze Smoke Indoor air quality Internal combustion engine Global dimming Global distillation Mining Ozone depletion Particulates Asbestos Oil refining Polluting cooking fuels Persistent organic pollutant Smelting Smog Soot Black carbon Volatile organic compound Waste
Biological	Biological hazard Genetic pollution Introduced species Invasive species
Digital	Information pollution
Electromagnetic	Light Ecological light pollution Overillumination Radio spectrum pollution
Natural	Ozone Radium and radon in the environment Volcanic ash Wildfire
Noise	Transportation Land Water Air Rail Sustainable transport Urban Sonar Marine mammals and sonar Industrial Military Abstract Noise control
Radiation	Actinides Bioremediation Nuclear fission Nuclear fallout Plutonium Poisoning Radioactivity Uranium Electromagnetic radiation and health Radioactive waste
Soil	Agricultural pollution Herbicides Manure waste Pesticides Land degradation Bioremediation Open defecation Electrical resistance heating Soil guideline values Phytoremediation
Solid waste	Advertising mail Biodegradable waste Brown waste Electronic waste Battery recycling Foam food container Food waste Green waste Hazardous waste Biomedical waste Chemical waste Construction waste Lead poisoning Mercury poisoning Toxic waste Industrial waste Lead smelting Litter Mining Coal mining Gold mining Surface mining Deep sea mining Mining waste Uranium mining Municipal solid waste Garbage Nanomaterials Plastic pollution Microplastics Packaging waste Post-consumer waste Waste management Landfill Thermal treatment
Space	Satellite
Visual	Air travel Clutter (advertising) Traffic signs Overhead power lines Vandalism
War	Chemical warfare Herbicidal warfare (Agent Orange) Nuclear holocaust (Nuclear fallout - nuclear famine - nuclear winter) Scorched earth Unexploded ordnance War and environmental law
Water	Agricultural wastewater Biological pollution Diseases Eutrophication Firewater Freshwater Groundwater Hypoxia Industrial wastewater Marine debris Monitoring Nonpoint source pollution Nutrient pollution Ocean acidification Oil exploitation Oil exploration Oil spill Pharmaceuticals Sewage Septic tanks Pit latrine Shipping Stagnation Sulfur water Surface runoff Thermal Turbidity Urban runoff Water quality
Topics	Pollutants Heavy metals Paint Brain health and pollution
Misc	Area source Debris Dust Garbology Legacy pollution Midden Point source Waste
Responses	Cleaner production Industrial ecology Pollution haven hypothesis Pollutant release and transfer register Polluter pays principle Pollution control Waste minimisation Zero waste
Lists	Diseases Law by country Most polluted cities Least polluted cities by PM_2.5 Most polluted countries Most polluted rivers Treaties
Categories (by country) Commons WikiProject Environment WikiProject Ecology Environment portal Ecology portal