Finest topology making some functions continuous
Category:Articles with short descriptionCategory:Short description matches Wikidata
In general topology and related areas of mathematics, the final topology[1] (or coinduced,[2] weak, colimit, or inductive[3] topology) on a set
with respect to a family of functions from topological spaces into
is the finest topology on
that makes all those functions continuous.
The quotient topology on a quotient space is a final topology, with respect to a single surjective function, namely the quotient map. The disjoint union topology is the final topology with respect to the inclusion maps. The final topology is also the topology that every direct limit in the category of topological spaces is endowed with, and it is in the context of direct limits that the final topology often appears. A topology is coherent with some collection of subspaces if and only if it is the final topology induced by the natural inclusions.
The dual notion is the initial topology, which for a given family of functions from a set
into topological spaces is the coarsest topology on
that makes those functions continuous.
Definition
Given a set
and an
-indexed family of topological spaces
with associated functions
the final topology on
induced by the family of functions
is the finest topology
on
such that

is continuous for each
. The final topology always exists, and is unique.
Explicitly, the final topology may be described as follows:
- a subset
of
is open in the final topology
(that is,
) if and only if
is open in
for each
.
The closed subsets have an analogous characterization:
- a subset
of
is closed in the final topology
if and only if
is closed in
for each
.
The family
of functions that induces the final topology on
is usually a set of functions. But the same construction can be performed if
is a proper class of functions, and the result is still well-defined in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. In that case there is always a subfamily
of
with
a set, such that the final topologies on
induced by
and by
coincide. For more on this, see for example the discussion here.[4] As an example, a commonly used variant of the notion of compactly generated space is defined as the final topology with respect to a proper class of functions.
Examples
The important special case where the family of maps
consists of a single surjective map can be completely characterized using the notion of quotient map. A surjective function
between topological spaces is a quotient map if and only if the topology
on
coincides with the final topology
induced by the family
. In particular: the quotient topology is the final topology on the quotient space induced by the quotient map.
The final topology on a set
induced by a family of
-valued maps can be viewed as a far reaching generalization of the quotient topology, where multiple maps may be used instead of just one and where these maps are not required to be surjections.
Given topological spaces
, the disjoint union topology on the disjoint union
is the final topology on the disjoint union induced by the natural injections.
Given a family of topologies
on a fixed set
the final topology on
with respect to the identity maps
as
ranges over
call it
is the infimum (or meet) of these topologies
in the lattice of topologies on
That is, the final topology
is equal to the intersection 
Given a topological space
and a family
of subsets of
each having the subspace topology, the final topology
induced by all the inclusion maps of the
into
is finer than (or equal to) the original topology
on
The space
is called coherent with the family
of subspaces if the final topology
coincides with the original topology
In that case, a subset
will be open in
exactly when the intersection
is open in
for each
(See the coherent topology article for more details on this notion and more examples.) As a particular case, one of the notions of compactly generated space can be characterized as a certain coherent topology.
The direct limit of any direct system of spaces and continuous maps is the set-theoretic direct limit together with the final topology determined by the canonical morphisms.
Explicitly, this means that if
is a direct system in the category Top of topological spaces and if
is a direct limit of
in the category Set of all sets, then by endowing
with the final topology
induced by
becomes the direct limit of
in the category Top.
The étalé space of a sheaf is topologized by a final topology.
A first-countable Hausdorff space
is locally path-connected if and only if
is equal to the final topology on
induced by the set
of all continuous maps
where any such map is called a path in 
If a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space
is a Fréchet-Urysohn space then
is equal to the final topology on
induced by the set
of all arcs in
which by definition are continuous paths
that are also topological embeddings.
Properties
Behavior under composition
Suppose
is a family of maps, and for every
the topology
on
is the final topology induced by some family
of maps valued in
. Then the final topology on
induced by
is equal to the final topology on
induced by the maps 
As a consequence: if
is the final topology on
induced by the family
and if
is any surjective map valued in some topological space
then
is a quotient map if and only if
has the final topology induced by the maps 
By the universal property of the disjoint union topology we know that given any family of continuous maps
there is a unique continuous map
that is compatible with the natural injections.
If the family of maps
covers
(i.e. each
lies in the image of some
) then the map
will be a quotient map if and only if
has the final topology induced by the maps 
Effects of changing the family of maps
Throughout, let
be a family of
-valued maps with each map being of the form
and let
denote the final topology on
induced by
The definition of the final topology guarantees that for every index
the map
is continuous.
For any subset
the final topology
on
will be finer than (and possibly equal to) the topology
; that is,
implies
where set equality might hold even if
is a proper subset of 
If
is any topology on
such that
and
is continuous for every index
then
must be strictly coarser than
(meaning that
and
this will be written
) and moreover, for any subset
the topology
will also be strictly coarser than the final topology
that
induces on
(because
); that is, 
Suppose that in addition,
is an
-indexed family of
-valued maps
whose domains are topological spaces
If every
is continuous then adding these maps to the family
will not change the final topology on
that is,
Explicitly, this means that the final topology on
induced by the "extended family"
is equal to the final topology
induced by the original family
However, had there instead existed even just one map
such that
was not continuous, then the final topology
on
induced by the "extended family"
would necessarily be strictly coarser than the final topology
induced by
that is,
(see this footnote[note 1] for an explanation).
Final topology on the direct limit of finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces
Let
denote the space of finite sequences, where
denotes the space of all real sequences.
For every natural number
let
denote the usual Euclidean space endowed with the Euclidean topology and let
denote the inclusion map defined by
so that its image is
and consequently,

Endow the set
with the final topology
induced by the family
of all inclusion maps.
With this topology,
becomes a complete Hausdorff locally convex sequential topological vector space that is not a Fréchet–Urysohn space.
The topology
is strictly finer than the subspace topology induced on
by
where
is endowed with its usual product topology.
Endow the image
with the final topology induced on it by the bijection
that is, it is endowed with the Euclidean topology transferred to it from
via
This topology on
is equal to the subspace topology induced on it by
A subset
is open (respectively, closed) in
if and only if for every
the set
is an open (respectively, closed) subset of
The topology
is coherent with the family of subspaces
This makes
into an LB-space.
Consequently, if
and
is a sequence in
then
in
if and only if there exists some
such that both
and
are contained in
and
in 
Often, for every
the inclusion map
is used to identify
with its image
in
explicitly, the elements
and
are identified together.
Under this identification,
becomes a direct limit of the direct system
where for every
the map
is the inclusion map defined by
where there are
trailing zeros.
Categorical description
In the language of category theory, the final topology construction can be described as follows. Let
be a functor from a discrete category
to the category of topological spaces Top that selects the spaces
for
Let
be the diagonal functor from Top to the functor category TopJ (this functor sends each space
to the constant functor to
). The comma category
is then the category of co-cones from
i.e. objects in
are pairs
where
is a family of continuous maps to
If
is the forgetful functor from Top to Set and Δ′ is the diagonal functor from Set to SetJ then the comma category
is the category of all co-cones from
The final topology construction can then be described as a functor from
to
This functor is left adjoint to the corresponding forgetful functor.
Notes
- ↑ By definition, the map
not being continuous means that there exists at least one open set
such that
is not open in
In contrast, by definition of the final topology
the map
must be continuous. So the reason why
must be strictly coarser, rather than strictly finer, than
is because the failure of the map
to be continuous necessitates that one or more open subsets of
must be "removed" in order for
to become continuous. Thus
is just
but some open sets "removed" from 