User talk:Yann

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 6364

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi, File:Perpendicular bisector la.svg and File:Perpendicular bisector proof la.svg are my first works so I apologize for my error and I beg you to explain how to resolve. Dimitris131 made these images: File:Perpendicular bisector el.svg and File:Perpendicular bisector proof el.svg respectively. Their license is {{PD-self}} , so I pick them and change the greek letters with roman ones because I need them for italian wikipedia. As you can see, I put a link to the original works in "source", but I don't know if it is the right place. Further, I used PD-chart instead of PD-self, because they aren't technically made by me, but author allows changes.

Thank you for the advice. Best regards, Emmanuhel (talk) 16:50, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

@Emmanuhel: This is in the public domain as simple geometric shape, but you still has to provide a license. I did for you this time. Yann (talk) 17:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you so much Emmanuhel (talk) 17:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File deleted

Hello Yann, hope you are well. I just noticed you that a file I uploaded was deleted for copyright violation. First, I want to sincerely apologize—it was not my intention to upload content that violated any rules. I was under the impression that it could be uploaded under Fair Use, as it was related to the subject of Jean de Meuron's IMDb page. I do not have contact with the subject, but establish copyright license and would like to know if there is any way I could re-upload the image without violating copyright terms? I would really appreciate your guidance on how to do this properly. Repsjared (talk) 10:24, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Şəkil bərpası

Salam. Bu hesab Ahmed Gozala mexsusdur. Sekli berpa edin zehmet olmasa Ahmed Gozal (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This account belongs to Ahmed Gozal. Please restore the photo at the link. File:Ahmed_Gozal.jpg. Ahmed Gozal (talk) 10:52, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

@Ahmed Gozal: Hi, Wikimedia projects are not social media. We do not accept personal images unless people contribute somehow. Also please read COM:SCOPE. Yann (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Yann, even though I am an unimportant person here on the Commons, I notice all the work you do that keep this place functioning. You do things that other admins don't bother with. With much appreciation, Krok6kola (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elşad İman uşağı ilə.jpg

You have no business closing this deletion request. You voted on the deletion request and also closed the undeletion request of the same file (speedily closing the request without any chance for discussion). If you do not immediately reverse your closure and allow another administrator to close the discussion, I will bring up this repeated misconduct to COM:AN/U. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@IronGargoyle: Hi, Why does the deletion of this file seem so important to you (and to others)? This is a good portrait used in two articles, so it is in scope. There is a license verified by a VRT permission. I don't understand your insistence, nor your aggressiveness. First closure by Krd was Kept, and the repeated nomination by Yousiphh without any new argument seems abusive to me. Yann (talk) 16:13, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
They removed the picture from both articles, without explaining why or on what basis. It is clear that the picture adds a special beauty to the article, but who cares about it? Elshad Imanverified Verified 12:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Restored. IronGargoyle's behavior is really disappointing. Yann (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
The picture is a terrible vanity picture and it seems you only added the picture to the articles to justify your out-of-process keep. You know you shouldn't close discussions you were involved in, and especially when the discussion is a referendum on your earlier undeletion close. I clearly have a dispute with you here, but if I weren't involved in this discussion and I was uninvolved and saw this sort of behavior from a different admin. I would warn and then block if they persisted in this type of action. Repeatedly closing the same discussion topic in your preferred direction is tantamount to wheel warring in my opinion. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:35, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
You are wrong on all counts. This is a good picture, whatever was the initial intention of the uploader. It is much better than the ones currently used on the articles in English and in French. Then you have no business removing it from the French article, as you are not an editor there, except your personal antagonism. The DR was opened for 12 days, and there is no reason for deleting it. Yann (talk) 06:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
@Yann, The image has copyright and the author is Araz Yaquboglu, a well-known Wikipedia editor from Azerbaijan, and he (Araz Yaquboglu) is not blocked on any project. He (IronGargoyle) removes the image from the article, noting that the user is blocked on 3 wiki projects, but he doesn't understand that he is confusing me with the author of the image, Elshad Imanverified Verified 07:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
@Yann, I was just wondering if it would be possible to discuss whether this image should be added to the article? since in this case the conflict is ongoing and the image was removed from the article again by the same user. Maybe the wiki community should make a decision so that the person who removed the photo stops doing what they are doing. Is it possible to discuss this issue in the wiki community and make a final decision? Elshad Imanverified Verified 11:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm

I think you didn't get a notice about because the revisions with audio had been deleted, but a file you had originally uploaded, File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm, has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm. hinnk (talk) 07:51, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Yann,
J'espère que tout roule. ;). Malheureusement, il y en a encore qui insistent... C'est pénible de devoir tout recommencer. À quoi servent les votes majoritaires ? On se le demande. Bon dimanche quand même... Tisourcier (talk) 13:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Cepven-dysqa8-jIwsav

Hello, this user is the master, but the category is named after the CU who blocked them. Please correct the name of the category. Thank you for your attention. MathXplore (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

OOPS. Sorry, my mistake. Fixed. Yann (talk) 16:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

The last Jew in Vinnitsa, 1941.jpg image

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_last_Jew_in_Vinnitsa,_1941.jpg Hi, this is just a trivial matter, but I noticed the smaller/older version of this image actually has higher detail than the larger one! As such I think that version should be used instead by default. The increased resolution is a complete waste since the image was merely upscaled. It's also more blurry and has worse compression artifacts, so overall the small version is quite a bit better. Pseudoantiquasi (talk) 16:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

OK, reverted. Thanks for noticing. Yann (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm almost ashamed to be nitpicking like that, as the difference between the images is small. In the meantime I did have a look around, to see if there was an even better version somewhere, and I can affirm: there isn't one. This version is the best, and the best ones elsewhere are the same, besides the sepia one of course, which is roughly eqivalent in detail and rightly its own file (here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:German_soldiers_of_the_Waffen-SS_and_the_Reich_Labor_Service_look_on_as_a_member_of_an_Einsatzgruppe_prepares_to_shoot_a_Ukrainian_Jew_kneeling_on_the_edge_of_a_mass_grave_filled_with_corpses.jpg
Thanks for all your efforts! Pseudoantiquasi (talk) 12:11, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Kissing the War Goodbye.jpg

I took a stab at its restoration. Seeing as how it's on your list of favorite photos, how'd I do? JayCubby (talk) 18:34, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

@JayCubby: Sure. If you want to restore it, please go ahead. Yann (talk) 18:35, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
I already restored it, what are your thoughts on what I did? JayCubby (talk) 18:36, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
@JayCubby: Ah yes. I misunderstood you. The restoration is good, but it is much darker. Do you have a reference for the light? Yann (talk) 18:41, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
I restored the image from the NARA TIFF if my memory is not failing me. I pushed the exposure up, I think it's closer to the previous version now. JayCubby (talk) 19:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
@JayCubby: Ah OK. Fine then. Yann (talk) 19:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Copyvio

Hi

Per Deletion request about Illie Bolojan's official portrait, File:President Nicușor Dan Official Portrait.jpg is a copyvio. Panam2014 (talk) 18:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

@Panam2014: Link to DR? Yann (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Sure : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ilie Bolojan official portrait.jpg. Panam2014 (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Voilà : Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nicușor Dan. You could also create the DR yourself. Yann (talk) 21:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you. Panam2014 (talk) 09:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

More image theft by stock sites

File:Taj Mahal, Agra, India edit2.jpg https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/taj-mahal-one-seven-wonders-world-2535874281 JayCubby (talk) 01:54, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

For review

Hi! Can you reviewed the license for File:CaoMinhDat 22041975.jpg, I saw that it doesn’t seem to have a Creative Commons license. Thank you Lubinh123 (talk) 11:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

✓ Done Deleted, user warned. Yann (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hello @Yann, I do not know if there is a formal way to appeal the undeletion requests, so I hope I do not come as rude here. I do not agree with your decision not to undelete File:ALBERTO NÚÑEZ FEIJÓO.jpg as it goes against the precedent with Flickr images coming from official party accounts. Why is a VRT needed for this precise one when the common practice is to assume that the photographers have granted permission to release the image? If we were to be consistent, thousand of this kind of pictures should be deleted from commons. For instance, you have the official PP accounts of Madrid, Cantabria, Melilla and the EPP. I expect that if the file was reuploaded to commons, an eventual DR would result in the file being kept based on previous precedent. Basque mapping (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

@Basque mapping: Hi, In the other cases, all images on Flickr are under a free license. In the case of File:ALBERTO NÚÑEZ FEIJÓO.jpg, all other images are "All rights reserved". So I wonder why only this picture was released under CC-0. Yann (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks @Yann, I appreciate your rapid response. Now I will try to make a timeline of events around this image:
1) 9 May. Photographer Diego Puerta unveils a formal portrait of Feijóo he made two months before . A self-described photojournalist, it seems however that in the last months he has been working for the PP, as all of the photos he has published in Twitter suggest . It may be argued that the latter is not a proof of Puerta working for the PP, but upon a quick research in Google, there are dozens of newspaper crediting his photos in the format "Diego Puerta/PP", suggesting he works for the party .
2) 13 May. The PP official Flickr account uploads the image, apparently under an "all rights reserved" license
3) 14 May. User Vaqueroj uploads the image to Commons saying it comes from https://www.pp.es/alberto-nunez-feijoo-3 (recently the website was renewed so I was not able corroborate that claim). This user has been quite inactive, emerging from year to year. His edits record makes me believe they is somehow linked to the PP, which would explain why they inexplicably re-emerged to just upload this image and add it to the Spanish Wikipedia article.
4) 14 May. @LMLM marks the file as having no permission .
5) 19 May. The Flickr account of the PP changes the license of the image to CC0 . Perhaps, someone warned the PP that they had to give permission for the use of the file and so they decided to change the license. I do not really know exactly what happened here, but the sequence of events suggests they deliberately licensed this image as CC0 in order to use it on Wikipedia.
6) 22 May. After seemingly no one contested the no permission claim, the file was deleted. Apparently no one realised the existance of the Flickr permission. Basque mapping (talk) 21:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
@Basque mapping: I think that Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Deva1995 is a similar case. I am waiting for the outcome to decide what to do. Yann (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Laghouat (portrait d'une jeune fille) - Philippe Joudiou - btv1b53160630v - Retouched.jpg
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Laghouat (portrait d'une jeune fille) - Philippe Joudiou - btv1b53160630v - Retouched.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laghouat (portrait d'une jeune fille) - Philippe Joudiou - btv1b53160630v - Retouched.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 08:07, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Requestion for File protection.

Please protect this file which I uploaded File:Dasa darshan.jpg Ip user unneccesary target and kept the file for nomination, even receiving permission from Wikimedia. This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in permission archive. Request to save watchlist to prevent vandalism for this file and also change protection settings. @Yann Dasa darshan (talk) 11:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Chem Sim 2001 (2)

Hello Yann, since you commented/voted on my first RfA six years ago, I thought it would be a good idea to inform you about my new request. If you have the time, I'd be very happy to hear your opinion on this. Best, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Category:Paper documents

COM:SPEEDY is not an explanation of why you removed a category. This was a heavily used category before Rathfelder appears to have unilaterally emptied it. This is not how longstanding categories are supposed to be changed. - Jmabel ! talk 16:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel: The category was empty. OK it should not have been emptied, but I can't check the history of all empty categories. Yann (talk) 18:25, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
So where do we go from here? (and you are right that the history of the use of a category is often very hard to determine.) - Jmabel ! talk 18:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
@Jmabel: Well, revert Rathfelder edits? Yann (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Good. I'll do that. Just wanted to make sure that you hadn't been effectively endorsing them, and that nothing bigger was going on that I was missing.
By the way, COM:SPEEDY is really not a great deletion rationale. Your really ought to indicate which speedy deletion criterion. There is a big difference between C1 (where the category almost certainly should not be recreated and C2 (usually a plausible category, deleted simply because of lack of content). - Jmabel ! talk 19:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Please restore

Please restore Category:March 2025 at Melbourne Airport, I intend to populate it in the next day or two. Had thought I uploaded a file to populate but clearly I didn’t. Bidgee (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

OK, done. Yann (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
@Bidgee: It turned up at Other speedy deletions again. Maybe Yann didn't remove the speedy template after restoring? Anyway, I declined the speedy request because I saw this message. I suggest watching the category until it's populated so you can remove any new deletion request that shows up. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:23, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Euphrasie Kouassi Yao.jpg

Bonjour Yann,

Au sujet de Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Demande de restitution de ce fichier : File:Euphrasie Kouassi Yao.jpg, comment faut-il comprendre la situation en ce qui concerne cette photo (et d'autres dont le cas est semblable) ? Ça ne semble pas clair et ça laisse perplexe. Voici quelques éléments de réflexion.

  • Selon les données EXIF, l'auteur est "Bosson". On ne sait pas qui est ce Bosson (on y reviendra plus loin) ni si ce photographe a donné son accord pour que sa photo soit offerte au domaine public par une déclaration CC0.
  • La photo est du 8 mai 2018.
  • L'appareil est un Canon EOS 7D.
  • Le téléverseur du fichier (User:Mister Kolson) prétend être l'auteur de la photo et le propriétaire des droits d'auteur, ce qui semble douteux (pour les raisons ci-dessous), mais cette affirmation est possiblement une simple erreur de débutant, puisqu'il s'agit du premier téléversement de cet utilisateur, apparemment fait lors d'une séance de formation à l'utilisation de Wikimedia le 5 octobre 2024.
  • L'autre utilisateur qui a demandé la restautration du fichier à Commons:Undeletion requests (Aristide Kouamé, User:Aristidek5maya), dit que c'est lui qui a fourni la photo à Mister Kolson pour que ce dernier la téléverse sur Commons lors de la session de formation. Cela semble signifier qu'en effet le téléverseur Mister Kolson ne serait pas l'auteur de la photo. Alors, l'auteur serait-il Aristide Kouamé ? Dans son commentaire, Aristide Kouamé ne dit pas qu'il est l'auteur.
  • Le nom de famille Bosson semble porté par plusieurs personnes en Côté d'Ivoire.
  • Le nom Bosson ne semble apparemment pas utilisé par Mister Kolson ni par Aristide Kouamé.
  • Aristide Kouamé a téléversé sur Commons des photos prises avec divers appareils, mais apparemment pas avec un Canon EOS 7D, notamment pour ses photos de février à mai 2018.
  • La photo semble prise lors de la même entrevue que celle publiée dans le media FratMat le 14 novembre 2018 .
  • Plusieurs photos de personnalités actuellement incluses dans la catégorie Category:Ateliers Wikimedia Training Tour à l'Université Félix Houphouët Boigny d'Abidjan semblent avoir été téléversées par des participants de cette session de formation d'octobre 2024 comme exercices de téléversements. Elles semblent presque toutes téléversées en tant que "own work" par leurs téléverseurs respectifs et CC0. La plupart n'ont pas d'auteur dans les données EXIF. Parfois les données EXIF indiquent des auteurs qui ne semblent pas reliés aux téléverseurs, par exemple File:Sidiki Diakité (1).jpg, auteur EXIF "sylla", téléverseur User:Samenan.
  • On trouve aussi notamment File:Aimée Zébéyoux (1).jpg, téléversé par User:Ariele225 en tant que own work et CC0, ce qui semble aussi douteux, étant donné que les données EXIF indiquent que l'auteur est Bosson et, ce qui est intéressant, que les droits d'auteur appartiennent au media Frat Mat. Ce qui pourrait être le cas aussi de la photo File:Euphrasie Kouassi Yao.jpg.

Malgré tout, il est possible que ces photos soient légitimes pour quelque raison, par exemple si malgré toutes les données EXIF divergentes Aristide Kouamé en est le photographe ou s'il dispose des droits d'auteur de FratMat.

Mais, pour revenir à ce que je disais au début, ça ne semble pas clair. Je me demande s'il serait souhaitable de laisser ouverte la discussion sur Commons:Undeletion requests jusqu'à ce que les utilisateurs concernés aient fourni des clarifications sur qui est l'auteur Bosson et qui fait la déclaration CC0. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@Asclepias: Bonjour, Je pense qu'il est préférable de créer une nouvelle demande de suppression avec ces arguments. Chacun peut alors d'exprimer avec toutes les informations disponibles. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:34, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Mr. Seth Davis's Pics

Sorry, I don't have permission from artist to upload his pics I downloaded from his old social. I understand now it is a copyright issue. Sorry again, and I'll try to contact the artist with apologies. Thanks for helping me correct this. Sd drumming (talk) 00:23, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Photos

We produced a Play-Drama by contributing funds. I was one of the co-Producers. We employed a photographer to click photos of actors for publicity.

Though photos were clicked by photographer, we own the photos. Or created means only the person who has clicked it can only upload it? Uday0611 (talk) 04:11, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

  • (talk page stalker) @Uday0611: was the copyright legally transferred? (e.g. either a work contract that was explicit about you owning copyright, or some later document clarifying that?) - Jmabel ! talk 04:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
    It was a minor work amounting to less that INR 10000 i.e. Indian currency. No contract was drawn. Only oral understanding which is the norm.
    Just want to make it very clear I am not requesting to restore the photos or will not upload myself also.
    I only wanted to explain how and why photos were uploaded. Uday0611 (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Photos

All the photos were uploaded one after another at the same time hence messages were received later. Regret.

A small query can I click a photo of a book cover of the book which I have purchased and upload it? Uday0611 (talk) 04:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

UN

Hi

Could you confirm that for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maamoun Kuzbari.jpg PD-US applies (or not) instead of PD-Syria? Because the photo have been taken in UN General Assembly. Panam2014 (talk) 09:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

US law would only prevail if it was first published in the US. It doesn't matter where it was created, but where it was first published per Berne Convention. Abzeronow (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Scans of UK passport covers

Hi Yann, does this UK Gov document, particularly the two highlighted paragraphs, prove that passport covers are protected from copying? Cheers -- DeFacto (talk). 19:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

@DeFacto: Hi, Yes, I read that, but we are talking about the design of the cover only. It is the coats of the United Kingdom, which is in the public domain. Only reusing this on new passports is not sufficient to create a new copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
The UK passport office document (link above) says this (my bold): The Controller of His Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO), who manages Crown copyright, must give permission before a British passport and the Royal crest image on the front of a passport can be reproduced. Are they mistaken about that do you think? Cheers -- DeFacto (talk). 19:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
@DeFacto: Hi, I am not sure. May be we need a new discussion about that on COM:VPC#Scans of UK passport covers. I copied your link there. Yann (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for starting that. It'll be interesting to see what people think. Cheers -- DeFacto (talk). 20:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Mail sent

@Yann

Rejoy2003(talk) 13:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Nautilus Shell, 1927, by Edward Weston, edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nautilus Shell, 1927, by Edward Weston, edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Category:User talk pages with broken file links