Commons:Ընտրյալ պատկերների թեկնածուներ

Ընտրյալ պատկերների թեկնածուներ էջն այլ լեզուներով.

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文（中国大陆） | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Եթե Դուք կարծում եք, որ գտել կամ ստեղծել եք պատկեր, որն արժանի է դառնալու ընտրյալ, խնդրում ենք այն ավելացնել Թեկնածուներ բաժնում։ Եթե 15 օրվա ընթացքում Ձեր առաջարկն ընդունվի համայնքի կողմից, ապա պատկերը կստանա ընտրյալ տիտղոս։ Խնդրում ենք ուշադրություն դարձնել, որ «Ընտրյալ պատկերն» ուղղակիորեն կապ չունի Օրվա պատկերի հետ։

Թեկնածուներ

Քվեարկելու կամ նոր թեկնածու առաջադրելու համար, անցեք այս հղումով։

File:Nicholas Roerich - Himalayas, Sikkim.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 13:19:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Himalayas, Sikkim (circa 1928-1929) by Nicholas Roerich

File:Puits Rodolphe 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 10:02:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Potash mine Rodolphe II, Ungersheim, Haut-Rhin, France
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#France
  •  Info The Rodolphe Mine near Ungersheim (Haute Rhin, France) was the most important potash mining site established by the "Mines de Kali Sainte Thérèse" company from 1911 onward. The mine was closed in 1976, and most of the facilities were preserved. For over 25 years the Rodolphe Group has been maintaining, rehabilitating, and promoting this rich heritage, transforming it into the Historic Potash Mine Centre. Created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:02, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Llez (talk) 10:02, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:52, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Very satisfying composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:48, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --per others Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Can you offer more crop at the left? that narrowly cropped building doesn't look so good Poco a poco (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Peacock (Aglais io) caterpillar Ruggeller Riet.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 08:42:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peacock (Aglais io) caterpillar on stinging nettle (Urtica dioica)
  • Sorry; I uploaded version before any denoise. New version now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support I wonder what this guy will look like once he makes the transformation? Wolverine X-eye 18:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Peacock (Aglais io) caterpillars on stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) Ruggeller Riet.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 08:45:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peacock (Aglais io) caterpillars on stinging nettle (Urtica dioica)
  • as above, denoised version now uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Lots of wow for me and nice to see a photo that puts an insect into the context of its surroundings, i.e. the plant it's eating. There should be a place for FPs like this as well as 'portrait photos' of wildlife Cmao20 (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Somewhat agreeing with Cmao20 above in that it's nice to see the subjects' environment. Wolverine X-eye 18:12, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:002 Asian green bee-eaters in Keoladeo National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 07:54:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Asian green bee-eaters in Keoladeo National Park

File:Black alder twig and water ripples at Wolfsberger Mühle, 2019-06-29.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 04:58:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black alder twig, deadwood and water ripples at Wolfsberger Mühle, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Liquid
  •  Info A black alder twig floats on gently rippling water at the Wolfsberger Mühle near Tessin in Germany. The scene combines subtle light and shadow with harmonic wave patterns and a quiet composition. While not technically perfect, it offers visual calm and expressive depth beyond pure documentation. Some tonal and color enhancements were applied to strengthen the sky reflection. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:58, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Despite minor softness and noise, the image conveys a reflective mood with artistic strength. The resolution (8.1 MP) isn't large by today's standards, but acceptable here, imho. No Raw exists - I was still shooting JPEGs in 2019 (to my regret). The subtle blue in the water was selectively enhanced to support the atmospheric effect. I'm aware of its flaws, but I'd rather share it than let it fade in the archive. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:58, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful peaceful composition, a photo which invites to meditation. I love the the combination of the soft water ripples with the sharp contours of the floating twig and leaves. – Aristeas (talk) 08:07, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful --XRay 💬 10:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Something original Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support per others --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Not your run-of-the-mill FP candidate; this is something new and fresh and I like it. Wolverine X-eye 18:16, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:View of the glacier of Öræfajökull volcano in Hornafjörður municipality, Iceland, 20240719 1738 2793.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 04:09:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the glacier of Öræfajökull volcano

File:Moken Village1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 02:57:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moken Village

File:Familiar bluet (21468).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 01:16:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Familiar bluet
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Wow! Stunningly sharp and beautifully composed. Cmao20 (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Great sharpness and detail. – Aristeas (talk) 15:40, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support A great image showcasing impressive focusing abilities. Wolverine X-eye 18:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Саат-кула (Стар Дојран) 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2025 at 22:44:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The clock of the Clock Tower in Star Dojran
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
  •  Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:44, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:44, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Good picture, I really like the work on shadows and different textures but I don't have a wow effect. —An insect photographer (talk) 23:46, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lacks wow-factor. Insufficient DoF -- the stones at the top and other parts are blurry. --Tagooty (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment I was hoping to support this because I do think it's a nice motif but the sharpness was a bit disappointing when I zoomed in to full size. Cmao20 (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Asian Emerald Dove in Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary March 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2025 at 08:56:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Asian Emerald Dove
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Columbidae_(Pigeons_and_Doves)
  •  Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:56, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:56, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 10:45, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice one. I would be tempted to crop that branch in the top left though. It looks a bit messy to just have a tiny bit of a branch in the corner. Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
    I have uploaded a new cropped version of this file just now, but it isn't reflecting here. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Striking colours and composition. Per Cmao20 cropping the branch on left would be better. --Tagooty (talk) 15:57, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
    I have cropped that branch in the top left and uploaded a new version but it's not reflecting here, do I need to do something else? Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Really nice picture, I like the orange petal which echo the beak. However, per Cmao20 and Tagooty, cropping the branch in the top left though would improve composition and focus the gaze on the bird. --An insect photographer (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:39, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:59, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:16, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:07, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:40, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Perhaps the most random collection of differently colored feathers I've ever seen on a bird. It suits it though. Wolverine X-eye 18:26, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Although I'd go for a portrait format using the branches as a frame Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Camarasaurus supremus skull (TMP 1984.161.0008, detail), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2025 at 01:01:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Camarasaurus supremus skull with neck vertebrae

File:Paul Schrader at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival (cropped) 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 18:18:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paul Schrader posing for the photographer at the Toronto International Film Festival
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
  •  Info created by Jaydixit – uploaded by Seewolf – nominated by Seewolf -- Seewolf (talk) 18:18, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Such a great portrait of the funny guy who brought us films like "Taxi Driver", "Raging Bull" and "Dog Eat Dog" -- Seewolf (talk) 18:18, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support I like the gesture – taking of his sunglasses, closing one eye and looking with the other one at the photographer(s), he seems to say “Did you get it, finally?” or similar. It’s a pity about these printed backgrounds with all the irritating logos, but they are so standard that they are hard to avoid. – Aristeas (talk) 08:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Small and not a great background but it's a very characterful and fun portrait and very sharp, I think it deserves a star. Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Pamela Anderson 2024 Headshot by Norman Wong.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 18:08:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pamela Anderson, 2024. Headshot by Norman Wong
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
  •  Info created by Norman Wong, uploaded by Graygoldmgmt, nominated by Yann
  •  Support -- Yann (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:27, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Seewolf (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 03:59, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Good portrait. “When I was young” in the 1990s, Pamela Anderson was famous for her role in Baywatch, a series that many of us German teenagers despised (and secretly watched); we thought Anderson was dumb as a post, not realizing that we were just watching her role. And many photos apparently wanted to confirm this prejudice, reducing Anderson to a sex symbol (e.g.). So I appreciate all the more that Norman Wong portrays Anderson as a dignified personality. This picture destroys my prejudices, I have to apologize to Anderson in my thoughts. – Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support An important view of her - Pamela Anderson is becoming increasingly known amongst younger generations for being someone who has chosen to age gracefully and without cosmetic intervention, and has spoken out against a culture of obsessing over anti-aging. Cmao20 (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support in line with Aristeas' perspective. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:55, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support A great portrait. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:16, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Aristeas -- Jakubhal 08:59, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:26, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Црква „Св. Јован Крстител“ - Љуботен 10.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 13:26:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A circular window on the western side of St. John the Baptist Church in the village of Ljuboten

File:Ashy-crowned Sparrow-Lark in Ajodhya Hills February 2024 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 08:42:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ashy-crowned Sparrow-Lark

File:Iglesia de San Martín, Pau, Francia, 2023-01-06, DD 69-71 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 07:26:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baldachin of St Martin's, Pau, France

File:Elif Iman.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 06:02:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Children
  •  Info The photo was taken on 05.11.2014 at Elif's birthday in Baku. created by Elshad Iman – uploaded by Elshad Iman – nominated by Elshad Iman -- E.IMANCOMMONS 06:02, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  • A beautiful child portrait.  Support -- E.IMANCOMMONS 06:02, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Very nice portrait. Please add more relevant categories, and a bit more in description (context of the portrait etc.). In the info it says "created by Elshad Iman", which is true in ways more than one hahah. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Agree with this, a well-taken and charming photo but it needs to be categorised and presented differently so that it feels more like a real contribution to a project with educational goals rather than a photo from a personal album. Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support, but I believe also that the description will be a little bit improved. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I really like this as a portrait as well as the composition, but it would make the image much more useful if description and categories could be expanded (a little bit). – Aristeas (talk) 08:35, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Verdord blad van een Aesculus hippocastanum, 20-04-2025 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 04:43:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Vandans Lünersee Vogelperspektive W.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 16:59:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Lake Lünersee, Vorarlberg, Austria

File:Rapperswil - Hafen IMG 0963.JPG

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 16:59:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harbour area and See-Quai in Rapperswil (Switzerland)

File:20201019 Alte Brücke Saarbrücken.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 16:44:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old bridge in Saarbrücken, Germany, in Autumn

File:MKr377603 Yō Yoshida (A Pale View of Hills, Cannes 2025).jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 13:33:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait from a Cannes photocall of the japanese actress
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
  •  Info created by Martin Kraft – uploaded by Martin Kraft – nominated by Seewolf -- Seewolf (talk) 13:33, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice and pleasing representation of that beautiful woman. Tack sharp, good color balance and the long lens gives a really good separation from the background. -- Seewolf (talk) 13:33, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm jealous. I'd love to shoot a film festival. Fantastic portrait.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:36, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good portrait, pleasant background and flattering expression. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:04, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent portrait which combines high sharpness exactly on the eye with beautiful soft bokeh and a gentle transition from sharp to unsharp. Great use of a 300mm ƒ/2.8 lens! Here ƒ/4 is perfect, but the ƒ/2.8 samples like this one are also excellent. I’m still searching for an affordable good used copy of this lens … ;–) – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
    @Aristeas That lens can be borrowed from Wikimedia Österreich for Commons projects. --Seewolf (talk) 09:27, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
    Thank you very much for the hint, Seewolf! This is a great service if one is going to take photos on a festival or on a planned trip. My problem is that I never really know in advance what kind of photos I’m going to take and when, and which lenses I will need; therefore I buy all gear myself (normally used gear, of course). But I will keep that in mind in case I do ever end up planning a project. – Aristeas (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
    Good to know such services are available. I've got a lens that tops out at F8, so anything I shoot won't have nearly as nice DOF (that being said, at 300 mm bokeh starts very quickly). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mile (talk) 09:13, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:42, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:13, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:29, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:04, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:19, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Apollo 11 Lunar Lander - 5927 NASA.jpg (delist and replace)

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 10:38:56
Buzz Aldrin removing the passive seismometer from a compartment in the SEQ bay of the Lunar Lander Buzz Aldrin removing the passive seismometer from a compartment in the SEQ bay of the Lunar Lander

  •  Info Apollo 11 extravehicular activity (EVA): Buzz Aldrin removing the passive seismometer from a compartment in the SEQ bay of the Lunar Lander.
  •  Info Replace by a higher resolution and quality image (Original nomination)
  •  Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 10:38, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delist and replace  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak delist and replace As a rule I'm generally not that in favour of scanning old pictures at a higher size because I question whether we're really recording any more useful information, rather than just adding file size. I feel this about a number of painting scans that have been nominated for D&R - no one needs a massive scan resolving the individual brushstrokes that no one's computer can actually load. One interesting question is how many pixels does it take to describe the usable detail we actually get from the Hasselblad cameras they used on the Moon. The question of what is a film camera's native resolution doesn't really apply as it would with a digital camera (see here ) but it is still worth considering what would be the ideal tradeoff between fine detail and file size.
That said, the original here was only 5.5 megapixels, so there is surely room for improvement. Additionally, it cuts off the antenna at the top - again, this is an improvement in the new version. On the flipside, this one seems a bit too light, and some details are overexposed. On balance, taking into account all these factors, I do think this is an improvement overall, but it is not clear cut. Edit: one thing I would ask is if the nominator could add all of the useful image notes on the original picture to the proposed replacement. They make this picture more valuable for the project and it would be a shame to lose them. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
@Cmao20: FYI, the overexposure of the highlight was already there in the PNG source. I have only increased the light in the middle range, and reduced the red overcast. According to the link you give above, 360 Mpx are needed to record all information from the 6x6 film used by Apollo missions. We are still far from that. Sure, I will copy the notes. Yann (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delist and replace Agree completely with Cmao20, but for me the extra room at the top significantly improves the composition, hence I wholeheartedly vote for D&R. I also assume that the high contrast of the new version (which looks a bit exaggerated at the first glance) is just realistic for images taken on the moon (almost no atmosphere → high contrast). – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:15, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delist and replace JayCubby (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 13:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Avian influenza roee shpernik 09.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 02:02:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Foam depopulation of turkeys after a bird flu detection in Revadim, Israel
  • A variety of opinions is to be welcomed, and it's what makes this process work. I think people should never be afraid to go against consensus, whether that is opposing an image with lots of supports or supporting one with several opposes. There are plenty of individual decisions I disagree with at FPC but I think overall, it probably averages out to a suitably high standard of pictures getting promoted. Cmao20 (talk) 15:51, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support At first glance I thought the "ground" was a dirty beach with a wave coming in, before I realized it is a pile of dead turkeys -- quite a shock. I think it's a great composition (a few live birds contrasting with the rest), covering a difficult topic in a way that captured my attention and made me want to learn more. Unfortunately as said above it's not the highest technical quality, but that is less of a factor for me given the subject, circumstance, and the effectiveness of the photo. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support: this is what factory farming actually looks like... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support I can overlook technical flaws in this case. FPs shouldn't always be about things that are pretty - we should not avoid difficult subjects. Acroterion (talk) 01:55, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support A striking subject for sure, one that we rarely see here. The quality could be better, but is not particularly bad. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:16, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support per UnpetitproleX. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:17, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:11, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Chopa (Spondyliosoma cantharus) con un parásito (Anilocra physodes), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2022-07-22, DD 75.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 20:37:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black seabream (Spondyliosoma cantharus) with a parasite (Anilocra physodes), Arrábida National Park, Portugal
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Cymothoidae (section for Cymothoidae just created)
  •  Info Black seabream (Spondyliosoma cantharus) with a parasite (Anilocra physodes), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. Note: there is no FP on Commons for the whole order Isopoda (including over 10,000 species! half of them aquatic and half of them on land). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:47, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:43, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Nice, but don't you have the whole fish? Yann (talk) 07:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
    • The focus on the parasite makes this special. It is attached with its claws (not teeth), not just swimming. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
      • I've indeed several pictures with the whole fish like this or this. Another possibility is this one but focusing on the parasite the fish is oof. From them all I considered that this candidate was overall the best one, it focuses on the parasite, the background is clean and detail level of the fish is good. Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support with the explanation that the intention here was to focus on the parasitism Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Of the two, I believe the front view is much more striking and educational. I suggest you nominate that one as well, either here or separately. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:24, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The picture would like focusing on the parasite, while here the fish steals the scene. This happens because the observer is catched by the eye, which was taken so well. A different angle of view would have been imho more effective in representing the parasitic relation. UnpetitproleX is right in noting that this picture is more effective in that sense. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support OK, I got the point. --Yann (talk) 17:33, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support. @Poco a poco: , do you think it is worth reducing the backscatter? JayCubby (talk) 02:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  • You mean the highlights on the body of the fish, right? I can reduce them along with some cloning of particles in the water, but unfortunately not before Sunday Poco a poco (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Blue throated blue flycatcher.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 14:24:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Mandrem Beach and Mandrem River, Mandrem, Goa, India (edit).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 09:54:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mandrem Beach behind the Mandrem River in North Goa, with bamboo bridges over the river.

File:Soufre&gypse sicile.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 09:20:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gypsum with sulphur, Cianciana, Agrigento Province, Sicily, Italy
  • There are 2 minerals here, I put it in sulphur. Yann (talk) 07:06, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Trier, 08-12-2023 (actm.) 25.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 04:57:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
  •  Info Architectural detail of St. Peter's Cathedral, Trier. Beautiful brickwork in various shapes and colors surrounding a barred window. Because the window was high up, I had to take the photo in perspective, which created beautiful oval rings.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this nom one is definitely lacking wow. Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Didn't look like much in thumbnail but at full size I definitely see enough interest for FP, it's all about the textures and colours in the brickwork. It's like an artistic study in different shades of ochre and burgundy. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support: per Cmao20 --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:35, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The lighting is rather uninteresting. Otherwise, I agree with Poco.--Ermell (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not FP: routine symmetrical composition, ordinary window in a brick wall, no technical challenge. --Tagooty (talk) 03:47, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support per Cmao20, weak because of the light (as mentioned by Ermell). – Aristeas (talk) 14:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Eastern kingbird (21559).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 01:34:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eastern kingbird

File:Arctodus simus skull (TMP 1988.061.0001), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 00:58:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cast of an Arctodus simus skull

File:Thai Mueang Beach2.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 17:13:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thai Mueang Beach,

File:Unnamed island, Cheow Lan Lake1.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 17:14:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Unnamed island, Cheow Lan Lake

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 12:00:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baltic Sea coast in Rerik, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
  •  Info A dynamic summer view of the Baltic Sea coast in northern Germany, taken from the elevated Schmiedeberg hill in the town of Rerik. The image shows beach chairs along the sandy shoreline with a subtle diagonal composition, framed by coastal vegetation and a partial view of local architecture. The photo was taken within the Kühlung landscape protection area. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support The diagonal perspective, contrast between sky and sea, and inclusion of architectural detail were deliberately chosen to create a dynamic and informative coastal scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent, could be a painting Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality, pleasant mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support A pretty solid image that has a really good composition. Wolverine X-eye 16:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful painterly composition, striking light from the side, much atmosphere thanks to the impressive clouds, the turbulent sea and the wind-swept blades of grass. – Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 15:28, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:46, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:15, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:15, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:56, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --XRay 💬 10:19, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 10:49:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boat passes through mangrove arch, Ashtamudi Lake, Kollam, Kerala, India

File:Регионалниот пат кај Ново Село 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 19:08:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A section of the European route E65 near the village of Novo Selo between the towns of Gostivar and Kičevo, North Macedonia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Transport infrastructure
  •  Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Good QI but on reflection I think we can afford to be a little bit picky about drone photos now that we are seeing more and more of them. This one is well composed but the subject and light are not outstanding for me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support I think this is a pretty good image. There's not much to complain about; at least from my point of view. Wolverine X-eye 16:48, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I really like how the aerial view of the long, winding curve of the road creates a graphical, almost abstract image. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose per Cmao20. Good execution, but the composition is not eye catching. The cars are occupying mostly one roadway; the shadows of the trees draw a jagged pattern in the upper part of the image, breaking the homogeneity of the colour. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:01, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose per Harlock81. Beautifull picture but the shadows of trees at the top contrast a bit with the white road at the bottom, a bit disturbing for me.--An insect photographer (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Glass cobweb.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 14:32:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography
  •  Info Town square in Opera, Metropolitan City of Milan, Italy, taken through a fractured glass pane, giving it a cobweb/mosaic effect.
  •  Info created by muzzudan – uploaded by muzzudan – nominated by muzzudan -- Muzzudan (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Neutral -- Muzzudan (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nice idea although unsure quality is sufficient for FP, however you're going to have to improve the description and categorisation. When I looked on the image page this photo had no categories at all which is a huge problem for FP because pictures that we give stars ought to be top tier in terms of documentation and categorisation as well as just good pictures. The image description contains no information as to where this is or what the town hall is. I know that's not the point of the image, but we should still have that information. Cmao20 (talk) 22:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for your suggestions. I realize it’s a particular picture and it’s not easy for me to categorize it (besides the fact that I am just a beginner about galleries and categories). I can add more information about the place, but what’s behind the glass is of no special interest honestly. I think the artistic (for me at least) effect of the glass is the real point of the picture. I’ll try to do better next time anyway :) Muzzudan (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
    I’ve just added few categories to improve the picture. Muzzudan (talk) 16:03, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Many thanks to Cmao20 for the helpful comment. To make a start with voting: I have often admired the effect of broken windows, but this is a particularly nice example and the photo really shows this very well. – Aristeas (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support A subtle, well-executed image that unfolds its abstract clarity and atmospheric mood upon closer viewing. Convincing both technically and artistically. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Interesting idea --Llez (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support: I'm mildly bothered by the fact that the background's verticals are leaning. Well done otherwise. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
    I loaded an improved version. Thanks Muzzudan (talk) 18:29, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks; full  Support for this version --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support JayCubby (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful show of a broken window, it makes a change from more usual subjects. --An insect photographer (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

File:SW Ketti Valley Nilgiris Jul25 A7CR 06125.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2025 at 06:17:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ketti valley view to the southwest, Nilgiris, India
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
  •  Info Looking down on the fertile Ketti valley, located on the east side of the Nilgiri mountains in south India. Ketti village in the foreground. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Tagooty (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support - Nice landscape, but the wires are distracting.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support beautiful scenery; the wires don't bother me but the pole does, however too marginal for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:01, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
    It would actually make a cool photo if you included more of the wire tangle, wires and pole, and made it a prominent feature in the foreground of the photo (perhaps using a two-photo stack). Sometimes it's better to go all in than trying to conceal something or work around it. --Cart (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
    @W.carter: Good point, will keep in mind in future. In this case, I was standing on the edge of a cliff with only a small parapet for protection. (I have a tendency to vertigo! ) Not much scope for a better viewpoint. Tagooty (talk) 03:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful for me, I didn't really notice the wires at first and I don't think they are that significant Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Needs denoising, and perhaps increasing the contrast just a bit. Nice photo otherwise. AVDLCZ (talk) 18:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @AVDLCZ: Thanks for the suggestion. Please see the new upload with NR. --Tagooty (talk) 03:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great view, but impossible to become a FP with those disturbing wires. The wires could be overlooked if this weren't about FP. FPs should be nearly perfect, and the wires detract from the image composition too much in my opinion. Maybe a crop could help. --Milseburg (talk) 12:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Milseburg: Some viewers like the wires and buildings in the foreground. As suggested by you, I've made a crop without the wires, proposed as an alternative below. Please review it. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Works for me. Beautiful landscape in the background, the College of Engineering in the midground is interesting and provides some contrast to the landscape, and somehow the wires in the foreground go well with a College of Engineering ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support per Aristeas. --Yann (talk) 07:26, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the composition is too busy with buildings here and there, and the cropped tree near the right edge and the wires in the bottom-right corner are distracting. Furthermore, if the college is a particularly important detail, it should occupy a more prominent position. Overall, it's a quality picture of a nice scenery, but the extraordinarity is missing.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Alternative below is withdrawn

Alternative

Ketti valley view to the southwest, Nilgiris, India (wires in foreground cropped)

  • @Crisco 1492, UnpetitproleX, Cmao20, W.carter, and AVDLCZ: As suggested by Milseburg, I have proposed this alternative crop. Please review it. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry but I prefer the original. This crop looks unbalanced to me. Too much sky, not enough land. It turns a careful composition into what feels like a snapshot. Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  • I agree with Cmao. Losing the village hurts... how are you with cloning? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
    @Crisco 1492: I had tried cloning, even using LR's gen AI. As there is a lot of intricate detail of buildings and vegetation behind the wires in this 60 MP image, the results are obviously fake. Tagooty (talk) 04:58, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
  • In view of the comments, I withdraw the alternative nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 10:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)