User talk:IvanScrooge98

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IvanScrooge98!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Selena Gomez VMA 2015.jpg

File:Selena Gomez VMA 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Livelikemusic (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


File:Santhià-Stemma.png

File:Santhià-Stemma.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
Dear IvanScrooge98,
Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now.
-- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 20:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Che Guevara

Che Guevara was a murderer and a terrorist. I don't understand why you remove those categories Gampe (talk) 17:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

I explained it in my latest edit summary. Did you even read it? If you are so eager to label him, please place those categories at Category:Che Guevara, not under a picture. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 0x0a (talk) 12:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)


File:Issam Alnajjar (cropped).jpg

France3c0 (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Alla fine, come previsto, la persona che aveva caricato il file originale non si è nemmeno accorta degli avvisi. Ottimo. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Image

I mean that of Radio Bruno, not that of the photo shoot. The image of Radio Bruno is much better. 37.159.55.190 00:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

No. A YouTube screenshot can never be “much better” than a professional photographic portrait. Please try to make some sense. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
@IvanScrooge98 No it's not good, the image is of a photo shoot that also comes out among Instagram stories. The one in the Radio Bruno interview is better. 37.159.55.190 00:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
What? What has Instagram to do with this? That is a professional image, period. Find an actual argument before restoring the screenshot or I’ll report you for edit warring. Regards. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
@IvanScrooge98 It is a copyright image. If you put it on Google it comes out immediately, so it's not good. Better that of the Radio Bruno interview. 37.159.55.190 01:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Gosh. It’s on Commons because the author uploaded it—or at least someone who claims to be. Kindly read the file information page. And next time please explain the issue on the first occasion instead of forcing others to beg for a clarification. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 01:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
@IvanScrooge98 it is possible to upload some other version of the Radio Bruno interview. 37.159.55.190 01:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I know that. I may do this tomorrow or in the next few days, but as long as the better image is on Commons, there’s no further need for screenshots. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 01:18, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
@IvanScrooge98 The image of the photo shoot is not convincing at all, especially for the license inserted, which as usually happens with badly inserted images, are deleted after a certain period. For this reason there are doubts, as the image was taken from social media and usually those taken from there are often deleted. One could insert the image of the interview video, as it is also supported by the source. 37.159.55.190 01:31, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
The image of the photo shoot was taken from here (https://www.instagram.com/share/p/BAbwgkoChc), then not even the license used is convincing. It is not suitable as a source, which is why a YouTube image is better than an interview. 37.159.55.190 01:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
@IvanScrooge98 Hello, in these days a user has raised a discussion about the images of the participants of the Sanremo Festival, regarding the logo on the microphones and defining it as a "promotion", which is not at all. In addition, such images were also used for the participants of previous editions and the meaning of the discussion is not understood. Logos or crests are also used by actors, footballers and singers and all this is not called a "promotion". This is just a user annoyance that some images bother you. If you'd like to participate to the discussion, you can do it whenever you want. 83.225.11.230 23:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Sarah Toscano 2025 (cropped).jpg

File:Sarah Toscano 2025 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 37.159.49.237.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)


File:Sarah Toscano 2025 (cropped).jpg

France3c0 (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Rajieen YouTube logo.jpg

File:Rajieen YouTube logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC)