Commons:VIC

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

How to review an image

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You typeYou getWhen
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
59,254 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 53,431 (90.2%) 
Undecided
  
 3,277 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
 2,546 (4.3%) 


New valued image nominations

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
CtasACT(talk) on 2025-09-08 12:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia, view from Haile Selassie I stadium (Et)

 Oppose I see two differents people here. So both of them should be in the scope IMHO. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review.

View
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-06-10 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Beurre & Oeufs (Paris)
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2025-06-12
Scope:
Euthalia iva iva (Himalayan Grand Duke) - dorsal
  •  Comment The butterfly is in poor condition, it is difficult to take it as a reference. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--benlisquareTalk•Contribs on 2025-06-12 12:50 (UTC)
Scope:
PLANS Anshan (101)
Reason:
Out of all photos of the Anshan on Commons, this is the sharpest, has the highest resolution, has the full ship in view, and does not have renovation scaffolding in the background. -- --benlisquareTalk•Contribs
  •  Comment This image (and all your others) are too underexposed to be assessed. Also, although there is no rule against making many nominations, there is an understanding that three per day is a good limit. Best wishes.Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:51, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the tip regarding nominations, this is my first time on VIC and I'll keep that in mind from now on. I've just bumped up the exposure in-post by another 0.3 eV, does that make it slightly better? --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 07:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Sorry, too dark on my monitor. Have you calibrated yours? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
  • I've just uploaded another version right now, bumping up exposure by another 0.3 eV, refer to the file history for details. The current revision should now be 1.1 eV brighter than the original RAW that I took on the day. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 08:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--benlisquareTalk•Contribs on 2025-06-12 12:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--benlisquareTalk•Contribs on 2025-06-12 12:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Yanagi ba
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--benlisquareTalk•Contribs on 2025-06-12 12:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Nakiri bōchō
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--benlisquareTalk•Contribs on 2025-06-12 12:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Gyūtō
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--benlisquareTalk•Contribs on 2025-06-12 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-12 17:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Vanellus chilensis cayennensis (Southern lapwing) in flight
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-12 17:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Piaya cayana mesura (Squirrel cuckoo)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-13 05:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Musei civici di Treviso, entrance in Via Santa Chiara
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-13 05:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Stictoleptura cordigera female on Rubus plicatus
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-13 06:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Dendroplex picus peruvianus (Straight-billed woodcreeper)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-13 07:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Boissonneaua jardini (Velvet-purple coronet)
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 09:08, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-13 07:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglaiocercus coelestis coelestis (Violet-tailed sylph) female
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-13 09:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Sharnopil - House of Culture
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-13 09:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Zarubyntsi, Uman Raion - House of Culture

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:52, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-13 14:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Opel Vivaro C (Facelift) - right front view
Used in:
de:Opel Vivaro, en:Opel, en:List of Opel vehicles, uk:Opel Vivaro
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-13 16:49 (UTC)
Scope:
House nr 6 Rue des arts Lille, North view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-13 18:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz W463 G 63 AMG 6×6 - right front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz G-Klasse
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-06-14 04:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculptures Sur En, Sent. Mösch 2. Artwork Ruedi Mösch.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-14 04:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Gondola Veneziana by Antonio Zona - Museo civico Luigi Bailo - Treviso
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-14 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Cotinus coggygria (flowers) - Male inflorescence.
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-06-14 05:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Lembulus bicuspidatus, right valve
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-14 07:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Intercession church, Kupchyntsi
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-14 07:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Sharnopil - Church
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-14 16:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Building, 34 rue de Paris (Lille), view from crossroad Rue du St Nicolas

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-14 10:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Building 120 rue Pierre Mauroy Lille, view from crossroad Rue du Molinel
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-14 21:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Ibycter americanus (Red-throated caracara)

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-14 21:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Jacana jacana intermedia (Wattled jacana)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-14 21:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Ocreatus underwoodii melanantherus (White-booted racket-tail) female in flight
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-15 04:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Sulle labbra il nome di Gesù (The name of Jesus on the lips) - Alberto Martini - Oderzo, Pinacoteca Alberto Martini
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-15 04:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Lewisia cotyledon (Siskiyou lewisia)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-06-15 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Lembulus bicuspidatus, left valve
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-15 08:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Ocreatus underwoodii melanantherus (White-booted racket-tail) male in flight
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-15 08:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Galbalcyrhynchus leucotis (White-eared jacamar)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-15 08:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Notharchus hyperrhynchus hyperrhynchus (White-necked puffbird)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-15 13:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Vladyslavchyk - House of Culture and Village Council
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-15 13:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Vladyslavchyk - Kindergarten and post office
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-15 18:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Ruf Rodeo - left front view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-15 18:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi R8 V10 RWS - left front view
Used in:
de:Audi R8 4S
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-15 18:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz W463 G 63 AMG 6×6 - right rear view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-06-16 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Loripes orbiculatus var. leucoma, right valve
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:15, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-16 07:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Avramivka (Uman Raion) - Old cowshed
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-16 07:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Avramivka (Uman Raion) - School
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-16 08:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglaiocercus coelestis coelestis (Violet-tailed sylph) male

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-16 08:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Discosura popelairii (Wire-crested thorntail) male in flight
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-16 08:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Discosura popelairii (Wire-crested thorntail) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Shadow Ayush (talk) on 2025-06-16, 11:41(UTC)
Scope:
Boiga forsteni (Forsten's cat snake) - head
Used in:
en:Boiga forsteni
  •  Comment The image of the whole snake would be better for VI. The scope here could be Boiga forsteni (Forsten's cat snake) head Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks. Shadow Ayush (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-16 15:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi R8 V10 RWS - right rear view
Used in:
de:Audi R8 4S
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-16 15:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Tesla Model Y (2025) - right front view
Used in:
de:Tesla Model Y
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-16 15:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Melkus RS2000 - interior
Used in:
de:Melkus RS 2000
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-16 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of the Reduit of Fort Saint-Sauveur (CIRFA Lille), view from rue du Reduit
  •  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This is the better photo but the one with the gates shows more of the building. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Acroterion (talk) on 2025-06-16 00:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Leah Kunkel
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-06-17 04:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Broerekerk (Bolsward) Part of the interior of the church (view of the chancel and the window)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-17 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
San Brunone by Salvator Rosa - Museo civico di Santa Caterina
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-17 04:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Lampyris noctiluca (common glow-worm) - Female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-17 07:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Dacnis flaviventer {Yellow-bellied dacnis) female
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-17 07:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Melanerpes cruentatus (Yellow-tufted woodpecker) male
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-17 07:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Melanerpes cruentatus (Yellow-tufted woodpecker) female in flight
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-17 07:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Bachkuryne - School
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-17 07:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Bachkuryne - Village council
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-17 10:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Facade of the Hospice général (Lille), view from Av. du Peuple Belge
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2025-06-17
Scope:
'Caltoris tulsi (Purple Swift) - ventral
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-17 20:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi R8 GT Spyder - left front view
Used in:
de:Audi R8 42
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-06-17 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Tesla Model Y (2025) - right rear view
Used in:
de:Tesla Model Y
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-17 22:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Apse of the Saint-Denis church (Hellemmes-Lille), view from Rue du Théatre de Verdure
@Charlesjsharp: Thanks for your advice ✓ Done lighting. correction best regards --Pierre André (talk) 09:41, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-18 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Flora by Giambattista Tiepolo - Museo civico di Santa Caterina - Treviso

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

  •  Question Is the 'halo' there in real life? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-06-18 05:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Olea europaea (olive) - Inflorescence and leaves
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:15, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2025-06-16 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Loripes orbiculatus var. leucoma, right valve
  •  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:15, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Красный wanna talk? on 2025-06-18 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Transport of Bishkek
Used in:
Transport of Bishkek
  • The scope should be more specific such as Railway sidings at 'town' 'region/country'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:30, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-18 07:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Dibrivka (Uman Raion) - Village council
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-06-18 07:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Dibrivka (Uman Raion) - Drachevski Manor (view from the south)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-18 08:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Phaio acquiguttata (Wasp moth) dorsal
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-18 08:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhetus dysonii (Blue doctor) dorsal
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-06-18 08:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Anolis scypheus (Yellow-tongued anole)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-06-18 10:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Baptismal font of Sainte-Catherine'church (Lille)
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates


hamster

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2011-12-10 22:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European Hamster)

 Support Excellent. All criteria met.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)  Support Seems to be the best one Kersti (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-01-04 16:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European hamster)
Reason:
replacing image of museum specimen -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
  •  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Support Proposed image is definitely the better VI of the two. While this one shows the paws a little better, proposed image has better overall quality and more valuable. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
  •  Best in Scope —Nikride (talk) 07:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Acridotheres ginginianus nests

   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Moheen (keep talking) on 2025-04-27 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acridotheres ginginianus nests
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Moheen (keep talking) on 2025-04-27 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acridotheres ginginianus nests
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Au chat barré, ancien estaminet avenue du Peuple Belge (Lille)

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-24 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Old tavern Au chat barré avenue du Peuple Belge, Lille, view from Parc Louise de Bettignies
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
  •  Oppose In favour of the intended replacement. Light is inferior here. --Milseburg (talk) 14:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Au chat barré, ancien estaminet avenue du Peuple Belge (Lille)
Reason:
Perspective is ok on this one. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2025 (UTC) -- Sebring12Hrs (talk)

 Support Light and colors are superior. --Milseburg (talk) 14:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Immeuble, 31 rue de Gand (Lille)

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-25 15:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Renaissance house, rue de Gand 31, Lille, view from rue des Tours
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 31 rue de Gand (Lille)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-27 16:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies, 61-63, rue de la Monnaie (Vieux-Lille), view from 28 Rue de la Monnaie
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies, Lille
Reason:
The left facade is visible from this view. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 06:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC) -- Sebring12Hrs (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

bats

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-08-05 13:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhynchonycteris naso (Long-nosed proboscis bats)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose In favour of the intended replacement. Quality is overall inferior here.--Milseburg (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-06 15:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhynchonycteris naso (Long-nosed proboscis bats)
Reason:
I use a better camera these days! -- Charlesjsharp (talk)

 Support Quality is overall superior. --Milseburg (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Category:Valued image candidates#Valued%20image%20candidates Category:Valued images#Valued%20image%20candidates