Module talk:Property documentation
- URL to purge the cache of all pages using this template
Click once on this link after changes affecting multiple elements, such as one of the template categorization schemes:
Use sparingly; this operation requires at least 15 minutes to complete.
 Archives | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Multiple reguliere expressie (P1793)
If the item has multiple formaatbeperking (Q21502404) with qualifier reguliere expressie (P1793), then such expressions should be concatenated using a vertical bar "|". Currently they are concatenated without any separator character. Horcrux (overleg) 09:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, they shouldn’t. The vertical bar means alternation (disjunction), i.e. either of the two parts should match. Two constraints, however, mean that both parts should match (conjunction). There’s no expression for conjunction in regex, so the only solution is to list all regexes separately, for example using a wikitext list. P.S. It always helps to cite the page on which you ran into the problem instead of letting others go through your contributions and guess what’s in your mind. —Tacsipacsi (overleg) 13:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Tacsipacsi: Actually nobody forced you to "guess what was in my mind", you could even have asked me for clarifications ;-). I thought a specific example was not necessary because I believe this issue was occurring in each instance of the described scenario (which was easily queryable). Thanks, however, for the correction about the vertical bar, I was clearly wrong.
- Anyway, the problem seems to have been fixed, but I can't spot the exact change that was made. Do you? Did you fix it? --Horcrux (overleg) 11:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Horcrux:
Actually nobody forced you to "guess what was in my mind", you could even have asked me for clarifications ;-)
– then I’ve had to wait two months to even understand the problem. Remember that this is asynchronous communication, and every time someone asks back, considerable time passes by (likely at least a day, but as seen here, sometimes even months). I thought a specific example was not necessary because I believe this issue was occurring in each instance of the described scenario (which was easily queryable).
– a specific example always helps, to make sure that we’re speaking about the exact same thing. And, actually, I don’t think the query came into my mind (although I can’t say for sure two months later) – and, probably, it didn’t come into many other people’s minds either.Anyway, the problem seems to have been fixed
– I don’t think so. I still seehttps?://.+^(?!https?:\/\/schema\.gov\.it\/lodview\/controlled-vocabulary\/).*on Property talk:P2888, which is the concatenation ofhttps?://.+and^(?!https?:\/\/schema\.gov\.it\/lodview\/controlled-vocabulary\/).*. —Tacsipacsi (overleg) 09:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Horcrux:
Type constraint with relation is een of subklasse van (Q30208840)
Please check out this thread. Horcrux (overleg) 12:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Lists
Could someone change the queries so items with "mul" as label shows up as well? See the difference it makes here
https://w.wiki/EGMp Trade (overleg) 12:31, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Uitgevoerd I did it using find and replace, hopefully I got it right. --Matěj Suchánek (overleg) 16:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
WDQS graph split
Currently this template shows by how many items a property is used. I did not dive into the code to find out how this number is found, but it seems that the WDQS graph split has some effect. For instance, it now seems like ResearchGate-identificatiecode voor publicatie (P5875) is used by 662 items only, while in fact it is quite a bit more. It seems that only items in "main" split are counted. Can that be adjusted, maybe by splitting numbers? --Lymantria (overleg) 13:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)