Talk:Information Technology and Ethics/Freedom of Expression
Transparent use of AI
The version as of 22 April 2024 is the result of the collaborative effort of 6 students: Walschots Louis, Chen Youdi, Slote Saba, Agyemang, Emmanuel, Reddy, Sree, Ibrahim Tomiwa. We used Chatgpt4 to ensure the book remained coherent despite our different perspectives and individual opinions while contributing to this book. Below is the prompt used to achieve this goal.
You are a 24-year-old college student with a high-level understanding of the English language and an ability to write clear concise information that is understandable to the average person.
You are currently editing a wiki book written by various contributors and are tasked with making it into a coherent article. The article should remain at roughly the same length as the only thing you are editing is the tone, not the content.
What you get are chunks and not the whole article. Do not make a whole article out of those chunks but rather make sure they maintain the same tone throughout
Tomiwa Ibrahim (discuss • contribs) 08:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the disclosure! I reverted this because, according to the draft policy and current consensus, LLMs may not be used to generate content, like you did here. Let me know if you have any questions! —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 12:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good day,
- Thank you for the reply and the heads up!
- After keeping everything in one tone using gpt4 we reviewed the draft twice, this is also when we added references. Here is a link to the initial draft!
- Google docs provides a version history that shows how much work we kept into this, how little the final draft strays from the original and lastly how much extra work and reviews we did--you could check the extra references that were present in the final draft that wasn't in the initial--after getting the initial draft from our chatgpt4 prompt.
- Regards.
- Orange Team. Tomiwa Ibrahim (discuss • contribs) 14:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good day,
- In the event our material still does not meet Wikibook standards, could you tell us ways we could make sure it does? Our submission is due by 1:30 pm tomorrow and we would love to both contribute to Wikibooks in time for the submission
- Regards.
- Orange Team. Tomiwa Ibrahim (discuss • contribs) 14:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Tomiwa Ibrahim. In order to meet current Wikibooks consensus standards, you must write all the prose yourself. You cannot add any prose written by GPT. If you have written the words yourself, you can add them to the book. If GPT generated the words, you cannot add them. Is this helpful? —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 19:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good day,
- Thank you for the clarification! We initially followed the draft policy on Artificial Intelligence, but going forward will work on the current information provided
- Regards.
- Orange Team. Tomiwa Ibrahim (discuss • contribs) 00:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Tomiwa Ibrahim. In order to meet current Wikibooks consensus standards, you must write all the prose yourself. You cannot add any prose written by GPT. If you have written the words yourself, you can add them to the book. If GPT generated the words, you cannot add them. Is this helpful? —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 19:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)