Properties
Definition: A function
is injective if

Lemma: Consider a function
and suppose
. Then
is injective if and only if there exists a function
with
.
Proof:
:
Suppose
is injective. As
let's define
as an arbitrary element of
. We can then define a suitable function
as follows:

It is now easy to verify that
.
:
Suppose there is a function
with
. Then
.
is thus injective.
Q.E.D.
Definition: A function
is surjective if

Lemma: Consider a function
. Then
is surjective if and only if there exists a function
with
.
Proof:
:
Suppose
is surjective. We can define a suitable function
as follows:

It is now easy to verify that
.
:
Suppose there is a function
with
. Then
. Then
.
is thus surjective.
Q.E.D.
Definition: A function
is bijective if
it is both injective and surjective.
Lemma: A function
is bijective if and only if there exists a function
with
and
. Furthermore it can be shown that such a
is unique. We write it
and call it the inverse of
.
Proof:
Left as an exercise.
Proposition: Consider a function
. Then
is injective iff 
is surjective iff 
is bijective iff the image and preimage of
are inverse of each other
Example: If
and
are sets such that
, there exists an obviously injective function
, called the inclusion
, such that
for all
.
Example: If
is an equivalence relation on a set
, there is an obviously surjective function
, called the canonical projection onto
, such that
for all
.
Theorem: Define the equivalence relation
on
such that
if and only if
. Then, if
is any function,
decomposes into the composition

where
is the canonical projection,
is the inclusion
, and
is the bijection
for all
.
Proof: The definition of
immediately implies that
, so we only have to prove that
is well defined and a bijection. Let
. Then
. This shows that the value of
is independent of the representative chosen from
, and so it is well-defined.
For injectivity, we have
, so
is injective.
For surjectivity, let
. Then there exists an
such that
, and so
by definition of
. Since
is arbitrary in
, this proves that
is surjective.
Q.E.D.
Definition: Given a function
,
is a
(i) Monomorphism if given any two functions
such that
, then
.
(ii) Epimorphism if given any two functions
such that
, then
.
Theorem: A function between sets is
(i) a monomorphism if and only if it is injective.
(ii) an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective.
Proof: (i) Let
be a monomorphism. Then, for any two functions
,
for all
. This is the definition if injectivity. For the converse, if
is injective, it has a left inverse
. Thus, if
for all
, compose with
on the left side to obtain
, such that
is a monomorphism.
(ii) Let
be an epimorphism. Then, for any two functions
,
for all
and
. Assume
, that is, that
is not surjective. Then there exists at least one
not in
. For this
choose two functions
which coincide on
but disagree on
. However, we still have
for all
. This violates our assumption that
is an epimorphism. Consequentally,
is surjective. For the converse, assume
is surjective. Then the epimorphism property immediately follows.
Q.E.D.
Remark: The equivalence between monomorphism and injectivity, and between epimorphism and surjectivity is a special property of functions between sets. This not the case in general, and we will see examples of this when discussing structure-preserving functions between groups or rings in later sections.
Example: Given any two sets
and
, we have the canonical projections
sending
to
, and
sending
to
. These maps are obviously surjective.
In addition, we have the natural inclusions
and
which are obviously injective as stated above.
Universal properties
The projections and inclusions described above are special, in that they satisfy what are called universal properties. We will give the theorem below. The proof is left to the reader.
Theorem: Let
be any sets.
(i) Let
and
. Then there exists a unique function
such that
and
are simultaneously satisfied.
is sometimes denoted
.
(ii) Let
and
. Then there exists a unique function
such that
and
are simultaneously satifsied.
The canonical projections onto quotients also satisfy a universal property.
Theorem: Define the equivalence relation
on
and let
be any function such that
for all
. Then there exists a unique function
such that
, where
is the canonical projection.
Category:Book:Abstract Algebra#Functions%20
Category:Book:Abstract Algebra#Functions