Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict
| Should a new section titled "Aftermath" be added to the 2025 India–Pakistan conflict article to cover developments that occurred after the end of the conflict but are related to it, as reported by reliable sources? Currently, some of these developments—such as the promotions of Indian and Pakistani military officers and Pakistan's announcement of a Nobel Peace Prize nomination for Donald Trump—are included in the final paragraphs of the 2025 India–Pakistan conflict#Impact section. If consensus supports the creation of an "Aftermath" section, these items could be moved there for more appropriate contextual placement. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:46, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the infobox photograph be changed from the current 1959 portrait to something else? Note that the other three images below are purely illustrative and not part of the proposal. Cremastra (talk) 20:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict
| Should the following statement, reflecting a Pakistani claim, be added to the Background section of this article, which currently describes the 2025 Pahalgam attack as a key event in the lead-up to the conflict?
|
| Which of the following images should serve as the lead image for Andrei Gromyko? Emiya1980 (talk) 22:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC) |
Should the sentence: be added after the second paragraph in the Background section? The Background section currently reads:
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:42, 14 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Which of the following two sets of edits are supported by the secondary material and should therefore be used in the article? |
| Should James Barry be referred to with male pronouns? Tanline666 (talk) 14:43, 13 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Which of these two paintings (1:British Museum, 2:Smithsonian) would be more appropriate as the lead image for the article on Babur (1483–1530), the Turco-Mongol founder of the Mughal Empire? पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC) |
_reading_a_book,_painted_circa_1605-1615_in_India_(British_Museum_1921,1011,0.3)_Cropped.jpg){kind=link}
_Babur_detail.jpg){kind=link}
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters
Should the spirit and intent of usually capitalized in sourcesat MOS:MILTERMS be taken as consistent with the general advice on capitalisation given in the lead of MOS:CAPS or is the spirit and intent to create a substantially different and lower threshold for capitalising the types of events named. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the article on Kusaila include one of the available photographs of the modern (reinstalled) statue located in Bouhmama, Algeria, as the lead image?
There are two freely licensed photographs of the statue: Both are images of a modern public monument commemorating Kusaila, and have been proposed as alternatives to a previously used fictional drawing: , which was removed due to sourcing concerns. This RfC seeks input on whether either image should be used, and if so, which version is more appropriate. (For additional context, see: Talk:Kusaila#c-ElijahUHC-20250602183300-Image_Change:_Statue_of_Kusaila_from_Bouhmama) |
.jpg){kind=link}
- ↑ Kestler‑D'Amours, Jillian (24 April 2025). "Kashmir updates: Pakistan claims Pahalgam attack 'false flag operation'". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
- ↑ "Shehbaz hails Trump as 'man of peace'". The Express Tribune. 5 June 2025. Retrieved 12 June 2025.