Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/White-booted racket-tails

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2025 at 08:03:54 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  •  Pro --Llez (Diskussion) 09:02, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Pro --Tkarcher (Diskussion) 09:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Pro --Harlock81 (Diskussion) 10:18, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Pro Good pair of images. --Tagooty (Diskussion) 05:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Pro Indeed, and we must especially appreciate that these photos were taken without flash etc. – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Too much Topaz for my taste, e.g. the legs of the second picture look unnatural due to excesive sharpening Poco a poco (Diskussion) 17:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Anfrage I agree with Poco's assessment. In its current state, the images appears to have undergone quite heavy processing - possibly involving strong noise reduction followed by sharpening. As a result, some details seem unnaturally emphasized, and parts of the image take on a slightly harsh or fragmented appearance. If reprocessing is an option and not too much effort, a more balanced development could preserve the many strengths of this set. That way, the nomination might still succeed - and we would gain two new, excellent featured pictures. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
new version of the female uploaded. Charlesjsharp (Diskussion) 19:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Definitely better, will  Pro now Poco a poco (Diskussion) 19:58, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Pro for the set. Thank you for the updated version. The texture now appears more natural and balanced. I appreciate the quick revision and am happy to support the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Pro--Agnes Monkelbaan (Diskussion) 14:54, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Pro Looks nicer now. Just curious: Are the male's "foot feathers" purple at the base or is that CA? --Cart (talk) 15:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)