Commons:Deletion requests/2025/06/12

June 12

File:Infobox Faylaq al-Wa'ad al-Sadiq.png

Too similar to https://jihadintel.meforum.org/pics/symbols/thumbs/447.jpg as displayed by https://jihadintel.meforum.org/identifiers/.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, why according to you is it copied, if you look at the person with the RPG his hand is literally a square, The text is straight and not circular, I hope you check it, greetings Farcazo (talk) 00:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I copied the below exchange from Special:Diff/1042949238/1042952242.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
@Farcazo: I did. Tineye thinks they are an exact match.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:45, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to ask you what "Tineye" means.Farcazo (talk) 00:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
@Farcazo: Please see this link I used, and more generally https://tineye.com/ and the "Reverse Image Search" gadget listed on the "Maintenance tools" section of Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
They aren't exact matches, and this isnt even sorted to "best match" Thegoofhere (talk) 03:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Exactly Farcazo (talk) 01:07, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep, it's literally just simple shapes and text. Castroonthemoon (talk) 08:07, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Yes, the shapes of the people are deformed and the background is yellow. Farcazo (talk) 23:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Tantrums vs. meltdowns.webm

Uploader has claimed the video under 3 different licenses (CC-BY-SA 4.0, OGL 1.0, CC-BY 3.0), I cannot find any evidence or indication of any of those license current in the source YouTube video. Archives doesn’t help much as the furthest back it goes is March 2025. Tvpuppy (talk) 00:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

No I have not claimed 3 different licences. The licence was checked and corrected by BotMultichillT here nearly 5 years ago in December 2025; it added CCBYSA3. On the uploading date i added a YouTubeReview template and two licences (OGL and CC BY, as per policy) as can be seen here; and the licence was checked at that time. If they have deleted that licence since then is irrelevant. Nothing at all wrong in the above procedure, which in fact was advised to me in discussions in the Commons Tavern. Please remove the deletion template. I am still in touch with Welsh Government Comms staff, and could request that they reinstate OG licence; but feel that is not needed as it was in place at the time, and checked at the time. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 08:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
  • I checked the file history, the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license was added by you when the video was first uploaded, seen here at the first edit . If it was added mistakenly (which I have assumed), that’s not a problem at all.
  • I believe you when you said there were a CC-BY-3.0 license when you uploaded it (as most other Welsh Gov videos also have one), but I cannot find any evidence to verify that. You mentioned BotMultichillT “checked” the license at the time, but BotMultichillT does not “check” licenses, it is just a bot that adds license data to SDC based on whatever licenses was stated in the file page, so it cannot be proof that a CC-BY-3.0 license existed on the YouTube video at that time.
  • I am not completely familiar with the extent of OGL 1.0, I know it applies to content on the Welsh government website (per this copyright statement), but do you know if it also apply to their Youtube videos as well?
Tvpuppy (talk) 12:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I added cc-by-4.0 on upload. Template:YouTube CC-BY was later added, but the template name did not specify which version; i took it that it was a general one, as the name suggests. When viewed, yes, it generates v 3! So, yes, you are correct. Multi licensing is permitted according to this discussion on Commons Village Pump 3 November 2020 (UTC), before uploading. I was also told that 'Multi-licensing is fine on Commons', and that can be verified here where it notes Contributors to Wikimedia Commons can offer as many licenses for a file as they wish. I'm pinging @Richard Nevell (WMUK): here, as the uploads were done by Wikimedia UK. Best regards. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 13:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Степан Иванович Любарский.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Ochota ta Wola as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3. Old Russian photo, should be discussed for potential PD. King of ♥ 03:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Unkownanylast (talk · contribs)

The user exhibited a weird, potentially project-harming behaviour. Most, if not all nominated files are useless crops of extant Commons imagery.

  • File:Locator map of Trinidad and Tobago (3D globe zoom).png may have additional copyvio issues, the globe silhouette is most likely already somewhere here as base for our locator maps, but I did not manage to track it down.
  • File:Trinidad And Tobago in the Caribbean.jpg has moral issues. While it is legally fine to put a "own work" statement on a PD resource like File:CIA map Central America & Caribbean.png, it is showing kind of a en:WP:NOTHERE attitude by not stating the data source.
  • I deem the stadium images problematic (on copyright grounds) as this kind of view is only offered by equipment and authorisations that are not widely available to the general public: a drone or helicopter overflight over crowded venues is only possible for accredited professionals. It could also be undeclared AI generated cruft by the look of it.

To sum up: The DR is mostly based upon an infringement of COM:SCOPE / COM:EDUSE with a few more contentious points stated separately.

* File:W.H. Whiteman - Coolie Woman, Trinidad and Tobago circa 1890.jpg

Grand-Duc (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Coolie Woman, Trinidad and Tobago, circa 1890.jpg this is in use
Anyway there are many, many English Wikipedia users who do this kind of useless crops and ruin the quality of photos while doing it  REAL 💬   18:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)


Keep the following as PD --RAN (talk) 16:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • File:Coolie Woman, Trinidad and Tobago, circa 1890.jpg
  • File:W.H._Whiteman_-_Coolie_Woman,_Trinidad_and_Tobago_circa_1890.jpg
I indeed included the "W.H. Whiteman" image by mistake, I'll remove the DR there. The "Coolie Woman" image is a bad crop of the former, I had replaced it with the Whiteman file on EN-WP before opening the DR. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Over the past days the user has uploaded copyright-protected portrait pictures of Trinidadian politician that he had simply labeled as PD. Examples:
User:Túrelio, User:Grand-Duc: FYI.
Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 10:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unkownanylast (talk · contribs)

The PD clauses of COM:CRT/Trinidad and Tobago do not cover photography. Nothing else is applicable. Imagery sourced from official websites as indicated.

Grand-Duc (talk) 11:14, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Keep File:Sir Ellis Clarke 2 T&T.jpg this is a crop of a PD photo  REAL 💬   14:35, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Info I missclicked in VFC, meant to nominate them as copyvios. That's done now. Grand-Duc (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2025 (UTC)


Procedural close, all but 1 already deleted, 1 kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

File:IHM Givat Yeroham 1.jpeg

Possibly not admissible per COM:FOP Israel. This is not utilitarian like a map and maybe also not permanently located in a public place. Grand-Duc (talk) 05:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

This picture is one of several pictures of a memorial viewpoint, named "מצפה איתי", all part of OpenStreetMap users' contributions to Wikimedia. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/278478612 and https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/poi/OSM/node_278478612.
As can also be seen from the other pictures, this is part of the applied art of the memorial and it is definitely part of a permanent public location. Therefor it is admissible per COM:FOP Israel 2A02:14C:5300:E100:A0E0:1C70:8D60:87A3 07:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
The issue is that COM:FOP Israel contains this advice: " Not OK for 2D works that were created for artistic purpose (only conveying symbolic information), like paintings." The nominated file is by all appearances a painting in 2D, not applied art like a tourist info map. FOP is always somewhat tricky when assessing a detail of a larger work, when the depiction of the detail occurs without any broader context evidencing the applicability of FOP. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 08:09, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
It seems like you interpret this painting as "created for artistic purpose", such as works of art exhibited in a museum. This was, indeed, the context of the referenced discussion with Dr. Presenti. The File:IHM Givat Yeroham 1.jpeg painting was not created for artistic purpose. It is a part of the decoration of a memorial viewpoint.
The Israeli law is very clear about paintings placed permanently in a public place. As was written years ago in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:HaMakhtesh_HaGadol_IMG_5985.jpg:
Back to the issue. As we are talking about 2009, art. 23 sais
* "שידור, או העתקה בדרך של צילום, ציור, שרטוט או תיאור חזותי דומה, של יצירה אדריכלית, יצירת פיסול או יצירת אמנות שימושית, מותרים אם היצירה ממוקמת בקביעות במקום ציבורי."
* Namely: "Transmission, or copying by way of photography, [of a -IHM] painting, sketching or similar visual description, of an architectural work, a work of sculpturing or work of usefull art, are permitted if the work is placed permanently in a public place." Ori~ (talk) 09:50, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
IsraelHikingMap (talk) 09:51, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
You may have seen that I worded my deletion proposal in a somewhat cautious way: "possibly not admissible" - if the discussion provides sufficient grounds to keep the image, then I'm totally fine with it! It would be an agreeable outcome of this quality assurance process named "deletion request". Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 18:34, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

File:AppleMaps logo.svg

Not in public domain - The Apple Maps (iOS) icon 2017 version had been approved for copyright registration (Registration record VA0002103831). Reference: Apple Maps logo evolution. 0x0a (talk) 05:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Question: 0x0a, if the image is not in public domain, does Apple licensing the logo to freely used by another license, such as MIT or CC-BY? If they license the image for free with another license despite having copyright registration, this file should be  Keep with licensing changed. 2404:8000:1037:767:D8D8:D548:E4EE:BAC 10:08, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
    I'm not an employee of Apple, so I don't know. 0x0a (talk) 13:33, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
 Delete per nomination. Absolutiva 22:23, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

File:RTI Response confirming images are under GODL license.png

This file was initially tagged by Shaan Sengupta as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Scanned copy of Right To Information reply. The problem here is the signature. Signatures in India are copyrighted. Signature seems to be COM:DM, and if not, it can be censored without affecting the main portion of the image (is the text GODL?). King of ♥ 09:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  •  Comment I will just quote the GODL exemption here. The license does not cover the following kinds of data: a. personal information; b. data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive; c. names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); d. data subject to other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade-marks and official marks; e. military insignia; f. identity documents; and g. any data that should not have been publicly disclosed for the grounds provided under section 8 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Now what I make of it (maybe wrongly) is that both the signature and the stamp need to go. Rest of the crop (maybe) can remain as PD-text. Also this file is uploaded as own work which certainly isn't the case here. So that also needs to be fixed. Shaan SenguptaTalk 13:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I have asked @Shaan Sengupta for a source and would happily censor the non textual items to ensure Wikimedia complies with copyright laws. Skratata69 (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
The answer to this is in the rationale given by King of Hearts at the top. Shaan SenguptaTalk 18:36, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Not finding a source for "Signatures in India are copyrighted" in said rational. Skratata69 (talk) 03:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
What I meant is the signatures or any official marks/symbols are not covered by the license. Particularly regarding signatures, it is protected if it has some level of creativity to be categorised as an artistic work. Also signatures of any high ranking officials, like that of the above, are meant to be censorsed under relevant laws to prevent forgery. Anyway, as said above in the rationale, the signature is COM:DM and can be blurred. The text can stay. Shaan SenguptaTalk 11:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Since the deletion requester has not provided any source, can we close the deletion request? Skratata69 (talk) 09:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
It will be closed in due time by any admin. Thank you. Shaan SenguptaTalk 11:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

File:RO VN Jariștea 2.jpg

This image, claimed to represent the commune of Jariștea, Vrancea County, Romania, is highly unrepresentative and does not provide encyclopedic value. It depicts an outhouse, seemingly in an outlying field, and fails to illustrate any of the constituent villages, notable landmarks, characteristic architecture, or any other relevant features of the Jariștea commune. It therefore provides no meaningful encyclopedic information about Jariștea, Vrancea, and misleads readers. The uploader has a history of similar problematic uploads. 79.115.1.161 09:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC) {{subst:DRN-notice|File:RO VN Jariștea 2.jpg}}

This file was then tagged by 79.115.1.161 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F2: Egregiously misleading media. Depicts an outhouse as representative of the commune of Jariștea, Vrancea, providing no encyclopedic value for the subject. 79.115.1.161 09:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
{{Delete}} tag was removed while the discussion was in process.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Araz Yaquboğlu. Sazın-sözün sorağında. Bakı, "Elm və təhsil", 2023, 200 səh.pdf

Wrong license and copyright violation Yousiphh (talk) 09:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I am the author of the book. I have released it under a free (cc-by-4.0) license. Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Then please go through the COM:VRT process to verify you are who you say you are. Yousiphh (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Araz Yaquboğlu. Daşkənddən Yeni Daşkəndə. Bakı, "Elm və təhsil", 2023, 480 səh.pdf

Wrong license and copyright violation Yousiphh (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I am the author of the book. I have released it under a free (cc-by-4.0) license. Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Then please go through the COM:VRT process to verify you are who you say you are. Yousiphh (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Araz Yaquboğlu. Daşkənd aşıqları və şairləri. Bakı, Nurlan, 2008, 416 səh.pdf

Wrong license and copyright violation Yousiphh (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I am the author of the book. I have released it under a free (cc-by-4.0) license. Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 10:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Then please go through the COM:VRT process to verify you are who you say you are. Yousiphh (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:MERGE-it 2023 - Fabio Lovato - talk OpenStreetMap - raccoglitore olio esausto.jpg

No evidence that the content on the depicted screen/board is under a free license; so the photo is a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Premising that these slides are very low quality memes, we should consider them as fair use in Europe.
If we don't consider fair use, this slide cannot really reach any thresholds of originality since it's very low quality. So it's public domain mark.
If we don't consider public domain mark,
The slides are part of an event that required slides in CC BY-SA 4.0 or compatible - as also stated in the footer: <-- this might help
https://merge-it.net/2023/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
The talk is "OpenStreetMap per il territorio: la raccolta rifiuti speciali", by Fabio Lovato.
The author, Fabio Lovato only release materials under Free Licenses since years.
As additional proof, that presentation has partnership with Wikimedia Italy.
https://www.wikimedia.it/news/merge-it-2023-a-verona-incontra-chi-si-impegna-per-le-liberta-digitali/
If we also (!) don't consider the slides under CC BY-SA 4.0,
Since we can, I just notified this discussion to the author, Fabio Lovato. The public contact is "loviuz @ linux dot it" as stated in this public Internet page https://www.ils.org/info/
So, if we don't consider anything of the above (where every mentioned thing is about "keep"), please at least wait for the author's feedback... Thanks. bozz (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I just would like to add: please look at this phrase on the slide:
"The raccoglitor of the Olio in italian cauntry"
Is clearly a meme slide, plus, very low pixel definition bozz (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
"Fair-use" and "below TOO" doesn't work here. However, if participants of this event were officially required to provide their presentations under said CC license, this would be sufficient, IMO. If there is such a statement available, please put the link to it here and in the "Permission line" of the image-description. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I am the people on this photo. The image on the slide is a meme and this pic and the meme is under Creative Commons Zero Loviuz86 (talk) 10:29, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Melahat Gahramanova's Azerbaijan Patent 1.jpg

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Melahat Gahramanova's Azerbaijan Patent 2.jpg

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Melahat Gahramanova's Azerbaijan Patent 3.jpg

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Melahat Gahramanova's Azerbaijan Patent 4.jpg

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Melahat Gahramanova's Azerbaijan Patent 5.jpg

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Melahat Gahramanova's Azerbaijan Patent 6.png

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:N. Chandrasekaran CEO Tata Consultancy Services.jpg

Larger files found elsewhere prior to local upload, see Tineye --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Metro Globe Network.png

The copyright license is completely questionable. The left image of text logo uses a bird's head image, meeting the threshold requirements for copyright protection. Astrinko (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Sofia Airport Terminal 2

According to w:en:Vasil Levski Sofia Airport#Terminal 2, it was inaugurated in 2006. Being recent, it is still under architectural copyright. There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Bulgaria, making these freely licensed images infringements on architectural copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Interior of Sofia Airport Terminal 2

Elaborate parts of the airport's interior architecture. Unsure about the other interior architecture in which I did not nominate. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sofia Airport Terminal 2 for the details of the airport terminal itself.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Sofia Airport model.jpg

No commercial Freedom of Panorama in Bulgaria (COM:FOP Bulgaria). Also, User:Elcobbola/Models. For the building that the model is based on, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sofia Airport Terminal 2. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Yukikawashima.png

File:川島さん宣材 プロフィール用.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:5 Logo Triangular fractal.svg

Unused OOS logo. Adamant1 (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Support Low-value file for Wikimedia Commons. Sev6nWiki (talk) 12:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Keep small, but in scope. -- Ooligan (talk) 04:42, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

File:President Nicușor Dan Official Portrait (cropped) (3).jpg

Vellutis here, this file has incorrect license as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ilie Bolojan official portrait.jpg 2A02:2F04:F510:8E00:0:0:0:DC7 14:26, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep : Your file was also nominated for deletion for the same reason. but yet you defended it. but when i make a file that is more accepted it gets nominated for deletion xDD
𝕸𝖆𝖑𝖇𝖔𝖗𝖐𝕳𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 14:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
normal coaie 2A02:2F04:F510:8E00:0:0:0:DC7 14:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ilie Bolojan official portrait.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep : There are multiple discussions about this file. but it was confirmed to have been taken by the Romanian Government which means it is in the public domain. they even proved it in the discussions
𝕸𝖆𝖑𝖇𝖔𝖗𝖐𝕳𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 19:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Christmas baubles - 2022-01-02 - Andy Mabbett - 07.jpg

Per COM:TOY: possible DW of the trinket JayCubby (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Penguin Christmas ornaments are fairly generic and easily buyable. I'm not sure what makes this one unique compared to the millions of other ones that are released every year. More so since from what I can tell it doesn't seem to be based on a unique, original character or other work of art. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep per User:Adamant1. Also note that this is a retaliatory nomination, made immediately after I pointed out that two video files uploaded by the nom are copyvios, falsely claimed to be CCTV. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
    @Pigsonthewing -- not retaliatory. I tend to go through a user's uploads when I find one possible copyvio. JayCubby (talk) 15:45, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
    This does seem to violate German copyright. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 07:51, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delete due to copyright violation. Original works of art fixed in a tangible form are automatically protected in Germany (and most other countries) by copyright from the moment of their creation. Käthe Wohlfahrt does their own designs, so they are original, and a Christmas ornament is a tangible form. Christmas ornaments are primarily decorative not utilitarian. Nv8200pa (talk) 19:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per Nv8200pa. It seems this is indeed a copyright violation in Germany. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 07:50, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

File:AU Hauptsitz in Metzingen.jpg

This photograph was uploaded by SPA account and there's zero evidence that they are the photographer or copyright holder of the image. So the file should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment The copyright status looks valid to me, meta data exists as well. I have contacted the uploader by wikimail to clarify this, please wait some days before closing this. ChemSim (talk) 10:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by KamilosR (talk · contribs)

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 6 June 2025. --83.61.242.133 16:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Well, they have an autorization by ticket nº2006111410007364 in OTRS. Alex Pereiradisc 11:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
@Alexanderps, yes but in September 2024 they revoked permission by ticket nº2024090610008572. For that, {{Presidenza della Repubblica}} was updates with a notice about that the license is valid if the file was uploaded to the website before 10 September 2024. These photographs were published in Presidenza della Repubblica's website on 6 June 2025, so the license is not valid for them. 83.61.242.133 14:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

File:The Adventures of Ali and His Gang vs. Mr. Tooth Decay cover.jpg

I'm seeing a copyright symbol on the record itself, as well as an "All Rights Reserved" within the book. Link: https://www.discogs.com/release/2153472-Muhammad-Ali-2-The-Ali-Gang-The-Adventures-Of-Ali-And-His-Gang-Vs-Mr-Tooth-Decay-Volume-1. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Isn't this the same thing like Template:PD-US-dust-jacket? "A notice of copyright on the dust jacket of a book is not an acceptable notice for the book, because the dust jacket is not permanently attached to the book. Likewise, a notice appearing in a book is not an acceptable notice for the dust jacket or any material appearing on that dust jacket, even if the book refers to the jacket or material appearing on the jacket." The cover is not permanently attached to the record.  REAL 💬   17:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep per Commons:ALBUM and File:Are You Experienced - US cover-edit.jpg Star Manatee (talk) 12:05, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
FYI, this discussion is related to a question that I asked in VPC. prospectprospekt (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Arisa sings Italian Anthem in 2025.JPG

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 2 June 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Sergio Mattarella con Edith Bruck.jpg

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 28 January 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Sergio Mattarella con Sami Modiano.jpg

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 28 January 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Sergio Mattarella, con il Sindaco di Marsiglia, Benoît Payan.jpg

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 5 February 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Sergio Mattarella, Dottore Honoris Causa dall’Università di Aix-Marseille.png

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 5 February 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Sandrino 14 (talk · contribs)

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 29 January 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Wang Hao 2024.jpg

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 11 November 2024. 83.61.242.133 17:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Huang Kunming 2024.jpg

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 12 November 2024. 83.61.242.133 17:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Sergio Mattarella e Pirc Musar.jpg

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 8 February 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Cerimonia di giuramento dei nuovi Giudici della Corte costituzionale - 81472.jpg

Per Presidenza della Repubblica, this license is only valid if the file was uploaded at Quirinale.it prior to September 10, 2024, date when the Presidency of the Italy revoked permission for files published in its website after that date. This photograph was published at Quirinale.it on 19 February 2025. 83.61.242.133 17:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  •  Delete I'm the uploader. I didn't know about the revoking of the permission, sorry for that. I agree with the deletion. --Jaqen (talk) 13:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Z domingo savio.jpg

This undated depiction may well be copyrighted, since no source or citations are provided for its dating. Under the precautionary principle, this file should be deleted unless source info is provided. Howardcorn33 (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I've done a little bit of digging. It seems that this photo is of this prayer card, manufactured by Cromo NB.
No idea who actually did the painting, however, going by this description of the company provided by the company, chances are they own the copyright regardless of who painted it.
However, I have also seen another variant of an 'original version' on a different prayer card in an ebay listing (not providing a link because ebay links are probably frowned upon even in these cases) - no idea who manufactured that prayer card though, so that's a dead end on the hunt for authorship.
Unless anyone's willing to go through the effort to work out the full story re the authorship of the picture, I'm in favour of the precautionary deletion. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talkedits) 00:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

File:San Domenico Savio.jpg

This obviously posthumous painting may well have been made recently enough to be copyrighted. Source info is necessary for it to be kept. Howardcorn33 (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Compañía Nacional De Chocolates.jpg

Seems to me above Peru - TOO. We should take a look at this, pretty please. ;) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:45, 12 June 2025 (UTC)