Commons:Deletion requests/2025/05/23

May 23

File:Rodrigo Bacellar foto de perfil.jpg

Foto de perfil em rede social, sem indicativo de permissão de uso pelo titular que consta na foto Paladinum2 (talk) 00:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Marie Louise Kirkland with Gus Frerotte.jpg

probably copyvio - the attached agreement appears to just add the words "Creative Commons" to an otherwise very non-free license (doesn't even specify which CC license it would be anyway). TheLoyalOrder (talk) 03:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Marie Louise Kirkland VHM and Redskin Gus Frerotte.pdf has same problem TheLoyalOrder (talk) 03:05, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Should I fix it by changing the license? Visitation is fine with whatever license I put on it, as long as they get credit for the photo. Oh-Fortuna! (talk) 03:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
you should probably go through VRT to ensure they understand the terms they're releasing under correctly, as Creative Commons licenses necessarily are very different to what is said in that agreement TheLoyalOrder (talk) 03:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
I changed the file to say that the photo is courtesy of the Georgetown Visitation archives, and Cassandra Berman is the author. Does that satisfy the concerns? Oh-Fortuna! (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
no, if you're not the author you'll have to get them to send a message to VRT TheLoyalOrder (talk) 22:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Great, I'm doing that now. I just sent them an email. Oh-Fortuna! (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Le Duan's Cambodian Travel Document.jpg

Subject is likely not outside of URAA copyright. The subject is of Cambodian origin, not Vietnamese. TansoShoshen (talk) 04:39, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

  •  Comment Given that this is a government-issued travel document from Cambodia, similar to those in Category:Visas of Cambodia, could it be eligible for {{PD-CambodiaGov}} as well? Leeaan (talk) 01:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RG72 (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from background, posters, advertisement.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

The background image behind the dancers is not the main or even significant object of the image. Therefore, such images are widely published in Russian and foreign media without any legal consequences. RG72 (talk) 04:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

It can be found all over the internet and nobody has complained?  Delete per nom. Quick1984 (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Files uploaded by RG72 (talk · contribs)

Derivatives of 2D/3D-artworks/maps/posters, no FoP in Russia/Ukraine for these.

  •  Keep The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo and properly credited to a photographer from Unsplash (I don't know whether they post Creative Commons-licensed photos over there, but it might be a CC photo). The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo and properly credited to a photographer from Unsplash (I don't know whether they post Creative Commons-licensed photos over there, but it might be a CC photo). The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep? The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo, however, it's not credited this time. The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo and properly credited to a photographer from Pexels (I don't know whether they post Creative Commons-licensed photos over there, but it might be a CC photo). The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo and properly credited to a photographer from Unsplash (I don't know whether they post Creative Commons-licensed photos over there, but it might be a CC photo). The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo and properly credited to a photographer from Unsplash / Pexels (I don't know whether they post Creative Commons-licensed photos over there, but it might be a CC photo). The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo and properly credited to a photographer from Unsplash / Pexels (I don't know whether they post Creative Commons-licensed photos over there, but it might be a CC photo). The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:57, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep The depicted photo is COM:DE MINIMIS imo and properly credited to a photographer from Unsplash / Pexels (I don't know whether they post Creative Commons-licensed photos over there, but it might be a CC photo). The depicted text is not copyrightable because it simply lists the items that are in the depicted containers (the text says things like "Lego", "dishes", "phones", etc.). Nakonana (talk) 13:57, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Info 1950 sculpture, according to . Unfortunately, I can't find any information on the sculptor. Nakonana (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Info This is a sculpture of the Coat of Arms of the city of Zavodoukovsk. CoAs fall under PD-Russia. I'm not sure whether and how this might affect the copyright status of sculptures of Russian CoAs. Nakonana (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Info Sculpture by Dmitry Makolkin (Дмитрий Александрович Маколкин). I didn't find any biography on, but there's an profile on ok.ru with data that matches the information given in news articles about him (e.g. profession, place of residence, etc.), which suggests that he was born on 1 April and is currently 68 years old, so probably born in 1957. He is likely still alive as I've found news articles about him from 2025. Nakonana (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Info Same sculpture by Dmitry Makolkin as above. Nakonana (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Info Sculpture by Lev Puzakov (born 1946, Пузаков Лев Васильевич, see ). Nakonana (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Info Sculpture by Lev Puzakov (born 1946, Пузаков Лев Васильевич, see ). Nakonana (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Info Sculpture by Lev Puzakov (born 1946, Пузаков Лев Васильевич, see ). Nakonana (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep The logos are COM:DE MINIMIS and the text is not copyrightable because it just states the names of the organizations whose logos can be seen (such as "Tyumen branch of the Federation of Computer Sports of Russia"). Nakonana (talk) 16:09, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Komarof (talk) 06:29, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@Komarof two files you nominated appear to be from Armenia, like File:Muzeo de la fabriko Ararat 01.jpg. However, COM:FOP Armenia is unclear on artworks in public indoors (likely not OK). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 12:19, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
 Keep for File:Historia leciono de Stanislav Belov 02.jpg, considering the uploader's claim that the map is from the 1920s and being hosted here on Wikimedia Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 12:23, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RG72 (talk · contribs)

Derivative works of mood videos broadcasted on Huawei TV screens as well as wallpapers on Huawei smartphones. If blurred, the images become unusable. Not de minimis.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 12:16, 30 May 2025 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Пётр Вельяминов.jpg

Random date of creation (missing at the source), missing date of first publication needed as per COM:Russia#Durations, no evidence of PD. Romano1981 (talk) 06:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Found the information here:
  • Петр Вельяминов в ссылке. Краснотурьинск, 1948—1949 годы
  • фото: Архив актера. Публикация «Искусство кино», № 8, 1993 год
Translation:
  • Petr Velyaminov in exile. Krasnoturinsk, 1948-1949
  • photo: Actor's archive. Publication "Iskusstvo Kino", No. 8, 1993
Nakonana (talk) 16:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

File:LNT Evade.png

No evidence that game assets shown are freely licensed Based5290 (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Breed-1995-2007-DriessensenVerstappen.jpg

Not own work. Most likely taken from museum website, hence copyrighted Spinster (talk) 07:28, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:王璐的照片.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Kakan spelar as no license (No license) Krd 07:28, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Yep, so I tagged the file as no license to try to get further confirmation that the uploader own the rights. The uploader has previously uploaded copyrighted files, and this photo seems to have been taken professionally. I do not trust that this uploader owns the rights for this photo, especially since it's been uploaded with a CC0 license. Also, no metadata. // Kakan spelar (talk) 13:30, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Hasina Jalal .jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jay8g as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.cgm.pitt.edu/people/hasina-jalal
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the external "hit" is cropped (https://www.cgm.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/styles/person_large/public/person-images/thumbnail_hasina_jalal_.jpeg) and undated. So, there is no hard evidence that our version was taken from it. It might be the other way round. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Lubbock Tornado Memorial photos

There's no freedom of panorama for 3D works of art, even ones installed in public spaces, installed on or after January 1, 1978, under US copyright law per COM:FOP United States, and photos of such artwork are considered derivative works for which there are two copyrights to consider: one for the artwork itself and one for the photo. Even though the en:Lubbock Tornado happened in 1970, this particular memorial was installed in 2020, which also means that a copyright notice or copyright registration isn't required for the memorial to eligible for copyright protection under US copyright law. So, unless the COM:CONSENT of the person who created/designed the memorial (i.e., its copyright holder), who appears to be an architect named Stephen Fauk per this, can be obtained, I don't think these can't really be kept by Commons. --Marchjuly (talk) 08:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep this: File:LubbockTornadoMemorial1.jpg - light poles are "useful objects"- the physical memorial is just simple shapes from this distant photo and text is de minimis. -- Ooligan (talk) 03:45, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Marsabit-County-Headquarters.jpg

Probably taken from Marsabit County government website (this), as detected by reverse image Google Search on the same month (February 2018) as the date of the upload here. Desert Breeze (talk · contribs)'s talk page bears notices to some problematic uploads, so this upload may be problematic too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 08:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Kim at MBC Radio in June 2024.jpg

This image has been digitally upscaled using AI software, thus making it an inaccurate representation of the person. Tananastasia (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Be opposed to! This image has been reviewed for authorization and does not differ significantly from the original source .
Furthermore, the person who requested the deletion is suspected of forcing the posting of his own images on various language versions of Wikipedia. Loveuu23 (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Using an image digitally upscaled using AI software is a misrepresentation of the person, even if it does not differ much from the original. Besides, there are other images available.
And to clarify, the images I replaced from previous ones are all either more recent or forward-facing. Tananastasia (talk) 08:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
But I don't see any distortion of the characters' images in this picture, so your reason is not valid.
In addition, the picture you updated is from the same year as the original one, 2024, and some of them are from the same source as the original one, so it has no more meaning than the original picture. Loveuu23 (talk) 09:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
No matter how small the difference, it is still a distortion from the original.
I replaced this specific image with another one because it was digitally upscaled using AI software. Whereas for other images, it was the same year, but as mentioned, a more recent date, or more forward-facing. Tananastasia (talk) 09:34, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I just want to ask, does Wikimedia Commons have any regulations prohibiting AI assistance of images?
As for what you said about forward-facing, that is your own personal perception, but you have no right to force Wikipedia in all languages ​​to use the pictures you made!
I have stated everything I should state, and the rest is left to the administrator to judge. Loveuu23 (talk) 09:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I have made my position clear. I would also appreciate if you could maintain your etiquette in this discussion and your edit summary on 金惠奫 (https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%87%91%E6%83%A0%E5%A5%AB).
Again, to clarify, previously, File:240902 Kim Hye Yoon (김혜윤).png and File:240902 Kim Hye-Yoon (김혜윤).png were being used in most of the pages, then I changed it to either File:Kim Hye-yoon at SDA 2024.jpg, created by another user, or File:Kim in Sep 2024.jpg, that I created, because it was a more recent image.
I shall also leave it to the administrator to judge. Tananastasia (talk) 10:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
How can it be said that I am impolite since I didn't say anything bad but just objected to your behavior? On the contrary, it is not kind of you to suggest deleting other people's photos just to express your own point of view. Please let the administrator judge the above. Loveuu23 (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I believe the administrators can also judge for themselves .
And rather than just wanting to express my point of view, I nominated the image for deletion for a reason I already stated.
Also, just to summarise, I tried to replace File:Kim at MBC Radio in June 2024.jpg with File:Kim in Jun 2024.jpg, that I created, because the former was digitally upscaled using AI software, which I believe is a misrepresentation of the person.
Next, I replaced File:240902 Kim Hye Yoon (김혜윤).png and File:240902 Kim Hye-Yoon (김혜윤).png that were being used in most of the pages, to either File:Kim Hye-yoon at SDA 2024.jpg, created by another user, or File:Kim in Sep 2024.jpg, that I created, because the images were more recent. Tananastasia (talk) 11:51, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

File:De Rat, IJlst.jpg

Personal Request Dantdmnl (talk) 09:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Colours after sunset.jpg

File:Europastaatsministerin Anna Lührmann.jpg

I uploaded this picture and would like to remove it because there might be a copyright issue. Josef Bernd (talk) 12:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Marcel-Reimen-diplome-universitaire- octobre 1973.pdf

La personne concernée M. Marcel Reimen ne souhaite plus avoir ces documents personnels disponibles en ligne. JetJerem (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Marcel-Reimen-retraite-ministre-plenipotentiaire - septembre 2011.pdf

La personne concernée M. Marcel Reimen ne souhaite plus avoir ces documents personnels disponibles en ligne. JetJerem (talk) 12:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Marcel-Reimen-Représentant permanent adjoint OCDE - juillet 2005.pdf

La personne concernée M. Marcel Reimen ne souhaite plus avoir ces documents personnels disponibles en ligne. JetJerem (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Marcel-Reimen-octobre2005-nomination-Envoyé extraordinaire et ministre plénipotentiaire en service ordinaire.pdf

La personne concernée M. Marcel Reimen ne souhaite plus avoir ces documents personnels disponibles en ligne. JetJerem (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Ativistas pedem liberdade de morador de rua preso.jpg

Per COM:FOP Brazil, there exists freedom of panorama in Brazil for permanently located things. As this banner is not permanently situated, probably the photo violates its author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

According to the Brazilian Copyright Law, Article 46: "The following does not constitute an infringement of copyright: (...) VIII. the reproduction, in any work, of small excerpts of pre-existing works, of any nature, or of an entire work, in the case of visual arts, provided that the reproduction itself is not the main objective of the new work and that it does not harm the normal exploitation of the reproduced work nor cause unjustified harm to the legitimate interests of the authors."
This is a protest banner (not a piece of art made for a living) in a public space (a court) photographed by a public agency under a free licence. The protesters wanted the banner to be seen by as many people as possible. Therefore, the argument that this photo violates copyrights doesn't seem to be reasonable. MayTheForce (talk) 13:41, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Doesn't matter. Law doesn't say that protest banners have special rights. VRT-permission from author (or other kind of evidence of publication under free license) from banner author is needed. In addition, this is derivative work of photo of Rafael Braga Vieira with unknown copyright status, so actually another permission from photographer is needed as well. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Fuad Axundov.jpg

Copyright violation. Taken from the internet Yousiphh (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Bahadurseyidov.jpg

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 13:09, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Budbee Parcel Locker at Albert Heijn.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Mbch331 as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Source however is own work, and this parcel automat is placed outside the supermarket (noticing the little 'no-entrance' flaps in the lower right). These kinds of vending machines are even placed in public space to be accessible outside office hours. Imho FOP applies here, no additional persmission is needed. Ciell (talk) 13:09, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:AfqanAsgarov.jpg

Copyright violation. Taken from the internet Yousiphh (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:19580613黑人超氟牙膏.jpg

Legal entity work published in 1958 is protected, as per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Taiwan#Authored_by_a_legal_entity. Wcam (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

 Delete per nom, PD in Taiwan but not PD in the US until 2054 per URAA. Tvpuppy (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Əbdülkərim Xamanei.jpg

Wrong license and too small to be used Yousiphh (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Rasim Tağıyev yazıçı.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Rasim Tağıyev.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Müzəffər Nəsirli şair-dramaturq.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:İbrahim Məmmədov aktyor, xalq artisti.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:EyvazZeynalov.jpg

Not used COM:ADVERT file Yousiphh (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Yasəmən Ramazanova- xalq artisti.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Vaqif Əhmədov- rejissor.jpg

Copyright violation Yousiphh (talk) 13:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Vəli Babayev- rejissor.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Sona Mirzəyeva-aktrisa.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Sona Mirzəyeva və Zəroş Həmzəyeva.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Sona Mirzəyeva.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Vəli Babayev.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Səməd Canbaxşiyevin fotosu.jpg

Not used COM:ADVERT file Yousiphh (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Elxan Şeyxov aktyor.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Həsən Ağasoy -aktyor.jpg

Copyright violation. Taken from the internet Yousiphh (talk) 13:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:ISCA Project.png

The copyright claim is invalid, and the "globe" is quite untrivial. Janhrach (talk) 14:05, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Flag of Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine.webp

The only nontrivial design element is nonfree; see en:File:PIJ emblem.png. Janhrach (talk) 14:11, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Doom dark ages gamescom 2024.jpg

Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character and bakground. Temporarary display. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

 Delete per nom. COM:FOP#Germany doesn't have public interiors. Requesting local upload on ENWP. Ahri Boy (talk) 22:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Joaobulascruz (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Replaced by newer versions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Hohe Kiefer 159 Klm.jpg

Doppelt vorhanden File:Hohe Kiefer 159 Klm 1996 (1).jpg Andreas Lippold (talk) 14:45, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Apluswiki (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Scheler max.jpg

Per and , this photograph was taken ca. 1925 by German photographer de:August Sander, who died in 1964. So the photo is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2035. Rosenzweig τ 16:28, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Max Scheler2.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 16:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Bruno Giacomel.jpg

Photo privée BCGiacomel (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Max Scheler2.jpg

Not public domain yet. Yann (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scheler max.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 16:35, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:PraveenKumarNishad.jpg

The same issue that was with File:Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury official portrait.jpg. The profile of MPs on this website comes with disclaimer that these contents are owned by Lok Sabha (Parliament of India) and requires email permission from them. Please refer to a previous DR for the same violation. Shaan SenguptaTalk 17:24, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Brijbhushansingh.jpg

The same issue that was with File:Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury official portrait.jpg. The profile of MPs on this website comes with disclaimer that these contents are owned by Lok Sabha (Parliament of India) and requires email permission from them. Please refer to a previous DR for the same violation. Shaan SenguptaTalk 17:25, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Grian sig.svg

COM:SIG United Kingdom: Grian is British Howardcorn33 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

I have uploaded a compliant version at w:File:Signature of Grian.svg Howardcorn33 (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Azerice ders kitaplari.png

Copyright violation. Taken from the internet Yousiphh (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Nothing copyrightable here. The book covers are too simple for copyright and this is a PD-art-style faithful reproduction of them. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Rysca-turqca.png

Copyright violation. Taken from the internet Yousiphh (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Anudip.png

some logo. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Vəfa Xanoğlan.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 19:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

 Comment how, Yousiphh? We can't read your mind, try to give more information. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
This photo üas taken from this website: https://www.museumcenter.az/ Yousiphh (talk) 19:29, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Žan Luka Artič.jpg

It’s an old picture of the person, please delete it or replace it with a latest one. Jabolkozjablane (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:35, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Igreja de São José, Caatinga do Moura 11.jpg

aparece uma pessoa SalesIza (talk) 20:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Can be cropped off. --Achim55 (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Kit shorts arg9697a.png

esta mal hecho Valentinobrz (talk) 20:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Kit shorts arg9697h.png

esta mal hecho Valentinobrz (talk) 20:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Джаджурский тоннель. Западная сторона 11.gif

Прошу удалить файл в связи с тем, что хочу загрузить иную версию, но похожую! Я - автор изображения Well-read MountainMan (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Виды в районе восточного въезда в тоннель.gif

Прошу удалить изображение в связи с тем, что хочу загрузить иную версию, но что бы не было повторов Well-read MountainMan (talk) 21:06, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm

The {{PD-1996}} tag here is incorrect. Director Jean Vigo died in 1934, so URAA would have restored the U.S. copyright in 1996. hinnk (talk) 20:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Please note that before 1996, the copyright term in France was 58 years. Beside it may have been shown in USA at the time, and therefore copyright there wasn't restored. Yann (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Summarizing a related discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zéro de conduite (1933) par Jean Vigo.webm, À propos de Nice entered the public domain in 1993, but in 1995 just before URAA restoration, France increased the copyright term to 70 years. Do we know if this restored copyrights to works that had entered the public domain? I've been assuming the answer is yes, but COM:FRANCE doesn't indicate one way or the other. hinnk (talk) 18:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
According to Cinema 16: Documents Toward a History of the Film Society, À propos de Nice wasn't available in the U.S. until 1954. en:Copyright law of France#Authors' rights law of 1957 indicates that rights under the 70-year term were retroactive to July 1, 1995. That means copyright would've been restored in both France and the U.S. by 1996, and since then it has only entered the public domain in France. hinnk (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
No. The law was 50 years + extension until 1996. Yann (talk) 09:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Is there somewhere we could find someone who could confirm that, maybe at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/France or COM:VPC? COM:FRANCE seems very clear on the increased term starting July 1, 1995, so if you're correct about that then we have a prominent error or omission on that page. hinnk (talk) 10:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
I have asked Carl Lindberg. Yann (talk) 10:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
France's law change to 70pma did not take effect until April 1, 1997. For the URAA, it mattered what the law actually was in the source country on Jan 1, 1996. Subsequent law changes (retroactive or not) do not matter. The transitional rules in that law make clear that owners of revived rights (for works in the public domain as of July 1, 1995) did not apply to any exploitations before April 1, 1997, so the works were still considered public domain on Jan 1, 1996. There is some gray area for works which expired on January 1, 1996 itself, as the EU directive came into force six months earlier, and it was clear such works would become re-copyrighted (and this later 1997 French law would allow copyright infringement charges for someone who exploited such works between Jan 1 1996 and April 1 1997). However, the law still actually in place on January 1, 1996 was still the 50pma law with wartime extensions, which may have been enough to satisfy the URAA clause of public domain in its source country through expiration of term of protection. But works which expired 1995 or earlier seem pretty clear-cut. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Great! Sounds like there should be no issue with this film then. I've modified COM:FRANCE to include and explain the 1997 date. I'm also going to propose something on the talk page there to recommend adding this interpretation to the page, both of you may want to keep an eye in case there's any discussion. I'll take care of the {{Non-free audio}} tag and strip out the audio sometime soon. hinnk (talk) 21:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Question: How do we decide who was the main director between Vigo and Kaufman? -- Asclepias (talk) 12:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

en:À propos de Nice says that Vigo was the writer and director, and Kaufman was the cinematographer. The cinematographer does not enter into the copyright term per the EU directive. Is there somewhere that he was credited as a co-director? Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Well, en.wikipedia can say what it wants, the film itself in its credits says that they are both directors and so do fr.wikipedia, IMDb, Cinémathèque, ... -- Asclepias (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
 Keep Per Yann (this film is a French movie, directed and producted in France). On another hand, this could be also clearly considered as collective work, so under PD-France, because this picture has been taken more than 70 years ago. Tisourcier (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  • The Mr Cinema encyclopedic Form for "À propos de Nice" defines Vigo as the director and Kaufman as photographer ("opérateur de prises de vue"). This could be also considered as "technical director" because the main author, writter and conceptor of the movie is Jean Vigo. []. Tisourcier (talk) 18:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Here another valid and serious reference, by french public museum "Centre Pompidou" about À propos de Nice's public domain status [].
    Tisourcier (talk) 14:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Kept: Overwhelming concensus is in the public domain, from both Wikimedians and outside sources. --Sadads (talk) 13:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm

This film is still under copyright, when Boris Kaufman died in 1980. 112.202.50.214 23:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Under the EU directive the cinematographer's lifespan is not part of the copyright length for movies. I'm not sure it was part of the term under older French law either. What makes Kaufman's lifetime matter? Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:24, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Well, I guess that was the discussion at the end of the previous DR, so this nomination doesn't seem to be providing any new information compared to the one before. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:27, 24 May 2025 (UTC)