File:DRG 10 002 Werkaufnahme Maybach.jpg

This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It is not known when it was published. Licence is invalid. No evidence that the author died 70 years ago. Photo scanned from book published in 1988. Please refer to Commons:Publication. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. There are many indications that this is a photograph taken by a private person. Please refer to Commons:Project scope/Evidence. The uploader failed to prove that the photo was published over 70 years ago. All content in the book is copyrighted by the publisher. The image was taken at the train station. Several indications indicate that it is not a factory photo. This picture was probably taken by a private person. This photo was badly taken. It is unlikely that such a fatal image was made for promotional purposes. Respecting copyright is not about making claims without evidence. It never means that someone can scan a photo from a book and a recipe that they introduce shortly after creating it. The photo comes from a private collection with a high probability. There are no signs that this is a promotional photo. Many such photos were kept in private archival collections. Copyright should not be implied. This should be based on unequivocal evidence. No one can ever immediately assume that a photo was published immediately after it was taken. This can never be an arbitrary decision by one editor. This file is a copyright violation because it comes from - Heinz Kurz, "Die Triebwagen der Reichsbahn-Bauarten", EK-Verlag, Freiburg, 1988, ISBN 9783882558036. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

 Keep Per bundled response at Commons:Deletion requests/File:KkStB 1.401 Repro Horn.jpg. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

 Delete Invalid argument. It is not known when it was published. In addition, the entire content of the book is copyrighted by the publisher. Respecting copyright is not about making claims without evidence. Probably the photo comes from a private collection. You cannot scan a photo from any book and assume it was published immediately after it was created. It can be assumed that the photo was published many years later. No one can immediately tell that a given photo was published immediately after it was taken. It shouldn't be discretionary. It can't be an arbitrary decision by one editor. There is no evidence that there is a promotional photo. It is possible that it was made by an ordinary person. It is dishonest to scan photographs when there is a suspicion that they come from someone's private collection and make them available on the Internet. It may have been made available only to the authors of the book. Uoijm77 (talk) 05:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - URAA applies. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC)