Commons:Administrators/he
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
Category:Commons guidelines/he
דף זה מסביר על התפקיד של מפעילי המערכת (לפעמים נקראים מנהלים או מפעילים) בויקישיתוף. שים לב שפרטי התפקיד ואופן ההתנהגות של מפעילי המערכת עשויים להיות שונים מאתרים אחרים.
אם ברצונך לבקש עזרה ממפעיל מערכת, ניתן לעשות זאת באמצעות לוח המודעות של מפעילי המערכת.
נכון לעכשיו ישנם 178 מפעילי מערכת בויקישיתוף.
מה זה מפעיל מערכת?
Administrators as of מאי 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 178
If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
טכנית
מפעילי מערכת הם משתמשים בעלי יכולות טכניות בויקישיתוף ל:
- למחוק ולבטל מחיקה של תמונות וקבצים שהעלו אחרים, ולצפות ולשחזר גרסאות שנמחקו
- למחוק ולבטל מחיקה של דפים, ולצפות ולשחזר גרסאות שנמחקו
- להגן ולבטל הגנה על דפים, ולערוך דפים המוגנים על ידי מפעיל
- לחסום ולבטל חסימה של משתמשים, כתובות IP בודדות וטווחי כתובות IP
- לערוך הודעות ממשק עם פחות הגבלות (ראו גם ויקישיתוף:עורכי ממשק)
- לשנות שם של קבצים
- להוסיף ולהסיר קבוצות משתמשים
- להגדיר מסעות פרסום של אשף ההעלאה
- למחוק ולבטל מחיקה של רשומות יומן ספציפיות וגרסאות של דפים
- לייבא דפים מאתרי ויקי אחרים
- למזג את היסטוריית הדפים
- לשנות מסנני שימוש לרעה
- לא ליצור הפניות מדפי מקור בעת העברת דפים
- לעקוף את בדיקות הזיוף ואת הרשימה השחורה של כותרת או שם משתמש
- לשלוח הודעה למספר משתמשים בו זמנית בעזרת (massmessage)
- להשתמש במגבלות גבוהות יותר בשאילתות API
אלה ידועים יחד ככלי ניהול.
תפקיד הקהילה
מפעילים הם חברים מנוסים ואמינים בקהילת ויקישיתוף, אשר לקחו על עצמם עבודות תחזוקה נוספות וקיבלו את כלי הניהול בהסכמה/הצבעה ציבורית. למפעילים שונים יש תחומי עניין ומומחיות שונים, אך משימות ניהול אופייניות כוללות קביעה וסגירה של בקשות מחיקה, מחיקת הפרות זכויות יוצרים, שחזור מחיקת קבצים במידת הצורך, הגנה על ויקישיתוף מפני השחתות ועבודה על תבניות ודפים מוגנים אחרים. כמובן, חלק מהמשימות הללו יכולות להתבצע גם על ידי אנשים שאינם מפעילים.
מפעילים צפויים להבין את המטרות של מיזם זה, ולהיות מוכנים לעבוד בצורה בונה עם אחרים למען מטרות אלו. על מפעילים גם להבין ולפעול לפי המדיניות וההנחיות של ויקישיתוף, ובמידת הצורך, לכבד את הקונצנזוס של הקהילה.
מלבד תפקידים הדורשים שימוש בכלי הניהול, למפעילים אין סמכות עריכה מיוחדת מתוקף תפקידם, ובדיונים ובהצבעות ציבוריות תרומותיהם מטופלות באותו אופן כמו כל עורך רגיל. חלק מהמפעילים עשויים להיות בעלי השפעה רבה יותר, לא בזכות תפקידם ככאלה, אלא בזכות האמון האישי שזכו לו מהקהילה.
הצעות למועמדים
אנא קרא את ה-Commons:Guide to adminship.
הסרת הרשאות המפעיל
תחת מדיניות ביטול הניהול, זכויות מפעיל עשויות להישלל עקב חוסר פעילות או שימוש לרעה בכלי מערכת הפעלה. בבקשת הסרת מפעיל, הסטנדרטים הרגילים לקביעת קונצנזוס בבקשת מינוי כמפעיל מערכת (RfA) אינם חלים. במקום זאת, יש להשתמש ב"קונצנזוס הרוב", לפיו כל קונצנזוס להורדה בדרגה של יותר מ-50% מספיק כדי להסיר את המפעיל.
הפוך למפעיל מערכת
כל המפעילים הפוטנציאליים חייבים לעבור תהליך זה ולהגיש את הבקשה למינוי כמפעיל מערכת (RFA) עבורם, כולל כל המפעילים לשעבר המבקשים לחזור לתפקידם הקודם.
ראשית, עבור אל Commons:Administrators/Howto וקרא את המידע שם. לאחר מכן חזור לכאן והגש את בקשתך בסעיף למטה.
- לאחר לחיצה על הכפתור המתאים ויצירת דף המשנה, העתיקו את הקישור לדף המשנה, לדוגמה "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", ערכו את Commons:Administrators/Requests והדביקו אותו בראש הקטע, לאחר מכן שימו אותו בסוגריים כפולים מסולסלים (למשל {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) כדי להכליל אותו. בקשו הודעת רשימת מעקב ב-MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, או ערכו את MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice כדי לפרסם אחת אם אתם מפעילי מערכת.
- אם מישהו אחר הציע אתכם, אנא קבלו את המועמדות על ידי אמירת "אני מקבל/ת" או משהו דומה, וחתימה מתחת למועמדות עצמה. דף המשנה עדיין יצטרך להיכלל על ידכם או על ידי המציע/ה שלכם.
השתמשו בתיבה למטה, והחליפו את Username בשם המשתמש שלכם: |
הצבעה
כל משתמש רשום רשאי להצביע כאן, אם כי ייתכן שאלו שביצעו מעט עריכות קודמות או ללא עריכות כלל לא ייספרו במלואם. עדיף שתציינו נימוקים הן להצבעות תמיכה והן להצבעות התנגדות, שכן הדבר יסייע לבירוקרט הסגירה לקבל את החלטתו. משקל רב יותר ניתן לטיעון, עם ראיות תומכות במידת הצורך, מאשר להצבעה פשוטה.
קידום דורש בדרך כלל לפחות 75% בעד, עם מינימום של 8 קולות תמיכה. קולות ממשתמשים לא רשומים אינם נספרים. עם זאת, לבירוקרט הסוגר יש שיקול דעת בשיפוט קונצנזוס קהילתי, וההחלטה לא בהכרח תתבסס על המספרים הגולמיים. בירוקרטים רשאים, לפי שיקול דעתם, להאריך את תקופת הבקשה למינוי כמפעיל מערכת (RfA) אם הם סבורים שזה יהיה מועיל בקביעת קונצנזוס קהילתי טוב יותר.
תגובות Neutral אינן נספרות בסך הקולות לצורך חישוב אחוזי מעבר/כשל. עם זאת, תגובות כאלה הן חלק מהדיון, עשויות לשכנע אחרים ולתרום להבנת הביורוקרט המסכם את הקונצנזוס הקהילתי.
ניקוי המטמון השתמש בקישור העריכה למטה כדי לערוך את הדף המצורף.
בקשות להרשאת הפעלה
לאחר השלמת התהליך, יש לאחסן את הדפים המפורטים כאן ב-Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- אנא קראו את ויקישיתוף:מפעילי מערכת לפני שאתם מצביעים כאן. כל משתמש מחובר רשאי להצביע, אם כי אלו שביצעו מעט עריכות קודמות או שלא ביצעו כלל עריכות, עשויים לא להיספר במלואם.
Ziv
Ziv (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 12:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Good day everyone
I thought about how I could contribute more here and I've decided to run for administrator.
About me: I'm from Switzerland, already over 50 years old, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2008. My main account is on the German Wikipedia, but since November of last year, I've been primarily active on Commons. Since December, I've been a file mover, having already moved over 11,000 files. My specialty is renaming coats of arms from German-speaking countries, as well as renaming files with meaningless names. I don't shy away from manually editing in all language versions, even if I can't read the language. However, I can converse fluently with anyone in German and Swiss German, and I have knowledge of English, Italian, French, and Hebrew.
I'm active almost every day, and I'm also good at finding copyvios; occasionally, I even submit deletion requests.
This is the first time I've applied for such a position at Wikipedia. Because of my calm and matter-of-fact manner, I've been approached before to become an administrator on the German-language Wikipedia. However, I wasn't particularly interested at the time and didn't know exactly how I could contribute as an administrator to the German-language Wikipedia.
Here at Commons, however, I do see potential where I could contribute.
Where I could certainly help as an admin and where a backlog I can often see:
- Processing open deletion requests
- Processing speedy deletion requests
I'll leave any further areas of activity open for now, as I probably need to find my way around first.
Whether the Commons community will place its trust in me remains to be seen now. Of course, it could also be that many of you don't know me that well yet and I still have to prove myself a bit more. But I hope I'm worthy of becoming an administrator.
Thanks to everyone who voted, even if your vote was negative. It shows me that you're taking notice and have gotten to know me a little better.
Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support safe! Shalom aus München --Mateus2019 (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --TenWhile6 13:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, valuable contributor. Suitable for being a sysop. Good luck.--Kadı Message 14:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Krorokeroro (talk) 16:11, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for proposing yourself. --Yann (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support She has "Make (Wiki)Love Not War" on a userpage. --A.Savin 17:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support thanks for volunteering All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support thank you for volunteering. Jianhui67 T★C 18:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Incall talk 04:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 10:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. The mop is waiting you! Taivo (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Support No strong concerns. Good luck. RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Codename Noreste (talk) 17:35, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 16:12, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. — ArtSmir (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. — doclys (❀) 18:15, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Arrow303 (talk) 19:07, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Päppi (talk) 19:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- I am a but unsure if all of your files moves are really covered by the renaming policy. Especially moves es like or . GPSLeo (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @GPSLeo: The Disney logos represented a harmonization of an entire file set, see Category:Disney Jr. logos, and the example you mentioned was the last one to remain in the requests list for a day or two. However, other Filemovers and admins were also involved in the name changes. Second: The old name File:George Simion cu media 04·05·2025 (6).jpg only mentioned George Simion, but three people are shown. You're right, I certainly could have been more specific, such as adding the first names to the suggestion and including the date. Greetings, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 14:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- That is not what the criterion To harmonize the names of a set of images so that only one part of all names differs is intended for. Commons:File renaming says
That does not apply to mass renames of coa files. Or Disney logos. --Rosenzweig τ 23:11, 15 May 2025 (UTC)There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.
- Okay, I'm not the only one who seems to have completely misinterpreted this criterion in the past. Others seem to have trouble with it, too. Based on your input, I won't be making any further name changes to coats of arms in the future. Best regards. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 06:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- That is not what the criterion To harmonize the names of a set of images so that only one part of all names differs is intended for. Commons:File renaming says
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Lymantria
Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.
We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.
Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- im
ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 00:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Nemoralis (talk) 00:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support as above. 〈興華街〉📅❓ 09:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 21:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uschoen (talk) 08:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Msb (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support per Kadi. I know them from Wikidata and they are very active and experienced there. Jianhui67 T★C 18:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Incall talk 18:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak support--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Haven't interacted with them much (if at all). But, already CU at other project, I don't see any issue why they can't be a good one here as well. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak support. — ArtSmir (talk) 19:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 07:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Support. Rkieferbaum (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support GPSLeo (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Seems competent and trustworthy, and cross-wiki capacity is useful. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Pafsanias (talk) 16:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Can this checkuser handle such cases like the sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1? 〈興華街〉📅❓ 09:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well, that has not been a straightforward CU-request and it is clear why the complexity of this CU-request led to a discussion, which I think led to a good outcome. The complexity is not so much in the CU part itself (the sockpuppetry seems to be quite clearly visible), but in the judging if this sockpuppetry is to be considered disruptive or not (commons and wikidata do not have exactly the same standards on that), the deletion of uploads and the long history. I certainly would be able to take up such a case, but not without trying to discuss with my colleague checkusers and/or ask them for advice. All by all these tasks are meant to serve the community as well as possible and should not be solo projects.--Lymantria (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment No opposition, but I am wondering about your level of activity with only 13 admin actions during last month. Yann (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- no access to https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/commons.wikimedia.org/Lymantria/4 .
- without that, then I found that there were fewer than 5 edits to all 4 Commons:Administrators' noticeboards in the last 3 years.
- https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/commons.wikimedia.org/Lymantria/4/Requests%20for%20checkuser .--RoyZuo (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
משימות
ר' גם
- ויקישיתוף:רמות גישה של משתמשים
- Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section
- Commons:Administrators/Nominations
- Commons:Administrators' noticeboard