== April 20 ==

File:Amélie (Piano music recording, The Fabulous Destiny of Amélie Poulai) played in the real piano classroom by piano teacher Jason M. C., Han (Jixun).wav

Derivative of copyrighted music composed by Yann Tiersen Johnj1995 (talk) 05:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:SUMMER played by piano student ZeyuCui.wav

• File:Kiki's delivery service Seasons-Switching Player JMC Han.ogg
• File:Summer Kikujiro - Joe Hisaishi, performed by Jason Han.ogg

Derivative of copyrighted music composed by Joe Hisaishi Johnj1995 (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Main piano melody of 'Plants vs. Zomb' played by Anzhi, Lin.wav

Derivative of copyrighted music composed by Laura Shigihara Johnj1995 (talk) 05:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Butterfly Lovers （Piano Music）played by piano student Shengran, Ma.wav

Not public domain. The composers Chen Gang and He Zhanhao are still living. See en:Butterfly Lovers' Violin Concerto Johnj1995 (talk) 05:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by GennadyL (talk · contribs)

Date of the first publication is needed to clarify the copyright status (COM:Russia#Durations).

• File:Строительство Ивановского меланжевого комбината.jpg
• File:Ивановский меланжевый комбинат - строительство.jpg
• File:Татаркин Пётр Евпсифович.jpg
• File:Tatarkin FE.jpg
• File:В. К. Аркадьев.jpg
• File:Малинин Борис Михайлович.jpg
• File:Luzin NN.jpg
• File:Заслонов Константин Сергеевич.png
• File:Шейх-Али Дауд Махмудович.jpg

Quick1984 (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:ماسة المجد.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Dyolf77 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Above threshold of originality. Complex -- — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 10:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

?? keep, has license. ltbdl (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep. Seems to just be text and simple shapes. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:09, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

File:مجد للأطفال.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Dyolf77 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Above threshold of originality. Complex shape -- — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 10:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

keep, has license. ltbdl (talk) 03:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep. Just simple text in circles. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:09, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by König des Fußballs (talk · contribs)

Definitely not CC files, some might be ok to keep but a relicense is needed.

• File:SV GRAF SCHWERIN.png
• File:Sport Verein 1910 Kolberg.png
• File:VfB Deutsch-Eylau.png
• File:Viktoria, Stargards bekanntester Fußball-Club.png
• File:SV HOCHMEISTER MARIENBURG.png
• File:Militär-Sp.-V. Hubertus (Germain).png
• File:Deutscher Sport-Club Neusalz e.V.png
• File:S.C PREUSSEN GOLLNOW.png

--Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 07:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Deleted two as CSD F1. Some of these may be PD-textlogo. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:One Direction figures at Madame Tussauds London (33783672342).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jolielover as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama in the UK for indoor copyrighted works S5A-0043🚎^{(Leave a message here)} 07:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Keep COM:FOP lists UK public interiors and 3D items as acceptable. S5A-0043🚎^{(Leave a message here)} 08:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

• Sorry about that, still new to copyright laws and such. Can I withdraw my nomination or something? @S5A-0043: jolielover♥talk 03:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

• Yes you're able to, though the information page isn't really clear about whether either of us should be closing this, so I won't be closing this myself. Changing my vote to  Speedy keep per above withdrawal. S5A-0043🚎^{(Leave a message here)} 07:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

• • I have a question: aren't only permanent displays allowed per COM:FOP? I just wanted to clarify. The display was taken down a few years ago. @S5A-0043: jolielover♥talk 03:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

    Frankly I'm not sure how Madame Tussauds work with their displays, but multiple past DRs have decided that other wax figures in the same museum are considered permanent and therefore kept in DRs. (one, two, three, four). So a question to ask is that whether there were any signs indicating that this display is only there for a limited time (e.g. a sign saying it will be taken down by year 20XX). If there's none I think it falls under FOP since there's no such indication that it's not permanent. It's like a building that's slated to be demolished; one can't exactly argue that since the building is no longer there it's not a "permanent" fixture (at least in terms of FOP). S5A-0043🚎^{(Leave a message here)} 04:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

    Thanks for the clarity! Yes, definitely speedy keep. jolielover♥talk 04:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Grandma and grandpa with stuffed bunny.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

In my opinion it falls under {{FoP-Germany}}. --Llez (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

 Question Is the toy a permanent display? If not, then this cannot benefit from FOP. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

 Info I know. It is a permanent installation. --Llez (talk) 09:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Any proof? --A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

 Info The photo was taken in 2020. When I passed by some time later, the figures were still sitting on the bench. They had been publicly displayed for a long time. Since I don't live in the area and won't be passing by anytime soon, I made a phone call. The figures are at the moment no longer on the bench. Since the figures weren't designed for outdoor use, they suffered greatly from the weather and were therefore removed.
As far as I know, in the German FoP, "auf Dauer" doesn't mean "for all eternity," but rather for the duration of their existence. For example, a work of art made of fruit exhibited in public can rot after just a few days or weeks, but in this case, "dauerhaft" applies, meaning the duration of their individual existence. For example, all images in this category would have to be deleted, as these works only exist for a few weeks, as the pumpkins would have rotted by then. Nevertheless, they are still subject to panorama freedom due to their limited durability. The same applies to the installation in this picture. --Llez (talk) 07:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

See also the discussion here --Llez (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

File:REKDAL SUU 2025 HEADSHOT.jpg

Professional headshot, no meaningful exif, PCP Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

keep. "all photos that are good quality must be stolen!" please. ltbdl (talk) 04:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

File:交通事業人員與交通行政人員相互轉任採計年資對照表.jpg

Better version: File:交通事業人員與交通行政人員相互轉任採計年資對照表 20181023.pdf Solomon203 (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:E-qua Logo.JPG

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Eai logo with margins.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:EAI-tagline.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Eamsep logo.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Affiche Adolfo Kaminsky 2022.jpg

No proof of no Copyright Limfjord69 (talk) 09:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Expo Parfums 2023.jpg

No proof of no Copyright Limfjord69 (talk) 09:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:MNMBEN 2024.jpg

No proof of no copyright Limfjord69 (talk) 09:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Home Sweet Home, une histoire du chez-soi. Exposition 2025..jpg

No proof of no copyright Limfjord69 (talk) 09:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Vraa.jpg

The statue was made by the Norwegian sculptor Dyre Vaa (1903–1980) https://nkl.snl.no/Dyre_Vaa There is no freedom of panorama in Norway (buildings and structures excepted). The copyright term in Norway is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2051. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 10:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

"LL" logos in Category:Logos of La Liga

The LL in these logos are extremely stylised with Footy Headlines remarking "a modern yet cryptic "ll" symbol, which is not easy to recognize as LaLiga at first glance." Personally, I did not see LL in these logos at first glance, but rather thought they were representation of legs in motion.

• File:LaLiga 2023 Horizontal Logo.svg
• File:LaLiga 2023 Vertical Logo.svg
• File:LaLiga EA Sports (Black).svg
• File:LaLiga EA Sports 2023 Vertical Logo.svg
• File:LaLiga Hypermotion (Black).svg
• File:LaLiga Hypermotion 2023 Vertical Logo.svg
• File:LaLiga logo (2023).svg
• File:Laliga23.png
• File:LL SIMBOLO LALIGA.png

Robertsky (talk) 10:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep all because File:LL SIMBOLO LALIGA.png is actually uploaded by FotosLaLiga an official account of La Liga  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   00:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Ah. I missed that it is a verified account. I assumed that permissions from VRTS would be explicitly stated on the File instead. If the same VRTS ticket is applicable to the other files above, I have no issue withdrawing this nomination. Robertsky (talk) 04:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

LaLiga indeed has accounts on Wikimedia projects and contributes images to Wikimedia Commons, such as their logos, which are also publicly available for download on their website. They also actively participate in editing, especially on the Spanish Wikipedia. Capa23 (talk) 12:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Speedy keep all. No valid reason to justify the deletion. I anyone remember who uploading some of the Logos, they're uploaded by a La Liga account (FotosLaLiga) that received VRTS there. I also believe that there's no issue regarding threshold of originality there, as the logo is too simple to be copyrighted. 2404:8000:1037:469:E80B:31A:EA31:9FF0 23:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Colourwheel logos in Category:Logos of La Liga

The colourwheel do not meet the threhold of originality as it requires a selection of colours as well as customising the shape and placement of the wheel.

• File:LaLiga2.svg
• File:Lfp-logo-vector.png

Robertsky (talk) 10:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Mahammad Kangarli.jpg

Copyright violation. Taken from the internet Yousiphh (talk) 10:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Aynur Farmanova.jpg

COM:ADVERT Yousiphh (talk) 11:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Shri Gauri Shankar Sharma kakku.jpg

Wrong page uploaded SKakku (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Denkmal Margit Johnsen.jpg

The bust is made by the Norwegian sculptor Olaf Leon Roald (born 1952, still alive) https://www.nrk.no/mr/avduket-byste--margit-j.-godo-1.11019900 There is no freedom of panorama in Norway (buildings and structures excepted). The copyright term in Norway is 70 years after the artists death. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Alejandra Herranz.jpg

Posible colisión con derechos de autor B.N.Sanchez. (talk) 11:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Fiskergutten Alesund.jpg

The statue was made by the Norwegian sculptor Knut Skinnarland (1909–1993) https://snl.no/Knut_Skinnarland There is no freedom of panorama in Norway (buildings and structures excepted). The copyright term in Norway is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2064. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Veliki Korinj Slovenia.jpg

This image shows private property that I own, and I did not give permission for it to be photographed or shared publicly. I believe this photo constitutes an invasion of privacy and I kindly request its removal from Wikimedia Commons. The property is not of public interest and was not photographed from a fully public space. Please respect the owner's rights and privacy. Coleboo (talk) 12:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

The request appears problematic in several regards. 1) The image shows multiple properties and does not focus on any particular property. 2) The scene was photographed from a fully public space (a public road). 3) The same scene has been publicly available on Google Street View since 2022, where there has apparently been no request from a home owner or tenant to blur a particular property. Doremo (talk) 16:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose, per Doremo. --Andrejj (talk) 13:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Sondre Norheim Morgedal.jpg

The statue was made by the Norwegian sculptor Knut Skinnarland (1909–1993) https://snl.no/Knut_Skinnarland and https://snl.no/Sondre_Norheim There is no freedom of panorama in Norway (buildings and structures excepted). The copyright term in Norway is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2064. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Delete. Vinguru (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Novruz Agayev. Azerbaijani poet.jpg

AI subjected not used photo fiel Yousiphh (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep It isn't AI, just a bad scan, replace it with better when better is available. --RAN (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

  Look closely, AI was used for better resolution. Yousiphh (talk) 22:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Bu faylı mən yükləmişəm, şəkil ailə üzvü tərəfindən verilib, skanerdən keçirilib. 1870-1948-ci illər arasında yaşamış, təxminən 1920-30-cu illərdə çəkilmiş bir şəkildir və təbii olaraq keyfiyyətsizdir. Silinməsini düzgün hesab etmirəm. Azərbaycan əlyazma xəzinəsinin toplanmasına böyük xidmətlər göstərmiş şəxs tanınmalıdır. Kriptex (talk) 07:25, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Oslo, Norway - panoramio (4).jpg

The monument was made by the Norwegian sculptor Joseph Grimeland (1916–2002) (Krigsseilermonument, 1980, Bygdøynes, Oslo) https://nbl.snl.no/Joseph_Grimeland There is no freedom of panorama in Norway (buildings and structures excepted). The copyright term in Norway is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2073. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 13:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu 仙湖植物園 Fairylake Botanical Garden 弘法寺 Hongfa Temple November 2023 R12S 100.jpg

Photograph of copyrighted text or 2D billboard Midleading (talk) 15:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu 仙湖植物園 Fairylake Botanical Garden 弘法寺人文佛教博物館 Hongfa Temple Renwen Fojiao Museum November 2023 R12S 04.jpg

photograph of indoor 2D artwork Midleading (talk) 15:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Files found with Special:Search/Lipnitzky, Boris

French photographer Boris Lipnitzky died in 1971. So these photos are not in the public domain in France, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2042 (no URAA problem then).

• File:Olga Spessivtseva dans "Les créatures de Prométhée" - btv1b7002324z.jpg
• File:Olga Spessivtseva (dans "Les créatures dee Prométhée") - photo Lipnitzki - btv1b7002365w.jpg
• File:Olga Spessivtseva (dans "Pavane") - btv1b7002400w.jpg

Rosenzweig τ 16:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Files found with Special:Search/Lipnitzki

French photographer Boris Lipnitzky died in 1971. So these photos are not in the public domain in France, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2042 (no URAA problem then).

• File:Kerttu Wanne (1932).jpeg
• File:Léone Nogarède dans Mariana Pineda 1946.jpg

Rosenzweig τ 16:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Finna publishes information from museums, which may have bought rights to publish it. The description of the image File:Kerttu Wanne (1932).jpeg (Finna-record) has marked license as CC BY 4.0. It is NOT public domain but Creative Commons license, which is allowed in Commons. Ipr1 (talk) 06:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I doubt that this small Finnish museum bought rights from the Lipnitzky studio. It does not seem plausible. --Rosenzweig τ 09:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Museum in question is Sibelius-museum (). Finna is the common platform that different museums and libraries use. And as I said, it is CC-licensed, not public domain, there is a difference. Ipr1 (talk) 14:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I do know the difference between free licenses and the public domain. The CC license being correct is the thing that I doubt. --Rosenzweig τ 15:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

And here's an example why I think so: is a photographic portrait of Jean Sibelius as part of the collection of that museum. The photographer (which they credit) is en:Daniel Nyblin, who died in 1923. So his works are in the public domain in Finland and everywhere else. But the museum says the photo is under a CC BY 4.0 license. So it seems they do not know when a photo is in the public domain. Why exactly should I trust them to be careful and correct with the objects they label with this CC license? To me, this seems to be yet another case of a museum/archive/etc. adding a CC license label to all (or most) of their scans without really doing research about the copyright situation. And as I wrote, it is not plausible. If the archive of that museum had inherited or bought the whole estate of some photographer, including the (copy-)rights attached to it, and decided to release it all under a free license: Fine. I don't see the Sibelius Museum having acquired the Lipnitzky estate though. --Rosenzweig τ 15:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Usual thing is that museum acquire a part of some collection that is of interest to them - not a whole collection, that would not be in their interest. Photography museums may acquire larger photographic collections either directly or by donations. Museums dealing in paintings may acquire a painting that would be a necessary piece to their collection. But museums can acquire different kinds of artifacts such as information related to students of a conservatory. Ipr1 (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

And I think that it is rather unlikely that when acquiring these individual pieces they also acquire the copyrights which are attached to them, at least not to a degree that would actually allow them to release these works under a free license. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Moussa Medella (cropped).jpg

Cropped version of an image deleted for no licence. Star Manatee (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Files found with Special:Search/"2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest"

Photos "submitted by amateur photographers" for a photo contest as per https://www.flickr.com/photos/blmoregon/albums/72157677708027983/ No indication that they have been created by BLM employees and are thus public domain or CCBY as claimed.

• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (32911726700).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (33139279532).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (33139279932).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (33139281492).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (32480141373).png
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (33139277142).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (32451897824).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (32480142603).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (33139279582).jpg
• File:1st Flat Smokey 3 (32911735260).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (33139276952).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (33139276722).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (32911735300).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (32911726870).jpg
• File:3rd Selfie 2 (32911734150).jpg
• File:2017 Land of Umpqua Photo Contest Winners (32911735180).jpg

~TheImaCow (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete, agreed. vip (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep Such contest implies sometimes tthat you give up your rights to the organisator. I didn't found the rules for this 2017 contest however I found an archived version ot the 2025 contest rules , the point 10 is very clear, I quote: "The photos become property of the event organizers and may be used by the sponsoring agencies in future publications, websites or programs." This seems realistic and reasonable to think that it was the same in 2017. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

  "The photos" != "the copyright of the photos". --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

That being said, if kept, I think {{PD-USGov-BLM}} should be removed from the files because the photos were not taken by BLM employees, and just let the CCBY licenses. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Preparing for Shabbos with Fiveish.jpg

No sign at listed source that this material has a Creative Commons license NatGertler (talk) 18:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Russia 3569 - Napoleon in Egypt (4165342393).jpg

Author died in 1955, PD in Poland 2026 + URAA. 93.159.63.158 19:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Narcyz Witczak-Witaczyński - Obraz "Bem pod Ostrołęką" (107-355-1).jpg

Author died in 1955, PD in Poland 2026 + URAA. 93.159.63.158 19:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Information on the Site of the Source:

"27. Archive group No. 107: Photo archive of Narcyz Witczak-Witaczyński (1914-1918,

1921-1939). Public Domain" Mewa767 (talk) 22:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

There aren't such claim in https://audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/252541/ 93.159.63.158 21:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Fred Linhares 2023.jpg

The flickr source says that this image is not by Agencia Brasilia which would make it OK but "Foto: Vinicius de Melo/ Secretaria da Mulher"--a third party. So, this image cannot be kept without COM:VRTS Leoboudv (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:A View from a House, Oblastnaja 1.jpg

The comment by the uploader "Uploaded a work by Jane Evgeniia Dubrov from Permission granted by the copyright holder Jane Evgeniia Dubrov, via email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 19 April 2025. with UploadWizard" notwithstanding, even if the VRT accepts the email of permission, this picture has no educational value, is poorly framed and is out of scope for commons. Permission does not guarantee inclusion, it simply gives evidence of permission 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

 Speedy delete note that EXIF data states "Author Yakov DUBROV", who is not "Jane Evgeniia Dubrov" referred to above. Unless the email to COM:VRT covers this issue, this is a simple copyvio issue 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Gustave de Smet 014 (38744593032).jpg

Copyvio. This image was originally uploaded to Flickr - the flickr uploader mistook this painting by Léon De Smet (died 1966) for one of his brother Gustave (died 1943). The painting is signed with the monogramme "LDS" in the red circle. As the works of Gustave have entered public domain, those of Léon however, have not. Henxter (talk) 22:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Logotype-Knowit-Digital-Black.svg

This file was initially tagged by Osmo Lundell as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Has been uploaded by possibly a member of the company but there is no clear permission that this logo should be used under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Uploader User:Knowitfi Convert to normal DR, logo appears to be under COM:TOO Finland. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. Are you sure it falls under the examples set in COM:TOO Finland? The example set under the logos (K-Market) states that usage in a parody or satire piece is acceptable. I'm pretty sure that this logo shouldn't be in free use unless a company rep confirms that it can be used freely even for commerical purposes. --Osmo Lundell hey 23:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

After reading the Finnish Copyright advice boards answer I quoted above thoroughly, I had to scrape away my earlier comment; this logo does not go over the threshold of originality. Sorry @Tvpuppy! I'll change it to normal deletion request now. --Osmo Lundell hey 23:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)