Commons:Verifiability
- English
- español
- 日本語
- Deutsch
- français
- 中文
- русский
- italiano
- português
- polski
- Nederlands
- العربية
- Afrikaans
- الدارجة
- مصرى
- অসমীয়া
- asturianu
- azərbaycanca
- تۆرکجه
- беларуская
- български
- भोजपुरी
- বাংলা
- bosanski
- català
- کوردی
- čeština
- чӑвашла
- Cymraeg
- dansk
- Ελληνικά
- Esperanto
- eesti
- euskara
- فارسی
- suomi
- Frysk
- galego
- گیلکی
- ગુજરાતી
- Hausa
- हिन्दी
- hrvatski
- Kreyòl ayisyen
- magyar
- հայերեն
- interlingua
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Ilokano
- íslenska
- ქართული
- Qaraqalpaqsha
- қазақша
- ಕನ್ನಡ
- 한국어
- कॉशुर / کٲشُر
- kurdî
- Latina
- lietuvių
- Minangkabau
- македонски
- മലയാളം
- Bahasa Melayu
- မြန်မာဘာသာ
- Napulitano
- नेपाली
- ଓଡ଼ିଆ
- ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
- română
- русиньскый
- sicilianu
- Scots
- سنڌي
- srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
- တႆး
- සිංහල
- Simple English
- slovenčina
- slovenščina
- shqip
- српски / srpski
- svenska
- தமிழ்
- తెలుగు
- тоҷикӣ
- ไทย
- Türkmençe
- Tagalog
- Türkçe
- татарча / tatarça
- українська
- اردو
- oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча
- Tiếng Việt
- ייִדיש

It is not a Commons policy or guideline, and editors are not obliged to follow it. Please update the page as needed, or discuss it on the talk page.
Commons does not require reliable sources or any independent evidence that an image or other file contains what it purports to contain. The author's or uploader's claims are normally accepted unless there is reason to doubt them.
Images and other files that are "known wrong", such as maps with outdated or disputed borders, may still be acceptable within the Commons:Project scope.
That said, if there is a reason to doubt the description, then contributors can attempt to update the description, or, in some cases (such as an unlabeled photomontage that amounts to a hoax), send the file to Commons:Deletion requests.
See also
- Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view – policy
- Commons:Overwriting existing files – policy
- Commons:Disputed territories – essay
- Commons:Evidence-based mapping – essay