Review
(criteria) |
 Oppose A great image, and meets most criteria except #4: the description does not adequately explain the measurement process. It is not self-evident from the animation why the 0.07 is taken. Those looking to use this image would have to know how to use a Vernier caliper already in order to explain what's going on. I will gladly change to support if this minor problem is corrected. – flamurai 08:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC) Oppose I agree, it's too hard to get why the 0.07 value is selected. /Daniel78 11:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 Support Issue fixed so changing my vote. /Daniel78 15:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 Done - And please feel free to improve my poor English -- Alvesgaspar 11:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)- Support. Now meets all the criteria. --MichaelMaggs 13:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support per above. – flamurai 17:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support per above. - Till 11:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support An oustanding example of encyclopedic dynamic documentation --Foroa 14:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support per above • Rohan T 17:48, 8 June 2008
Result: 6 support =>
Promoted. -- Slaunger 19:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
|
