Review
(criteria) |
 Comment Not sure if geocoding is relevant here - can easily provide if requested.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC) Request Yes, geocoded data would be a plus, as this image refers to a specific location. --Myrabella (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Request I am ready to support this nomination, even if this ship was never completed for sea service, but the description should indicated that it is a retouched picture, digitally altered from its original version. In particular, colors are rather different from those of the source. --Myrabella (talk) 00:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 Done Thanks for help. As an aside, do you think the level adjustment was a good idea (so I know for future uploads).--Nilfanion (talk) 21:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The image has been well improved IMO ; for future uploads, what's important is to point out the photo manipulations, if there is any. --Myrabella (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 Support OK now, criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
|
