File:AlYaquob2.jpg

Sorry, but there is no FoP in the UAE. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.62.193.194 19:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Kept: all possible FOP issues are DM Jcb (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

File:AlYaquob2.jpg

No permission. 84.61.170.180 09:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Keep - permission clearly stated - Jcb (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Delete: No permission from the architect: the buildings are under copyright (and no FOP). Buddy431 (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  • That argument has been clearly addressed at previous closure (please not that this delete-vote has been placed by a single purpose account, that may be connected to the Fernrohr/84.*.*.* user) - Jcb (talk) 23:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Delete Prominently depicts at least 3 skyscraper designs - I'm pretty confident at least one of them rises above the level of copyrightability in the UAE (particularly the one on the left featuring some kind of decorative reflective surface. Jcb never offered any justification for his claim of de minimis. Dcoetzee (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I can imagine the doubts about the left building. Since that building is not the subject of the picture, it could be cropped away to resolve this issue. Jcb (talk) 10:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
    • That would be fine with me. The central building is a simple square design and also under construction, so it does not concern me. Dcoetzee (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
      • Done. Jcb (talk) 10:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
        •  Keep I'm still concerned about the building on the right, but less so. It's good enough. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason to delete.--Trixt (talk) 08:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)