Commons:Deletion requests/2025/06/17
June 17
File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 06.jpg
Per COM:FOP Uzbekistan, there is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan. The design is gorgeous, but unfortunately also far beyond the threshold of originality in the United States (and likely Uzbekistan, if we have any case law on the subject). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- First read this law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. It says: results obtained by technical means intended for production of a certain kind of work without the performance of creative activities by a person directly aimed at the creation of an individual work. Thanks. Jamshid Nurkulov (Diskussion) 00:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- The full quote is, "The following shall not be objects of copyright: ... results obtained by technical means intended for production of a certain kind of work without the performance of creative activities by a person directly aimed at the creation of an individual work." That basically means that works under an undefined threshold of originality (i.e., purely functional) works do not attract copyright. That covers items such as File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 04.jpg and File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 01.jpg. However, the item in discussion here features a brick road, a tower, and various elements of what look like mosque design (minaret, windows, dome). There is a lot more creativity involved than a mere "technical" design. Mass production, which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- "...which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design", the design of Uzbek banknotes and postage stamps also includes mosques, towers, etc. According to your definitions, they can also be considered the work of a designer. Jamshid Nurkulov (Diskussion) 02:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- EVerything can be considered the work of a designer. Sebring12Hrs (Diskussion) 09:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, everything can. The only reason Uzbek banknotes are not considered copyrighted is because of a separate term in the copyright law, i.e., symbols of the state. See COM:CUR Uzbekistan. In other countries, currency may be copyright protected; the United Kingdom is a fairly prominent one. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- EVerything can be considered the work of a designer. Sebring12Hrs (Diskussion) 09:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- "...which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design", the design of Uzbek banknotes and postage stamps also includes mosques, towers, etc. According to your definitions, they can also be considered the work of a designer. Jamshid Nurkulov (Diskussion) 02:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- The full quote is, "The following shall not be objects of copyright: ... results obtained by technical means intended for production of a certain kind of work without the performance of creative activities by a person directly aimed at the creation of an individual work." That basically means that works under an undefined threshold of originality (i.e., purely functional) works do not attract copyright. That covers items such as File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 04.jpg and File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 01.jpg. However, the item in discussion here features a brick road, a tower, and various elements of what look like mosque design (minaret, windows, dome). There is a lot more creativity involved than a mere "technical" design. Mass production, which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Logo of the Royal Australian Navy.svg
This file was initially tagged by Safes007 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a logo version of the Navy badge created in 2002 (https://www.navy.gov.au/about-navy/history/customs-traditions/official-badge-design-history) However, it is widely in use for representing an important educational subject -- not clear if there is an exception that would apply Sadads (Diskussion) 00:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen There are no exceptions for copyright on Commons, however someone should let local projects using this image know, as they may have exceptions themselves. The Squirrel Conspiracy (Diskussion) 01:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benjamim31 (talk · contribs)
Out of scope / potential copyvio: AI-generated images of Street Fighter characters.
- File:Renji Ishisaki (27966).jpg
- File:Polly Dankworth.jpg
- File:Renji Ishisaki.jpg
- File:Hana Ishisaki.jpg
Omphalographer (Diskussion) 00:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Edward I (king of england)image01.png
Out of scope: likely AI-generated faux-historical painting. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 00:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Edward II (king of england).jpg
Out of scope: another likely AI-generated faux-historical painting. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 00:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Roller docker Update.png
Out of scope: badly AI-upscaled image. The image model seems to have misunderstood the shape of these tools and has rendered the one in the lower right as a single, strangely shaped mass of plastic. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 00:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen as an extremely badly-interpreted heavy AI upscale with no COM:EDUSE for showing what roller dockers look like or how they work. In real life, the rollers are not the blobby, organic lumps of plastic depicted here. They roll rather than being solidly connected to the handle. The handles do not grow out of the finger of the user. The point of them is that when rolled across pastry they leave holes behind (the upscaling process has decided that the pastry looks better completely flat and smooth). Belbury (Diskussion) 07:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:56219830 8539ddf5-a8ff-45e6-9c24-66119f158a75.png
1930s or 1940s photograph, presumably British. Need an actual source to determine copyright status of photograph because this is not an own work. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 00:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten Attribution corrected. --RAN (talk) 04:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Reddit credits Wikipedia, neither of which is a source. This was published somewhere, and URAA likely applies. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 18:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ottoman cuisine.png
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a display of food. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 00:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen AI images are inherently inaccurate. There surely are actual photos of Ottoman cuisine. The Squirrel Conspiracy (Diskussion) 00:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy. How did you know that the image was inaccurate, when it actually showed for example a plate of dolma? Mohmad Abdul sahib 03:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:5e centenaire Jacques Gélu.jpg
Old French photograph published by Cliche Brosse (see lower right). Not an own work, need publication date to determine copyright status and more information on Cl. Brosse. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 00:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for your attention. Here is the website where you can find information about the photographs from this anniversary ceremony. Best regards.
- https://www.patrimoine-embrunais.fr/photorama2.php?lng=fr&pg=909&tconfig=0 IsidoreHendrix (Diskussion) 08:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, 1932 is possibly public domain. But we need to know when Brosse died, if he died before 1955, then it's PD in France, if he died before 1938, there are no URAA issues. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 18:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:5th Archbold expedition to New Guinea. March 4, 1956 to February 1, 1957 (IA 5tharchboldexpe00bras).pdf
1950s handwritten notes by Leonard J. Brass (1900-1971). Undelete in 2042. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 00:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:62 rgt fanteria.png
Italian coat of arms, could still be copyrighted. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 00:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Lapide Pino Amato.jpg
Modern Italian monument, writing may be below ToO but wasn't sure. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 00:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Serra del Negrete en Utiel.jpg
Metadata says source is Facebook. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 00:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Flag_Australia_tasmania.png
The image was tagged as Template:PD-flag when first uploaded. Now, the license has been depreciated for some time and still has not been relicensed, even after telling the uploader. Speedy contested, brought here. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- The wholesale deletion of all media with a license tag recently deprecated (not even voided) is tantamount to invalidating the security of using any license tag at all. What would be the point in ever uploading any media with any license tag? ¦ Reisio (talk) 00:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Behalten Image is pd-ineligible. -Nard the Bard 23:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Flag Australia tasmania.png
Almost redundant to the SVG. ErrrrrWhat (Diskussion) 00:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pissarro - chestnut-trees-at-louveciennes-1872.jpg
very bad quality, very low resolution better 2 files File:Camille Pissarro - Bois de châtaigners à Louveciennes - Nelson-Atkins Museum (PD 233).png, File:Camille Pissarro - Bois de châtaigniers à Louveciennes (1872).jpg Oursana (Diskussion) 00:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Inazuma Break V2.jpg
Copyrighted by something i don't know. Vitor Hello? 01:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pissarro - orchards-at-louveciennes-1872.jpg
very bad quality, very low resolution better File:Camille Pissarro - Vue sur le village de Louveciennes - Minneapolis Institute of Art (PD 166).jpg Oursana (Diskussion) 01:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pissarro - road-to-saint-germain-louveciennes-1871.jpg
very bad quality, very low resolution, better File:Camille Pissarro (French - Louveciennes, Route de Saint-Germain - Google Art Project.jpg Oursana (Diskussion) 01:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:ChatGPT Image Jun 16, 2025, 11 40 05 AM.png
Was created to replace File:Children in blue and pink.jpg on the English Wikipedia article on Gender Bias, but enwiki bans AI images in most circumstances and the existing photo was perfectly fine. Out of COM:SCOPE. The Squirrel Conspiracy (Diskussion) 01:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- This image was created first and then replaced by the second image (taken from a related page), as it was later decided to be more suitable than this one. However, either way, it's no longer needed for enwiki. Jamarr81 (Diskussion) 01:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pissarro - stagecoach-to-louveciennes-1870.jpg
very bad quality, very low resolution better File:Camille Pissarro 035.jpg Oursana (Diskussion) 01:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pissarro - the-road-from-versalles-to-saint-germain-at-louveciennes-1872.jpg
very bad quality, very low resolution better File:Camille Pissarro - Le Relais de poste, route de Versailles, Louveciennes, neige (PD 214).jpg Oursana (Diskussion) 02:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pissarro - the-road-to-versailles-at-louveciennes-1870.jpg
very bad quality, very low resolution, 2 better files File:Camille Pissarro - Route de Versailles, Louveciennes - 1955.828 - Clark Art Institute.tiff, File:Pissarro - Route de Versailles, Louveciennes, 1870.jpg Oursana (Diskussion) 02:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:241130 Jiyeon MMA.jpg
Unused image. DaynneDarrylleDelosSantos (Diskussion) 02:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Park No. 474 Chicago Illinois.jpg
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the US has no freedom of panorama for 3-dimensional artworks in public places, and sculptor George Segal only died in 2000, so it will be under copyright until Jan 1 2071. I have challenged this because I do not believe we can speedy due to FOP. This statue is from 1986, so there needed to be a valid notice on the statue OR if lacking that it needed a valid repair of the notice by its creator. I do not know if it has that, but many many many statues did not, so it needs more investigation. Therefore a speedy is inappropriate. There is a decent chance this is free; depends on what is on the statue. PARAKANYAA (Diskussion) 02:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- This would seem to be the opposite of the precautionary principle. DS (Diskussion) 13:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- That's why I did the DR, so we can get more information. We cannot do a speedy based on something as complicated as FoP (that is what I have been told in the past). There are two pieces of information we need to know here. PARAKANYAA (Diskussion) 20:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm the photographer, and as a practical matter, I already went ahead and reuploaded the photo on wikipedia with fair use rationale in the event this is deleted on commmons. Shotgunheist (Diskussion) 13:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Flag of Song Dynasty (China).png
Original research. Konno Yumeto 13:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Behalten per COM:NPOV:
Commons is not Wikipedia, and files uploaded here do not necessarily need to comply with the Neutral point of view and No original research requirements
. If you believe the filename is not appropriate, consider Commons:File renaming. --Wcam (Diskussion) 14:25, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Files which are COM:INUSE, by definition, cannot be out of scope. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Flag of Song Dynasty (China).png
Fictional flag. Maybe original research and out of scope. And now the flag is only used in user pages and user talk pages. Saimmx (Diskussion) 02:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 05:36, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- This image does not qualify for COM:INUSE since it is only used in user pages (3 times in zh-wiki) and user talk page (1 time in th-wiki). Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 10:39, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pissarro - landscape-near-louveciennes-1870.jpg
very bad quality, very low resolution, better File:Pissarro - View from the Versailles Road, Louveciennes, 1870.jpg Oursana (Diskussion) 02:41, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:ئەردەڵان بەکر.jpg
Not an own work. This user has uploaded several false own works. 186.175.145.243 02:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:دزێکی ڕاستگۆ لە نووسینی فیۆدۆر دۆستۆیەڤسکی.jpg
Not an own work. This user has uploaded several false own works. 186.175.145.243 02:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:مێردی ھەمیشەیی.jpg
Not an own work. This user has uploaded several false own works. 186.175.145.243 03:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:سەنا بەرزنجی.jpg
Not an own work. This user has uploaded several false own works. 186.175.145.243 03:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:ھاوپا.jpg
Logo for NeoNazi admins? No scope 186.175.145.243 03:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Photo of mural in Brewers Passage, Hereford UK.png
No FOP in UK for graphic works DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 03:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Photo of a mural on The Commercial, Hereford UK.png
No FOP in UK for graphic works DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 03:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't know about this. It certainly is a mural and I don't have any permission from the copyright owner. I will engage with the council which commissioned the murals (there are a series of them) to seem if we can get some properly licensed images. Thanks for pointing it out. I support the deletion.Likeaword (Diskussion) 08:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:30 Mar - 1 of 1.png
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 03:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I was unaware of this and now I am I support the deletion. Likeaword (Diskussion) 08:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Every Corner Holds a Memory.png
No FOP in UK for murals (graphic works). DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 03:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I was unaware of this and now I am I support the deletion. Likeaword (Diskussion) 08:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Forever Flowers (Shifting Borders).png
No FOP in UK for murals (graphic works). DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 03:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I was unaware of this and now I am I support the deletion. Likeaword (Diskussion) 08:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Our Wild Heart.png
No FOP in UK for murals (graphic works). DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 03:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I was unaware of this and now I am I support the deletion. Likeaword (Diskussion) 08:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Museum of the Mausoleum of the Nanyue King 004.JPG
The author of this photo did not authorize me to distribute it, so I request to delete it. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 03:49, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zeng Xianzhi 4.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1937, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zeng Xianzhi 5.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1945, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zeng Xianzhi 6.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Nice link it says " A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. " Victuallers (Diskussion) 07:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zeng Xianzhi 7.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zeng Xianzhi 8.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ben Huan 1950.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ben Huan 1950s.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ben Huan about 1950s.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Bing Xin 1949.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Bing Xin 1951.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Lei Jieqiong and Xie Bingxin.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1930s, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Bei Shizhang 1950s.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhou Youguang and Zhang Yunhe 1938.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1938, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhou Youguang and Zhang Yunhe 1953.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhou Youguang 1930s.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1931, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhou Youguang 1947.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhou Ruchang 1939.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1939, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qi Gong 1955.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qi Gong 1960.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qi Gong- artist.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yang Jiang 1941.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1941, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qian Zhongshu and Yang Jiang in 1935.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1935, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qian Zhongshu and Yang Jiang in 1936.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 04:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1936, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zeefilmytv.png
Fake logo YehudaHubert (Diskussion) 05:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Logo Al Nimr Marine Services Company.jpg
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (Diskussion) 05:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:London-england-his-majestys-theatre-showing-phantom-of-the-opera-theatre-land-west-endenglanduk2023-2T6PP2M.jpg
Obvious copyright infringement with huge watermarks. WikiJonathan (Diskussion) 05:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Schnell Löschen per nom, copyvio of Alamy stock photo here: . Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:OPPO Find X8s+ Back.png
This file was initially tagged by Menakei as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- How should I handle this file? The lack of detailed EXIF information in the image happened because I processed the background. I can provide the unprocessed original photo. Should I wait for this current file to finish its process and get deleted before uploading the new one, or can I simply upload a new version of the photo (with the complete EXIF data) now? ——他人が悪い。自分は悪くない。他人だけが悪い。自分だけが??🧡X-SHLIED 10:07, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:2025 05 13 0936 - Flickr - Papinou49 26.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Port ymuiden (114) - Flickr - indyraf.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Waterfall-Austria - Flickr - chachasarra.png
This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Takahashi portlate.png
This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Danryckert.png
This file was initially tagged by Incall as no source (No source since) Krd 05:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ismet Inönü.png
This is an amateur photomontage. It causes disinformation. The original file is File:Ismet Inonu portrait.jpg Aybeg (Diskussion) 06:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Adolf Harnack (cropped).jpg
duplicate of File:Adolf Harnack.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (Diskussion) 06:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yang Jiang and Qian Zhongshu 1934.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1934, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Chen Yingning 001.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yuan Ying.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Чирхалю.jpg
The illustration is taken from a 1947 magazine article (https://djvu.online/jpg2/E/6/p/E6p6HEIQtxuKi/052.webp). The author of the article (Н.А. Нагинский), died in 1961. It is estimated that it will be transferred to the public domain no earlier than 2036. Borealex (Diskussion) 06:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Li Ao 1957.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Li Ao 1955.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Li Ao 1947.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Li Ao 1946.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Li Ao 1941.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1941, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Li Ao 1939.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1939, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Li Ao 1935.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1935, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:LaiGuo.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yao Xueyin 1955.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yao Xueyin 1949.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yu Junbo.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Liu Dezhi.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ma Ji 1950s.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Huo Baolin 1960.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Huo Baolin 1940.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1940, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Shao Xianghua 1955-family.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Shao Xianghua 1934.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen per nom, the photograph was not originated from China, but was in fact taken in the UK by photographer “Douglas Scott” (his signature can be seen at the bottom). According to the National Portrait Gallery , there isn’t a known death date for him. So, per {{PD-old-assumed}}, this image should be undeleted in 2055. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Shao Xianghua 1952.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Shao Xianghua 1955.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Shao Xianghua 1960.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yang Zhenning 1949.JPG
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ai Qing 1944.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:41, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1944, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ai Qing 1962.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:41, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:1947 Mao'wife He Jijen.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Ailing 1935.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Ailing 1946.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Ailing 1954.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Zedong and Xu Teli 1936.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen per nom, per the Carleton College , this photo is part of US photographer Haldore Hanson's collection (taken in 1938 during his trip in China). The collection was donated to the college in 1992, so assuming it was unpublished before, then it will enter PD in 2063 (life+70). Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Zemin 02.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Proof? Kemkhachev (Diskussion) 10:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken before 1943, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Tan Bing'e.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qian Weichang 1937.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1937, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qian Weichang 1946.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng 1952.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng 2.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng in 1952.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Nan Huaijin in 1945.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1945, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Same photo as the one here: File:Nan Huaijin Mount Emei.jpeg. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Liu Chunquan.jpeg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 06:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:立皇嗣宣明の儀のお写真 1.jpg
我上傳此檔案,但不確定版權,請求刪除以避免任何版權問題。I uploaded this file but I’m not sure about the copyright status. Requesting deletion to avoid any copyright issues. SophiaTrista (Diskussion) 06:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen the portrait of the Imperial Family are excluded from CC-BY.--Netora (Diskussion) 12:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ballymena railway station (2021).png
Falsely claimed as 'own work'; image source is stock photo with no clear evidence of permission from Alamy: https://www.alamy.com/train-station-image226659091.html Hullian111 (Diskussion) 06:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ballymoney station.png
Falsely claimed as 'own work'; image source is stock photo with no clear evidence of permission from Dreamstime: https://www.dreamstime.com/two-diesel-trains-crossing-ballymoney-train-station-northern-ireland-looking-towards-tracks-pedestrian-image290866324 Hullian111 (Diskussion) 06:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:立皇嗣之禮,2020年11月8日。.jpg
我上傳此檔案,但不確定版權,請求刪除以避免任何版權問題。I uploaded this file but I’m not sure about the copyright status. Requesting deletion to avoid any copyright issues. SophiaTrista (Diskussion) 06:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:立皇嗣宣明の儀のお写真 2.jpg
我上傳此檔案,但不確定版權,請求刪除以避免任何版權問題。I uploaded this file but I’m not sure about the copyright status. Requesting deletion to avoid any copyright issues. SophiaTrista (Diskussion) 06:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Guo Moruo 1942.JPG
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1942, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:1939 He Long and Nie Ronzhen.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, photograph taken in 1939, and I can’t find the photo being published before 1996. So the photo should be PD in China and the US per COM:CRT/China#Photographs. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Bai Mao Nv 1950.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:HongSe Niangzijun 1961.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:HongSe Niangzijun 1961.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Chen Qiang.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Marshal Nie Rongzhen.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Originally uploaded in 2009, grandfathered. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 18:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Ruifang 1947.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 1954.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 1956.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 1962.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 3.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 4.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 5.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 6.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 7.jpg
This photo was taken by Chinese photographer Lv Houmin (吕厚民), who died in 2015, so this photo is not in the public domain. Image also still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 8.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin younger.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:毛远新.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Zhixin younger.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Zhixin younger 2.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (Diskussion) 07:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Divine (cropped).jpg
Bórrelo por favor. 191.126.167.104 11:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Porqué? -- Ikan Kekek (Diskussion) 12:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photos-Celebs-attend-the-GQ35-Most-Influential-Young-Indians-909-2.jpg (thumbnail version of that one). --Platonides (Diskussion) 22:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Divine (cropped).jpg
Please this this is wrong information of rcprashant Rcprashant (Diskussion) 07:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Gillette Sensor Excel 05.jpg
Derivative, COM:PACKAGING. Quick1984 (Diskussion) 08:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Project 365 -55 240213 Let Flavour Flood Out! (8505451342).jpg
This file was initially tagged by YehudaHubert as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no supporting evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (Diskussion) 08:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Tableau artistique Koch céline.png
Painted in 2014 so obviously not in public domain. No permission given, no usage in WP Zen 38 (Diskussion) 09:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Peinture koch céline.jpg
Painted in 2013 so obviously not in public domain. No permission given, no usage in WP Zen 38 (Diskussion) 09:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:The struggle for supremacy.jpg
I am the uploader and I no longer want this file to be published. I mistakenly uploaded this file here. MdRezwanulAlam (Diskussion) 09:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Igors Litvjakovs.png
Part of a prank article on lvwiki, unknown source Papuass (Diskussion) 10:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Tables of x-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetry interest (IA tablesofxraymass5632hubb).pdf
In copyright per - https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/voyager_17297215. ShakespeareFan00 (Diskussion) 10:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FlyingPigs4You (talk · contribs)
Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful
- File:Flaccid penis without pubic hair curled up in a coil.jpg
- File:Flaccid penis without pubic hair.jpg
- File:Example of electrolysis method for permanent hair removal.jpg
- File:Flaccid penis point of view.jpg
- File:Example of pre cum.jpg
A1Cafel (Diskussion) 10:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all. No argument is needed. 186.174.205.255 22:18, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I mean nom is enough. Speedy. 186.174.205.255 22:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello A1Cafe,
- I respectfully disagree that my uploads are “Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful.” I believe these images are far better quality-wise than many of the other images. It was (is) my purpose to make a quality contribution here on Wikimedia. I did try to learn as much as possible about the process and importance of doing so in keeping with the project communities guidelines.
- Furthermore, these words from Commons Welcome were influential in my decision to share/contribute to Wikimedia:
- “ First steps tutorial
- Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.”
- Thank you for your support.
- All the best,
- FlyingPigs4You FlyingPigs4You (Diskussion) 22:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Kew Gdns Union Tpke td (2018-08-17) 01 - IND.jpg
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (Diskussion) 10:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:PeoplesVoteMarch IMG 6923 (42107520815).jpg
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (Diskussion) 10:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Niko Galešić.png
This file was initially tagged by CennoxX as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: License review NOT passed: Author is using all rights reserved. REAL 💬 ⬆ 11:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten The video was previously published under the Creative Commons Attribution (3.0 Unported) license on YouTube at https://web.archive.org/web/20250110002306/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8McUlG8WIE. Although YouTube allows users to change the license on videos, Creative Commons licenses are legally not revocable REAL 💬 ⬆ 11:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:«Чирхалю».jpg
Duplicates File:Чирхалю 2.jpg Borealex (Diskussion) 12:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Logo FuniviaVallvidrera.svg
{{Fake SVG}}, vector logo available: File:Fvallvidrera.svg. Leyo 12:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:3d methyl isocyanide.JPG
Really poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Methyl isocyanide. Leyo 12:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Files on Stèle Commémorative du Souvenir EH
The photographs infringe on the copyright for the sculpture. While it is simple, it is certainly creative. Also, the text is long enough to have a US copyright and probably one in France as well.
- File:Stèle du Souvenir Estrablin 01.jpg
- File:Stèle du Souvenir Estrablin 02.jpg
- File:Stèle du Souvenir Estrablin 03.jpg
- File:Stèle du Souvenir Estrablin 04.jpg
- File:Stèle du Souvenir Estrablin 05.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Il n’y a aucuns droits d’auteur car j’ai téléphoné à l’entreprise marbrerie Germain qui me donne son accord .
- vous pouvez visiter leur site internet : https://marbreriegermain.com/
- Merci de remettre la page correspondante sur Estrablin Historique.
- Good morning,
- There is no copyright because I called the company marbrerie Germain who gives me his consent.
- You can visit their website: https://marbreriegermain.com/
- Please put the corresponding page back on Estrablin History.
- best regards
- Jean- Louis Gay Jlgay38 (Diskussion) 15:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten The monument is a simple stone with a short text. I don't see how there could be a copyright. Yann (Diskussion) 17:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Ticket:2025062110003855 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Artistgala Göteborg 1990.jpg
I doubt Gunilla909 is the author of these pictures. Stigfinnare (Diskussion) 13:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:En sån folkfest-GT.jpg
Gunilla909 is not the writer, nor the author of the pictures. Stigfinnare (Diskussion) 13:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:10 000 Arbetet.jpg
Gunilla909 is not the writer, nor the author of the pictures. Stigfinnare (Diskussion) 13:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:New Barauni Pic.jpg
Small image, no EXIF. Uploader's other uploads were all copyvios. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Gränslöst.jpg
I doubt Gunilla909 is the author of this picture. Stigfinnare (Diskussion) 13:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Kalla fakta och heta rytmer.jpg
I doubt Gunilla909 is the author of this picture. Stigfinnare (Diskussion) 13:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Tänk dig själv.jpg
I doubt Gunilla909 is the author of this picture. Stigfinnare (Diskussion) 13:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Andrew B Greytak.jpg
Copyright violation, picture taken from webpage of the University of South Carolina without permission. We would need explicit permission via COM:VRT to host this file. ChemSim (talk) 13:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Hochschule Koblenz.svg
Logo ist veraltet, zudem sind die Nutzungsbedingungen unklar. Ob das neue Logo der Hochschule Koblenz im Rahmen der Creative Commons Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt wird,wird derzeit seitens der Hochschulleitung geprüft. Hskoblenz (Diskussion) 10:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Nur, weil das Logo ersetzt wurde, muss es nicht gelöscht werden. Zahlreiche ehemalige Logos werden in der Wikipedia weiter "ausgestellt". Grundsätzlich erreicht aber weder das alte, noch das neue Logo die nötige Gestaltungshöhe, um davor geschützt zu sein, Teil der Wikipedia zu werden. Es handelt sich am Ende nämlich bloß um paar Blöcke. Siehe dazu auch Schöpfungshöhe. Daher gilt: Behalten! --Cekay (Diskussion) 19:34, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per Cekay, but license was updated. ChemSim (Diskussion) 12:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Hochschule Koblenz.svg
Das Logo ist veraltet und nicht mehr gültig. Das neue Logo darf nicht unter Commons Lizenz verwendet werden. Daher löschen. Hskoblenz (Diskussion) 13:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Mir persönlich ist das egal. Ich habe mich allerdings schon weiter oben dazu geäußert. Beide Logos erreichen nicht ansatzweise die nötige Gestaltungshöhe, um den erwünschten Schutz zu halten. Das neue Logo besteht lediglich aus zweizeiligem Text in serifenloser Schrift und drei simplen geometrischen Formen mit abgerundeten Ecken. Es nicht der Wikipedia zur Verfügung zu stellen, um sich hier vollumfänglich zu präsentieren, ist aus marketingtechnischer Sicht ein Eigentor. Und wenn es um Bedenken geht, dass das Logo als Vektorgrafik frei im Internet zugänglich ist: Das ist es sowieso bereits, auf der Internetpräsenz der Hochschule. Wer damit niedere Absichten verfolgt, findet genügend Wege abseits der Wikipedia. Cekay (Diskussion) 20:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten "Old logo" is not a reason for deletion, also too simple for copyright protection. --Rosenzweig τ 18:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Hafiz Saad Hussain Rizvi.jpg
If the uploader is really the copyright holder of this image, supposedly from 2020, it's very strange that they chose to upload a copyvio last year at File:Saad Hussain Rizvi.jpg. And despite that image being swiftly deleted and editing the person's biographical article many times since, it's taken them until now to upload this image. According to tineye, published in many places before this upload. 2A0A:EF40:D72:F801:817C:5401:FEEB:8E8 14:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:StateLibQld 1 119800 Oxfordshire (ship).jpg
This image of HMHS "Oxfordshire" is too damaged to be usable. Wikimedia Commons has enough images of the same ship, in better condition. Motacilla (Diskussion) 14:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Explosions in different areas of Tehran following Israeli attack Mizan 13 June 30.jpg
description is misleading about what the image shows. Further, location & other details are inaccurate 184.75.207.138 15:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten, image is widely COM:INUSE. If you think the description and filename is inaccurate, you are welcomed to change it instead of having the image deleted. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 21:49, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Mizan News Agency by it's very definition is misinformation and propaganda. I dont think we can avoid this unless we refuse importing their photos Trade (Diskussion) 22:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Marche des Portraits à Bayonne le 25 août 2019 pendant le G7.jpg
Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (Diskussion) 15:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, bonjour, I don't understand this request. This picture has been taken by Michael Augustin, and I uploaded it in his name on Wikimedia Commons. Maybe you were present in Bayonne too that day @A1Cafel? There were so many journalists and photographs, you may have taken a picture close to this one, but not this one? Howogar (Diskussion) 11:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zojoji Temple (53080632447).jpg
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (Diskussion) 15:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Geibi line 20210403182431 (51333408362).jpg
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (Diskussion) 15:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Waste Management logo.svg
The uploader claimed “own work” using https://www.wm.com/location/new-mexico/nm/index.jsp as a source, but this page does not release the logo under a free license. This logo is a registered trademark of WM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, L.L.C. It was not uploaded by a company representative or with permission, and is not freely licensed or in the public domain. This appears to conflict with Commons’ licensing policy requiring freely licensed or public domain content. I’m requesting a review for potential removal or correction based on these grounds. JgonzaWM (Diskussion) 16:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten. Well below the threshold of originality. The logo is trademarked, but it is not eligible for copyright protection in the United States. When the original uploader listed the source as "Own work using: ", I believe they were trying to communicate that they did the work of extracting the SVG file from the PDF, not that they created the logo from scratch; I have updated the file description to clarify this. –IagoQnsi (Diskussion) 17:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Spusu Italia (screenshot CellularZ).jpg
screenshot of software Gambo7 (Diskussion) 16:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:SAngel1F.JPG
Incorrect IP rights, no owner of image rights. Fashionenterprise (Diskussion) 16:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Kathedralbasilika St. Maria, Trujillo, Peru (Catedral basílica de Santa María)Stammsitz des Erzbist com google android apps photos AlbumActivity.jpg
Doppelt und Fehler in der Dateiinfo Juniperi (Diskussion) 17:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Kommentar Wo ist das Duplikat dazu? Fehler in der Bildbeschreibung oder falsche Dateinamen können rasch behoben werden. Herbert Ortner (Diskussion) 20:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Kommentar The duplicate is File:Kathedralbasilika St. Maria, Trujillo, Peru,.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 18:24, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
File:ClaytonJensen Mechanismus V3.svg
{{Fake SVG}}, replaced by File:Mechanismus der Clayton-Jensen Reaktion.svg as correct SVG file. ChemSim (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Selena-and-yolanda-mc-240208-02-11d6c8.webp
Copyright violation, Screen grab from "Selena and Yolanda: The Secrets Between Them" Jnestorius (Diskussion) 17:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:CHURCHOLL BROTHERS KIT HOME.jpg
Description "Purelyfor personal use" hints, that this is out of project scope. Unused, no categories. Taivo (Diskussion) 17:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Haim Hitler. Photo © Israel Museum, Jerusalem, Eli Posner.jpg
Already exists in commons as File:חיים גיטלר. צילום © מוזיאון ישראל, ירושלים, אלי פוזנר.jpg . Also, the typo in the file name (it's Gitler, not Hitler) alone justifies removal Poliocretes (Diskussion) 17:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Behal-Sommelet Uebersicht V2.svg
{{Fake SVG}}, replaced by File:Overview reaction of Béhal-Sommelet rearrangement.svg as correct SVG file. ChemSim (talk) 17:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Himachal pradesh, kali su shiva, mandi 1810 ca.jpg
The image depicting Kali stepping on Shiva is problematic because it includes explicit and inappropriate content, showing sexual imagery involving Shiva. Such content violates Wikipedia's guidelines on respectful portrayal of religious figures, especially when it could be considered offensive or disrespectful to various communities. The inclusion of explicit imagery also does not align with Wikipedia's standards for encyclopedic content, where images should enhance the understanding of the article without promoting offensive or controversial depictions. This image should be removed to maintain the integrity and cultural sensitivity of the Wikipedia platform. Bromo34 (Diskussion) 18:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten image of historical artifact should be kept for educational pupouses. --Sailko (Diskussion) 18:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- this is what i have found from chatgpt and trying to tell you that it hurts my communnity felling and their is no evidence of that they had the sexual relationship
- Did Kali and Shiva Have Sex?
- No, there is no mythology or textual evidence that Kali and Shiva had sex in the way that might be implied by sexual imagery in art or popular depictions. Their relationship is primarily spiritual and symbolic.
- Sexual symbolism might be used in some tantric traditions or in certain depictions to represent the union of masculine and feminine forces, but even then, the focus is on the symbolism of cosmic creation, not physical intimacy.
- No, there is no mythology or textual evidence that Kali and Shiva had sex in the way that might be implied by sexual imagery in art or popular depictions. Their relationship is primarily spiritual and symbolic.
- Bromo34 (Diskussion) 18:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- The image is publicly diplayed in an
IndianAmerican museum, so there is not a policy in Commons for the removal of controversial artworks. --Sailko (Diskussion) 18:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)- if it is possible that you can send me the name of that museum then it would be a big help as their when i saw i get the reference of Cleveland Museum of Art which is in Ohio, United States. Bromo34 (Diskussion) 19:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- The image is publicly diplayed in an
- REQUESTING you to remove this picture because when i first saw it, i couldn't believe on this and never in my life seen this type of picture and after researching i found there was no sexual relationship written or described in any of the books. and whenever this photo came to mind it just kind of feel like anger and heart break that i couldn't do anything about this wrong image , that's why today i post the deletion request . PLEASE try to understand and do research by yourself . Bromo34 (Diskussion) 19:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- There is an entire category of this tantric theme, I apologize if it in any way offends your beliefs. The purpose of the image is to represent art, not to convey or promote any religious doctrine, which may be inaccurately portrayed. You can add a disclaimer to the images in this category, but there is no reason to delete them. --Sailko (Diskussion) 20:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten. This is a ~1810 painting. Regardless of whether you feel it is "offensive or disrespectful", it is nonetheless a real painting and is historically significant. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 20:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten per above. I understand nominator’s point on this, but unfortunately that is not a valid reason for deletion. In Commons, there are many other examples of images that are controversial and offensive to certain religions/beliefs, so this type of images is certainly not unique. I also find many images that I feel it’s offensive to me, but that doesn’t mean they should be deleted. Tvpuppy (Diskussion) 22:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten per Tvpuppy, and there is a rule in the Russian Wikipedia that literally translates as “Wikipedia content may cause you protest,” and it applies to this nomination. Incall talk 10:07, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Very old photo.jpg
Because it is photoshopped, wherein the white shirt person doesnt exist in the actual photo. శ్రీనివాస్110 (Diskussion) 18:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen. Personal photo from a non-participating user. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 20:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Tonton Flag.png
過去の版の「語通東」という文字に使われているフォントは「HG行書体」であり、このフォントはフリーライセンスでないから トラネコマン (Diskussion) 18:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Earthsea.svg
Derivative work of non-free media. The original map of Earthsea was first published in the US in 1968 in A Wizard of Earthsea, for which copyright was renewed (V1952P262). The map is available at https://www.ursulakleguin.com/maps-of-earthsea and is CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 according to https://www.ursulakleguin.com/maps-and-drawings. Maps of fictional worlds are protected as visual art, and the "original selection, coordination, and/or arrangement of cartographic features, such as roads, lakes, rivers, cities, or political or geographic boundaries" is protected by US copyright law.(Compendium 3rd ed. § 919.1) While this map has a different visual style, and some details have been simplified, it still bears substantial similarity to the original map. AntiCompositeNumber (Diskussion) 18:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Photo 3 - Parc des Braves - vue d'en haut, à l'est, le 5 mai 2025.jpg
Image ajoutée dans le cadre d'une formation Wikicommons. Oiselle irisée (Diskussion) 19:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Weak delete. The photo is free licensed and could be kept without problem. However, it can be understood that the upload by an inexperienced person was a test/exercise at uploading a photo from an external website and taken by someone else, and the uploader may prefer that it does not remain permanently in their uploads. -- Asclepias (Diskussion) 18:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aivarasds1 (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
- File:DS1 certifications.png
- File:DS1 GREEN LOGO.svg
- File:DS1 SERVICE LOGO.jpg
- File:DS1 LOGO BLACK.svg
- File:DS1 LOGO.jpg
Gnomingstuff (Diskussion) 19:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, these are not promotional images, these are just to clarify the context. They are being used on wikipedia's draft. Aivarasds1 (Diskussion) 05:48, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:The Worm Ouroboros (HT umn.31951002464517c).pdf
It's a US reprint of a British work with original British illustrations by Keith Henderson, who died in 1982. Undelete in 2053. Prosfilaes (Diskussion) 19:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- This is a US publication of a different edition known to have changes from earlier UK publications (e.g., this edition has end papers and a dust jacket with art work by Boris Artzybasheff) so country of origin is the US and for Commons rules, copyrights in others jurisdictions do not count. Commons only adheres to US and country of origin where that is defined as legal publication of a unique edition, which this is. —Uzume (Diskussion) 21:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Why? Again, the whole point of the rule is to make works on Commons in the public domain in a country with the rule of the shorter term. To let any US edition of a UK work count is basically to ignore that purpose, since this work is decidedly in copyright in any Berne Convention country in the world.--Prosfilaes (Diskussion) 22:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Дети мои (обложка романа Г. Яхиной).png
VRT-permission from copyright holder (publishing house? cover illustrator?) is needed. Taivo (Diskussion) 19:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Venazia logo.jpg
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (Diskussion) 19:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabriel Tissot (talk · contribs)
Out of scope: plain text. These tables of sports records all appear to have been created recently in Excel (i.e. they aren't official documents). If you are trying to create tables to use in a Wikipedia article, please read mw:Help:Tables.
- File:RECORDS HOMMES LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:EQUIPE DE FRANCE LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:RESULTATS FRANCAIS LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:FINALISTES FRANCAIS LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:RECORDS FEMMES LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:MINIMA IAAF LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:PROGRAMME & RECORDS LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:TABLEAU DES FINALISTES LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:DOPAGE LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:TABLEAU DES MEDAILLES LONDRES 2012.pdf
- File:FINALISTES FRANCAIS HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:RESULTATS FRANCAIS HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:EQUIPE DE FRANCE HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:RECORDS HOMMES HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:RECORDS FEMMES HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:PROGRAMME & RECORDS HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:TABLEAU DES FINALISTES HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:TABLEAU DES MEDAILLES HELSINKI 1983.pdf
- File:MINIMA HELSINKI 1983.pdf
Omphalographer (Diskussion) 19:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Обелиск кировчанам, погибшим в годы Великой Отечественной войны.jpg
- also file:Обелиск кировчанам, погибшим в годы Великой Отечественной войны.Киров.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture and probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is after-WWII monument. Taivo (Diskussion) 19:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:ReunionRadiantVolcanoFlag.png
Redundant; it's a duplicate of the SVG file. ErrrrrWhat (Diskussion) 20:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I usually nominate these PNGs for deletion because now we already have SVG files for these. ErrrrrWhat (Diskussion) 20:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten This PNG file was uploaded several years before the SVG file was created, and it appears to have been the base for the SVG version. So it is not a duplicate and should not be deleted. Also heavily COM:INUSE. --Rosenzweig τ 18:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- My apologies for that. I was trying to mean "Delete this PNG version ONLY". However, I will
Enthaltung myself from nominating this then. ErrrrrWhat (Diskussion) 20:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- My apologies for that. I was trying to mean "Delete this PNG version ONLY". However, I will
Files uploaded by Cnemo99 (talk · contribs)
Posibble COM:NETCOPYVIO: Dubious own work claims of derivative works without precise source informations. Incorrect dates, and therefore also incorrect licenses. Everything looks like it was copied from the web. Always uploaded "while editing on nl Wikipedia..." Some of the logos and other images could perhaps be kept with precise dates, source links, and a license changes. Hints in this regard from @EugeneZelenko: were ignored or not noticed at all. Summary: We have logos of unknown origin, whose authenticity we don't even know. We have photos without EXIF data, one also have Exif which the name of the photographer is "Niels Meussen." A ticket would likely be required for this. We have files that have been tagged with the {{Wrong license}} template, but this shouldn't be seen as a permanent solution, nor is it because the uploader isn't working properly. Therefore, all uploads should be checked and, if necessary, deleted if it is not possible to keep them.
- File:Zegel loge la Vertu Leiden.png
- File:Zegel loge Le Profond Silence Kampen.jpg
- File:Zegel loge Salomo Amersfoort.jpg
- File:Zegel loge Concordia ad Libertatum Sneek.png
- File:Zege loge Fides Mutua Zwolle.png
- File:Zegel loge De Waare Broedertrouw Gouda.jpg
- File:Embleem Grand Lodge of Ireland.jpg
- File:United Grand Lodge of England (emblem).jpg
- File:Embleem Grand Lodge of Scotland.png
- File:Embleem Grootoosten van Luxemburg.jpg
- File:Monument Liberte Cherie VM museum Brussel.jpg
- File:Logo Nederlandse Grootloge der Gemengde Vrijmetselarij.jpg
- File:Logo le-droit-humain Nederland.jpg
- File:Logo Grootoosten der Nederlanden.jpg
- File:Emblem Societas Rosicruciana in England.jpg
- File:Zegel District Grootloge van Merkmeesters in België.jpg
- File:Zegel District Grootloge van Merkmeesters België.png
- File:Logo VSKV.jpg
- File:Logo Louisa Stichting.svg
- File:Logo Huize het Oosten, Bilthoven.svg
- File:OSM breast jewel 1st degree.jpg
- File:Emblem Order of the Secret Monitor.jpg
- File:Emblem Royal Order of Scotland.jpg
- File:Borstjuweel Royal Order of Scotland.jpg
- File:Logo Le Droit Humain International.png
- File:Affiche tentoonstelling tegen de vrijmetselarij 1941.jpg
- File:Ritusentempelbouw logo.jpg
- File:Thirdtracing1.jpg
- File:Zegel loge Silentium, Delft.png
- File:Zegel Provincial Grand Lodge TheNetherlands Royal Order of Scotland.jpg
- File:Lewis, hijswerktuig om zware blokken steen te tillen.png
- File:Les Vrais Amis de l'Union et du Progrès Réunis (Bruxelles).gif
- File:Wijzerplaat toren logegebouw L' Amitié sans Fin Terneuzen.jpg
- File:Emblem Fraternity of Royal Ark Mariners.png
- File:Emblem Grand Lodge of Mark Master Masons.png
- File:Havenstraat Terneuzen ca. 1900-1910.jpg
- File:Schootsvel Abraham Spalter.png
- File:Schootsvel Royal Ark Mariners CMC.jpg
- File:Cordon La Compagnie Durable.jpg
- File:Historisch schootsvel Merkmeesters, collectie CMC.jpg
- File:Zegel loge De Eendraght nr. 22 RGLB.jpg
- File:Zegel District Grootloge van Merkmeesters in Nederland.jpg
- File:Constitutiebrief LCD 1986.jpg
- File:Vaandel Loge La Compagnie Durable Middelburg.jpg
- File:Glas in lood DOS Beestenmarkt.jpg
- File:Gedenkpenning 1907 Comte Goblet d'Alviella.jpg
- File:Vaandel loge de Zon Antwerpen.jpg
- File:Kringhuis NSB 9-8-43 Beeldbank Zld.jpg
- File:Stemkastje Vrijmetselarij - Muzeeum Vlissingen.jpg
- File:Vaandel loge L'Astre de l'Oriënt.jpg
- File:Tempel logegebouw L'Astre de l'Oriënt.jpg
- File:Gevelsteen logegebouw L'Astre de l'Oriënt.jpg
- File:Voorhof logegebouw L'Astre de l'Oriënt.jpg
- File:Logegebouw L'Astre de l'Oriënt.jpg
- File:Cordon L'Astre de l'Oriënt.jpg
- File:Afbeelding Vaandel AASR-631x1024.png
- File:Draagpenning Afdeling van de Meestergraad.jpg
- File:Arie Ruysch Zelandia illustrata 1820-1850 Zeeuws Archief.jpg
- File:Vlissingen Bellamypark de IJzeren Brug ca. 1900.jpg
- File:Voorpagina Vrijmetselaarsgezangen J. Verschuere Reynvaan.gif
- File:Zegel loge l'harmonie Lillo en Hulst.jpg
- File:Gebouw loge L'Astre de l'Orient - in de oorlog.jpg
- File:Gevelsteen Bellamypark 139-143 Vlissingen.jpg
- File:Lakzegel loge L'Astre de l'Orient 1948-1992.jpg
- File:Coosje Buskenstraat 2 Vlissingen - hcr delta - 1972.jpg
- File:Coosje Buskenstraat 2 Vlissingen - 1925-28 - gezicht Unitas.jpg
- File:Gedenkpenning L'Astre de l'Orient 200 jarig bestaan.jpg
- File:Zegel loge L'Astre de l'Orient Vlissingen.jpg
- File:Vervolgpaden Grootooster der Nederlanden 2024.jpg
- File:Bedelnap loge de Ster in 't Oosten.png
- File:Cordon De Ster in 't Oosten.png
- File:Fluweelen Burgwal 22 Den Haag, voormalig eigendom Orde van Vrijmetselaren.jpg
- File:Prins Frederik der Nederlanden - schilderij B. de Poorter ca. 1870.jpg
- File:Voorschoot Afdeling vd Meestergraad begin 20e eeuw.jpg
- File:Symbool Afdeling vd Meestergraad.jpg
- File:Detail ijzeren stoephek Loge De Ster in 't Oosten Zierikzee.jpg
- File:Zierikzeese courant 7 februari 1855.jpg
- File:Glas in loodraam loge De Ster in 't Oosten, Zierikzee.jpg
- File:Tempel loge De Ster in 't Oosten Zierikzee.jpg
- File:Voorhof loge De Ster in 't Oosten Zierikzee.jpg
- File:Sint Domusstraat Zierikzee 1953, na de ramp.jpg
- File:Wapen Orde van het Heilig Koninklijk Gewelf.jpg
- File:Portret M.C. de Crane (1843) door Johann Heinrich Richter.jpg
- File:Dr. J. Helder, schilderij T.G. van Hettinga Tromp.jpg
- File:Panden Sint Domusstraat Zierikzee, voormalige logegebouw.jpg
- File:Loge de Ster in 't Oosten, wapenschild met ponjaards.jpg
- File:Logegebouw Ster in 't Oosten.jpg
- File:Steenen Brug Zierikzee 1865-1871.jpg
- File:Historisch schootsvel HKG collectie CMC.jpg
- File:Kleine Tempel L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Troon Voorzittend Meester L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Grote Tempel L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Deurklopper grote tempel L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Comparitieruimte L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:7e graad L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Gevelsteen Havenstraat L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Cordon L'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Historisch voorschoot hoge graden.jpg
- File:Voorschoot hoge graden.jpg
- File:Zegel Orde der Hoge Ggraden.jpg
- File:Beleg van Sluis 1794 Cornelis Bogerts.jpg
- File:Zegel L'Amitie sans Fin 1 cutout.jpg
- File:Zegel L'Amitie sans Fin 2 cutout.jpg
- File:Zegel L'Amitie sans Fin 1.jpg
- File:Goessche Courant 2 april 1881- oproep concierge De Opgaande Ster.jpg
- File:Zegel loge l'Amitié sans Fin.jpg
- File:Tempel loge Scaldis.jpg
- File:Vaandel loge 'Scaldis'.jpg
- File:Eerste steen 'de Steen'.jpg
- File:Wandbord Merkmeesters loge 'Delta'.jpg
- File:Tempel loge 'Scaldis'.jpg
- File:Voorhof loge Scaldis.jpg
- File:Entree logegebouw 'de Steen'.jpg
- File:Cordon Scaldis 2e Opziener.jpg
- File:Scaldis gevelsteen.jpg
- File:Westwal 41 Goes.jpg
- File:Lokatie Prins van Oranje.jpg
- File:JanPersantSnoep.jpg
- File:De opgaande ster oud.jpg
- File:Zegel loge De Opgaande Ster.jpg
- File:Zegel loge Scaldis Goes.jpg
- File:Historisch schootsvel LCD.jpg
- File:Voorschoot LCD.jpg
- File:Middelburgsche Courant 12 januari 1891.jpg
- File:Tempel LCD.jpg
- File:Voorhof LCD.jpg
- File:Lakzegel la philantrope.jpg
- File:Moker des Gezags.jpg
- File:Zegel La Compagnie Durable.jpg
- File:Lokatie9 Schouwburg2.jpg
- File:Lokatie8 Hotel De Burg2.jpg
- File:Lokatie7 Waalse Kerk.jpg
- File:Lokatie6 Sint Sebastiaan.jpg
- File:Lokatie5 Schouwburg1.jpg
- File:Lokatie4 Groote Christoffel.jpg
- File:Lokatie3 Kloveniersdoelen.jpg
- File:Lokatie2 Wijnhuis.jpg
- File:Lokatie1 Hof van Holland.jpg
- File:Notulenboek 6nov1944 pagina.jpg
- File:Middelburgsche Courant 8 juli 1884.jpg
- File:De steenhouwer.jpg
- File:Voorgevel Logegebouw.jpg
זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Kommentar, I've already marked some files for speedy deletion because they were clear copyright infringements. So the list will get shorter. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Kommentar Commons definitely should have hard grace period for files tagged with {{Wrong license}}, may be longer than with No permission/source/license, but not infinite as of now. EugeneZelenko (Diskussion) 14:00, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Brighton Mural.jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Interim Financial Report.pdf
Out of scope: financial report from a Wikimedia event. Not sure who this was meant to go to, but it's not needed on Commons. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 20:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer Thanks for your communication. Our Wiki event team felt that financial matters related to the event be transparent to the Telugu wikimedia community, if I upload the details to commons and link to the project page. As a coordinator of the event, I took the responsibility to upload the statement prepared by me to commons. This is the idea behind uploading the statement to commons, the decision to delete the statement is left to you. Appreciate your quick observation. Vjsuseela Vjsuseela (Diskussion) 11:10, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mural for Plymouth Unitarian Church by Jack Pickup.jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:William Morris Graffiti in the parking lot adjacent to the William Morris Gallery in London.jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Wall Art in Sutton Surrey London.jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Camden Town (6419075899).jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Camden Town (6419244425).jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Camden Town (6419258563).jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Camden Town (6419272235).jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Camden Town (6418747697).jpg
No FOP in UK for graphic works. DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Leadingchannel.jpg
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The watermark casts doubt that the User is the copyright holder Nv8200pa (Diskussion) 20:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Бюст Азарова.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture and probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is 1969 statue, death year of sculptor N.N. Kozlova is unknown. Taivo (Diskussion) 20:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Chippenham Gardens street art (9192079425).jpg
No FOP in UK for murals (graphic works). DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:John Lennon Mural, Camden Town London (22906552924).jpg
No FOP in UK for murals (graphic works). DesiBoy101 (Diskussion) 20:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Knapp für Löschen Graffiti is usually fine since there's a low likely the artist will sue to due the legality but it's hard to tell if this is legitimate street art or a paid mural. So it should probably be deleted anyway just to be on the safe side. That said, I doubt there would be an issue with keeping it. --Adamant1 (Diskussion) 20:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:한성 동대문 화력발전소.png
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a very strange building. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 20:29, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:New Mogadishu International Airport Logo (AI generated).jpg
Out of scope: fictitious logo. If the airport doesn't have a logo, it doesn't have a logo. Don't make one up. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 20:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Busan port about 1900.png
Out of scope: unused AI-generated faux "historical photo". Omphalographer (Diskussion) 20:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:CCIT building.jpg
no FoP in Turkmenistan —Vorstehender, nicht signierter Kommentar stammt von Menakei (Diskussion • Beiträge) 16:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Rossi 2024.webp
Provável violação de direitos autorais. Se tratando de uma imagem de pessoa famosa, o usuário que adicionou a foto ao Wikimedia Commons não deu informação sobre a origem dela. Leandro M800 (Diskussion) 20:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Pojokelas.png
self promotional logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (Diskussion) 20:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Inherence EP line up.jpg
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The copyright holder in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (Diskussion) 21:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Inherence ccj.jpg
Very low-quality image from user only promoting this band Nv8200pa (Diskussion) 21:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Inherence Line up.jpg
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The author in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (Diskussion) 21:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Competidor Integral.png
Out of scope: unused, bizarre AI-generated illustration of a samurai/leopard robot playing soccer? Associated article es:Competidor integral was speedily deleted. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 21:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Fresh fledged Baby bird.png
This file was initially tagged by Menakei as No permission. Converting to regular DR, because I don't see why the own-work claim and the CC license provided by the uploader wouldn't suffice in this case. I've checked some of their other uploads and they seem to focus on photos of nature (e.g. plants). Their other photos were taken with an iPhone. All photos I've checked were taken with the same phone and have full exif data. This photo doesn't have exif data, but it is in line with the nature theme of the other uploads, and it somewhat looks cropped, which might be the reason why the exif data is missing. Is there reasonable doubt that the uploader is the photographer? Nakonana (Diskussion) 21:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Behalten - agree it's safe to assume uploader is the photographer; subject (a Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus) is a common species in the area (Cornwall, ref their first upload, of Bude in Cornwall) - MPF (Diskussion) 10:44, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- I just noticed that the image appears to be a screenshot (it's a bit hard to notice when viewing it on a mobile screen with dark wiki theme), but I still think that it's reasonable to assume that the photo is their own work. For example, they uploaded a photo of a plant (File:Spear Thistle with Bumblebee, Bude, Cornwall 1.jpg) with full EXIF data, and they uploaded a photo of a bee File:Bee working hard collecting pollen.jpg) with full EXIF data, and then they uploaded a screenshot of a bee on the same plant as the one in the first photo (File:Spear Thistle with Bumblebee, Bude, Cornwall 2.png). So, while the latter is a screenshot, it's still reasonable to assume that the uploader took the photo themselves because of the two photos with full EXIF data that pretty much show the same motive. Given that, it's also very well possible that they uploaded another screenshot of a photo they took (i.e. the nominated one) and for some reason also chose to upload the screenshot instead of the actual photo (or maybe it was accidental that they picked the screenshot instead of the photo). Nakonana (Diskussion) 16:05, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Tttyyddd66.jpg
The title and description are nonsense. There is no context from uploader. The image has no objective educational value. Nv8200pa (Diskussion) 21:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen. Unused photo of some snowy trees in an unidentified location; user has no other edits to provide context for this photo. This is an extremely common photographic subject - there are thousands upon thousands of similar photos in Category:Trees in snow alone - so we can afford to be selective. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 03:58, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:По маршруту "В лабиринте Васнецовских сказок".jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture and probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (Diskussion) 22:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Detail map flag of Ottoman Empire in the year.png
Based on the uploader's own description, it is clear that the sourcing is greatly exaggerated, primarily added to mislead contributors.. The map was initially created by this user to spam English Wikipedia. In accordance with the COM:EDUSE and COM:NOTUSED guidelines, this content is evidently irrelevant and devoid of educational value. Moreover, it is misleading. Riad Salih (Diskussion) 22:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:قضيب مختون.jpg
Bad quality, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:32, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Behalten The file is used in ar.wiki. Actually the quality is not so bad at all. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
File:قضيب مختون.jpg
One of many more. For me an F10. 186.174.205.255 22:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:John Wilde studio photo.jpg
Taken from a ©2025 page and uploader recognizes having no clue to rights. No need to wait for a permission for this 1983 photo which will not come from them. F1 SPEEDY but lets have a record here. 186.174.205.255 22:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Sotiris Spatharis.jpg
The application of this rule in this case looks a bit questionable. The fact that the hosting website doesn't give (?) any sort of information regarding the photographer of this portrait doesn't mean that there isn't any or that we dont them or that there are no copyrights for this file. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Copyright ownership is not particularly important: The file has no reason not to remain, since it meets the conditions under which it was added. It is also of a good degree of quality, which can help in the seemingly beautiful formation of the article, and it is an image that is appropriate for its topic. User:GMJM1234 2:07, 18 June 2025 (UTC) GMJM1234 (Diskussion) 23:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Regrettably copyrights is an important issue. In the picture the artist is quite old, therefore it's a 1960s-early 70s photo. Problem in the horizon... 186.174.32.249 23:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Русо за неделю до исчезновения.jpg
Out of project scope. Дима Г (Diskussion) 23:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Alex suarez.png
This is my original work but I would like it deleted. It is not being used on any pages. Hamcee (Diskussion) 23:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mas de Caballero (Serra del Negrete).jpg
Metadata says source is Facebook. Abzeronow (Diskussion) 23:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Cracker Country map.png
probably copyvio from the museum, photo in the left upper corner definetly is Hinnerk11 (Diskussion) 23:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- lower right corner looks like a commercial logo that's not free to use--Hinnerk11 (Diskussion) 23:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Löschen. This looks like an official map of the park - probably from a guidebook or wayfinding sign. No evidence it's freely licensed. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 04:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Image came from Wikimapia website which has a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike release for their content. Mgreason (Diskussion) 12:39, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- This graphic looks like it was created by the park, though, not by a Wikimapia contributor. If the park provided it under a permissive license, or if it was actually (improbably) created by a Wikimapia user, I'd want to see some specific documentation indicating that was the case - a blanket license on the site's content isn't sufficient here. Omphalographer (Diskussion) 17:11, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Image came from Wikimapia website which has a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike release for their content. Mgreason (Diskussion) 12:39, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Henri Jacquier.jpg
Couverture d'un ouvrage de 1994. Absence de mention des autorisations de déversement. Plusieurs photographies déposés par le contributeur ne possédaient pas les autorisations. --B-noa (Diskussion) 17:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)