Commons:Deletion requests/2025/04/25

April 25

File:Richard Campagna Kareokee (cropped).png

Better photo uploaded on wiki commons Regalxx99 (talk) 01:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Alan Kurdi Graffiti.jpg

I brought this image of a graffiti to COM:VPCOPY, hoping to be wrong about whether the graffiti is the derivative of one non-free photo. As it turns out, despite FOP given to artworks in Germany, the graffiti may be a derivative of multiple non-free photos of the same corpse found on a beach. One assumes that the graffiti is not a "derivative" because it doesn't exactly copy one of the photos or more. Another disagrees under assumption that even requirement for the graffiti to be this non-free derivative may be very, very minimal. Taking this to DR was suggested, so here I am doing this. George Ho (talk) 02:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Who assumed, who disagreed, who suggested and where can I find this discussion? --Plenz (talk) 07:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Carl Lindburg assumed and suggested; Grand-Luc disagreed. Either tap "COM:VPCOPY" or the following for further more: Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2025/04#File:Alan Kurdi Graffiti.jpg. George Ho (talk) 07:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you very much. So, all in all, the whole initiative came from you. I wonder what was your motivation. As for me, I am a determined enemy of preemptive obedience.
Anyway, let's find a solution.
Would you be satisfied if I change the red skirt into a green one and add a comment "For copyright reasons, the original red color of the shirt was changed"? --Plenz (talk) 08:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
preemptive obedience: Never heard of that before, so I'm looking at wikt:anticipatory obedience.
Your question doesn't address who owns the red skirt and whether photos of the red skirt have separate copyright different from the red skirt itself. COM:DW addresses matter of derivates, and COM:FOP US and COM:FOP Germany have different stances on freedom of panorama. I can't help wonder whether this is the complex question (fallacy?). George Ho (talk) 08:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
My question addresses your motivation for your deletion request. You're trying to assume the photographer's presumed future role and discuss presumed future arguments for deleting the photo. If you were that photographer yourself, I could understand your motivation. But you're not him. This matter could be completely irrelevant to you. That's why I have absolutely no desire to delve into the intricacies of various copyright laws. --Plenz (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
But you're not him. One of the photographers is a woman. This matter could be completely irrelevant to you. Don't know why you assume so. Besides using photos, how else can a graffitist/muralist depict that dead boy lying on the ground?
"Motivation"? Besides COM:PCP, I just don't want the project to be receiving legal challenges just for hosting this image. Also, before taking the image to DR, I initially didn't intend to nominate the image for deletion. Indeed, I took this to COM:VPCOPY as a precaution... or precursor to this DR nomination, hoping that others would've deemed the image free to use. However, the opinions were split/divided there, so I took this image here instead, citing laws and project policies and photographers' (or photographer's) rights of the photos, and hoping for any other opinions, like yours. George Ho (talk) 21:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Obama Milk (4080502801).jpg

This was sticker art, not graffiti, and no FoP for 2D works in USA A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)


  •  Weak keep This looks like a stenciled sticker created by street artist as opposed to a commercial product. So there wouldn't be other copyright concerns. It's also placed in a public place in a way that breaks the law. Meaning there's very little chance the artist themselves will sue anyone for reusing it. That said, I wouldn't be super upset if the image is just deleted. But I don't see why the same rule for regular graffiti wouldn't apply here. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Parallelepiped09 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own works: assorted resolutions, incomplete EXIF metadata, the uploader was found to have lifted pictures from multiple websites.

0x0a (talk) 03:14, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:El hadj Mohamed ben zamoum.png

AI generated; guy lived in 1795 but uploader lists as own work plus license. Looks AI generated AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:I must disguise my identity from others (9305883913).jpg

Crédit photo : Anne Lubrano, which means not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)


 Delete. Unlicensed derivative work - "street art by RNST". Omphalographer (talk) 05:16, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Revendication (29127165596).jpg

Crédit photo : Anne Lubrano, which means not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Trump graffiti in Paris.jpg

Crédit photo : Anne Lubrano, which means not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:A strange animal (14195160449).jpg

Crédit photo : Anne Lubrano, which means not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Delete per nom (misleading author of actual work depicted, the work itself might be copyrighted). ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Déjà vu... (9305882293).jpg

Crédit photo : Anne Lubrano, which means not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Ingemund Berulvsons

The bust was completed in 1955 by Ingemund Berulvsons (1900–1976). There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2047

A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Anti Trump Protest March London July 13 2018 (121) (29529104188).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Don't feed the deer 01.jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)


  • Keep per de minimis exception. Laurel Lodged (talk) 07:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delete per nom, the sign (a graphic work) is the reason for the photo and naming. What is the source of the sign and the images on it?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
    It's a public notice provided by a state agency Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
    See harp smybol which is the symbol of the state Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
    @Laurel Lodged: What agency? Exactly why would that agency's notices not be copyrighted? If they are copyrighted, exactly what license would apply and why?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
    The FoP for Ireland is only for ""works of artistic craftsmanship". The notice in the image is not only de minimis, it is also not a work of artistic craftsmanship. It looks like it was written by a 6 year old child. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
    @Laurel Lodged: 6 year old children have copyrights, too.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
  •  Unsure - The sign itself is certainly not de minimis, but I don't think the text is copyrightable, only the images/illustrations, which are fairly small parts of the image. They aren't in high resolution and could be blurred out and the photo would still be useful. Consigned (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Campusse der uni tü.jpg

This is image, is an own work to be used to "proof" a point. The items depicted have no reliable source, so we can say that there is no verifiabitlity and that it is original research Wuselig (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:ChatGPT Image 2025년 4월 14일 오후 03 47 43.png

Change the name of picture Jameseugene (talk) 05:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I made a mistake, I would like to rename the image, not deleted it. The new name I'd like to propose is 'Robert E. Park, Roderick D. Mckenzie, Ernest W. Burgess created by ChatGPT' Jameseugene (talk) 06:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by 6D (talk · contribs) with Tags: Recreated

Sorry, but there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in France and reuploaded, see

6D (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:LieMudRun Schlammrutsche 09 2023 Verein Hindernislauf FL.jpg

Copyright infringement (no release from copyright-owner [see exif-data] evident) and violation of personal image rights of the people depicted. Martin (Mpns/BD) 06:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Ist in Abklärung, Bildrechte/Einverständniserklärung sollten uns aber vorliegen, Feedback folgt ASAP. BG Annabelle/Bank Frick Bank Frick (talk) 08:43, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Shahedulla kaisar.jpg

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 07:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Shahedulla.jpg

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 07:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.jpg

Wrong license. I do not find the name of painter, but I think here we have copyright violation Yousiphh (talk) 10:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in Izmir, 1926 – portrait painting.jpg

Not used COM:ADVERT file Yousiphh (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Museum of Konstantin Vasilyev (Kazan)

Derivatives, the author died in 1976 (ru:Васильев, Константин Алексеевич). Non-free until 2047.

Quick1984 (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Enes osman aba.jpg

Not used COM:ADVERT file Yousiphh (talk) 10:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Lauro1954 (talk · contribs)

Propably Copyvio

Codc (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete The paintings are apparently by German painter Paul Brachetti (1895–1969). --Rosenzweig τ 16:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

File:LGO-COLR.png

Not used COM:ADVERT file Yousiphh (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Harbiye Yıldızı.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Cahangir bey Novruzov.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 10:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Cahangir bəy Novruzov Ailəsi ilə.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 10:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 03:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Cahangir bəy Novruzov.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 10:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Jahangir bey Novruzov with Ismet Inonu.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 10:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 01:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Nicat.Qədirov.jpg

Not used COM:ADVERT file Yousiphh (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Oleq Memmedov.jpg

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Rovşən Hüseynov.jpg

Not used COM:ADVERT file Yousiphh (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Sophiiesch (talk · contribs)

Advertising pictures - out of scope

Codc (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:ДАДнО-Р6478-1Т1.pdf

замінено файлом вищої якості Alexandrtovmach (talk) 11:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by DTAICHWOM SIMLOOA (talk · contribs)

Painting by living artist ANDRE BRASILIER (B. 1929) is still under copyright protection. See https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-6347028.

0x0a (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Lincoln Park Holiday Lighting - The sculpture is "The Promise of the Prairie" (1993) (23725275942).jpg

License checks out, but my understanding is that this pic fails Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Artworks_and_sculptures per the artwork by George Lundeen in the foreground. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Paul VI - Official portrait.jpg

Probably derivative work. I highly doubt that the "official portrait" of the pope (!) was taken by BastienM (talk · contribs). --Entbert (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I've now noticed that in this IP edit, it was claimed that BastienM is the heir of the creator. BastienM is the grandson of a French amateur photographer, but I still doubt that he is simultaneously the heir of a photographer taking the official portrait of the pope. --Entbert (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Majocancino14 (talk · contribs)

This appears to be a draft Wikipedia article oddly formatted as a collection of JPGs. In addition to being outside of COM:SCOPE, these files contain photographs of unknown origin and are therefore derivative works without a source. Permission from the photographers/copyright holders would be needed before these files could be hosted on Commons.

Marbletan (talk) 13:16, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Petty Port.jpg

This appears to be a case of COM:FLICKRWASHING. Photo copied from https://psychology.osu.edu/people/petty.1 . Eureka Lott 13:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by RandomG243 (talk · contribs)

User's other "collage" upload at File:Bakongo-pictures.jpgBakongo.jpg ("Ive done this" "My own work") consisted of two old images by other photographers found online and put next to each other, so it's likely that the same is happening here.

Belbury (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Jinx! User:Adeletron 3030 tagged the same four images as essential source and copyright information for all work incorporated in this file is missing while I was writing that, so this DR may be redundant if they time out with no response on sources. --Belbury (talk) 13:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Logos of China

Copyrighted logos.

沈澄心✉ 03:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - excepeted the last as it is unlikely to be a chinese logo (though about China). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Files in Category:Logos of China

Non-free logos. Calligraphy is copyright protected per COM:TOO China.

Wcam (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep for File:BTV 1958.png. In fact, the old Beijing Television (CCTV predecessor) logo was made in 1958, 67 years ago. Assuming that Wcam argue that calligraphy is copyright-protected in China, this one had its copyright expired more than a decade ago (Remember, China had 50 years copyright protection for many works as opposed to life+70 years in many developed countries), so (PD-PRC) might be apply for this case, no matter whether it above TOO in China (which is very low).  Delete for the rest. 114.4.214.189 13:04, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
    Copyright protection duration in China is indeed 50 years, but its US copyright was restored per COM:URAA (on the restoration date of 1 January 1996 which is within the 50 year duration). Images must be free in both the US and country of origin to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Wcam (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delete for
 Keep for File:BTV 1958.png. Strictly speaking, this is older version of calligraphy that its protection in China expired long time ago (assuming that this is not government work). In the United States, according to section 906.4 of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, typography and calligraphy cannot be protected by copyright in the United States, so the Chinese calligraphy cannot be protected by copyright in the US (hence URAA), or no evidence that this work was registered in the US before. Remember, just saying a file is URAA cannot be a sole reason for deletion. More than a proof needs to justify it. 2404:8000:1037:469:A56B:968E:1C04:B235 23:35, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
 Comment, according to the image description and w:zh:中国中央电视台台标#文字台标时期, the calligraphy in File:BTV 1958.png is written by Mao Zedong, which passed away in 1976. If this is true, then the calligraphy logo is copyrighted in China until 2027, which means we need to  Delete it. Tvpuppy (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Interesting, so this file can be undelete in 2027? We just lost it for 1.5 years. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Nope (33975950881).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 13:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:KINEMASTER-LOGO.svg

Probably a copyvio - I cannot find any evidence for the logo being released under CC-BY-SA-2.5. The provided source is just the image and looking on the website reveals nothing suggesting it, the only copyright info about the site given is "© KineMaster Corporation. All Rights Reserved." Looking on kinemaster.com is not helpful either. Schützenpanzer (talk) 15:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Speedy keep Actually, the uploader who upload this image didn't know about which the license are correct for this logo, because the uploader originally upload the image as an incorrect license (CC-BY-SA 2.5). It seems that the someone fix the license to correct one (as PD-Textlogo), and just the copyright info was revealed at websites doesn't mean that this logo was copyrighted (it also happened on all websites, well most of them also include simple logo that doesn't meet TOO), it's just disclaimer. Anyways, this logo doesn't meet threshold of originality in the country (remember TOO-South Korea), due to this logo being simple just consisted of letters and circles. 2404:8000:1037:587:AC39:61BE:A474:7350 09:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

File:New Taipei Metro logo new logo.svg

No license, no permission, complex logo exceeding COM:TOO Taiwan. Logos of state owned enterprises aren't government works (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:CSBC Corporation logo.svg). Wcam (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Delete In order for Commons to keep this file, it's going to need to either need to be too simple to be eligible for copyright protection in both Taiwan and the US, or it's going to need to be released under an acceptable free license per COM:L. While this logo probably is OK to treat as {{PD-logo}} per COM:TOO US, the same can't be said per COM:TOO Taiwan. Moreover, there's nothing to indicate that the logo has been released by it's original copyright holder, including what's written on page linked to above by Sinsyuan. This probably would be OK to undelete on English Wikipedia and relicense for local use as en:Template:PD-ineligible-USonly. It could also certainly be licensed as en:Template:Non-free logo on English Wikipedia if the consensus is that it's too complex to be PD even under US copyright law. In that case, though, there would be no way for the file to be used in so many articles or used in templates per en:WP:NFCC, and the only vaid non-free use would be in en:New Taipei Metro. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep I think... These look like VERY simple shapes/typefaces. However, if deleted on commons, I would request re-opening on en-wiki. The whole reason for deletion is that it was available here. Buffs (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
    Let me add to that. Near as I can tell this is nothing more than a stylized "N" or something similar. Even in Taiwan, I don't think it's copyrightable. I think TRADEMARK would apply and would get some protections, but not copyright. From looking at the examples in COM:TOO Taiwan, I'm not convinced this is eligible. HOWEVER, they appear to be inconsistent (I don't know local culture there, so I'm open to the possibility that I'm missing something). My  Keep stands. Buffs (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
    TOO is very inconsistent in Taiwan, yes, see wikipedia:Threshold of originality#Taiwan. Saimmx (talk) 17:18, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak keep per Buffs. I believe simple logos like this one are ineligible for copyright in the United States or countries where threshold of originality are roughly similar or higher than the US. In case of this file deleted from Commons (assume TOO-Taiwan applies for this case), we can undelete similar file at En-wiki and stated that the file is PD-Ineligible-USOnly. In any case, there's no evidence that this file can be put at local en-wiki as "fair use", even the source stats "© New Taipei Metro Corporation. All Rights Reserved". Remember, the copyright tags only apply for Taiwan in case of this logo, not so for the US or other countries where threshold of originality for logos are higher. 120.188.4.166 06:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Staalwerk in hal rond 1930.jpg

wrong date, probably copyright violation. Xocolatl (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This photograph of on-going works has been taken inside the hall of a ship-/construction yard and is reproduced directly from a print found in the archives of the company itself. The original photo has either been taken by yard personnel, or under contract from the yard, so GustowdB believes the copyrights rest with the yard. GustowdB has written the article as member of the yard's history-group. The photo gives a good sketch of the yard atmosphere in 1930. GustowdB (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
@GustowdB: If you think you have sufficient rights to upload the file here under a free license, please confirm it by sending a permission e-mail directly to Wikimedia Commons using the COM:VRT process. Thanks. --Rosenzweig τ 16:28, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Peter Muhlenberg Memorial bust detail.jpg

the US has no freedom of panorama for 3-dimensional artworks, and sculptor Caroline Muhlenberg Hufford died in 2019, so her copyright will be in effect until 2090. (And this image has been on Commons since 2019, so I figure there might be some fussing re: whether it's too old to speedy.) DS (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Also applies to File:Peter Muhlenberg Memorial Washington.jpg and File:PeterMuhlenberg.jpg. (I'm willing to grant that File:Muhlenberg Park (18056c73-a8b2-4dd2-b7bb-d6459fca9f85).jpg is de minimis.) DS (talk) 17:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
I've replaced the copyvio template on File:Muhlenberg Park (18056c73-a8b2-4dd2-b7bb-d6459fca9f85).jpg with a link here. The sculpture was dedicated in 1980, so {{PD-US-1978-89}} might apply, but I'm not versed in looking up that info. Other than that your assessment seems correct to me. I don't think any of the images linked are de minimis. – BMacZero (🗩) 17:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
I assume you mean File:Muhlenberg Park (dee9b19d-c4cb-4d4f-bfaa-b161607594ed).jpg, not File:Muhlenberg Park (18056c73-a8b2-4dd2-b7bb-d6459fca9f85).jpg. (This is why I fuss about making filenames human-readable.) DS (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Ah, yes, correct. – BMacZero (🗩) 18:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Программист 1С.jpg

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Idris Ahmad and Sebastian Francis.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Traxezz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.heraldmalaysia.com/news/mahabbah-fratelli-tutti-promosi-semangat-persahabatan/72660/7 (8 september 2023) But his source is ASIA/MALAYSIA - I valori del "Madani" per un Paese prospero e sviluppato, have a Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale license in 28 august 2023. Alex Pereiradisc 17:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes I initially submitted the wrong source link. I subsequently ammended it with the correct source link in this version.
The correct source link is https://www.heraldmalaysia.com/news/mahabbah-fratelli-tutti/72468/1 (25 August 2023) which predated the uploader's source. The Herald Malaysia website states "@heraldmalaysia.com all rights reserved." at the footer which is not compatible with CC, making this file a copyvio, justifying speedy deletion.Traxezz (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Nicolás Maduro investidura 10 de enero de 2025.jpg

I believe this photo was not taken by this user but instead belongs to AP News and thus does not fall under creative commons licensing. Here is a link to where this photo was used on AP https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-president-maduro-inauguration-41df1203ab06e1ee9168622d12aac461 76.20.23.98 17:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I believe this photo was not taken by this user but instead belongs to AP News and thus does not fall under creative commons licensing. Here is a link to where this photo was used on AP https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-president-maduro-inauguration-41df1203ab06e1ee9168622d12aac461 76.20.23.98 17:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Newspapers about the death of Pope Francis in Sicily, 22th of April 2025.jpg

Derivative work. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep No valid reason for deletion. HaT59 (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Yes, there is. There is no way to claim de minimis when the photograph obviously focus on the newspapers. Its title says it all. RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
 Keep there are plenty of photos in wikimedia regarding newspaper covers, most of them even with text visible and readable. in this photo, most of the text is censored, and I decided to leave readable only the titles about the pope. I don't see any copyright issue, but I'll let others decide. LANCIAY 1 (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Then nominate them to deletion, because they should be deleted as well. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
 Delete Quite prominent, IMO fails de minimis--A1Cafel (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
 Keep mostly just text with low detail/resolution and partially obscured images Dronebogus (talk) 04:04, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

File:George Parker filming in the California desert (2024)..jpg

Rejected draft 45.250.252.163 19:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

And file previously deleted in Wikipedia. (With one dot at title;) 45.250.252.163 19:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:2024 George Parker at Eagle Rock, California.jpg

Rejected draft 45.250.252.163 19:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Delete Unused personal picture. Nv8200pa (talk) 23:04, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Pinkfong logo.svg

This file was initially tagged by Headlock0225 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source, web and youtube site given, is marked "ⓒ The Pinkfong Company. All Rights Reserved"  REAL 💬 ⬆   19:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

The video uses the Creative Commons Attribution (3.0 Unported) license option on YouTube as does hundreds of other videos by Pinkfong across multiple channels. The copyright owner can distribute it under as many different terms as they want. Similarly several videos by Warner Bros and Bandai Namco with the CC license contain "All Rights Reserved" within the videos itself but no one has used this as a deletion reason (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Videos by Bandai Namco, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hogwarts Legacy)  REAL 💬 ⬆   19:25, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
 Weak keep due to channel uploader having verified status, although not sure if the CC license applies to the external SVG. SergioFLS (talk) 01:10, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

This file was initially tagged by Headlock0225 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source, web and youtube site given, is marked "ⓒ The Pinkfong Company. All Rights Reserved" Headlock0225 (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Dunmore's Proclamation signed November 7, 1775 - 4.jpg

Unreadably small Pinterest-sourced thumbnail of a document for which we have a legible version already. Hargrimm (talk) 20:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:ScRNA-seq reveals two transcriptionally distinct pinealocyte populations.png

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Rasbak (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

It is a: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.Rasbak (talk) 21:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Transcriptomic characterization of cell types in the daytime rat pineal gland.png

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Rasbak (talk) 21:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

It is a: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.21:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

And also the file which is already deleted,!!!!!Rasbak (talk) 21:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Arthur Herbert Thompson with his milltary uniform (colourized).png

possible copyvio - feasably still within the copyright term of a british photographer given a estimated year of 1915 when this was taken and british copyright being life + 70 TheLoyalOrder (talk) 21:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Arthur Herbert Thompson with his military uniform.png also TheLoyalOrder (talk) 22:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
File:Arthur Herbert Thompson in his youth.png TheLoyalOrder (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
As I and TheLoyalOrder have discussed externally, the photographer seems to be a soldier which under COM:CROWN would make Public Domain, so I request until we figure out if it's Public Domain or not, don't remove the two images. Crispybeatle (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Just to clarify from that conversation, we don't know anything about the photographer so can't just assume they're a soldier. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Could the file still be hosted locally on enwiki? Howardcorn33 (talk) 22:09, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
it's unclear whether this photo was published when it was taken or not (could be from a private photo collection). to be on en:wiki it would have to be out of copyright US so published over 95 years ago. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 22:40, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
ww1 was over 100 years ago Crispybeatle (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
year of publication =/= year of creation necessarily TheLoyalOrder (talk) 20:06, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
I got a response on the Sevenoaks School archivist. She said that it was possibly made by Charles Essenhigh Corke. In fact, here is a portrait of another soldier taken by Charles: https://sevenoaksww1.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/image4.jpeg with an almost identical border to the original picture. Crispybeatle (talk) 12:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Charles also died in 1922 which would make it copyright free. Crispybeatle (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
That should settle it in favor of keeping then. Howardcorn33 (talk) 12:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Go Back to Alaska Sarah Palin, 2008 - Larry Fulton Postcard (5335891606).jpg

Copyright violation? Confusing entry on Flickr - permission required to reproduce is contrary to the cc-by-sa licence given. Besides it seems to be a Derivative Work . Are all the images by Fulton and if so why is Fulton not the copyright holder. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Delete I was actually trying to avoid uploading postcards by Fulton. One must have snuck in though. Feel free to nominate any others you see in my uploads for deletion. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Silva gustavo1111 1703534029136.jpg

Facebook 186.173.62.41 23:14, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:MacEwanPaul BW600dpi.png

This photo is still under copyright and no evidence it is freely licensed. Nova Scotia Legislature copyright: https://nslegislature.ca/legal/copyright. This photo will become Public Domain 50 years after publication, as it is under Canadian Crown Copyright. It can be undeleted at that point (January 1, 2044). PascalHD (talk) 23:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Blair Bazdarich.jpg

Not an own work. Has transmission code. 186.173.62.41 23:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Brennan thestandnyc 20190824.jpg

Own work? 186.173.62.41 23:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:A Touch More Live April 6 2024.jpg

See Google Lens and if you delete this delete also a crop made by the uploader please. 186.173.62.41 23:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)