Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/13
![]() |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
![]() |
|
|
File:Mahmut Naci BALKIŞ.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Sayginer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is impossible that the image is uploaders own work.
A picture before the Hat Law in Turkey, 1925. PD. E4024 (talk) 00:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept, license corrected. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:The most boring person in the world.png
Vandalism KandidKansan (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted private joke/insult image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Wages.png
This is has a copyright symbol Ooligan (talk) 06:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, privacy. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Yes yes.png
This appears to personal medical information- possibly protected under federal law (HIPPA) Ooligan (talk) 06:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, privacy. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Wages for Angela.png
This document (top/part 1) has a copyright symbol located on the “wage.png” (bottom/part 2) Ooligan (talk) 06:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, privacy. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:쵱성민.jpg
실수로 업로드했습니다 철알못 버알못 (talk) 05:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:My new car.jpg
COM:HOST out of scope Netora (talk) 09:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
pretty weak argument as we have very little images of such contemporary "mundane" things and if anonymised this file could be used to illustrate how a car purchase in the United States works. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Keep,
- Withdrawing as it's likely a revenge upload. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete one of a number files that I believe were vindictively uploaded at the same time disclosing all sorts of personal details of this individual, Angela. All the others have been deleted. This one should be as well. I have messaged the uploader in case it was a mistake but not received a reply. I conclude there that this is a malicious upload and should be on a speedy delete.--Headlock0225 (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom and Headlock0225. I added similar photo File:Registry.jpg of the same document. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:De Sanctis, Francesco – La scuola liberale e la scuola democratica, 1953 – BEIC 1799240.pdf
A 1953 work can't be PD-old... Is this actually a reprint or metadata error? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn Nominated in error. Seems to be from an official archive , who are assume to know about licensing. :)
File:Montaigne - c.1590 portrait.png
this is not public domain, it is kalki's usual vandalism as he wants to show off, this is a good drawing and it's obvious it belongs to known author!!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.139.64.20 (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- The image is merely a PNG version of a public domain JPG image already on the commons, simply edited to permit transparent background in PNG format.
- This nomination is an act of a long term abuser who has been vandalizing and trolling WMF sites since 2005. For many years he has been announcing malicious intentions and insulting threats against ANY admin who dares to remove or block his persistent vandalism, and has persistent grudges against a few of us, including myself — ie: his latest edit to my WQ talk page, where he announced his malicious intentions here. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 19:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Farah Jefry.jpg
Taken from Twitter and tagged since a good time. E4024 (talk) 11:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 07:21, 14 März 2021 UTC: No permission since 6 March 2021 --Krdbot 15:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Amerika Tarihinin Ana Hatları.pdf
This doesn'lt look immediately look like a work of US gov, 1951 publication? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- There is also no translator's name or publisher information in the book and according to what isit is written here: it fits the relevant license.
Turkish: "Bu kitap Birleşik Amerika Devletlerinin Dışişleri Bakanlığı tarafından hazırlanmış ve İktisadi İşbirliği İdaresi'nin Ankara'daki Türkiye Özel Misyonu tarafından yayınlanmıştır."
English translation: "This book prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United States of America and published by the Economic Cooperation Administration Special Mission in Ankara, Turkey." Satirdan kahraman (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United States of America? I thought that would be the State Department in the US . The translated note added to the file though. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Translation confirming the licence was provided above.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Luiz Gastão de Orleans e Bragança.jpg
No proof of permission of the copyright holder or the portrayed person to publicly transmit or display the photograph. The image has been previously published in other media with no indication of a license that allows use for third parties. Examples of previous publication: 1 2 Awikimate (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Mónica García Gómez Más Madrid (cropped).jpg
Copyright infringement, as per https://masmadrid.org/aviso-legal-de-proteccion-de-datos/: "Los contenidos, textos, fotografías, diseños, logotipos, imágenes, programas de ordenador, códigos fuente y, en general, cualquier creación intelectual existente en este sitio, así como el propio sitio en su conjunto, como obra artística multimedia, están protegidos como derechos de autor por la legislación en materia de propiedad intelectual. Más Madrid es titular de los elementos que integran el diseño gráfico del Sitio Web, lo menús, botones de navegación, el código HTML, los textos, imágenes, texturas, gráficos y cualquier otro contenido del Sitio Web o, en cualquier caso dispone de la correspondiente autorización para la utilización de dichos elementos. El contenido dispuesto en el Sitio Web no podrá ser reproducido ni en todo ni en parte, ni transmitido, ni registrado por ningún sistema de recuperación de información, en ninguna forma ni en ningún medio, a menos que se cuente con la autorización previa, por escrito, de la citada entidad." The image is copyrighted and cannot be freely used, yet it is being added non-stop throughout a number of articles in Wikipedia. Impru20 (talk) 20:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:34, 14 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: As per https://masmadrid.org/aviso-legal-de-proteccion-de-datos/: "Los contenidos, textos, fotografías, diseños, logotipos, imágenes, programas de ordenador, códigos fuente y, en general, cualquier creación intelectual existente en este sitio, así como el propio sitio en su conjunto, como obra artística multimedia, están protegidos como derechos de autor por la legislación en materia de propiedad intelectual. Más Madrid es titular de los elementos que integran el d --Krdbot 03:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Rahn Anthoni .jpg
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete as a copyvio from the same source as https://i1.wp.com/indiemusicmagazine.live/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/rahn.jpg as badly displayed and linked by https://indiemusicmagazine.live/2017/05/02/rahn-anthoni-won-best-contemporary-christian-song/ . It also qualifies for CSDs G10 & F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 11:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roland.aprent (talk · contribs)
Exif show origin author is Aprent Roland. seems not to be uploader himself.
- File:Anemone sylvestris 8.jpg
- File:Anemone sylvestris 7.jpg
- File:Anemone sylvestris 6.jpg
- File:Anemone sylvestris 5.jpg
- File:Anemone sylvestris 4.jpg
- File:Anemone sylvestris 2.jpg
- File:Anemone sylvestris 3.jpg
- File:Anemone sylvestris 1.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 09.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 10.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 08.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 07.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 06.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 005.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 04.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 02.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 003.jpg
- File:Anemone nemorosa 00a1.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis A4.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis 11.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis A2.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis 06.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis 09.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis 08.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis 03.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis 12.jpg
- File:Hepatica nobilis 04.jpg
- File:Callianthemum anemonoides 4.jpg
- File:Callianthemum anemonoides 6.jpg
- File:Callianthemum anemonoides 3.jpg
- File:Galanthus woronowii 5.jpg
- File:Galanthus woronowii 4.jpg
- File:Galanthus woronowii 3.jpg
- File:Galanthus woronowii 2.jpg
- File:Galanthus woronowii 1.jpg
- File:Galanthus elwesii 7.jpg
- File:Galanthus elwesii 5.jpg
- File:Galanthus elwesii 6.jpg
- File:Galanthus elwesii 4.jpg
- File:Galanthus elwesii 3.jpg
- File:Galanthus elwesii 1.jpg
- File:Galanthus elwesii 2.jpg
(`・ω・´) (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe I am missing something but I find it very difficult to understand why user Roland.aprent should not be Exif author Aprent Roland. -- Gauss (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): I withdraw my nomination. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
File:7-Zip 19.00.png
Я автор этого изображения и прошу вас удалить его. Спасибо. Alderlake (talk) 10:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Файл нигде не используется. Прошу удалить его. Спасибо. Alderlake (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- No longer in use because you replaced it on Wikidata with the Russian version. --Achim (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
File:7-Zip 19.00.png
Да, это так. Разве это мешает удалению? Извините, что я так часто загружаю файлы и запрашиваю их удаление. Заменил скриншот на другой. Alderlake (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
File:7-Zip 19.00.png
Можно удалить это изображение? Alderlake (talk) 08:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:My Italian - Marketplace - Authentic Italian products.jpg
may be COM:ADVERT Netora (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammadhkk (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.
- File:شهادة مشاركة يوم وطني.jpg
- File:Titanium scan copy0869.pdf
- File:Titanium scan copy0865.pdf
- File:Titanium scan copy0868.pdf
- File:Titanium scan copy0867.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marta Iskiv (talk · contribs)
Modern art. I think artists identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Олена Каїнська Тонкі сни 2020 PM Gallery.jpg
- File:Петро Грицюк. Метал. 2019, PM Gallery.jpg
- File:Петро Грицюк. Метал. 2019. PM Gallery..jpg
- File:Петро Грицюк. Метал. 2019. PM Gallery.jpg
- File:E-Glass. Retrospection, 2019, PM Gallery.jpg
- File:Микола Курилюк, 2020, PM Gallery .jpg
- File:Микола Курилюк, 2020, PM Gallery.jpg
- File:(1;12). Відкриття PM Gallery, 2019..jpg
- File:Відкриття PM Gallery, 2019.jpg
- File:Микола Курилюк, 2019, Proart Gallery..jpg
- File:Петро Старух, 2019, Proart Gallery x Futura HUB.jpg
- File:Микола Курилюк, 2019, Proart Gallery x Futura HUB.jpg
- File:Роман Опалинський, 2019, Proart Gallery.jpg
- File:Квіти і птахи, 2019, Proart Gallery.jpg
- File:Олена Жеребецька, 2019, Proart Gallery..jpg
- File:Олена Жеребецька, 2019, Proart Gallery.jpg
- File:Сергій Декалюк, 2019, Proart Gallery.jpg
- File:Без назви. Дерево, різьба..tif
- File:З серії "Наші стовпи". Деталь роботи..jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per EugeneZelenko. --Микола Василечко (talk) 15:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Доброго дня! Дані файли були додані для використання у статті про діяльність PM Gallery. Можемо надати електронний дозвіл на високористання даних зображень. Оскільки фото були створені на замовлення інституції під час виставкових проєктів в її приміщенні, чи потрібно дозвіл від імені галереї чи конкретно кожного з авторів робіт? Дякую! Очікую на відповідь. --Marta Iskiv (talk) 20:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Marta Iskiv
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saksham Singh T (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Nepalese Singer Sindhu Malla.jpg
- File:Nepali Magar cultural dress.jpg
- File:Nepali Folk song.jpg
- File:Sindhu Malla in saree.jpg
- File:Singer Sindhu Malla.jpg
- File:Sindhu Malla Singer.jpg
- File:Festival photo of Nepal.jpg
- File:Sudam Thapa.jpg
- File:IMG-20201121-WA0016.jpg
- File:Sindhu Malla Singer of Nepal.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Md Nurul Karim Jewel.jpg
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 08:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:محمد أشرف العقاد.jpg
personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 08:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:محمد أشرف العقاد 2.jpg
personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 08:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Pruthveerajsinhdabhi.jpg
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 10:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Vennou Atwaini Wearing a green suit.jpg
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 10:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Paisaje y las sierras..JPG
Unused landscape photo. Without location information is of little educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:شکل1.png
Unused, uncategorized. Educational value is not shown. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Pandoras Ask.jpg
Unused photo of room with no explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:LOGO-Box Office Capsule.png
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 11:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Runeed.png
Unused screenshot of poorly described image. no educational or exemplar value. Richard Avery (talk) 12:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Ilovepdf merged (7).pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:8 ParvathiDevi Thapassu.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Baila hasta que llueva.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Pyramid of Crisis Intervention Steps.png
Coady and Lehmann are not mentioned in en.wiki, so their crisis management plan can be out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Wiki Scots Indep V2.pdf
and:
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to delete this chart.RERTwiki (talk) 12:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Impacto social.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Terorista.jpg
I doubt that this file is really an own work by *SimoujN. Hebrew Wikipedia has got a and it says that it was taken by the AP and it's under ©. Golmore (talk) 10:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Dbs3xf3-83ae8a05-1d76-47e1-8594-59543e0bb52c.png
Copyright violation, and it's a non-free image created by ROBLOX Corporation. Also, a tip is that you can use the TinEye reverse image search for knowing if a file is Non-Free. 2601:40:C003:9550:C578:9A0:DF25:4AC8 21:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by I knowuj (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Andres Urdaneta monumentua, Urdaneta City, Philippines.jpg
According to per w:Urdaneta Park Landmark Monument, this work was jointly-designed by Napoleon Abueva (d. 2018) and Abdulmari Imao (d. 2014). Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Bambangjf3642 08.JPG
The plaque on the pedestal below this sculpture indicates 2009 as the year of unveiling (inception). Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Beloy.jpg
The person being commemorated by this sculpture died in 1986, so it is highly possible that the sculptor of this is either still alive or not yet dead for more than 50 years. Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Commemorative Monument of Peace & Unity.JPG
As there is still no FOP in the Philippines while the amendment to the copyright law is still pending, permission from Kublai Millan who is the artist of this sculpture is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Lagoon Monument.JPG
The statue is most likely not in public domain. According to SunStar this was a work of Negrense sculptor Felix Garzon (who seems to be alive during 2010), while others like Lakad Pilipinas.com also considers Guillermo Tolentino (d. 1977) as the creator. Either way, the sculpture is not yet public domain, and no FOP yet in the Philippines. Permission from the sculptor or his heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Laya at Diwa park.JPG
According to w:Cavite State University#Laya at Diwa Monument, this monument from 2006 was a creation of Jonnel P. Castrillo. Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Manny Pacquiao statue.jpg
Artist Fred Baldemor is still alive ( and ). There is no freedom of panorama yet in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/File:UPmuseumjf3028
This particular statue was a work of w:Napoleon Abueva (Magdangal) who died in 2018. Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Montemaria Statue.jpg
The statue was a work of w:Eduardo Castrillo (who died in 2016). Regular rules apply even if the copyright law amendment is still pending according to IPOPHL-BCRR: permission from Castrillo's heirs is required. Otherwise, undelete if FOP is formally and officially introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Monument in SBFZ.JPG
This monument called Children of the Sun Returning or Subic Volunteers Monument commemorates thousands of men and women who helped protecting the former Subic Naval base facilities from looting, after the departure of the Americans in 1992. ( and ). As a sculpture unveiled after 1992, the sculptor is most likely alive and COM:OTRS permission from him is required. Otherwise restore only if FOP is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Paghimud-os sculpture Capitol Lagoon Bacolod City Philippines.jpg
This was created in 1975 by Eduardo Castrillo (d. 2016). Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:The Pegaraw and the UPLB Main Library.jpg
While the statue is perhaps de minimis, the building itself is problematic (online sources indicate it was an architectural work of w:Leandro Locsin, d. 1994). Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Sandugo-Bohol.JPG
According to Bohol Philippine Travel Guide, the creator was Napoleon Abueva. Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the artists or their heirs is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
1) SM City Sta. Mesa building (1990)
Conducting a proper nomination (in contrast to this destructive one by an anon user). According to w:SM City Sta. Mesa, the building was incepted in 1990. Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the architect or the architecture firm is still required.
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 20.jpg
- File:WTMP Redscale IMG 7201.JPG
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 05.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 18.jpg
- File:0128jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 09.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 04.jpg
- File:04049jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 19.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 16.jpg
- File:0557jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 02.jpg
- File:04049jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 21.jpg
- File:0128jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 06.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 06.jpg
- File:0164jfQuezon City SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 17.jpg
- File:04049jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 16.jpg
- File:04049jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 15.jpg
- File:0164jfQuezon City SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 14.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 15.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 19.jpg
- File:04049jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 20.jpg
- File:0046jfLandscape Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 16.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
2) Illustrated billboard advertisements
The ff. files are more problematic: derivative works of billboard ads. A free license from the production company or the graphics artists is required, preferably via COM:OTRS correspondence.
- File:0142jfQuezon City San Juan City Progreso SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:0142jfQuezon City San Juan City Progreso SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:0142jfQuezon City San Juan City Progreso SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:0142jfQuezon City San Juan City Progreso SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:0142jfQuezon City San Juan City Progreso SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 11.jpg
- File:0142jfQuezon City San Juan City Progreso SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:0142jfQuezon City San Juan City Progreso SM City Sta. Mesa Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 13.jpg
- File:0557jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 01.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 10.jpg
- File:0046jfLandscape Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 10.jpg
- File:0021jfLandscape Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 07.jpg
- File:0046jfLandscape Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 09.jpg
- File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 21.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:0534jf SM City Santa Mesa fvf 07.jpg
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with incategory:"SM City Sta. Mesa". Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the architect is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jardin Maria Clara, Zamboanga City
The person depicted, w:Maria Clara Lobregat, died in 2004, and this status is most likely recent. While there is no FOP yet in the Philippines, regular rules of obtaining permission from the artist who created this statue is still required.
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (19).JPG
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (20).JPG
- File:Jardin Maria Clara Llobregat (28).JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
1) Laya at Diwa Monument (©️2006, Jonnel Castrillo)
According to w:Cavite State University#Laya at Diwa Monument, this monument from 2006 was a creation of Jonnel P. Castrillo (d. 2020). Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from Castrillo's heirs is still required.
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 33.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 34.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 35.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 36.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 37.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 38.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 39.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 43.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 44.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 45.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 46.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 47.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 48.jpg
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 49.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 08.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
2) Murals beneath/adjacent the Laya at Diwa Monument
According to this online blog, the murals would be installed soon after the completion of the statue (2006 by Jonnel Castrillo). Permission from the artists is required as there is no FOP in the Philippines.
- File:4397Trece Martires Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 50.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 01.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 02.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 03.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 04.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 05.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 06.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 07.jpg
- File:4450Indang Cavite Landmarks Barangays 09.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:DC Stands United Against Hate Mural.jpg
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Every Day I See Something New Mural.jpg
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Marsha P. Johnson and George Floyd memorial mural.jpg
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Mural San Luis.jpg
The picture is a reproduction of a copyright-protected mural. See COM:CB. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Where's the copyright? It's municipal mural as far as I knew. It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to contact the relevant parties in San Luis. I'm pretty sure that's city owned though, so that would make it public art, which is copacetic... I thought? Can we not use publicly owned art? It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please see COM:CB and click on "murals." Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC).
- Yes, I read it. So, no caveats exist for tax-payer owned art? It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Only if it's a work of the U.S. Government. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC).
- But if it were owned by the City of San Luis and I got their express written permission, which I submitted (somehow), would it be okay to keep up? Likewise with a copyright holder? I'm just new and there's A LOT on these sites to learn. I thank you for any help. It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks Jeff. It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- But if it were owned by the City of San Luis and I got their express written permission, which I submitted (somehow), would it be okay to keep up? Likewise with a copyright holder? I'm just new and there's A LOT on these sites to learn. I thank you for any help. It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Only if it's a work of the U.S. Government. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC).
- Yes, I read it. So, no caveats exist for tax-payer owned art? It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please see COM:CB and click on "murals." Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC).
- Tend to
Delete, no FOP for murals in USA. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete - Give him a win. Life's rough lately. It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Violated COM:FOP US--A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete - Hurry up and delete it. Jeff Beall wants it gone and Republicans are always suppose to get what they want It'sOnlyMakeBelieve (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by U.G sam (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 14:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:All My Hopes and Dreams Mural.jpg
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Sqrt-on-macosx.png
Unused image that should not be an image. Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
--WIKImaniac 18:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep We don't remove images because they're "superseded". There are still plenty of contexts that can't support TeX (or SVG, or even PNG in some cases) and Commons shouldn't be quick to rule those out. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: thank you for your message, but I totally disagree. It is preferred that formulas or simple text are not provided as images. These images are outside the scope of this project. For a decade now, images containing simple text or formulas have been marked with Template: Use TeX to replace them with TeX. If you don't like this method, you can suggest the template for deletion. By the way, the File: Sqrt-on-macosx.png is a bad picture. You have not mentioned any specific context in Wikimedia projects that TeX does not support. However, if it is actually needed as a pixel-based image, I can always provide a high-resolution screenshot – based on the TeX equivalent. But of course there is no good reason to have all kinds of formula variants such as , , , …, or on hand just in case you ever need them. I hope you understand my intention better now. --WIKImaniac 13:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is preferred that formulas or simple text are not provided as images.
- There is no such policy. The wikipedias probably have a guideline formulas should be rendered with TeX rather than as images but that's a different thing. That's up to the editors and content creators.
- This is not Wikipedia, it's Commons. We're here to support other projects as a media resource. Some editors interpret that in a chauvinistic way as "Commons should not support any user who is not a Wikipedia or Wikimedia project", but I do not. If there is some teacher or homeschooler out there pasting this into a Word document or Paint because that's all they've got and they've never heard of TeX, then I'm fine with that. We should support them, we should not build walls just to exclude them, we should certainly not build a complicated deletion process just to keep them out.
- This is a trivial example. But would you also want to remove something more usefully complex like ? Or
, which is INUSE, SVG rather than bitmap, and kicked off a heated stream of abuse from an editor objecting to the TeX rendering being wrong, when it turned out the problem was their own browser?
- This example is of no use. I wouldn't miss it. It's trivial and it's also too small. But I'm not going to support any DR on the basis of "If I don't need that format, I will assume that no-one else could ever benefit from it", because that's against some of our basic principles of openness. Using Category:Images which should use TeX as a reason for deletion is not a route we should go down. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: I'm sorry, I don't know anything about the nomination to delete File:Butan Lewis.svg.
- If a teacher or homeschooler wants to copy a formula in one of his Word documents, he can take a screenshot of the formula from an article at any time. And when we use TeX for our formulas, all screenshots – even taken from different articles – look the same in terms of font and font size.
- In my opinion there should be a central project to collect TeX-based formulas or even to help with setting these formulas. There should also be a function for downloading rendered images of TeX-based formulas in various file types. This would be more useful than keeping bad pictures of trivial formulas on Wikimedia Commons.
- In the case of this file, if you think "this example is no use" and you "wouldn't miss it", I don't understand why you would vote to keep this image. --WIKImaniac 18:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Because this is a bad nomination on the wrong basis. Commons is full of such and they're being used to set precedents to delete a lot more, often verging into the valuable content we really shouldn't lose. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Help desk#TeX and images Andy Dingley (talk) 23:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, Andy, I found a link to that discussion on my user discussion page. --WIKImaniac 17:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Replaced globally, absolutely no need to keep. --Leyo 22:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
File:TikTok4Money.png
Advertisement KandidKansan (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Ram Lalla in Shwetambar.JPG
Copyright status not clear with regarding to sharing DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyright violation. No free license on the source site. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Arman Ramezani on Perspolis.jpg
Image is not exclusive to snn.ir Maometto97 (talk) 13:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 00:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Mualla.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Kiwi (31641214816).jpg
As it says in the description: "exceptionally poor photo". Not needed; we have heaps of good photos of kiwi. Schwede66 00:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Gabrielius-Landsbergis Mindaugo-Mikule ćno-nuotr (1).jpg
Watermark on image claims (c) Kilimas Arts -- no evidence of permission Renata3 (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Djmarcianooficial (talk · contribs)
Self-promotion. Out of the project scope.
- File:6TO CURSO DE COLEGIO.jpg
- File:JUGADOR PES PLAY STATION.jpg
- File:Graduación en FACSO.jpg
- File:GAMA TV.jpg
- File:DIRECTOR RADIO DIBLU.jpg
- File:Dj Arturo Alvarado Coello.jpg
Edslov (talk) 01:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:James Felton Keith speaking in Central Harlem.jpg
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:JFK Data Protection World Forum.jpg
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Jfk data protection world forum hj 2.jpg
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Rutas comerciales de la Nueva España.jpg
Very duibous "own work", license, and date claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Churintzio collage.png
Collage of unsourced photos -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Collage of Churintzio'.png
Collage of unsourced photos. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Modelphotoshoot.jpg
Not particularly educationally useful (photo of non-notable w:simple:Dhanusha Murugasan, who I've nominated for deletion). Elli (talk) 04:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Anchor Media Strategy41832.jpg
professional portrait of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:掛川市立栄川中学校 校章.jpg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:09646jfLandscape Grasslands Plaridel Bypass Road Bonga Menor Bustos Bulacan Villagesfvf 15.JPG
Out of COM:SCOPE in relation to already-existing files at Category:Landscape of Paddy fields and Grasslands (Plaridel Bypass Arterial Road, Bonga Menor, Malamig, Liciada and Cambaog, Bustos, Bulacan Villages) (more than 500 files actually). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:09780jfLandscapes Grasslands Plaridel Roads Bustos Bulacan Villagesfvf 12.JPG
Out of COM:SCOPE in relation to already-existing files at Category:Landscape of Paddy fields and Grasslands (Plaridel Bypass Arterial Road, Bonga Menor, Malamig, Liciada and Cambaog, Bustos, Bulacan Villages) (more than 500 files actually). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:1905Bulacan Makaki City Landmarks Roads 08.jpg
Derivative works of copyrighted advertisements with illustrations and billboards. Copyvio as missing evidence of permission from the graphics artists. Also No freedom of panorama yet in the Philippines. 49.144.138.181 09:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Also affected: File:1905Bulacan Makaki City Landmarks Roads 09.jpg. - 49.144.138.181 09:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete the old version of File:1905Bulacan Makaki City Landmarks Roads 08.jpg (revdel). I've already cropped out the copyvio elements to make image focused more on EDSA. While the second one (portrait orientation) is eligible for de minimis, delete it too as it has become a redundant image of the first one. @49.144.138.181: , please add noinclude magic wording (<noinclude>[[Category:CATEGORYNAME]]</noinclude>) so that the archival daily listing from which this is transcluded doesn't get categorized too (collaterally). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Deleted older version. --Minoraxtalk 23:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:09780jfLandscapes Grasslands Plaridel Roads Bustos Bulacan Villagesfvf 10.JPG
COM:ADVERT. Also out of COM:SCOPE in relation to the numerous and already-existing files at Category:Landscape of Paddy fields and Grasslands (Plaridel Bypass Arterial Road, Bonga Menor, Malamig, Liciada and Cambaog, Bustos, Bulacan Villages). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Ashish kumar.jpg
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 09:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:09780jfLandscapes Grasslands Plaridel Roads Bustos Bulacan Villagesfvf 07.JPG
COM:ADVERT. Also out of COM:SCOPE in relation to the numerous and already-existing files at Category:Landscape of Paddy fields and Grasslands (Plaridel Bypass Arterial Road, Bonga Menor, Malamig, Liciada and Cambaog, Bustos, Bulacan Villages). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:সেক্সট্যান্ট.jpg
Small photo without metadata, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 23paulas (talk · contribs)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Paula Rodriguez Alonso, militante equipo Balonmano Playa Alboraya ( Valencia).jpg
- File:Paula Rodriguez Alonso , militante Oviedo Balonmano Femenino ( Oviedo; Asturias).jpg
Didym (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:ARTICULO DE OPINION PARA PUBLICAR UNER 2021.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Maiduguri Linguistic Centre Profile 2021.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Yrsufell and Þórufell - panoramio.jpg
Advertisement for a Reykjavík real estate agency. Till (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Etouchmeta1.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Südvorstadt-Ost, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (2221).jpg
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Südvorstadt-Ost, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (2226).jpg
Bad image uality Derbrauni (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Südvorstadt-Ost, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (2227).jpg
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:FB IMG 1615456943337 youhou.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Südvorstadt-Ost, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (2238).jpg
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 15:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:سيافي سيا.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Dsabhishek -20210212-0001.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Photo de LuF.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Hannibal Elias Lerche Jakobsen.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Dnc logo.png
Non-trivial copyrighted artwork. FDMS 4 23:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Dnc logo.png
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:علم .png
Duplication of File:Flag of Iraq.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:LA PAZZA DELLA PORTA ACCANTO conversazione con Alda Merini.jpg
Film screenshot under copyright Caulfield (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Pečatni grb Crne Gore.png
Duplication of File:Coat of arms of Montenegro (seal).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Debbie Arnold.jpg
Apparent copyvio - low res, no EXIF, clearly part of this set, uploader history of copyvios of this subject, etc. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 17:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Help! I'm not an expert on how Wiki works (I don't even know if I'm typing this in the right place). I'm a friend of Debbie Arnold. Debbie and I arejust trying to get a photo on HER OWN wiki page.
We used one from her website, and you deleted it saying the copyright belonged to the pro photograher who took it, rather than Debbie herself (fair enough). But now we've uploaded a private home photo and you're threatening to delete that just because Debbie also put it on her OWN PERSONAL instagram?
How do we win here? Every other celebrity seems to have a photo on their page with no hassle. --KenBarlow (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Before deleting her photos, please contact Debbie Arnold herself User:Beandisney on here please. Neither of us know how to edit wiki properly, so would rather have some help than obstacles. --KenBarlow (talk) 18:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ramada Manila Central
The building was completed in 2009, and there is no FOP yet in the country. Architect's permission is still required.
- File:0698jfSanta Cruz Escolta Binondo Streets Manila Landmarksfvf 02.JPG
- File:0698jfSanta Cruz Escolta Binondo Streets Manila Landmarksfvf 09.JPG
- File:09518jfAnchor Skysuites Mandarin Square Buildings in Santa Cruz Binondo, Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:09518jfAnchor Skysuites Mandarin Square Buildings in Santa Cruz Binondo, Manilafvf 16.jpg
- File:09518jfAnchor Skysuites Mandarin Square Buildings in Santa Cruz Binondo, Manilafvf 19.jpg
- File:Manilajf0292 30.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jcrazyhead37 (talk · contribs)
Bogus CC/self claims - various theme park ride logos by serial copyvio uploader (see deleted contribs). File:Crocdroplogo1.jpg also appears to be screenshot for a video (and is otherwise very low res, lacking EXIF, and a COM:DW of the logo.)
- File:BlueBarnacleTempLogo.jpg
- File:Smug1988.png
- File:BlackBuccaneer Logo.png
- File:Crocdroplogo1.jpg
- File:Crocdroplogo.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Matzgivenchy.jpg
unused personal(?) photo, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Maulana S. Ghafir Rizvi Chhaulsi . مولانا سید غافر رضوی چھولسی.jpg
unused personal(?) photo, one of two uploads. Pibwl (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Screen 1.png
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Screen 2.png
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Screen 4.png
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Screen 6.png
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Simp collider.png
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:SPROSTINIUM1.JPG
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:SROCC formula.png
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Standard-deviation-formula.gif
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Emaddmarany1.jpg
It is a copyvio or DW... E4024 (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Sahte.jpg
Out of scope. Blur, unusable image of unidentified bird. Smooth O (talk) 19:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:56058878. UY630 SR1200,630.jpg
Book cover? E4024 (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:غلاف كتاب غابة اصابع.jpg
Book cover or poster... E4024 (talk) 19:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:صورة شخصية آية منصور.jpg
Dubious own work (small, no EXIF, other dubious uploads). E4024 (talk) 19:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:1924054 1043440011462 8475 n 1043440011462.jpg
to small to be useful Amada44 talk to me 21:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:800px.gif
No educational vaule. Also, possible copyright violation, plus read the metadata also. Also, You are claiming as your own work. 2601:40:C003:9550:C578:9A0:DF25:4AC8 21:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sistiurni (talk · contribs)
Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Zuraw w locie.jpg
Very blurred, low quality MPF (talk) 22:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Rrezatimi Gamma.jpg
Artistic representation of "Gamma rays". Not sure this has any educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
File:"Graham The Baron Hesketh".jpg
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Jeunesse Sportive de Kabylie Logo.svg
Copyright violation 83.200.67.7 00:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 86.212.245.156 22:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Flag of Taliban with X-Mark.jpg
Out of scope, unused, unnecessary. E4024 (talk) 16:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: I used it for my own page, It's nesseary for a true Muslim user. They are "enemy" of Afghan muslims, actually every muslim user should use this on his user page, to show empathy with Afghan people, and say no to terrorism. --Ruwaym (talk) 16:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm not here to make holy wars. I have never made any file to put only on my userpage, either. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 16:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ok @E4024: I can make it secular: They are human right's violators, designated as terrorist organization by some governments, and they are involved in civil right's abuse, and a lot of crimes. And I am free to use that picture on my user page. --Ruwaym (talk) 00:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please don't lecture me; my country took a lot of responsability in the struggle against those terrorists. Indeed do not lecture anybody in Commons. BTW I DR'ed something which was not in use anywhere. I hope all "personal things" in Commons get deleted some day. Please do not ping me any more on this. Good-bye. E4024 (talk) 01:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Earlier this Evening, I was searching for the Exact Taliban Flag with ❌ mark on it, Coincidentally i found this one. Then i see the "Deletion Nomination" Tag in it, with a correspondant and Also quite valid reason for deletion. And I think @E4024 made a very very solid point Regarding on this. Please be reminded that Commons is not a Place for Holy wars or even any types of wars at this point. So it is Very Very Unacessary to Put the Flag in anyone's Userpage just because to "Promote" something. Let me tell you that all of us have our own Political leanings and Activities. And i hope we can Leave those aside for a moment. Our job here is to Contribute With "Good faith". And not to promote conflict among groups. I am Also against The Taliban. Because the same reason of why all of you hate them. But overall. Creating this flag is Unacessary, and may not be used in any Articles in the near future. Douuwwurunwuuzhe 15:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- I @E4024: you when i pleasant, your are my "brother" don't be such strict. @Douuwwurunwuuzhe: War on terrorsim is holy for me. Every action for defending humanity is holy. And yeah, We "have our own Political leanings and Activities" but I am not talking about Ku Klux Klan or X party protest againt Y one. Afghanistan conflict with Taliban is more than just a political affair or a war. It is my issue and shows my "Good Faith" too and good heart on one of important currently conflicts: And i am with Afghan National Army and its allies. I wanna put that flag on my userpage, I removed it recently, But i will make a template. And Wikimedia Commons is a freely usable media files. And Talibn flag is published under CC, so i have the right to edit a verison for my own talkpage, Also it can be useful for wikiquotes. It was usefull for you too, from your searching you came here, and You can see here two views here. I wanna show my being with Afghan National Army on my userpage in my main wiki, Show me a way then delete this version. Thank you all. I like ping @4nn1l2: , he is my "brother" too and admin. --Ruwaym (talk) 19:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete If you want to show your support for the Afghan National Army, just use the flag of Afghanistan: File:Flag of Afghanistan.svg. If you put an X mark on the Taliban flag and upload it to Commons, then someone else (who sympathizes with Taliban) may put an X mark on the Afghan flag, make it upside down and upload it to Commons. Do you see the cycle of uploading useless files to Commons which only wastes the valuable volunteers' time? So it should be stopped from the outset. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Doesn't make any sense to delete, completely in scope and can be used for anything on Wikimedia. Seriously who on earth nominated this for deletion and why. This also has no president, flags with an X on it are perfectly acceptable, as an example want to nominate this for deletion or what about this, it doesn't matter if you disagree with the politics of the symbol. This entire deletion request is just personal bogus filled with personal attacks and nonsense. Nothing states you can not X with a flag, it is not only acceptable for personal files but also more generally for other articles. Des Vallee (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Note to the closing admin: 4nn1l2 has resumed things with clarity. I have no strong feelings about this file, but after reading 4nn1l2 I believe now more than before that it has to be deleted. Having said that, the above "keep" vote is clearly looking for a "vengeance" because I DR'ed one of their files. (What a tragedy!) The only two interactions we have had with that person. If I were an admin I would tell them this is not a "good" way of acting in Commons, but I'm not. (Seeing what I see everyday with every possible type of people here, being one does not attract me either, BTW.) E4024 (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- E4024 You literally just admitted to wanting to delete a file because you dislike the creator, and you also proved beyond doubt that your reaction to any disagreement is to begin to throw personal attacks, and accusations. Seriously you haven't just done this here, this is often your immediate reaction to try to poison the well. Des Vallee (talk) 01:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Really? Ruwaym, the creator, is a friend of mine. He just yesterday sent me a cup of tea, still warm, you can see it on my talk page. The issue here is why "you" suddenly felt the need to discuss with me on a topic other than your file I DR'ed. I know that our admins notice -generally- that that is not just a coincidence. Indeed they "all" notice that, but due to their neutral position on user disputes some of them would not say what they see. We all have to believe in the good faith of users here. Therefore I can swear that you have good faith in following me to this discussion. Best regards. E4024 (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Des Vallee: And this one too, seems used by three Iraqi users on ArWiki. Maybe they will be Afghan users who use this Anti-Taliban sign too. I don't wanna vote for deleting or keeping this file, but it can be useful for user templates, and wikiqoute. @4nn1l2: Thanks for suggestion, but I am not a politician. Every Anti-Taliban isnt with ANA - well, but I am - also every Anti-Ba'athist isn't with Iraqi Army. Your regime in the 1980s fought against Ba'athist Iraq, and in the 2010s until now is defending from another Ba'athist Pan-Arabist regime, Syria. Politicians can be pragmatist, but not individuals. I want just show my base views on my userpage in a Wikipedian way, nothing more. I aldready did that in my own way, and deleting this file is ok for me. But I like to mention: You can't stay silent as a Middle Eastern user nowadays. There is a lot of users in ArWiki, FaWiki and TrWiki showed their views - political, religious and social - on their userpage. But i don't wanna make mine a board of sayings - there is many wikipedian ways for that - but I just mentioned a few of my views, being Anti-Ba'athist and Anti-Taliban, or being with ANA and FSA. I just feel there is no neutral side, because this conflicts are more than just politics, shows our worldviews and humanity. No more neutrality, it's time for action, even just a sign in my page in cyberworld. --Ruwaym (talk) 06:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Really? Ruwaym, the creator, is a friend of mine. He just yesterday sent me a cup of tea, still warm, you can see it on my talk page. The issue here is why "you" suddenly felt the need to discuss with me on a topic other than your file I DR'ed. I know that our admins notice -generally- that that is not just a coincidence. Indeed they "all" notice that, but due to their neutral position on user disputes some of them would not say what they see. We all have to believe in the good faith of users here. Therefore I can swear that you have good faith in following me to this discussion. Best regards. E4024 (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
I think people are missing the point, the point is that the image can be used on Wikimedia commons it has a piratical use for per say articles against the Taliban, or for a Userbox. Overall I don't get why people are drawing the line of an X mark on a flag on Commons. Anyone can make an image with an X mark if it's under CC. This doesn't just apply to this flag it applies to every single one, and every symbol. I don't get this strange deletion request and I don't know why it wasn't immediately shot down. There are images of symbols with X mark everywhere for every ideology, belief system, (examples: crossed, capitalist, socialist, fascist, anarchist, liberal, conservative symbols) etc... All these images are perfectly acceptable and have extremely good uses.Des Vallee (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: Then why you are here as an Admin? Resign and back to your life. Leave this "bloody WMF project on the internet". I am not a unconscionable. You know what, i will make another X-marked flag, IRGC with X-Mark. I will make X-Marked symbols of all those who allied with Ba'athist regimes, Iraq 1968–2003) and Syria (from 1963 till now). And @Des Vallee: To know, Ba'athism is our type of Nazsim. And to know, Taliban flag includes Shahada, so yeah, I x-marked the Shahada used on Taliban flag too. Some Islamists can call this a slur, or even heresy. But actually when Taliban use this flag clearly shows its "Anti-Islamic faith", cruelty and being "Enemy of God" etc. They did a lot of Massacre of the Innocents, and I wanna show i reject them and wanna use that X-marked symbol here. --Ruwaym (talk) 12:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Do whatever you want, but please don't ever ping me about these political rants! Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- What an admin who confuse humanity with politics, and conscience with rant. --Ruwaym (talk) 06:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Lol, this isnt done yet ? I thought all of you already reached consensus a long time ago. and i didn't even thinked that this File deletion nomination discussion could ended up this way. Douuwwurunwuuzhe 07:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- What an admin who confuse humanity with politics, and conscience with rant. --Ruwaym (talk) 06:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Do whatever you want, but please don't ever ping me about these political rants! Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: Then why you are here as an Admin? Resign and back to your life. Leave this "bloody WMF project on the internet". I am not a unconscionable. You know what, i will make another X-marked flag, IRGC with X-Mark. I will make X-Marked symbols of all those who allied with Ba'athist regimes, Iraq 1968–2003) and Syria (from 1963 till now). And @Des Vallee: To know, Ba'athism is our type of Nazsim. And to know, Taliban flag includes Shahada, so yeah, I x-marked the Shahada used on Taliban flag too. Some Islamists can call this a slur, or even heresy. But actually when Taliban use this flag clearly shows its "Anti-Islamic faith", cruelty and being "Enemy of God" etc. They did a lot of Massacre of the Innocents, and I wanna show i reject them and wanna use that X-marked symbol here. --Ruwaym (talk) 12:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete as per E40 and 4nn1l2 - In case a few people above haven't noticed we're here to upload files, sort through the naff ones and categories images - We're not here to start promoting Anti this and Anti that - Basically we're not here to be political.
I would also go as far as to say 4nn's suggestion whilst in completely good faith should not be allowed here either because again we're not here to be Anti x, y and z although I would settle with 4nn's compromise if the community believe it should be allowed here. –Davey2010Talk 21:52, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- So, are we going to be consistent and delete evey image in Category:Political anti logos or is the Taliban the only group to have this protected status? If we aren't getting rid of them all based on the new criteria being made up on the spot in this discussion, then
Keep Beeblebrox (talk) 23:58, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep per Beeblebrox. Perfectly acceptable picture. I don't see a single reason why this anti-flag should be deleted while other similar pictures stay on Commons without problem. I see this nomination as a very thinly veiled attempt of pro-Taliban bias.--Darwinek (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep There is no good reason to delete this, and it is in commonality with other 'anti' images.→StaniStani 05:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, Beeblebrox summed it well and Des Vallee has also good thoughts. Taivo (talk) 07:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Nagabhushana.jpg
FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:OTRS Timtrent (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Lexington Minute Man relief (Basha Paeff) - Lexington, MA.JPG
This work appears to still be subject to copyright. This is a US memorial (so COM:FOP does not give an exemption) and there appears to be a copyright notice on the bottom right of the memorial (look above where it says COMMON CAUSE - that appears to be (name, probably Basha Paeff) (C) 1948). Thus, the "3D works without copyright notice installed before 1978" exception does not apply. Artist died in 1979, so we're not at life + 70 yet. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Just searched Google Books's Search of Scans of the Catalog of Copyright Entries and found no renewal for "Bashka Paeff". So the original protection expired after 1948 plus 28 years = 1976. I'd put it to "PD-US-not renewed".ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 02:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- I changed the license template to "PD-US-not renewed". But since I'm no copyright expert I stand to be corrected by someone more knowledgeable. ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm certainly not a copyright expert, but agree with ΟΥΤΙΣ that it seems that this work is no longer protected by copyright, thanks to the very complex US copyright laws. Daderot (talk)
Keep Thanks to ΟΥΤΙΣ for confirming the lack of copyright renewal. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Per above, {{PD-US-not renewed}} applies. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Anouk Meunier.jpg
Copyvio : https://www.picoum.com/fr/blogs/magazine/les-produits-beaute-preferes-danouk-meunier/ Lagribouille (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Marie Soleil Dion.jpg
copyvio : https://uda.ca/utilisateurs/352729 Lagribouille (talk) 12:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:21, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Kawayo Hemdem.jpg
"Own work" realized 35 years after the person's death... E4024 (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- The image is very common and one can see it in most of the Kurdish community centers throughout Europe.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:الروائية شهد الراوي.jpg
Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:نجم محمد نجم.jpg
Not a contributing user. E4024 (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Сергей Александрович Бычков.jpg
No permission from author. Photo was taken from http://www.kamchatsky-krai.ru/biography/bychkov.htm Venzz (talk) 21:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Buying souvenirs (5811963514).jpg
Holiday snap 62.216.207.252 21:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Abdulilah barakat .jpg
User image by a non-contributor. Per COM:SELFIE. BriefEdits (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Foto de José Luis Rodríguez Díaz de León.jpg
No es una búsqueda relevante. No vincula a ninguna página de Wikipedia. 2806:2F0:9240:77FA:716D:AA8E:523F:71B2 14:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Pulstron4a.jpg
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 16:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AliceBulevur (talk · contribs)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation
Timtrent (talk) 16:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:TimVollert at a conference.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:IPO kantoor.jpg
The other uploads by this SPA are an official portrait that was probably uploaded without permission and a logo. This upload has no EXIF data and limited resolution. I strongly suspect this isn't their work Vera (talk) 16:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Evergreensprinkler.jpg
this seems to be advertising only - and the user's two other uploads too:
File:Evergreen-sprinklers-commercial-jobs.jpg
File:Evergreen Sprinkler and Landscaping Services.jpg
ProfessorX (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:ArfanNisho.jpg
Copy from The New Nation at http://thedailynewnation.com/news/28291/afran-nisho-becomes-dad.html Copyright © 2013 - All Rights Reserved News: 108.56.139.120 18:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:J-92s.jpg
Per uploader's own words, the 2nd (current) version of this file is not his own work and the copyright-holder might have agreed only to a restricted use: "Owner of picture confirmed he is ok with the usage of the file for the J/92s infobox". So, a valid confirmation by the photographer/rightsholder to OTRS is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I have the explicit written permission from the owner of the picture allowing for the use of the picture for an article about J/92s on Wikipedia. (email from June 17, 2020. I can privately share the email if needed.) Simon.letort (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, you need to forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). They are accustomed to deal confidentially with emails. --Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. I sent the email to OTRS. Best, Simon.letort (talk) 04:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, you need to forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). They are accustomed to deal confidentially with emails. --Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:滨海, 海口市, 中国 Feb 15, 2021 15-43-42.jpeg
not in use David290 (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:سلام عادل.jpg
"Own work" it is not. E4024 (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Лилия Каяниди.jpg
Also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Лилия Данииловна Каяниди.jpg
Unlikely own work, extremely low resolution, no metadata. Lesless (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Лилия Данииловна Каяниди.jpg
Also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Лилия Каяниди.jpg
Unlikely own work, extremely low resolution, no metadata. Lesless (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Bench of love and fidelity.JPG
No FoP in Russia, local copy in ru.wiki saved rubin16 (talk) 20:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felixschiffler (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work. Four images taken with four different cameras, on file missing metadata. The uploader already has multiple deleted copyright violations.
- File:WestVerkehr1421 2021-03-11.jpg
- File:Gevelsteen phillokaal.jpg
- File:Vaandel Philharmonie Sittard, beeld "de vaandeldrager" Toon Hermans, Toon Hermans met grote trom Philharmonie Sittard.JPG
- File:Slagwerkensemble Philharmonie Sittard Veldeke-concert 2009.jpg
- File:Jubileumconcert Philharmonie Sittard 24-11-2012.jpg
Didym (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Bust of M. Shketan in Yoshar-Ola.jpg
no FOP in Russia rubin16 (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Bust of P. I. Tchaikovsky in Yoshkar-Ola.jpg
No FOP in Russia, local copy saved in ru.wiki rubin16 (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Carolyn Merchant (photo by Robert Holmgren).jpg
Copyright violation 37.171.216.146 22:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- User:Runningsunshine1234Category:Commons User template with namespace, can you comment here, please? SarahSV (talk) 02:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is Runningsunshine1234. This image belongs to Carolyn Merchant, the author/professor/ecologist of whom this is a photo. There is no copyright to it, and Professor Merchant gave me explicit written permission to use it for Wikipedia, and has explicitly authorized its reuse in any way. In other words, this is free content that does not bear copyright restrictions on the right to redistribute. Prof. Merchant only requested that the photographer (Robert Holmgren) be credited for his work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runningsunshine1234 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We need permission from the photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DanielCabatbatOroPhotos (talk · contribs)
Previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous instances on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites.
- File:Rrfamilyspringresort2.jpg
- File:Nasulispringbuk2.jpg
- File:Quezonbukmunicipalhall.jpg
- File:Maramagpublicmarket.jpg
- File:Maramagaerialviewbydanielc.jpg
- File:Luanluanspringbukidnon.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DanielCabatbatOroPhotos (talk · contribs) 2
Likely not own works: transmission code in EXIF data.
- File:Ultrawindsbukidnoncdo.jpg
- File:Rrfamilyspringresort.jpg
- File:Nasulispringbuk.jpg
- File:Bluewatercavebukidnon.jpg
- File:Bluewatercavebukidnoninterior.jpg
- File:Overviewnatureandculturepark.jpg
- File:Luanluanbukidnon2.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete all. Transmission codes seem to indicate these were originally published on Twitter or some socmed platform. Even if these are uploader's self-photographed images, previously published works require COM:OTRS correspondence for identity verification and confirmation of the use of licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Jfk and blm ny mlk 50th.jpg
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Malaybalay City Highway.jpg
Previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has otherwise applied a licence acceptable to Commons to their image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DaxCordova (talk · contribs)
Previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous instances on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites.
- File:ManjuyodWhiteSandbar2.jpg
- File:GuihulnganRizalFreedomPark.jpg
- File:Buglasanfreedomparkbydaxcordova.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
This is Dax Cordova, the owner of the photos. I uploaded the photos in Facebook that is why you can see the FBMD code at the metadata. Please see here https://www.facebook.com/Buglasan/photos/a.1404667216431200/1849162968648287/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaxCordova2 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
As for the photos File:ManjuyodWhiteSandbar2.jpg and File:GuihulnganRizalFreedomPark.jpg, I uploaded them in a Facebook page before I uploaded them here. I hope that answers your suspicion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaxCordova2 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @DaxCordova2: thanks for the response. Then this is the case of previously published images. We require verification (even if you are the photographer and uploader of those images) via email correspondence at COM:OTRS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. See also previous cases of deletions of FB-sourced images at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mariyam Nafees.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:ChrisCrossMagic2016.jpg. Or if the original photos still exist, please overwrite these FB-sourced images with the original ones. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Yes, I will re-upload it. Let me check if the original photos are still in my hard drive. Thank you. - Dax. 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Files can be undeleted if a permission is sent. Or upload the original images. --Yann (talk) 11:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NegrosanonFeels (talk · contribs) 1
Previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous instances on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NegrosanonFeels (talk · contribs) 2
Likely to have been published elsewhere before uploads here. Scant metadata reveals strange (Twitter-like?) transmission codes that signify these were published (posted) on social media before their uploads here.
- File:Hinigaran3.jpg — 720 × 960 pixels, transmission code: "uATSX5D3SGjRim6dSvRQ"
- File:Hinigaran2.jpg — 960 × 576 pixels, "si1TWX6cR3TJ3AvFdEl4"
- File:Escalante2.jpg — 960 × 720 pixels, "lrn9m0dJZGAN6mNLCIre"
Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of these images and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the licensing as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook, Twitter, or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original images overwrite this social media-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.
_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Mort Mills 1961.jpg
This 1961 image from a copyrighted film, the HItchcock classic Psycho. The film was produced by Shamley Productions and distributed by Paramount Pictures, both likely holding copyrights. Binksternet (talk) 07:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, the film is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 20:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
File:I'm so lucky lucky.gif
It's not used on en. wikipedia, and is unlikely to be used as there is no "animation meme" page. Naihreloe (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Oppose, as the uploader of this file. It is still realistically useful for an educational purpose. I didn't intend it only for Wikipedia, but any content which would like to talk about animation memes or the like and needs a freely-licensed image. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @PrincessPandaWiki: TOO might be a problem in this case. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: If it did copy the animation of the original video, it would be a COM:DERIVATIVE of a copyrighted work and have to be deleted. (The original video no longer exists, but a screencap can be found here.) It doesn't seem to copy the original animation, and the United States Copyright Office has stated that simple dance routines cannot be copyrighted if that's the issue. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- @PrincessPandaWiki: TOO might be a problem in this case. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- imo, there just really is no need for it. 90% of animation memes are simply rehashes of the original video, and the very nature of them means if someone needs a picture of an animation meme, they'd create a video/gif/image of the specific meme they're referencing. Naihreloe (talk) 12:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Naihreloe: I don't think "never going to be used" is a valid reason to delete a file here. I reckon there are so many files on Wikimedia Commons which have never been used somewhere else, but still have value. You should see COM:Deletion policy for valid reasons for deletion. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- @PrincessPandaWiki: oos literally covers that. "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold". needs to be speedy deleted, as you stated, it was released on toyhouse first. Naihreloe (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Naihreloe: Do we have any other images of animation memes? I haven't verified the claim of the animatation first appearing on Toyhouse. It just appears to. This appears to be coming more from a plain dislike of the subject than a valid need for the image to be deleted (copyright, actually out of scope, etc.). I would like you to stop arguing and I would like an admin to settle the verdict tomorrow. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @PrincessPandaWiki: oos literally covers that. "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold". needs to be speedy deleted, as you stated, it was released on toyhouse first. Naihreloe (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Naihreloe: I don't think "never going to be used" is a valid reason to delete a file here. I reckon there are so many files on Wikimedia Commons which have never been used somewhere else, but still have value. You should see COM:Deletion policy for valid reasons for deletion. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- UPDATE: I found that the animation appears to have been shared on Toyhouse at 12 PM. According to the API, the project was shared (aka released under CC-BY-SA-2.0 license) at 8 PM. (All timestamps are in my Central Time Zone, I think?) If the animation was indeed shared first on Toyhouse, then I'll have to COM:speedy delete this image. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 14:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
I think it's fine to stay here. This artwork can be used to educate audiences about a famous internet subculture and provide insight into the furry fandom (as well as trends in modern freelance animation). It just depends on whether or not it was first posted to Toyhouse or Scratch. Holdonspirit (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused file in several questionable categories. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
File:27u.png
Replaced in de:Benutzer:Roomsixhu/Baustelle with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:פרופ' חיית גרינשפן.jpg
This formal PR picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web (such as this one and this one). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 02:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:El pianista y compositor Julián Martínez Villar, México, 1907.jpg
I do not believe this is original work by the uploader under the claimed license. Might be PD for some reason if accurate source were givien -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2028 Ruthven (msg) 14:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Plastic Love (song).jpg
Non-free album cover incorrectly tagged as public domain, file already exits at en:File:Plastic Love by Mariya Takeuchi 12-inch.png ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 08:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep I've already corrected the public domain tags. Rodney Araujo (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment The fact that the image is already uploaded on enwiki is not an argument for the deletion, there are other wikis, however are we sure that the tic-tac-toe drawing is below COM:TOO? --Thibaut (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Inclined to keep as it is, because the drawing looks simple enough. If the community says it is above TOO, I could crop out everything below the "B-SIDE" line which includes most of the drawing. whym (talk) 13:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete The discussion outlined in COM:TOO Japan pertains only to logos. Distinction should be made between logos (which are utilitarian/industrial in nature) and artwork, including album covers. If the creation expresses sentiment or thought and falls within the literary, artistic or musical domain, it is protected under Japanese law, and I'd say that this artwork falls under that category. I don't know about cropping the image either, as the point of having cover art is to identify the album -- altering it just so that we can call it an uncopyrightable text seems like a backwards action to me. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 04:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per 朝彦 (asahiko) and COM:TOO Japan, regardless of the cover's copyright (in)eligibility in the US. Furthermore, I uploaded the local copy, initially non-free until Rodney changed the status to PD. I reverted the status of the local copy back, but Rodney re-reverted my change. George Ho (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Novel Explosives.jpg
Uploader Pcaablroa nominated the file for speedy deletion with reason "I'm requesting that this photo be deleted because it's not the one shown on the publisher's website." This is was not a reason for speedy deletion, so I create a regular deletion request. There's an article in en.wiki about the book. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo: in use. NB: It's the cover of the 1st edition, that's why "it's not the one shown on the publisher's website" Ruthven (msg) 14:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Articolo gazzetta 2004.jpg
2004; not old enough. E4024 (talk) 11:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Gracy Omokoso.jpg
Exif show this image origin source is facebook, seems not uploader's own work. (`・ω・´) (talk) 12:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:200309 r35944.webp
Copyvio image, falsely claimed as free content, from New Yorker magazine - https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/03/09/moses-sumneys-world-of-possibilities 172.83.175.58 14:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
The image is public domain though yes correctly shot by New Yorker Magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leviisadog715 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Cannot see how this could possibly be PD (unless uploader is Kayla Reefer). Davidships (talk) 23:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The New Yorker's website states: © 2021 Condé Nast. All rights reserved.. Ruthven (msg) 14:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Macbook Air.png
Permission makes no sense (this picture wasn't published before 1977), source isn't correct (that's just the logo) and licensing doesn't make sense (this picture is not just geometric shapes). Husky (talk to me) 15:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Request I request an experienced editor to contact the uploader to add proper licence, as the image is a uploader's own work.
- Also the image were this image is based on also have the same wrong licence: File:Macbook Air.jpeg. Maybe we should at this one to this deletion request? --Stylez995 (talk) 00:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Stylez995. Ruthven (msg) 14:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Cescole 1.jpg
cette photographie est à double par erreur de ma part OPAN (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 14:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MysticHues (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Inter Mailand (alt).svg
Copyright infringement, no realistic source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Disagree with the assessment, also the nominator is currently banned! Govvy (talk) 23:27, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep Below COM:TOO Italy.Jonteemil (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion: below TOO. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Axiom2.png
Replaced in de:Benutzer:Roomsixhu/Baustelle with TeX equivalent:
- Wir beweisen Axiom 2:
- Dazu nutzen wir Satz 27u:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Schnittregel.png
Replaced in de:Benutzer:Roomsixhu/Baustelle and de:Diskussion:Syllogismus/Archiv/1 with TeX equivalent:
- Schnittregel
- Beweis:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:26u.png
Replaced in de:Benutzer:Roomsixhu/Baustelle with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Umf.png
Replaced in de:Benutzer:Roomsixhu/Baustelle with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Portrait of Nikolai V. Timofeeff-Ressovsky by Oleg Zinger.jpg
This is work by German artist ru:Цингер, Олег Александрович (1910-1997). This image can be undeleted in 2068 or later only, and after that it will have to be relicensed with copyright law of the US and Germany (not Russia) Alex Spade (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Bust of S. G. Chavain in Yoshar-Ola.jpg
No FOP in Russia, local copy saved in ru.wiki rubin16 (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Poet Anant Rathod.jpg
This photo was uploaded by me when I was new user. This photo violates copyright. Please delete it. Gazal world (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @JuTa: Can you please help me here? Thanks. --Gazal world (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. cropped version deleted as well. Ruthven (msg) 14:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Construction of the NPP.jpg
This homepage was given as the source for this photo. However, there is no indication that the image was published under a "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license". Mosbatho (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Michelle Ballantyne.jpg
Copyright violation. According to the metadata, this is a screen capture. Clearly the capture is from this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cob8EbNaSwg&ab_channel=CDFImages
The description of the video states it is the copyright of Colin D Fisher. In addition, the account has a prior history of copyright violations. Alex B4 (talk) 05:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tonks of iCommP (talk · contribs)
Questionable uploads. Doubtful if these are the self-photographed images of the uploader User:Tonks of iCommP. All of their author fields bear the username "User:Ateneodedavao". As of today, several of their images in which the metadata bears the name "Paolo PV" in the author field have been tagged as copyvios for speedy deletion, and three files having the names "Igy Castrillo" or "The Blue Iguana" in the metadata's copyright holder fields have been tagged as candidates for speedy deletion due to no proper permission. These other files make these last remaining uploads by Tonks of iCommP questionable over their true copyright status. Note also the inconsistent resolutions of these images. And take note: physical ownership / possession ≠ copyright. Copyright remains with the photographer, not the person who owns these or the people in the photos, unless proof of copyright transfer is indicated (and this proof must be sent via COM:OTRS correspondence).
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Ansicht Zuschauerraum.jpg
OTRS-permission from author Stefan Schöning Fotodesign or copyright holder Werbefotostudio is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bentheswimmer11 (talk · contribs)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation
Timtrent (talk) 09:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Provide OTRS permission or delete one of the images was previously posted on Instagram. I think I remember the user claiming that they work(ed) for the Carolina Hurricanes. If that’s the case, getting permission and uploading high-res originals instead of these web quality files should be pretty easy. Ytoyoda (talk) 05:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bentheswimmer11 (talk · contribs)
These images appear to be screenshots rather than the original JPEG files, based on metadata and some extreme compression (?). The uploader should consider replacing them with the original JPEGs from their camera.
- File:Carolina Hurricanes Ice Crew.jpg
- File:Canes Ice Crew Pregame.jpg
- File:Canes Crew Members Halloween.jpg
- File:Canes Crew Members Cheering.jpg
- File:Advance Auto Parts Tower.jpg
- File:Walter Tower-Raleigh.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete COM:PCP applies. COM:OTRS needs to be used to validate copyright ownership Timtrent (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ouatssss--23 (talk · contribs)
No permission. The photograph work of public domain work is protected by copyright law. COM:OTRS is needed.
- File:Anthropomorphic jade figurines of Shang dynasty from Fuhao Tomb.jpg
- File:陶蓝绿釉男俑.png
- File:China's Northern Dynasties' pottery figurine.jpg
- File:Male figure from Tomb 2, Chang-t'ai-kuan, Hsing-yang District, Henan.jpg
- File:Man wearing shanqun featured in the bronze armed warrior holding up chime bells.png
- File:Han dynasty wooden figurines 2.jpg
- File:Han dynasty wooden figurines.jpg
- File:Han dynasty wooden figurines 3.jpg
- File:Sui dynasty Flower Crown.jpg
- File:Buyao Flower.jpg
- File:Reverse replica of the crown of Empress Xiao.png
- File:Empress Xiao's Crown.jpg
- File:Hang dynasty wooden figurine.jpg
- File:Ming dynasty Wu Liang Guan.png
- File:Gǔdài yāsuìqián.png
SCP-2000 10:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:SNEC.jpg
Claim of own work is unlikely. (1) The plant was decommissioned in 1972, but the image is claimed from 2003. (2) What are the chances the uploader was one of the few people who had the ability to take an aerial photograph in the 1960s/70s? Wikiacc (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Halkawt zaher with fadi.jpg
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 16:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Halkawt zaher (talk · contribs)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
Timtrent (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Ahmad Fawzi leaving Sirte, Libya after Darfur Peace Talks in 2007.jpg
Photo uploaded together with other 2 by new user, see here. All claimed as "own work". Other 2 proved to have a UN Photo copyright in their metadata and were deleted. This, older, one has less metadata but - given the context where it was taken - it is most unlikely to have been taken by the uploader and likely also not free like the other two. Desyman (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 05:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
File:VWU Logo 300px 2020.png
The file is sourced to http://hoilhpn.org.vn/web/guest/gioi-thieu and I can't see proof of the license and I can't find a reason on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vietnam to change the license to PD <something>. MGA73 (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment copyrighted logo. It should be deleted ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 10:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 05:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
File:"El primer piloto aviador del Ejército Constitucionalista". 03.jpg
Dubious license and date statement; source link does not lead to image. Looks like it may be PD-Old &/or PD-Mexico, but beter info would be needed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The CC license is understood to be false. Accepting the representation that the work was published 1916, CC licenses of course did not exist then, and this scan would generally be considered a slavish reproduction that would not generate a new copyright in the derivative. Continuing acceptance of 1916, Mexico is pma + 100. This has a known author (initials J.M.G.) and no evidence of their date of death has been provided. For this to be PD in Mexico, the author would need to have died within a mere 4 years (2021-100-1=1920), which is highly unlikely. This thus appears a COM:PRP issue and requires additional info per the nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Emblem of Travinh Province.png
The license templat {{PD-VietnamGov}} is meant for text documents so the template may not be correct for this file. MGA73 (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Per the discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Vietnam#Documents, the definition of "document" appears to narrowly refer to text documents, not all publications and/or logos and symbols. -M.nelson (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Emblem of Binhphuoc Province.png
The license templat {{PD-VietnamGov}} is meant for text documents so the template may not be correct for this file. MGA73 (talk) 16:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment, I've actually contacted the Vietnamese government ("Ministry of Justice") about the copyright © status of this file and similar files and have not yet gotten a response. Not sure if this is the right place to discuss this, but is there a Wikimedia Vietnam (WVN) organisation that can lobby the government on our behalf? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete Per the discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Vietnam#Documents, the definition of "document" appears to narrowly refer to text documents, not all publications and/or logos and symbols. -M.nelson (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Vestíbulo (Legislative Palace of Ecuador, Quito) 005 (cropped).JPG
This file was initially tagged by Wilfredor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivated work of copyrighted art DMacks (talk) 17:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep While it is surely a COM:DR of a piece of art, looking at the original (File:Vestíbulo (Legislative Palace of Ecuador, Quito) 005.JPG) it appears to be permanently installed in a public place in Ecuador. That makes it {{FoP-Ecuador}}. I've tagged that parent image accordingly. If we agree here with that, then this extract of it should be likewise. DMacks (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi DMacks, There is no information about the author of this painting and the copyright of it, it has nothing to do with FOP. This picture is a derivative work of a painting copyrighted --Wilfredor (talk) 18:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think that's important. We know enough that it meets the FoP standard based on "Lobby of the Legislative Palace of Ecuador, in the city of Quito" (translated from image-description) therefore it is "legal to realize, without realize without authorization from the author and without the payment of any remuneration...a work of fine arts, of a photographic work or of a work of applied art, that is found situated in permanent form in a place open to the public" (applicable FoP law). What more evidence is required to demonstate it meets the standard? I agree it would be great to know more details of the artist. DMacks (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi DMacks, There is no information about the author of this painting and the copyright of it, it has nothing to do with FOP. This picture is a derivative work of a painting copyrighted --Wilfredor (talk) 18:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. This is clearly not a general view of the lobby with incidental inclusion of art there, but rather a photographic reproduction of this specific painting. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Leonor de Navarra.jpg
Another unsourced image from the problematic "Lost Gallery" on Pinterest; see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Blanca_II_de_Navarra.jpg. Also worthwhile to look at the uploader's talkpage history. [[Eric talk 01:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and earlier request. --Ellywa (talk) 23:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:USN HSM-60 Jaguars insignia.jpg
Pretty obviously a derivative of this copyrighted logo. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: That's interesting, since the image seems to be the insignia of a legitimate US military unit, Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 60, as per http://www.seaforces.org/usnair/HSM/Helicopter-Maritime-Strike-Squadron-60.htm, which would put it in public domain. Is it still a copyright violation? Shotgunscoop (talk) 03:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, if they based it upon someone else's legitimate copyrightable work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 10:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom; a derivative work of a copyrighted logo. -M.nelson (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:SS Skanderbeg volunteer sleeve patch.png
If the patch was made in Germany, German copyright law applies, not Albanian. No US licence is provided, the link is dead, not proof this patch was the one actually used.. Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- This request is nonsensical revenge from Peacemaker67 related to this article 21st Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Skanderbeg. View editing history of the article to get a better understanding. The image automatically qualifies for fair use for several reasons. First, it's an official uniform symbol of Albanian troops fighting in Albania. That makes it copyright exempt based on Albanian Copyright Law. Second, it was produced between 1943–1944 which is past the 70 year copyright period. The link to the website may have expired because the image may have been taken down but the source is accurate. I updated the source link anyway. And since it was produced by a German company, it would still be exempt under German Copyright Law. See template PD-Germany-§134-KUG. Kj1595 (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Furthermore, here are a few other links as proof that the image was officially used by Albanian troops during the war
https://www.emedals.com/europe/germany/allgemeine-waffen-ss/ss-foreign-volunteers-shields/albanian-ss-volunteer-sleeve-shield-g5738
https://epicartifacts.com/product/waffen-ss-albanian-volunteer-sleeve-shield-4
https://www.hannahsreich.co.uk/shop.php?ps=1&pg=3#prettyPhoto
- Furthermore, here are a few other links as proof that the image was officially used by Albanian troops during the war
- It isn't "revenge" it is due diligence. You have added an image with highly dubious licensing to a Featured Article on en WP. To continue to be used it needs proper licensing as a PD image. Those sources aren't reliable, none of them prove the pictured badge was one created by the Germans (it could easily be a facsimile created by a badge maker) and in any case that is not really the issue here. The insignia was created by the Germans in Germany and worn by a unit of the German Waffen-SS, even though many of the rank-and-file of this unit were Albanians. Clearly German copyright law applies (not Albanian law), and all images on Commons require a US licence as well. If you think the licensing is wrong, fix it, otherwise, the deletion discussion will centre on the current licensing, which is clearly wrong and lacks a US licence. Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is exactly revenge. You nominated this image for deletion because you don't want it to show on the article I linked above. And wanted to replace it with a "fake" black and white illustration which "using your own argument" also doesn't have a US license https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:21st_SS_Division_Logo.svg
Unlike your "fake" image, the image shown here is an historical one. I showed links that prove it. And here is the patch again stitched to an actual uniform https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSoH-TOf8aPLx5nXBkJB7cHXxka5y0tytCkLQ&usqp=CAU
The licensing of the image has been updated. Kj1595 (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is exactly revenge. You nominated this image for deletion because you don't want it to show on the article I linked above. And wanted to replace it with a "fake" black and white illustration which "using your own argument" also doesn't have a US license https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:21st_SS_Division_Logo.svg
- Utter nonsense. You need to read up about licensing. It still needs a US license because it isn't a representation (like the black and white one previously used in the article). It is an original German work (purportedly), and the license you are using states that the actual badge that is shown in the photograph was made (ie published) before 1966. How do we know that? There is no provenance given on the militaria website, just an ambit claim it has been in storage. There are plenty of supposedly "original" badges sold online by militaria dealers. So, you still need proof this badge was made before 1966 to use this German licence, and it still needs a UD PD licence regardless of what German licence you use. Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is an offer by a militaria shop in the Netherlands, where you can buy it for 100 Euro. No reliable source, cpopyright unclear, please delete immediately. -Big Virgil (talk) 10:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Utter nonsense. You need to read up about licensing. It still needs a US license because it isn't a representation (like the black and white one previously used in the article). It is an original German work (purportedly), and the license you are using states that the actual badge that is shown in the photograph was made (ie published) before 1966. How do we know that? There is no provenance given on the militaria website, just an ambit claim it has been in storage. There are plenty of supposedly "original" badges sold online by militaria dealers. So, you still need proof this badge was made before 1966 to use this German licence, and it still needs a UD PD licence regardless of what German licence you use. Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Have you read the discussion taking place? What do you mean no reliable source? There is literally an entire book of 276 pages written about the subject and this image is on the cover page. It is sourced in the article page but I copy/pasted it to the image page as well. I posted an image of the uniform with the patch. I'm sure you can buy that for 100 euros, right? Kj1595 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- How do we know it was made before 1966? The source page explains that in the description: This shield originates almost certainly from the SS clothing department at the Dachau KZ when liberated in 1945. The shield is in mint and unissued condition and just shows some minor traces caused by years of storage. Nice original sleeve shield! Kj1595 (talk) 11:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is in compliance with the PD-GermanGov license and is earlier than 70 years. There is no reason to consider the source unreliable as long as there are enough other sources that describe both the subject in question and the symbols.Bes-ARTTalk 13:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Per license compliance, and the source being seemingly reliable and not a dead link as the the deletion request claims. Other links posted above prove that this insignia was in fact used historically. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. In addition, it is not proved this embroydery stems from 1944. In any case it is an exact copy - as far as needlework can be - of File:Albanian flag as a shield.svg, so safely assumed to be in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 23:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Black Lives Matter 2020 art.jpg
Logo above COM:TOO US A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like more of a CC-licensed work of art than a logo to me. TOO should be irrelevant. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files from User:Hsch31 round 4
- File:61 Elementarteilchen vertikal.png
- File:61 Elementarteilchen horizontal.png
- File:Zum Standardmodell 5.PNG
- File:Zum Standardmodell 1.png
- File:Zum Standardmodell 7h.png
- File:Standard Model horizontal of the real matter Construction with Graviton.PNG
- File:Standard Model vertical of the real matter Construction with Graviton.PNG
- File:Bosons Neutrinos level real Construction.png
- File:CERN-Standard Model for nonmathematic people.pdf
- File:Vergleich der verschiedenen Darstellungen des Standard Modells.pdf
- File:How to get the Standardmodel System.pdf
- File:Hsch31 im ResearchGate.PNG
- File:3Punkte-ein Kreis.png - just mentioned for completeness, this one has its own open deletion request
Fourth round after Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Hsch31 and Commons:Deletion requests/More files of User:Hsch31 and Commons:Deletion requests/Even more files from User:Hsch31. Same reason again: No educational value, zero chance that any of these will ever appear in an article. Some of them are re-uploads or nearly identical with earlier deleted uploads. Some of them are attempts to write "articles" on commons. File:Hsch31 im ResearchGate.PNG has a problematic licensing status as the user specified "nur intern, nicht zur Veröffentlichung" ("only internal, not for publication") which seems to be incompatible with CC.
Does this count as vandalism? If not, is there a different way to stop these continuous nonsense-uploads? Discussion with the user across multiple platforms had no effect. --mfb (talk) 07:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- The user added File:Construction of the Higgs field with all the Data of the 61 Elementary Particles according to Gell.pdf and File:Higgs field construction of the Elementary particles.pdf and File:Link Higgsfield Protokoll construction of the particles.pdf in the meantime. And it's again all the same nonsense. --mfb (talk) 13:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and earlier DR's, uploader did not comment to show their uploades are educational usefull per COM:EDUSE. --Ellywa (talk) 23:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Alexander Vladimirovich Grigoriev - Prisoner.png
The photographer of this image is stated to be the subject, which is unlikely. If it is, the subject died in 1961 and the work is not in the public domain in Russia as they died after 1947 (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia). If it is not, the photographer is not identified and the source link provided does not directly link to the image for verification; therefore the work may not be in the public domain in Russia as the photographer may have died after 1947. mattbr 08:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:A.V. Grigoriev - Prisoner in Karlag.png
The photographer of this image is stated to be the subject, which is unlikely. If it is, the subject died in 1961 and the work is not in the public domain in Russia as they died after 1947 (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia). If it is not, the photographer is not identified and the source link provided does not directly link to the image for verification; therefore the work may not be in the public domain in Russia as the photographer may have died after 1947. mattbr 08:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 23:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Aleksandr Vladimirovich Grigoriev - 1910 (20 y.o).jpg
The photographer of this image is stated by the uploader to be the subject. If it is, the subject died in 1961 and the work is not in the public domain in Russia as they died after 1947 (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia). If it is not, the photographer is not identified and the source link provided does not directly link to this version of the image for verification and does not state the photographer as far as I can tell; therefore the work may not be in the public domain in Russia as the photographer may have died after 1947. mattbr 08:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was taken, which will be 1910+120=2030.. --Ellywa (talk) 23:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - 1920s.jpg
The photographer of this image is stated by the uploader to be the subject. If it is, the subject died in 1961 and the work is not in the public domain in Russia as they died after 1947 (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia). If it is not, the photographer is not identified and the source link provided does not contain this image for verification; therefore the work may not be in the public domain in Russia as the photographer may have died after 1947. mattbr 08:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was taken, which will be 1921+120=2041.. --Ellywa (talk) 23:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Excerpt from a letter to A.V. Grigoriev's wife - 12-1944.png
The letter author is stated by the uploader to be en:Alexander Grigoriev (artist). The description says it is a letter to his wife, rather than a letter from him to his wife. I cannot tell who the letter is from. If the author is Grigoriev, he died in 1961 and the work is not in the public domain in Russia as he died after 1947 (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia). If it is not, the author is not identified and the source link provided does not contain this image for verification; therefore the work may not be in the public domain in Russia as the author may have died after 1947. mattbr 08:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 23:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Bust of V. P. Mosolov in Yoshkar-Ola.JPG
No FOP in Russia, local copy saved in ru.wiki rubin16 (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Partia e Punës e Shqipërisë.svg
Produkt eines Users, keine Quellenangabe vorhanden. Big Virgil (talk) 09:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
No reliable source, creation of an user. - Big Virgil (talk) 09:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The source has an explicit copyright notice. It is a logo of a political party, not a government work, so we need a free license from the copyright holder. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:21st SS Division Logo.svg
Produkt eines Users, aus der it_wp übernommen (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:21divss.gif), dort ebenfalls Schöpfung eines Users. Keine Quellenangabe vorhanden. Lizenzierung zudem fraglich Bestandteil eines deutschen behördlichen Dokuments? - welches?
No reliable source, creation of an user: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:21divss.gif. Licence questionable: "issued by a german authority"-which one? Big Virgil (talk) 09:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
The symbol was created by the Waffen-SS which was part of the German Wehrmacht. The German Wehrmacht was integrated part of the German Empire. The symbol is thereby a national symbol. The rights of the national symbols of the German Empire are under the jurisdiction to the Federal Republic of Germany. The license mentioned with the symbol is therefore valid. User:Marco Kaiser
- U:Marco Kaiser : NO. The "amtswerk" clause is clearly restricted to depictions actually used by official bodies (in official documents, amtsblatt, public occasions...). If a private person draws a version of an official coa, it is his own work and not an amtswerk. The BLAZON is free, the OFFICIAL DEPICTIONS are, but not the depictions created by the private individuals. Kathisma (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Kathisma The symbol has been used by an official body - the 21st Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Skanderbeg. All division emblems (Truppenkennzeichen) of the german Wehrmacht have been approved by the german high command of the army (OKH) with order no. 21 on Februar 26th 1944 (Befehl Nr. 21 vom 16. Februar 1944 (OKH Gen St d H Org Abt. II/31 180/44)) The file is not a version of the symbol just an transformation to svg. Marco Kaiser (talk) 08:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep These sources show that this emblem was historically used and not the invention of a Wikipedia user as the deletion request claims: 1, 2, 3. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- None of these websites is a reliable source. - Big Virgil (talk) 19:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- The italian drawing that was the model for this file has also been destroyed: . - Big Virgil (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- None of these websites is a reliable source. - Big Virgil (talk) 19:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this is reproduction of an illustration of the divisional arm shield on p. 139 of John Keegan's Waffen SS: The Asphalt Soldiers published by Pan/Ballantine in 1970, except that the black and white elements are reversed. Keegan was a senior lecturer at Sandhurst. The book is clearly reliable for this material. I will adjust the licensing to reflect that. Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:21st SS Division Logo.svg
This is not a representation of the armshield from Keegan as it states, it is a reversal of the black and white, and it is not the unit badge in Keegan. It is incorrect and should be deleted. A correct file has been created and is being used in the 21st SS Div article. I am reversing my position from the 2021 deletion discussion. Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vacant0 (talk · contribs)
https://mc.rs bottom have this info: "Sva prava zadržana. Medija Centar. Zabranjeno je svako kopiranje sadržaja sajta bez prethodnog odobrenja." (seems mean All copyright received).
- File:Ivan Kostić 2020 (cropped).jpg
- File:Nenad Čanak 2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:Ivan Kostić 2020.jpg
- File:Nenad Čanak 2021.jpg
(`・ω・´) (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @-akko: As far as I know, Media Centar issued an approval back in 2012 for uploading their pictures. This is the ticket (ticket #2012011710005331) Vacant0 (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Vacant0 I don’t have access to otrs, maybe should ping other otrs members (`・ω・´) (talk) 13:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment @Vacant0: There were several discussion about this ticket, you can see here latest one, but anyhow it is stil unresolved and not clear whether this ticket is valid today or not for all images from Medija Centar. --Smooth O (talk) 10:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Vacant0 I don’t have access to otrs, maybe should ping other otrs members (`・ω・´) (talk) 13:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Логотип PM Gallery.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Доброго дня! Додавала даний файл для розміщення у статті про діяльність PM Gallery. Якщо потрібно, галерея може надати електронний дозвіл на використання. --Marta Iskiv (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Marta Iskiv
Delete: since not COM:INUSE, the topic does not seem notable. Also, I suspect the gallery has not intended to release their logo under a CC license. -M.nelson (talk) 11:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:History & prehistory of Sanskrit.djvu
DR raised because the author appears to be - w:Sukumar_Sen_(linguist) who was still around in 1992. There is no indication this publication was of an 'official' nature. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)@
Delete Though the cover page shows "PRINTED BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT BRANCH PRESS 1958" suggesting PD per "Government: Publish + 60 years" at COM:INDIA, per page 8 this is a printing of lectures given by w:Sukumar_Sen_(linguist) at the University of Mysore, suggesting an academic work rather than government. I believe the standard term of 60 years p.m.a. should apply. -M.nelson (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Ofenbach @ Anglet Beach Rugby Festival 2016 Virgin Radio.jpg
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Féval - La Quittance de minuit, 1846 - tomes 4-6.djvu
A few pages are missing in the second file. A four-volume edition without any missing pages exists Aziliz Breizh (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Féval - La Quittance de minuit, 1846 - tomes 1-3.djvu
A few pages are missing in the second file. A four-volume edition without any missing pages exists Aziliz Breizh (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - page presented - 00.jpg
Copyright violation; icons used in the image are almost certainly above COM:TOO Iran. Ahmadtalk 22:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: Hi. This is a screenshot of a whole website and look at the footer of that image. There is under no copyright! If you want create a copyright for that, contact that website administrator. There is no icon under copyright. It's just common icons everyone can find everywhere. Do you really see any special design for that? I repeat that,This is a screenshot of a whole website and look at the footer of that image. Also look at
Look at these [1] [2] [3] image. It's screenshots of websites and UNDER COPYRIGHT but still we use it on WikiPedia and Commons. WP:COPYLINKS[4] and WP:FUR[5] describe the situation If a website COPYRIGHTED. But you can look at this screenshot of that whole page. There is not copyrighted. Good luck! --Arash00011 (talk) 04:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. It is still copyrighted. Copyright is not exactly something you "create". An image is only acceptable on Commons when there is evidence proving it's free, so the copyright holder needs to release the content under a free license. Otherwise, it's not free, even if there is no statement on the page concerning its copyright status. Non-free screenshots should be locally uploaded on Wikipedia under fair use; the screenshots you linked above have all been locally uploaded on English Wikipedia; they are not free and are not hosted on Commons. Please see COM:SS and COM:FAIR for more info. Ahmadtalk 22:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- peyvandha.ir not copyrighted Baratiiman (talk) 11:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
References
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Facebook_(login,_signup_page).png
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gmail_screenshot.png
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Twitter_verified_account.png
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:COPYLINK
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:FUR
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Huy hiệu Đội chuẩn 2015.png
- + File:Emblem of Ho Chi Minh Young Pioneers.svg Added identical svg -M.nelson (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
The license templat {{PD-VietnamGov}} is meant for text documents so the template may not be correct for this file. MGA73 (talk) 16:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete. License asserts PD-User but is unclear about whether it is a derivative work and if so why the underlying material is in the public domain. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Finnusertop: Thank you for clarifying. Yes I forgot that part because I copy pasted from other DR I made about same topic. --MGA73 (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Not the uploader's own work so {{PD-User}} isn't appropriate. Neither is {{PD-VietnamGov}}: Per the discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Vietnam#Documents, the definition of "document" appears to narrowly refer to text documents, not all publications and/or logos and symbols. -M.nelson (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete There's one vectorized version, you should use it Baokhang48812002 (talk) 13:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep vector version And don't delete the vectorized version because it is official standardized logo of a youth organization in Vietnam in vector. Baokhang48812002 (talk) 13:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Baokhang48812002: Why is the vector version free? According to this discussion, the tag {{PD-VietnamGov}} does not apply to logos, so the logo is assumed to be copyrighted by its creator. -M.nelson (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. The referenced discussion on Commons talk did not lead to a change in wording of the template, which still has this warning "The template is for images of scanned text documents only" This logo is not a text document so does not fall in PD according to the template. --Ellywa (talk) 21:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)