Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/20

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 20th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo feature 03.jpg

This file is not required in the Wikipedia article and should be deleted asap. Manas.chafekar (talk) 02:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nude Canadians at play.jpg

Unidentified people, and unused picture. May be also privacy issue, see . Yann (talk) 03:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mirza.parsa.rashidi (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, and probable copyvios. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StarGoodkid Worldwide (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StarGoodkid Worldwide (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; speedied per COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StarGoodkid Worldwide (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST (en:Star Goodkid).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; speedied per COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Example userpage new/graphic sexual

صورة.فيها.الاخصاب.بين.رجل 105.66.134.126 13:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erection Development V2.jpg

فيديو.يتبين.فيه.اخصاب.بين.رجل.ومرءة 105.66.134.126 13:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Screenshot of Outlook com.PNG

The design are copyrighted. You can not steal someones design. The layout maybe depending on if it is original or not. The coding to make the layout is copyrighted. If you made a copied microsofts homepage pictures and everything not including text. That could be considered copyright infringment. The Photographer (talk) 13:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

 Keep This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality , his work contains material which may be subject to trademark laws in one or more jurisdictions.

This is original Screenshot of Outlook com, rest on web site is -publicity -.--EEIM (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: as per User:EEIM. P 1 9 9   16:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Screenshot of Outlook com.PNG

This file was initially tagged by 神樂坂秀吉 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot of non-free content. Yann (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PHOTO FEATURE SC Chafekar1.jpg

Please remove/ delete this file since the admin has found a copy right issue with this. Manas.chafekar (talk) 12:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@Manas.chafekar: Actually, this could be allowed under the {{GODL-India}} license. But you must provide a source. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: I have added the source. It is not from any url or link but it was provided by the director directly as a copy on digital drive. Let me know if the changes i have made are now appropriate? Are any other changes required?Manas.chafekar (talk) 15:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 15:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swastik phulare (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spaarndammerstraat

File does already exist, slightly different name Paul bohte (talk) 20:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: Empty gallery. --Achim (talk) 20:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User talk:V123456789012

1233456678 V123456789012 (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, sockpuppeteer. --Achim (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sexy Crossdresser .jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:44, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crossdresser Ass.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:44, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:230e0388 9aa58d-Video.webm

Not educationally useful أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk) 23:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: F1, copyright violation. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:湯洛雯 Roxanne.jpg

CopyVio ( https://sina.com.hk/news/article/20190607/0/3/53/%E6%B3%95%E8%AD%89%E5%85%88%E9%8B%92-%E6%B9%AF%E6%B4%9B%E9%9B%AF%E5%8F%96%E4%BB%A3%E9%BB%83%E5%BF%83%E7%A9%8E%E6%88%B2%E4%BB%BD-%E8%87%A8%E5%8D%B1%E5%8F%97%E5%91%BD%E8%AE%8A-NG%E7%8E%8B-10247452.html ) 42.98.242.242 16:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

Unused images of non-notable person: out of project scope; COM:HOST

Rrburke (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination - re-uploads. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sannisaha (talk · contribs)

All images out of COM:SCOPE, periodically re-uploaded after deletion.

Ariadacapo (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; G4 as well. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020 Election Map (FAKE).jpg

fake map. election in the future Yilku1 (talk) 02:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted out of scope -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020 Electoral Map (FAKE).png

fake map. election in the future Yilku1 (talk) 02:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted out of scope -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2016JokeMap.png

not used fake map Yilku1 (talk) 02:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted out of scope -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ismail Shammout - Madonna of the Oranges.jpg

Still copyrighted, Shammout died in 2006. Racconish💬 05:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted per nom; false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DVD with constant rotational speed.png

It is a screenshot of proprietary software (MS Windows), the description and license are false. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 05:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Uploader's response

Yeah, could be deleted. I'll take one under Linux for you licenseholics.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiusz.olszewski (talk  contribs)


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Come Over by Mraimdy ft Rickey.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by हिंदुस्थान वासी (talk · contribs)

NO COM:FOP in India + please explain why these images are public domain in the U.S.A.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Patrick Rogel: , problem is the photos, right? I have removed them from File:Nelson Mandela quote on Gandhi.jpg. Please review that and tells me if that format is okay so I will make this change to this uploads as well. Thanks.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 14:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Removed photos from the remaining quotes too. I think they can be kept with deleting their previous version.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 13:37, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 Delete: Without the photos, these fall outside of Commons:project scope, being Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. --bjh21 (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
They are certainly educational and these pictures of the quotes can be used on many articles.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 10:13, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Files uploaded by हिंदुस्थान वासी (talk · contribs)

Ww2censor (talk) 13:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Yes, delete all these files. Indian postage stamp license on Tunisian stamp is my mistake.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 18:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isabel.jpg

Copyvio Sofree 22:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


Deleted: by User:Polarlys, later recreated with different content. JuTa 16:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isabel.jpg

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isabel.jpg

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder automatically retains their rights unless the item falls into the public domain. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  • @Magog the Ogre: A reverse google image search points back to this Getty Images page. It indicates it was created in 1913, but when it was published is unclear, and I don't see an author credit. What is your opinion on use of a PD template here? I forget if there's a rule of thumb for pre-1924 works of unclear and/or anonymous creation/publication? Rhododendrites talk |  01:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
    @Rhododendrites: it's probably OK. Press agencies take photos so they can publish and sell them. Occasionally they might take a photo which no one wants and only later publish. I think it's safe to keep in the absence of a claim to the contrary (notwithstanding the boilerplate copyright notice that Getty places on all their content). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
    That was my thought, too. So I've added PD-US-Expired to the page and added a date/description/categories. Rhododendrites talk |  02:14, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karl Franken en Friedrich Alpers.jpg

  •  I withdraw my nomination Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep:Yes, there source was already present, and now it is there twice. Same goes for the extracted file. Skjoldbro (talk) 15:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
You're right, my bad. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
When I clic on the link it directs me to the website en the picture? --Maddriver371 (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: See Signature field. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Friedrich Alpers.jpg

  •  I withdraw my nomination Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nique le système cassandre jeremy Noé 111 la baie saint Etienne de montluc.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mokadema.flac

Unused personal audio; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20185024 1377264695661484 2244361583163604992 n(1).jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by D007c (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Great example of a great person.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AndreaBologna.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MARVIN SR.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zoltan majer.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image (:hu:Wikipédia:Májer Zoltán). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Byoa (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination and no license since 20 July 2019. --Green Giant (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Weverij Basile Demuynck 11.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination and no license since 20 July 2019. --Green Giant (talk) 18:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Javier Bezares.jpg

This file was initially tagged by DigitalSergio as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: type reason here Yann (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Keep No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 13:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: No reason for deletion given. Person in the image seems to be a Spanish party official: Google translates the description as "Javier, former deputy spokesman for UPYD", UPYD is a party in Spain. Maybe he's not notable for a Wikipedia article, but educational use of this image seems possible (in the context of this party, politics in Spain...). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q1860 (eng)-Poslovitch-European Space Agency.wav

French accent, unusable PM3 (talk) 14:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I recently uploaded a newer version of this file. The pronunciation I'm now duely applying is therefore based on various sources including w:International Phonetic Alphabet, voice synthetizers and ultimately actual audio records of ESA's full name. May my French accent still be recognizable in it, I would - respectfully - consider any further remarks about it unacceptable: every single speaker, no matter if he's native or not, has an accent. As such, would you also consider the same record done by a Scottish would be unacceptable? Differences in phonemes remain obvious in both cases. Ultimately, the goal of my records are not to be spoken in a perfect (and I think normative too) manner, rather to depict one of the many differences there are in the way to pronounce and stress English words, while also providing pronunciations for Wikipedia articles, in order to fulfill my personal goal of creating an "audio" layer. To conclude, the file might be "unusable" in the way you think it should be used. However, I firmly believe it's not, because it is part of a larger project of transmitting a corpus of free-licensed pronunciations to next generations, scientists and linguists (whom Lyokoï is likely part of). --Poslovitch (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep: This file is in use on en:European Space Agency. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wikipedia is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. Also, as a native English speaker I don't think this has a noticeable French accent, though the first and last vowels are a bit off. --bjh21 (talk) 15:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nileshmundheaadiwasiking (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GOLDIEM J (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Those photos were previously used on my user page. The prom photo is the current one I've got up there, and the two you mentioned are old ones.

Deleted: Deleted as not in use. Uploader is an active user. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pengu1ngaynor (talk · contribs)

Modern art. I think artist's heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Pengu1ngaynor (talk · contribs)

Copyrighted work by Stan Jones, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Some images now have OTRS permission. --Krd 14:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okeile (talk · contribs)

Unused personal selfie. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:20, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okeile (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:I hate bank of america.png

per COM:OOS (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naturiss (talk · contribs)

Transfered from Flickr, most of them seems to be useful, but those seflies not so much. Per COM:SELFIE.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 18:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

No objection to these being deleted. I think the Flickr user Genevieve must have mixed these selfies in the folders of the panel discussions etc. Naturiss (talk) 20:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naturiss (talk · contribs)

Photos taken by Press Eye employees, not works from Northern Ireland Office

385 files
* File:Secretary of State Bradley visits Belfast Metropolitan College (39651150451).jpg

A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination - spot checked these and they all appear to be PressEye images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Edwin Pulgar.jpg

Low quality file with little potential educational use. Hiàn (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carl Thompson Cancer Awareness Campaign .jpg

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davepastor draft has since been deleted and file is no longer in use. Hiàn (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shiyankong (talk · contribs)

No EXIF. Photos from various events. Unreliable claims of own work.

Roy17 (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vancouver Bridge From Train Tracks.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Mds08011 (talk) 19:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alberto Fernández.png

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Other user overwrote with a totally different file that the one I uploaded, I reverted that edition. So please cancel this request. —Frodar (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alberto Fernández.png

Separate issue from previous DR: the video is private (including in the available links to archives), and its copyright status cannot be verified. Gikü (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The video was under the YouTube CC license. I myself requested for a license review over a year ago and nothing happened. Also, in the previous deletion request an incompatibility of the license was not mentioned, issue which could have been easily detected by the admin who made the DR closure.
This is the only file that I uploaded at that time, from YouTube videos, of which the source video is no longer available. Other succesfully reviewed YouTube screenshots uploaded by me date from that time, File:Mercedes Trimarchi.png and File:Gisela Marziotta.png.
 Keep All this I believe supports my position of keeping the file. An experienced user like me would never upload files like this if it wasn't with the right license. Similar files (from YouTube) that I uploaded at that time, all are CC licensed.
Said that, to avoid similar problems, I urgently request that revisions be made to the following files, all uploaded by me by that time (June-July 2019) with the CC license, and with a requested review template that I put:
Frodar (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Reviewed the 7 files requested. Gikü (talk) 12:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick response. Frodar (talk) 14:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alberto Fernández.png

Youtube video is now private, no saved version on Internet Archive that allows reviewing the license — Dudek1337 (talk) 20:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, the reason is the same as past year nomination. I think I gave enough information there that supports my claim. I don't know if it's appropriate, but if the "review needed" templates can be removed, it would be helpful to avoid this situation again in the future. —Frodar (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Best Picture Of Tyrone Moodley.jpg

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Embassy Suites Rockford with Conference Center.jpg

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Тарас Маменко (talk · contribs)

Photos of photos, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HamedHanifi (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Forallerrors (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC) Why is this being deleted? I own the rights to these photographs.

Files uploaded by Forallerrors (talk · contribs)

Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 12:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: In scope as she is the subject of a WP article but likely copyvios. Need proof that uploader is photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: In scope as she is the subject of a WP article but likely copyvios. Need proof that uploader is photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion Photos are owned by me and I gave full and complete permission for these photos to be used on wikipedia  Preceding unsigned comment added by Skash16 (talk  contribs) 22:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdel Fattah al Burhan.jpg

Possible copyright issue. I couldn't find CC indications in the source, and the picture is of low resolution Eran (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Girl running while eating bread.jpg

This picture has been released under the license that prohibits to use it for commercial use. The terms and conditions say "(5)イラストをそのまま、または加工して、独立の取引対象として頒布(販売、賃貸、無償配布、無償貸与など)したり、公衆送信(インターネットのホームページや放送などを利用した送信)などを利用して提供することは、営利、非営利を問わずできません。", and a summary of the T&C says "【禁止】商品化利用 ・販売用製品に利用 カレンダー、ジグソーパズルなど". The T&C does not satisfy the free license conditions required by Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia Foundation. Additionally, the T&C prohibits to use it for pornography ((4)イラストを公序良俗に反する方法で使用し、又は公序良俗に反する業務、活動に供する目的で使用はできません。また、公序良俗に反するか否かを問わず、アダルト雑誌やアダルトビデオ(その他、DVD、CD-ROM、WEBサイト等、媒体の如何を問いません)に関して、表紙、パッケージ、記事、映像、宣伝、広告、その他一切の態様による使用はできません。また、ポルノや風俗(合法・違法、営利・非営利、個人・法人、その他態様を問わず、性風俗に関する一切の事項を指します)に関する記事、映像、宣伝、広告、その他一切の態様による使用もできません。) . This restriction also seems to a deviation from the required free license conditions. Yapparina (talk) 23:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  • I posted this image. I made a mistake in the image. I'm sorry.--逃亡者 (talk) 23:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, license incompatible. --whym (talk) 13:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farsarjoo (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic

Seeing that there is a backlog of five months for deletion requests, I find it necessary to continue the clean-up of fictitious flags uploaded by Santiago RD, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. My apologies for dragging GTRus into this mess.They have done nothing wrong by producing svg files from the SantiagoRd files.

TU-nor (talk) 10:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Keep: I haven't checked them all, but a random sample suggests that these are in use on Spanish Wikipedia. Under COM:INUSE, Commons should not delete files that are used by other projects solely because they're alleged to be inaccurate. --bjh21 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Bjh21: They are used in Spanish Wiki because the uploading editor Santiago RD has placed them in the Spanish Wiki template es:Plantilla:DOM. Those flags are not "inaccurate", they are completely fake, they are a hoax. I am sure that COM:INUSE is not meant to protect fake information just because the uploading editor is smart enough to use the uploads in some Wiki. --TU-nor (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
@TU-nor: Taking the first two files, File:Bandera del Municipio La Caleta.png was added to pl:La Caleta by Janusz J., while File:Bandera del Municipio La Cienaga.png was added to es:La Ciénaga (Barahona) by Aitorembe. Neither change has ever been reverted or even discussed on the relevant talk page. COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV say that we leave content decisions like this up to individual Wikipedias. Once the various Wikipedias have decided that they don't need these files, then we can delete them. --bjh21 (talk) 17:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Santiago RD has uploaded hundreds of non-existent flags they have created themselves. I find it difficult to accept that we cannot remove them just because other users in good faith have believed they were real and used some of them in articles. --TU-nor (talk) 07:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic

Three files slipped away the last two times, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic

TU-nor (talk) 17:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic

These files are recreations of fictitious flags removed two years ago in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. See also files by same uploader removed recently twice in Commons:Deletion requests/Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic.

TU-nor (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic

Various versions of these flags have been uploaded in the past and subsequently deleted as fictional in multiple DRs over the years. The main seeming to be Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. So these images should be re-deleted as OOS since there apparently aren't any actual flags for municipalities of the Dominican Republic to begin with. Although I'm more then willing to remove any from the deletion request where there's evidence of it actually being used IRL.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, although I appreciate your concern, I don't think every image should just be deleted. Regarding your statement of no "actual flags for municipalities of the Dominican Republic", I disagree; many US municipalities use white flags with the seal and no one says they aren't "actual flags".

Every image (usually ending in ".gif") on Flags of the World I can confirm the existence of. Most are created by FOTW member Randy Young, who is indeed quite reputable. Sadly, I can't confirm the existence of flags for: El Seibo Province, Castañuelas, and Hondo Valle. Now, I can't give you proof regarding the Puerto Plata variant I submitted, but I can tell you I saw this flag quite often; you'll find it somewhere. Perhaps if you search ayuntamiento municipal puerto plata on Google Maps, you'll find it beside the DR flag. Flagvisioner (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I think the difference between flags for US municipalities versus these images is that the flags for US municipalities are actual flags used by the local governments. Not just digital files that can only be found on Wikimedia Commons or similar sites. Per at least Google's definition of a flag "a piece of cloth or similar material, typically oblong or square, attachable by one edge to a pole or rope." Not that you can't have digital versions of flags, but they should at least exist IRL and outside of Wikipedia to qualify as educational. Otherwise it's just a random image with a solid colored square background, which you'd have to agree isn't a flag and doesn't intrinsically have any educational value. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, all of the ones I back up have sources on FOTW, linking to an image (sometimes dead). Example is Duvergé, at https://m.facebook.com/202082586503881/photos/a.453801911331946/990152507696881/?type=3. Flags of the World is a quite a reliable source for flags; it functions like a Wikipedia for flags while maintaining reliability through its mailing list, where editors and contributors review information to try and ensure its reliability. I should also add that its likely San Pedro and Puerto Plata provinces might have no flags; I can’t find any images, which the Dominican Republic editor on FOTW has also stated. Flagvisioner (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
@Flagvisioner: According to the Flags of the World website content from there is copyrighthed. So what's your basis for thinking we can use images from it to begin with even if its supposedly a reliable source for flags? One of the problems with this is that we clearly can't even know who made the flags, where they came from, or if they are copyrighted or not if they are non-official/fictional and sourced from a copyright website. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, as I said in my last post, Flags of the World functions like a Wikipedia for flags while maintaining reliability through its mailing list, where editors and contributors review information to try and ensure its reliability. FOTW always assumes contributors’ very specific interpretations of drawings are copyrighted, though not really the case most often. Also, it is very easy to see who submitted specific information about a flag, as the date of posting and contributor’s name is next to every image/piece of info. Obviously, the images come from https://crwflags.com/fotw/flags/; you can click on the map to be directed to the page of any country. I am assuming you clicked on the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé, which can be seen being held by government employees that work with the municipality; it should be noted it has a nice gold fringe and quality, showing it is meant to be used in a government office. As such, I’m not sure what you mean by “we clearly can’t even know”, you can easily find this by clicking on one of the over 100,000 pages on Flags of the World. Flagvisioner (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
FOTW always assumes contributors’ very specific interpretations of drawings are copyrighted The problem is that we have no way of knowing when it is or isn't the case on our end since the flags aren't officially created to begin with and most of these countries don't have exceptions for flags anyway even if they were. But the default is always to assume that any user generated content from another website is copyrighted unless there's evidence to the contrary, which I don't see here. In fact FOTW clearly says "This page is part of © FOTW Flags Of The World website."
I am assuming you clicked on the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé... I assume you mean this link since you didn't specify. I don't see an image of anyone holding the flag in that link. Let alone any government employees that work with the municipality. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reading through my message, you will easily find a link at: https://www.facebook.com/202082586503881/photos/a.453801911331946/990152507696881/?type=3&paipv=0&eav=Afb3zs3E6RPqQ-hLQOWqsgEFCFy6MrqiE8alxhA_Oui9ZLXlCq8xGB6ZFNVR4xGwqr4&_rdr; if you clicked both links you would find "the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé". As I was saying earlier, FOTW claims their contributors own the rights to all of their drawings. Flagvisioner (talk) 01:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
The "flag" is pretty heavily, if not exclusively, comprised of the municipal shield for Duvergé and there is no general clause saying works created by the government of the Dominican Republic are PD. Obviously you can't just take a previously copyrighted image, put a square blue background behind it, and then claim a copyright to it. That's not how things work. So is there any evidence that the shield of Duvergé is in the public domain to begin with? Otherwise it shouldn't be hosted on Commons regardless of how things are on FOTWs end. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: FOTW is copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mjpraton (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hugo Tschakkar 1933.jpg

unlike that own work. Probably from the family album Estopedist1 (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sujith Samantha Priyadarshana Rathnayake (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in Sri-Lanka.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Sujith Samantha Priyadarshana Rathnayake (talk · contribs)

Possible self-promotion.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


Files uploaded by Sujith Samantha Priyadarshana Rathnayake (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in Sri-Lanka., artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sujith Samantha Priyadarshana Rathnayake (talk · contribs)

Modern art and historical photos. I think artist/photographers identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sujith Samantha Priyadarshana Rathnayake (talk · contribs)

Artworks, book covers & old photographs. Unlikely own work, all on subject of "art in Sri Lanka" appears to be a gallery uploaded for promotion of certain artists.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stansavin (talk · contribs)

Violation COM:FOP Russia

Maxinvestigator (talk) 13:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stansavin (talk · contribs)

Historical book, articles, photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M.P.T Map Battle.png

Je ne savais pas qu'il serait visible publiquement Prehistoricplanes (talk) 07:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1959, Ernest Hemingway.jpg

Not only 'photographer unknown', year of publication is unknown. And from this story it looks like it wasn't published until recently. Retired electrician (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)



Deleted per nom; source link states "Copyright Status - Unknown". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1959, Ernest Hemingway (1).jpg

Not only 'photographer unknown', year of publication is unknown. Of many Hemingway-at-the-bullfights photos, this one does not show up on Google, so it probably wasn't published until recently. Retired electrician (talk) 07:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted Per source link, copyright status unknown. Insufficient information to asses copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TawhidHussein.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted per nom; orphan very low quality pic -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:17, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Autographs (5740851715).jpg

Mistaken upload with panel photos. Presumably copyrighted Naturiss (talk) 10:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted DW by Flickr uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Angel xavier l. guerra.jpg

“FBMD” in EXIF, previously published on Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted also orphan and rather poor quality photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shapes.svg

Possibly out of scope, has random shapes that is scattered around. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted rather poorly done "shapes" as well, if some can even be called that. No in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q1860 (eng)-Poslovitch-Falcon Eye.wav

French accent, unusable PM3 (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept per Lyokoï. (Doesn't seem bad to me either. Creation of alternative versions are welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cristhian medina.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Brücke.wav

Wrong pronunciation, like "Brücker" PM3 (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
"Brücker" and "Brücke" are not the same words. The first is a surname, the second German for "bridge". It is simply wrong to say "Brücker" instead of "Brücke". --PM3 (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, just can you stop ? You are in bad faith, there. Lyokoï (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep: This file is in use on wikt:fr:Brücke. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept per Bjh21; in use. Creation of better/alternative versions welcome. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TREASURE ISLAND BVI STAMP 40c as issued.jpg

 Delete uploader has no copyright to this stamp image which is copyright for 50 years after issuance per inherited crown copyright. Ww2censor (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

User:GmigliavaccaCategory:Commons User template with namespace: Unfortunately your argument, on the talk page, bears no weight here on because Fair use of copyright images is totally forbidden on the commons. Your examples are for copyright images that are used under the fair use doctrine, so while you may not agree with the policy, that is the way it is and it is unlikely to change. You will note that a few language wikipedias do allow some very restrictive use of copyright images, known as "non-free media", such as stamps, however the criteria is much stricter than fair use. For instance on the enwiki, all of the following 10 criteria listed at non-free policy guidelines MUST be met to allow use of images such as stamps. If you care to review some previous stamp deletions, there is a category of several hundred of them: Ww2censor (talk) 10:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)



Deleted False source, false license; I do not believe that User:Gmigliavacca is the creator of and copyright holder of this stamp. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:THE ISLAND SUN 2002 BVI STAMPS COMMEMORATING THE 40th ANNIVERSARY OF THE WEEKLY NEWSPAPER OF THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS.jpg

 Delete uploader has no copyright to these stamps which are copyright for 50 years per inherited crown copyright. Ww2censor (talk) 14:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted I do not believe that User:Gmigliavacca is the creator of and copyright holder of these stamps. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Zukunft.wav

Wrong emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep: This file is in use on wikt:fr:Zukunft. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-stärk.wav

There is no German word "stärk". PM3 (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

I was in error here, the form "stärk" of "stärke" actually is valid. (Strange that I missed that, as native German speaker.)
But there is also some French accent here, so I keep up the deletion proposal for poor quality. --PM3 (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep: This file is in use on wikt:de:stärk. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-stärke.wav

French accent and wrong pronunciation, like "stärker" PM3 (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep: This file is in use on wikt:de:stärke. Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete files that are in use just because they have unusual accents. --bjh21 (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-stärken.wav

Strong foreign accent PM3 (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep: This file is in use on wikt:de:stärken. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Angelito y su grupo para vos.jpg

Promotional. Out of the project scope. Edslov (talk) 15:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:09, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bollore Logistic.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roberto Rébora (talk · contribs)

Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted. One or 2 might have possibly been in scope if they had sufficient info but they didn't. Several others were clearly photos of images in a book, likely DW copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nephelinite from Lovoš.jpg

Just a remnant after fixing a name of the file. The file is ok but this redirect is wrong and useless. Miraceti (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Badge of Dulwich Hamlet Football Club, created in 1893.png

Logo of an organisation, not a free image. On en.wiki as a non-free image here. Number 57 (talk) 19:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dulwich Hamlet Football Club Badge - 1893.jpg

Logo of an organisation, not a non-free image. On en.wiki as a non-free image here. Number 57 (talk) 19:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Malin Biller 2014.jpg

Image from the problematic mynewsdesk, where a lot of photos have been re-licensed by non-copyright-holders. In this case the EXIF-data states that the image is copyrighted and that the photographer is Julia Lindewall. Other sites has the photo published as "pressfoto" (https://news.cision.com/se/kolik-forlag/i/malin-biller,c1769451) and no sign of a free license. (And here it is published in a newspaper: https://www.skd.se/2016/01/08/bortglomd-klassiker-i-modig-serieform/) Vätte (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michaela18-2818 (1) (credit Matt Wignall).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) OTRS received from Matt but has issues. Ticket:2019071810007171. Not sure whether is the copyright holder. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photography by Victor Albert Grigas (1919-2017) North Sea 300517 (48325709826).jpg

per COM:BLP (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Closed DRs for other images
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)

COM:DW of artwork.

LGA talkedits 23:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

These are all public graffiti or mural works, not in a museum or other place, I believe there are free from copyrightVgrigas (talk) 17:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Have a read of Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Murals, it will explain that murals are copyrighted and as the US has no freedom of panorama for artworks these are not free for use on commons. LGA talkedits 22:23, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:03, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)

A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image.

Leoboudv (talk) 03:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

  •  Comment: The camera metadata says 'Finally the camera metadata says “@2013 Linda Rae Duchaine”. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Admin Jameslwoodward or Revent will tell you same thing about the reasons the public Domain Mark flickr template license is not accepted on Commons. You can ask them why. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
  • keep out of process, make a new DR every year or so. metadata does not trump explicit license. how do you copyright a photo taken in 2017 in 2013? i.e. the wrong date tends to undermine the claim. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: This has to do with the flickr license which is Public Domain Mark. The metadata is just a warning that the copyright owner retains copyright over the images...unless he/she changes the flickr license. A Public Domain Mark (PDM) license on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies because the flickr copyright owner retains full copyright over the images. Please see this Deletion Request for the Admin's clarification: the Public Domain Mark license can be revoked at any time. That's why Commons cannot accept this license. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment if you cannot nominate these photos the right way don't do it at all. they have a category, nominating by user is sloppy to the point of incompetence.
    • it is hard to believe that you would reject the good faith "public domain" declaration of the flickr user. your "licensing policies" do not have a consensus. provide the policy consensus where commons decided on the paradoxical - "public domain is not public domain".
    • why don't you consult here Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Public_Domain_Mark_.28PDM.29 Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Good faith is not sufficient when the copyright owner has a copyright notice clearly posted in the camera metadata for each photo. There was never any COM:OTRS permission from the copyright owner and so she can launch legal action against Commons at any time. As Admin Woodward stresses, the Public Domain Mark flickr 'license' can be revoked at any time and that Commons cannot accept this license due to this problem. COM:PRP should apply here. The other Admins rejected this license at present so as a non-Admin trusted user I have to follow their decision. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  • PS: This image is PD (under US law) despite the PDM license since it is a US government image but the images under DR are by a private individual. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
    • good faith is sufficient. these are low risk items. there is a far higher chance of copyright vio with an false "own" or "PD-USGov" or FOP germany, than PD uploader. what is the number of DMCA take downs of PD items? is it less than FOP germany? the other admins did not have a consensus, they and you only have your strongly held views unsupported by facts, only an ideology of license purity. we have 300000 items with no metadata, maybe we should improve those licenses and sources, and the existing files with PD, before increasing the standard for new uploads.
    • why don't you cleanup the metadata of the USGS image rather than persist using the the broken use of information template? "Photos were taken with a system developed by Dr. Anthony G Gutierrez (Tony.Gutierrez@us.army.mil) and taken by Brooke Alexander, Sue Boo, Heagan Ahmed and Sierra Williams." what makes you think all those people were works for hire? were not some of them contractors? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
@Slowking4: That's been discussed before.... Alexander and the others were interns, and so 'employees' under US law. - Reventtalk 19:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: When these images are sourced to a US government site, they would be PD if the metadata says US Navy, US Air Force, USGS, etc or generally sourced to a US government site. But when when an account linked to an individual person has a PDM license, it was the Admins who decided to delete the image, not me. I am not an Admin. In this image it says you can contact someone at usgs.gov at the bottom. So its certainly US Government..as in US Geological Survey. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
you realize how many thousand images have been deleted from NASA website as "contractor"? or even ESA : "Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons" - and some have been deleted and put back . maybe we need an OTRS to USGS to establish who is an employee and who is not?
do not evade responsibility for your deletion nominations. the blithe assumption of US website = US Government is equivalent to flickr uploader used PD tag = PD own. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

 Delete, unless the Flickr account owner licenses the images. The public domain mark, and it's use on Flickr, has been discussed repeatedly, multiple places. There is a clear community consensus that we cannot accept it, because it is not a license, and we cannot 'pretend' that people who apply it to their own works are granting a license. - Reventtalk 20:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

  •  Comment: In this case, the credit line in the camera metadata was given to NASA and the images are sourced to a NASAHQ Photos account. The copyright owner is explicitly named as '(NASA/Bill Ingalls)' which implies that Ingalls did the photography for NASA or NASA gave credit to Ingalls. In the undeletion request, it is clearly stated that "However, per Ingalls' own twitter account, he is a "Project Mgr and Sr NASA Photographer based in Washington, DC, but often found in other corners of the world". So, he is a NASA employee, but does some of his own photography on the side. That is perfectly fine, but he's still an employee, and his NASA work is therefore PD-USGov-NASA." So, Ingalls work is PD.

If you wish to change Common's policies on a completely different issue like Public Domain Mark, this is not the right forum. PDM just Cannot be accepted from a private person's flickr account because the copyright owner, Linda Rae Duchaine here who states a claim of copyright over her images in the camera metadata, can Revoke permission at any time. How can Commons use these images? --Leoboudv (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice Notice: Public Domain Mark 1.0. What is it, and what are the legal implications?

The tools also differ in terms of their effect when applied to a work. CC0 is legally operative in the sense that when it is applied, it changes the copyright status of the work, effectively relinquishing all copyright and related or neighboring rights worldwide. PDM is not legally operative in any respect – it is intended to function as a label, marking a work that is already free of known copyright restrictions worldwide.

It is a statement without any legal effect. The creator [Flickr user] can at any point change their mind and remove the PDM, and that it was previously applied means nothing, since they have not actually given up their rights, or licensed the work. PDM is not a legaly binding release which is non-revocable, which is needed to be stored on Commons. If someone changes a work from PDM to ARR, any use of it by us, or anyone else, is a blatant copyright violation.

Revent

It is a label. I think so, Creative Commons think so and it clearly says so. It s not a release of copyright. Our discussions if it is similar to other licenses or {{PD-author}} or not, is a non-question, since it is a revocable label. That's it.

Josve05a

With this announcement Flickr users will be able to choose from among our six standard licenses, our public domain dedication, and they will also be able to mark others’ works that are in the public domain.

(t) Josve05a (c) 22:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - obvious case. --Jcb (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)

These files are on Flickr with the 'Public Domain Mark', which is not a valid license for Commons, see Template:Flickr-public domain mark since they can be revoked by the copyright owner at any time. As long as the license is not changed at source, we cannot keep these images.

Leoboudv (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

comment these have a category - use visual file change right or not at all. how many times will you append this page confusing the issue?
keep intent of flickr user was public domain. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: PD Mark images are not accepted on Commons since the copyright owner can revoke the license at any time. This issue has been decided by numerous Administrators to protect Commons from any legal problems. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • comment you do not have a consensus for "This issue has been decided by numerous Administrators". your "revocable" is a theory only, there is no case where it has been here. there is no DMCA of a PDM. you are making up legal problems where none exist. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
@Slowking4: The matter was the subject of a six-month long RFC in 2015, as well as several discussions on VP/C since. The consensus of the wider community has always been that the PDM is not acceptable. - Reventtalk 04:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
a bad close is not a consensus - what wider community? i see a clique of deletionist admins who rule by fiat. you dare call it community? this is why commons is hated and you are hated. come to wikimania - then you will see a community, if you dare. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 04:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  • vk The is no doubt that the original photographer is the one putting these on Flickr, nor is there doubt that they intend them to be public domain. I have sent an advisory Flickrmail as below. With regard to the claim that a decision was made to "protect Commons from any legal problems", I find this an odd statement as there literally can be no legal problem for either Commons or volunteers who make the upload in good faith. @Leoboudv: could you link to where you have seen this stated? Thanks -- (talk) 12:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Changed to  Delete based on a Flickrmail received to my account this morning - (extract) "I do not want my photos on Wikimedia Commons at this time. I have removed them from Flickr to prevent further confusion." If the links given as sources on these images are followed, they are now '404' pages. -- (talk) 08:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


It was mentioned in this Deletion Request here and I believe that Jcb and Josve05a have the same understanding. I will be away on Thursday for a seminar. I am following Common's rules by filing this DR and I did not determine the rules on PD Mark. I too was warned not to pass such images some time ago. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

In the referenced DR, PDM was mentioned, but nobody described it as a legal problem for Commons. Though we may gain a consensus for policies to handle the uncertainties, my understanding still is that uploads in good faith pose no tangible legal risk to the uploader, nor to the WMF or Wikimedia Commons project. Simply put, if the Photographer is the Flickrstream owner and they wish to change the license, then there will be an issue of whether the license is revocable or ever meaningful when applied to the photographer's own works. As it would be the copyright holder changing their mind, they would be free to request take-down or deletion, however there never has been a case of a claim of damages going to court for a verifiable PDM license being used to rehost an image, nor is it really conceivable that there ever will be, so long as reusing parties are doing so in good faith. Consequently, we could, say, wait for an indefinite period to see if the Flickrstream owner replies to my email, and evidence of that effort to determine copyright would be sufficient legal protection against future claims; so deleting these files within 7 days may be precautionary but logically and legally is not a necessity. -- (talk) 20:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: The basic issue is if a license on flickr is revocable as other Commons Admins state then it would be a legal problem for Commons to use it. That is why the other Admins decided not to use PD Mark licensed photos. Of course, you are invited to flickrmail the copyright owner to change the license if you wish to CC BY (Attribution), CC BY SA (Attribution-ShareAlike)or CC zero (public domain dedication) if you wish. I saved some images in the past but there are hundreds of anti-Trump protest images on Commons already. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
you mean it is revocable like a flickr user can change their CC-BY license? gosh i guess we can confirm the status at upload and move on. why should PDM be any different? there is a higher legal risk of a "FoP Germany", since there has been a case of a DMCA takedown there - unlike PDM. you are arguing about risk with no data whatsoever.
"other Admins decided" - are you saying admins are the deciders, and we just report on what they do? do admins trump consensus? maybe we should revise the process page. maybe the admins should discuss this on a locked page and just inform us what images to keep and delete. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 23:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Once an image passes review with a generic CC-BY, CC BY SA or CC zero license, the image is considered passed for life no matter if the copyright owner changes the license at a later date...unless it is a copyright violation or if there are COM:FOP issues. So, Commons can keep the image forever. This image was definitely CC BY at upload even though it is now CC BY NC SA today at the flickr source in 2017 because it was uploaded in 2005 with a FlickLickr bot...that could only upload freely licensed CC BY images at upload. Hence it is not revocable today and Commons can keep it despite the copyright owners change of license with a NC (Non-Commercial) restriction. With PDM, the license is revocable, so its not really a license--more like a label. The copyright owner can remove the use of that image with a PDM license at any time simply by changing the license to say 'All Rights Reserved.' A PDM license has no legal effect. I think most normal Admins have the same understanding of the problems of using PDM labelled/licensed photos. Thank You and I will be away on most of Thursday in Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
its a funny thing, the flickr bot also approves PDM such as this one File:Library of congress panel 2140020.jpg. i guess it is not revocable. you have no example where an uploader has changed the "label" - why make stuff up? we have no case law about changing CC-BY licenses, so we do not know the "legal effect" of insisting they are irrevocable. all you have is some tl;dr boilerplate. hey- take all year off, you will not be missed. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: You would have to ask the flickrbot designer this, not me. Stop being a troll. I won't nominate your image for a DR since its clearly your own image. The flickreview bot never marked your image since you uploaded it with Upload Wizard Extension So, the Upload Wizard Extension bot programmer hasn't clued in that PDM images shouldn't just be passed without review. Lucky for you. As for me, I am a volunteer and I am doing my duty as a marker. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
it is just as much PD as the current case. apparently the admins who decided, have not decided to inform the wizard devs at the WMF to change their allowed licenses, but they screwed up the flickr2commons since that is java. lol. don't leave the barn door unlocked. "duty as a marker" = troll - have you ever taken a picture? why are you here if you have not? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Perhaps the closing Admin who decides this case will decide to send a message to the Upload Wizard Extension programmer about PDM. Or Admin Revent who knows about the PDM issue will close down this 'loophole' as you correctly note. Have a good day, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T158352 - Reventtalk 20:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@Revent: Thanks for your reply here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Update: According to Fae who flickrmailed the copyright owner, Jillian Sallaway has rejected the use of her PD Mark images on WikiCommons and deleted all of them on her flickr account. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
    • yeah maybe we should suspend all transfers from flickr, since uploaders there in general do not consent to the use on commons. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: We can them nicely if they agree to change the license. But the problem is this set of images is very replacable as there are hundreds of women protesting Trump. If the copyright owner says no and doesn't change a license and make it free, then we cannot use the photo. I have had other people agree to change licenses for their images here Some of these images were taken in the Cairo Museum before this Museum banned all photography in their museum so they are not replacable today. The Egyptians also ban all photography in the tombs of the Valley of the kings today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
    • no, the problem is, commons is not a safe space that honors personality rights, and people might well doubt good faith reuse. emailing people on a one on one basis is not a way to run an image repository, it is bush league. yeah "very replacable" = "once you're seen one protesting woman you've seen them all. so let's just clean out the category of all shots not in use. and we can always farm flickr for more" you have a somewhat smaller vision of commons, i.e. a walled garden necessary to support wikipedia only. i'm beginning to agree with you, maybe i should take all my uploads to english, and "do not transfer to commons" Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 23:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment: It was the Admins that decided that Public Domain Mark is too risky. I didn't even know about this decision until I was warned not to mark PDM images. So, I'm just following their decision here. An image doesn't have to be in use on wikipedia to remain on Commons forever. Thanks for your time and Goodbye, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
it was the admins who closed a discussion against consensus. i'm just not following their corrupt practices here. and you should expect images to go elsewhere forever. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE unused AI images.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

 Keep The King Trump ones are high-quality caricatures with quite some meaning. This is in contrast to this "caricature of Donald Trump" that people here are seemingly desperate to keep and which is entirely inappropriate, not a caricature, and not useful or educational but out of scope. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Personal art and AI art is deemed out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Praise kusi (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination + self-promotion + unused.  Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:59, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:35403556 450674692044744 41450351416573952 n(3).jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination + unused.  Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santosh Nishad Basti (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination + unused.  Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santosh Nishad Basti (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Downloadfffffff.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination + unused + self-promotion.  Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Markg729 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination.  Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boxingfan1995 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination and missing evidence of permission.  Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boxingfan1995

These images were uploaded by Boxingfan1995, who has a long history of uploading copyvios. They are all small resolution and lack metadata, so I suspect they were grabbed from the internet. (Also I do find it unlikely that they were in the Netherlands to take that photo of Crysencio Summerville, in Argentina (presumably) for the photo of Rodrigo de Paul and in the commentary suite for the Birmingham vs Leeds game in December 2019 (I think) for that photo of Patrick Bamford.) Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:함슬옹 미즈비키니 테마웨어 코코바이킹 노컷영상.webm

i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 223.62.188.65 00:28, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 211.248.183.181 01:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

 Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:함슬옹 미즈비키니 테마웨어 코코바이킹 노컷영상.webm

I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:함슬옹 미즈비키니 테마웨어 코코바이킹 노컷영상.webm

Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 02:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

@Túrelio: , You said "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless", I don't agree for the reasoning since there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. also, as I said in previous DR, this video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope), not privacy things. also it has archived pagehtml code of license info (cc license is irrevocable)Puramyun31 (talk) 12:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand that the claimant wants it deleted for privacy issues. And a CC license (as any other) is only irrevocable if it had been legitimate. As I understand it, the latter is disputed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

@Túrelio: the claimant seems not a videographer of the video, but seems the depicted person. your comment "stripped of its sound-track, is useless" That seems nonsense, there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope (not such as a simple selfie video)). Puramyun31 (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  1. Is it copyvio? No, licence been verified.
  2. Is it out of scope? No, it shows a beauty pageant.
So the remaining question is, whether Commons should delete the video because the (alleged) subject depicted wants it deleted.--Roy17 (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Roy17, as I stated above: AFAIK, the license on YT has not been verified, but just recorded. We have scores of uploads from Flickr with at-time-of-upload recorded CC license, which we nevertheless deleted, after we found that the Flickr-user had wrongfully claimed a free license for not-own images. --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

@Roy17:

1.In this case Cocoviking (a videography studio which has a official youtube account, this video is from the account, this site has a link to a video of the Cocoviking's youtube account), so it's not a fake account.
2. As i mentioned at previous DR, the video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition), so the "remaining question" as you said it's not a valid reason for DR. The user who opened the DR is blocked because of legal threat Puramyun31 (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Túrelio: then have you watched the video before commenting? What say the watermarks on the video? Have you also checked https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCqEWp27zVFQqeYBKqjWq5A/videos to see whether the youtube account is violating copyright?--Roy17 (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

 Keep If the YT video was deleted and the uploading YT account was not blocked, I think that deletion reason was unrelated to copyvio. Ankry (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)


Kept: per discussion. Video was published under a free license on YouTube. Ruthven (msg) 20:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm

Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 223.62.162.83 05:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


i am the model in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 223.62.188.65 00:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


Dont make me upset.


i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 211.248.183.181 01:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

 Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


  •  Delete unless the dubbed in music in the sound track can be shown to be free licensed; apparent copyright violation through derivative work. (This is regardless of other potential problems in the deletion request.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
@Infrogmation: I uploaded sound removed-version of File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm. also as i said above, this video depicts usual public contest event, not privacy things. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


      • The sound is intact in the linked nominated video. Regardless of whether or not you uploaded a different silent version, this version with sound should be deleted as a copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
@Infrogmation: oops I reuploaded as overwriting, upload error occurred. so I reuploaded as file:머슬마니아 함슬옹 (1).webm instead. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
@Infrogmation: the overwriting error of this video File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm is fixed. sound-removed version now. sound removed version is  Keep per as i said above. sound-included version uploaded was an unintentional mistake. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

p.s.: The ip user added apparently threatening comment which contains offensive words at my talk page. (you must be "crazy"...) If such comments are added repetitively at the pages related this discussion, the comments can be considered a legal threat. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)


Kept: the version without sound. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm

I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm

I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

  •  Comment Discussion on deletion of this image is still open. No need to repeat the same information. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm

Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 03:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  • @Túrelio: , You said "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless", I don't agree for the reasoning since there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. also, as I said in previous DR, this video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition), not privacy things. also it has archived pagehtml code of license info (cc license is irrevocable) Puramyun31 (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: Video was removed from YouTube, an no way to check the license (neither on the archived versions). Ruthven (msg) 20:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kojouri-profile.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept, not a personal photo; in use in fa:w. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andrewsarchus mongoliensis killing mammals.jpg

J'ai changé d'avis, je ne désire plus qu'il soit visible publiquement Prehistoricplanes (talk) 13:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted Prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:59, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MPT map battle.png

Je l'ai téléversé par erreur Prehistoricplanes (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted Prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mixo Fortune Ngoveni.jpg

Possibly out of scope, per COM:SELFIE. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Enora Malagré story.jpg

"Enora Malagré story" implies that this is a screenshot from the person's account on social medias (which seems to be the case given the quality of the photo and the way it is taken, which seems like a selfie). No authorization. Titlutin (talk) 01:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FAUDA, Netflix 2017.jpg

Taken from facebook (FBMD on Metadata); small sie, low-res, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dobay.jpg

No COM:FOP in COM:UAE. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Saloua Raouda Choucair

Still copyrighted, Choucair died in 2017.

Racconish💬 05:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mahmoud Said - Le Chat Blanc.jpg

Still copyrighted, Said died in 1964. Racconish💬 05:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: free in Egypt, but not free thanks to the URAA; also picture frame is a 3D element. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Sharjah Art Foundation

Derivative of non free content.

Racconish💬 05:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Niaje New Logo.png

And:

This is not own work, but the logo of Niaje.com, it is too complex to be copyright free Vera (talk) 05:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmclean74 (talk · contribs)

Derivative of non free content.

Racconish💬 05:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1941, Manezhnaya Square.jpg

Photo by Naum Granovsky - so the caption says - died 1984, not PD until 74 p.m.a. Retired electrician (talk) 06:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oni-Adil.jpg

Author (in EXIF) differs from uploader, permission should be given via OTRS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  • Hi, Please explain me the reason for deletion of this file.Risu43 (talk)
@Risu43: Metadata states that ASHRAY GOYAL is the author. If you're him, please send the permission to COM:OTRS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Facebook image - -- Begoon 14:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maksym Melnychuk.jpg

Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1941, Gorki Street, Moscow.jpg

Photo by Naum Granovsky - so the caption says - died 1984, not PD until 74 p.m.a. Retired electrician (talk) 07:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Akiko Naka

Copyright status unclear. The same photo had been published on https://web.archive.org/web/20170701174137/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/how-this--job-version-of-kickstarter--aims-to-help-firms-find-th-8107544 and on https://twitter.com/seekitcna/status/723055278623592449?lang=en and the attributions given there don't match that of the Commons file. It is likely to be copyrighted by Channel NewsAsia/Mediacorp Pte Ltd. (the medium) or Wantedly inc. (the subject, who might have provided the material to the medium). Although the uploader seemed to own a higher resolution version than images archived by archive.org, that does not necessarily mean they were the copyright holder.

whym (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, also web images are older than ours. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr Abdullah Rushdy.jpg

unused personal photo for non-wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 07:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Abdullah Rushdy has knowledge graph. Kind regards,  Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr Abdullah Rushdy.jpg

Not an own work. 186.172.189.10 21:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SAFVC Ranks.jpg

The image is copied directly from the source, which is a blogpost on a site operated by the Ministry of Defense. As such, this work may be copyrighted under Singapore law, which does not explicitly put government works in PD. Syed (talk) 08:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: the license claims this to be below the TOO, but I couldn't find anything about the threshold in Singapore. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed Naaim (talk · contribs)

Flickrwashing that claims to be avas.mv . See en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ShappeAli/Archive. Flickr account has been blacklisted.

Roy17 (talk) 08:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

    • Please explain your rationale without buzzwords, blacklisted where? Atlantic306 (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep as no proper detailed rationale with proof of the allegations has been given. The flickr account is still active on flickr and ShappeAli in his sockpuppet appeal has stated that the flickr account is owned by friend of his who is a photographer for a local news magazine,Atlantic306 (talk) 18:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tawhid Hussein.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Казань - вид на Казанский кремль.jpg

Very low-q photo of another photo or video (raster visible) -> not own work Retired electrician (talk) 08:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vartgf (talk · contribs)

Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyvio.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded versions of Latvian municipality locator maps

The following maps are unused and they have an odd border. Better quality maps using the same styles are available in the same category.

--Pikne 08:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Agree. I made those poor quality maps 10 years ago, they are no longer used. Destroy them. --Turkmenistan (talk) 09:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2000 මාර්තු, පුරහල බෝම්බය කෘතිය මුල් වරට ප්‍රදර්ශනය කළ ලයනල් වෙන්ඩ්ට් කලාගාරයේදී එය අබියස හ.jpg

No COM:FOP in Sri-Lanka. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:María Elena Ovalle.jpg

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Enlace corregido. --Cuidro (talk) 19:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: link was corrected. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata (talk · contribs)

If published 1974 not public domain yet. Anyway permission of each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Question. Do you understand that all NASA images are in public domain regardless of when they were published? Ruslik (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: I do and I don't see NASA images (except perhaps File:Mars (Mariner 9).jpg) nowhere, especially in the file description. Perhaps you should name which are NASA images and put the appropriate tag on them. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
This is your problem, not mine. Until you do your homework I will Oppose all deletions. Ruslik (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: You may oppose what you want but I dont think your advice will be followed unless the uploader gives a proper license for these work. Please note it's his/her own problem to provide the correct licenses for the works he/her uploads. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 Delete These uploads are not Patrick Rogel's homework rather from Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata. You can find the NASA files at the plant genus! category "Nasa" with false attribution and licence. All other ones are probably not from NASA and we need the authors' permission via OTRS. Additionally all files are heavily over-categorized. The uploader have to correct that, not Patrick Rogel! --Ras67 (talk) 21:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata (talk · contribs)

Permission of the respective artists needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata (talk · contribs)

Copyrighted work by Frida Kahlo, permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)


Deleted DW/incorrect license. Works by this artist are not yet in the PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New York (8320734920).jpg

per COM:OOS. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  •  Keep Rather good photo. While we have a good number of photos taken on the Brooklyn Bridge, few capture the city skyline well in the same shot. It would be an even better photo without the posed couple, but illustrative of the reaction of visitors to landmark location. (If kept, a more descriptive title would be better, but that's not a deletion issue.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no consensus for deletion. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Varujan Vosganian.jpg

Poor quality photo with person’s eyes almost closed and very unfavorable mimics. This person has more photos, no need to keep this. Rafał Komorowski (talk) 10:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  •  Delete per nom. We have a number of good photos of this person; no need to keep this very poor photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MinibusJR8291,313.jpg

Photo quality is poor and the portrait is taken without the consent of the people.Fran1001hk (talk) 09:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

File:MinibusJR8291,313.jpg

相片質素差且影到人樣。 Him9 (talk) 10:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pepepewriter (talk · contribs)

Dubious claim of own work, no EXIF. Possibly a derivative work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HK 1950年代 Sai Ying Pun 西邊街七號差館 Des Vouex Road Police Station 前西區警署 Western Police Station.jpg

Seems to be copyrighted work. Link at https://www.police.gov.hk/offbeat/781/eng/f02.htm 1233 (talk) 11:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AntonLandao (talk · contribs)

Dubious claim of own work, no EXIF

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, also differing qualities, partly watermarked. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kendra pic for wiki.jpg

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Comment There is an article about the depicted person in English Wikipedia: en:Kendra Erika. If she's notable and that article stays, I suppose the photo could be used there? Gestumblindi (talk) 21:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Https---en.wikipedia.org-wiki-File-Peltonturbine-1.jpg.png

a duplicate of File:Pelton wheel (patent).png Estopedist1 (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: in use. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2007 LaRouche PAC poster (Global warming).jpg

No FoP for 2D artwork in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shoko Asahara.png

This file was initially tagged by あにまる大王 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: ブロック済み Yann (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  •  Delete as probable dw of a copyrighted photo due to the uploader's history.  Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
  • To remove, useless--Accomer (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Weak keep It's currently in use in various Wikipedia language versions (though apparently in most or all cases added by the uploader), and it's such a minimalistic drawing reduced to a few lines that I'm not sure it would count as a derivative work of a specific photograph. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nichimoku Shonin.png

This file was initially tagged by 76.79.221.123 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously not own work. This uploader has a habit of scanning Japanese books and magazines and uploading images such sa this antique image as "own work." The spine crease of a book is evident in the middle right of this image from which it was apparently scanned. Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 13:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted Dubious license claim, at very least DW with no info on source image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nikko Shonin.png

This file was initially tagged by 76.79.221.123 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously not own work. Low quality scan of magazine or book with spine fold obvious in center right of image. Described by the uploader as an image stored in the annals of a private temple in Japan. Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 13:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted DW; no info on copyright status of original -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:日蓮大聖人.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 76.79.221.123 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously not own work. Low quality scan of magazine or book with spine fold obvious in center right of image. Described by the uploader as an image stored in the possession of a private temple in Japan with no source of verification provided. Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 13:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted DW; no info on source image, dubious license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Praying-Mantis-Mantis-religiosa.jpg

 Delete this has a false source (true source is https://colnect.com/en/stamps/stamp/447924-Praying_Mantis_Mantis_religiosa-Moths_Butterflies_and_Insects-Mali) but there is no evidence the author released this under the license given. The artist is Jean-Louis Puvilland but I cannot find any birth or death record for him. The general Mali term of copyright is 70 years pma, which even if he died the year this was designed, would mean it is in copyright until at least 2065. Ww2censor (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Maybe you are right. Though, it can be known work, published on stamp later to commemorate its author. Still I would not oppose deletion.--Brunei (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Brunei: Is there any evidence the main image is older and was published elsewhere that could place this into the public domain? Who is it commemorating? It's just an illustration of an insect of which there were several stamps designed by the same artist (see this and this page for more examples). Ww2censor (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
I see you are a big man in philately. :-) I agree, it should be deleted.--Brunei (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Brunei: I don't know about a big man but I have been dealing with stamp copyrights for many years both here and on the enwiki for over 10 years.

Deleted Uploader unlikely to have authority to license the stamp; no information on copyright status of original image of which this is derivative. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elvis fajko (talk · contribs)

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted orphan photos of person, no indication of in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mietmuze (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Diego Ruíz Cortés).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Mietmuze (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Diego Ruíz Cortés).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted Artwork might have been in scope had it actually been free licensed, but as the artist died in 2009 it is still under copyright by his heirs. (If there is actual permission to free license images of the art by the copyright holders, forward to Commons:OTRS.) I have left the one image which is of the artist rather than the art. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Premio Apoxiomeno.jpg

Copyrighted work by Carlo Badii, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sociedad de Geriatría y Gerontología de Chile.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GOLDIEM J 500 Edits.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Hi Four" bronze sculpture of a Great Dane by Louise Peterson.jpg

COM:FOP does not apply to statues in the US, and a photograph of 3D art is considered a derivative work Ytoyoda (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted, DW of modern copyrighted sculpture. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fire-fighting-facility node-6622340353 2.jpg

Hydrant falsch zugeordnet 2A01:598:B88A:AEFB:B5E0:89C:45D6:5AD6 18:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fire-fighting-facility node-6622340353 2.jpg

Hydrant falsch zugeordnet 2003:C7:83FF:A100:75A6:674B:F83D:3A6E 10:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

Missing permissions from the copyright holder and partly out of scope

Copyright protected logo and photograph from the web:

Zaccarias (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: While in scope as they were in use there is no evidence that permission was granted for them to be under that license. So, per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

dubious claim of own work. no exif. 2 files are very similar (other than 1 of it being blur).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  • The reupload was because since i have the original files, when i uploaded, i noticed it was too big, covering the whole article so i had to resize it and re upload, only that. Hurungudo (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
@Hurungudo: You could've just overwrited the file. Also you can adjust the image size using 200px. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
File:DawnChiedza.png
like this

Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

Nominated more files without metadata. Possible copyvio.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

per Doc James in previous DR nom. I think it is better to delete the files per COM:PCP as Hurungudo might not be the actual photographer. If it is Hurungudo's own work, he/she should send the full file to OTRS for verification. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

Considering the upload history of the user, all files are likely copyright violations. The PaperBag logo might fall under COM:TOO, but I am not sure about South African laws.

Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

 Comment I believe the paperbag logo is below TOO considering that there are more complex ones in Category:Logos of companies of South Africa. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleted, but two are  kept as ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مجسمه مشایخی در شهرک سینمایی غزالی.jpg

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: No COM:FOP in COM:IRAN. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Techno Ashish.jpg

i want to use it Technoashish (talk) 14:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Techno Ashish.jpg 2

i want to use my name and its my photo... so please delete it right now. Technoashish (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: CSD/F10. Racconish💬 16:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vadermonk (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Comment File:Boy Gamer.jpg is in use, which makes it in scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
@Rodhullandemu: I'll withdraw the DR for that file. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: as above, minus one. ~riley (talk) 22:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mazboor1361 (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шадрин Виталий.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Список покемонов (202-251).png

Copyright license violation Betakiller (talk) 15:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: by another. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Список покемонов (202-251).png

Copyright license violation Фон Бегор (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: by another. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My beautiful kids ADAM&LINA.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Harshit Datta .jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment A quick google suggests person shown is a professional singer of some note, although they appear not to have a Wikipedia article. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fernando Merchán Ramos.pdf

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Noviarie Pratamarsyah.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CorrosiveRecords (talk · contribs)

Album covers, promo photo, non-trivial logo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaurida2011 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

 Comment file:उतराखंड का लोक पर्व हरेला IMG 20190716 181856.jpg may be used for self-promo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bruguier crespy (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fire-fighting-facility node-6472529493.jpg

Foto falsch zugeordnet 2A01:598:B88A:AEFB:B5E0:89C:45D6:5AD6 16:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   18:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ANTONJARARA Gidorlin (talk · contribs)

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Haider Turi.jpg

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ofariasv (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spencer Tracy Judgment at Nuremberg Still.jpg

Film shot in Germany. Any reason for U.S. law to apply? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

  • The film was partially shot in Germany. link Hmm.. why was not this picture removed? It comes from the same movie. No one has reported his removal for six years. Mike89 (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Keep The film includes some incidental "location shots" in London and Germany, but the vast bulk of the filming was shot on the Universal Studios lots in California, USA. (see eg ) Indoor shots such as this photo would have been in studio. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 18:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wiersz polecen.png

This a screenshot of software copyrighted by Microsoft. Ostrzyciel (talk) 20:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: simple graphics and text, no copyrightable elements shown. P 1 9 9   18:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indígenas Guane.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Encik Tekateki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:OOS / COM:NOTHOST
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion whether this image might indeed be useful und thereby in COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: OOS, not an image of a genuine indigenous Guane, but just a girl dressing up. P 1 9 9   18:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fire-fighting-facility node-6622349894.jpg

Bild dem falschen Hydranten zugeteilt 2003:C7:83F3:BA00:444D:6FEF:A6B8:587 05:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fire-fighting-facility node-6622349894.jpg

Bild falsch zugeordnet 2A01:598:B88A:AEFB:B5E0:89C:45D6:5AD6 17:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Europäische Weltraumorganisation.wav

Strong French accent, unusable PM3 (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep: This file is in use on en:European Space Agency. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wikipedia is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï and bjh21. --Majora (talk) 03:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Mond.wav

Wrong pronounciation, like "Mont" PM3 (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Hauptstädte.wav

Wrong pronunciation, like "Hauptstädter" PM3 (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
"Hauptstädter" and "Hauptstädte" are two different words with different meanings. It's simply wrong to say "Hauptstädter" instead of "Hauptstädte". --PM3 (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, just can you stop ? You are in bad faith, there. Lyokoï (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Wasserbombe.wav

Wrong pronunciation, like "Wasserbomber" PM3 (talk) 14:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-pantheistisch.wav

Wrong pronunciation, like "panthestisch" PM3 (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, it sound wrong for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Boulevard.wav

Wrong pronunciation, emphasis should be on last syllable PM3 (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have different emphasis that you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Sauerstoff.wav

Wrong emphasis and intonation, first syllable should be emphasized, and cadence betwen first and last syllable should be much larger. Sounds like singing. PM3 (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Füße.wav

Wrong pronunciation, like "Füßer" PM3 (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
The word "Füßer" simply does not exists. This is not understandible. --PM3 (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, just can you stop ? You are in bad faith, there. Lyokoï (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Bahnhöfe.wav

Wrong emphasis and pronunciation, like "Bahnhöfer". Emphasis should be on first syllable. PM3 (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Höfe.wav

Wrong pronunciation, like "Höfer" PM3 (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Bahnhof.wav

Wrong emphasis, emphasis should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Autobahn.wav

Wrong timing, all syllables should have equal length PM3 (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Autobahnen.wav

Wrong timing and intonation. All syllables should have equal length, and down cadence should be much larger. PM3 (talk) 14:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-freilich.wav

Emphasis on first syllable is missing, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-frei.wav

Very poor intonation, tone should decline PM3 (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-freien.wav

Wrong pronunciation, like "frein" PM3 (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-habe.wav

Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-haben.wav

Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Aufbau.wav

Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-bauen.wav

French accent PM3 (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Bau.wav

Wrong intonation, should decline more, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Spitze.wav

Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing PM3 (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Parteien.wav

French accent PM3 (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Partei.wav

French accent PM3 (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Parteispitzen.wav

Wrong intionation and emphasis; emphasis should be on second syllable PM3 (talk) 14:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Parteispitze.wav

Wrong emphasis, should be on second syllable PM3 (talk) 14:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-abgestimmt.wav

Missing emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-abstimmen.wav

French accent, wrong emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Stasi.wav

Wrong emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Stasi-Akten.wav

Wrong pronounciation, separation between "Stasi" and "Akten" is missing PM3 (talk) 14:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-steifen.wav

French accent PM3 (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Poslovitch-Zuckerfest.wav

Missing emphasis on first syllable, and wrong pronunciation like "Zuckefest" PM3 (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rowan Atkinson signature.png

Also:

Copyright resides with Mr. Atkinson, not the scanner. See COM:SIG#United Kingdom. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: @Magog the Ogre: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Three flies about Lee Teng-hui: File:President05-large.png, File:President05-large 1 (cropped).jpg and File:Lee Teng-hui (Chopped Closer version).jpg

File:President05-large.png:檔案標示來源為總統府,但是國史館提供,惟國史館政府網站開放資料宣告範圍僅限該館網站,效力不及於總統府網站。況此檔案應非來自該館網站,而是該館館藏文物,如此更不會適用政府網站開放資料宣告,而是依循「國史館館藏檔案史料開放應用要點」。故此檔案恐非自由版權檔案。其衍生檔案File:Lee Teng-hui (Chopped Closer version).jpgFile:President05-large 1 (cropped).jpg亦然 --S099001 (talk) 12:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: licenses invalid, since the government agency was not filled in. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt (1892-1964).jpg

Not found at URL. German watermarked, unlikely to be a Polish work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: author dies in 1982. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fire-fighting-facility node-6472527952.jpg

Hydrant falsch zugeordnet 2A01:598:B88A:AEFB:B5E0:89C:45D6:5AD6 19:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tamako Market Schriftzug.svg

This is not the real logo of the Tamako Market series or movie. The colours don't even match. Thibaut (talk) 19:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

The logo with the bird would be Fair Use so I decided to use the Japanese and Western letters only. If you are able to generate it in a better way feel free to do so. Thanks for reading. --Goroth (talk) 21:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The Western letters are from the fansub, they are not part of the logo.
I can understand the fair use argument since apparently dewiki don't seem to accept local upload of logos as fair use, but instead of butchering the original logo, you could have just kept the pink background, the correct font colours and remove the bird, then you would have a logo closer to the original (even though I don't really like modified logos of anime and other artistic works, but anyway).
Unfortunately I'm not a vectorization expert, so I don't know how I can generate a better SVG file. --Thibaut (talk) 22:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Like here: File:Tamako Market logo.svg. --Thibaut (talk) 14:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pattom A Thanupillai.jpg

©This Site is developed and being maintained by Raj Bhavan and Hosted by APSU, NIC, Hyderabad. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

NIC is national informatics centre, which is a domain used by Federal and state governments in India.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Editormallu (talk  contribs)
@Editormallu: It contradicts the copyright notice. Besides "the user must acknowledge the provider, source, and license of data by explicitly publishing the attribution statement, including the DOI (Digital Object Identifier), or the URL (Uniform Resource Locator), or the URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) of the data concerned." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel: This file licensed under the Government Open Data License - India (GODL) which is mentioned along with the file. Also proper URL is also provided for the data. Preceding unsigned comment added by Editormallu (talk  contribs)

Deleted: not found at the source site anymore, COM:PCP. --Sebari  aka Srittau (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Commons User template with namespace Category:Commons pages with broken file links