This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file is not required in the Wikipedia article and should be deleted asap. Manas.chafekar (talk) 02:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unidentified people, and unused picture. May be also privacy issue, see . Yann (talk) 03:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination, and probable copyvios. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination; speedied per COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination; speedied per COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
صورة.فيها.الاخصاب.بين.رجل 105.66.134.126 13:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
فيديو.يتبين.فيه.اخصاب.بين.رجل.ومرءة 105.66.134.126 13:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The design are copyrighted. You can not steal someones design. The layout maybe depending on if it is original or not. The coding to make the layout is copyrighted. If you made a copied microsofts homepage pictures and everything not including text. That could be considered copyright infringment. The Photographer (talk) 13:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Keep This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality , his work contains material which may be subject to trademark laws in one or more jurisdictions.
This is original Screenshot of Outlook com, rest on web site is -publicity -.--EEIM (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as per User:EEIM. P199✉ 16:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by 神樂坂秀吉 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot of non-free content.Yann (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Please remove/ delete this file since the admin has found a copy right issue with this. Manas.chafekar (talk) 12:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
@Manas.chafekar: Actually, this could be allowed under the {{GODL-India}} license. But you must provide a source. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
@Yann: I have added the source. It is not from any url or link but it was provided by the director directly as a copy on digital drive. Let me know if the changes i have made are now appropriate? Are any other changes required?Manas.chafekar (talk) 15:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 15:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File does already exist, slightly different name Paul bohte (talk) 20:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty gallery. --Achim (talk) 20:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, sockpuppeteer. --Achim (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:44, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:44, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination - re-uploads. --Ronhjones(Talk) 01:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination; G4 as well. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Removed photos from the remaining quotes too. I think they can be kept with deleting their previous version.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 13:37, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete: Without the photos, these fall outside of Commons:project scope, being Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. --bjh21 (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
They are certainly educational and these pictures of the quotes can be used on many articles.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 10:13, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete the 3 artworks require the permission of the artists, or being children, probably their parents, as well as the photographer and those artworks, according to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/India are copyright until 60 years after the death of the artists. The Indian PD license attached to the Tunisian stamp is false but Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Tunisia is unclear on this topic and an FOP exception likely does not apply either. PCP applies.
Yes, delete all these files. Indian postage stamp license on Tunisian stamp is my mistake.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 18:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: by User:Polarlys, later recreated with different content. JuTa 16:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DaphneLantier 00:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder automatically retains their rights unless the item falls into the public domain. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
@Magog the Ogre: A reverse google image search points back to this Getty Images page. It indicates it was created in 1913, but when it was published is unclear, and I don't see an author credit. What is your opinion on use of a PD template here? I forget if there's a rule of thumb for pre-1924 works of unclear and/or anonymous creation/publication? —Rhododendritestalk| 01:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
@Rhododendrites: it's probably OK. Press agencies take photos so they can publish and sell them. Occasionally they might take a photo which no one wants and only later publish. I think it's safe to keep in the absence of a claim to the contrary (notwithstanding the boilerplate copyright notice that Getty places on all their content). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
That was my thought, too. So I've added PD-US-Expired to the page and added a date/description/categories. —Rhododendritestalk| 02:14, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I withdraw my nominationNot found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep:Yes, there source was already present, and now it is there twice. Same goes for the extracted file. Skjoldbro (talk) 15:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
You're right, my bad. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
When I clic on the link it directs me to the website en the picture? --Maddriver371 (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: See Signature field. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I withdraw my nomination Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image (:hu:Wikipédia:Májer Zoltán). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment There seems to be file redirects to, please delete them if applicable. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination and no license since 20 July 2019. --Green Giant (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and no license since 20 July 2019. --Green Giant (talk) 18:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by DigitalSergio as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: type reason here Yann (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 13:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion given. Person in the image seems to be a Spanish party official: Google translates the description as "Javier, former deputy spokesman for UPYD", UPYD is a party in Spain. Maybe he's not notable for a Wikipedia article, but educational use of this image seems possible (in the context of this party, politics in Spain...). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent, unusable PM3 (talk) 14:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I recently uploaded a newer version of this file. The pronunciation I'm now duely applying is therefore based on various sources including w:International Phonetic Alphabet, voice synthetizers and ultimately actual audio records of ESA's full name. May my French accent still be recognizable in it, I would - respectfully - consider any further remarks about it unacceptable: every single speaker, no matter if he's native or not, has an accent. As such, would you also consider the same record done by a Scottish would be unacceptable? Differences in phonemes remain obvious in both cases. Ultimately, the goal of my records are not to be spoken in a perfect (and I think normative too) manner, rather to depict one of the many differences there are in the way to pronounce and stress English words, while also providing pronunciations for Wikipedia articles, in order to fulfill my personal goal of creating an "audio" layer. To conclude, the file might be "unusable" in the way you think it should be used. However, I firmly believe it's not, because it is part of a larger project of transmitting a corpus of free-licensed pronunciations to next generations, scientists and linguists (whom Lyokoï is likely part of). --Poslovitch (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on en:European Space Agency. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wikipedia is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. Also, as a native English speaker I don't think this has a noticeable French accent, though the first and last vowels are a bit off. --bjh21 (talk) 15:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@EugeneZelenko: Those photos were previously used on my user page. The prom photo is the current one I've got up there, and the two you mentioned are old ones.
Deleted: Deleted as not in use. Uploader is an active user. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Some images now have OTRS permission. --Krd 14:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No objection to these being deleted. I think the Flickr user Genevieve must have mixed these selfies in the folders of the panel discussions etc. Naturiss (talk) 20:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination - spot checked these and they all appear to be PressEye images. .Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Low quality file with little potential educational use. Hiàn (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Other user overwrote with a totally different file that the one I uploaded, I reverted that edition. So please cancel this request. —Frodar (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Separate issue from previous DR: the video is private (including in the available links to archives), and its copyright status cannot be verified. Gikü (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
The video was under the YouTube CC license. I myself requested for a license review over a year ago and nothing happened. Also, in the previous deletion request an incompatibility of the license was not mentioned, issue which could have been easily detected by the admin who made the DR closure.
This is the only file that I uploaded at that time, from YouTube videos, of which the source video is no longer available. Other succesfully reviewed YouTube screenshots uploaded by me date from that time, File:Mercedes Trimarchi.png and File:Gisela Marziotta.png.
Keep All this I believe supports my position of keeping the file. An experienced user like me would never upload files like this if it wasn't with the right license. Similar files (from YouTube) that I uploaded at that time, all are CC licensed.
Said that, to avoid similar problems, I urgently request that revisions be made to the following files, all uploaded by me by that time (June-July 2019) with the CC license, and with a requested review template that I put:
✅ Reviewed the 7 files requested. Gikü (talk) 12:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick response. Frodar (talk) 14:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Youtube video is now private, no saved version on Internet Archive that allows reviewing the license — Dudek1337 (talk) 20:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, the reason is the same as past year nomination. I think I gave enough information there that supports my claim. I don't know if it's appropriate, but if the "review needed" templates can be removed, it would be helpful to avoid this situation again in the future. —Frodar (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: In scope as she is the subject of a WP article but likely copyvios. Need proof that uploader is photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: In scope as she is the subject of a WP article but likely copyvios. Need proof that uploader is photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Request temporary undeletion Photos are owned by me and I gave full and complete permission for these photos to be used on wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skash16 (talk•contribs) 22:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Possible copyright issue. I couldn't find CC indications in the source, and the picture is of low resolution Eran (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This picture has been released under the license that prohibits to use it for commercial use.
The terms and conditions say
"(5)イラストをそのまま、または加工して、独立の取引対象として頒布(販売、賃貸、無償配布、無償貸与など)したり、公衆送信(インターネットのホームページや放送などを利用した送信)などを利用して提供することは、営利、非営利を問わずできません。", and a summary of the T&C says "【禁止】商品化利用 ・販売用製品に利用 カレンダー、ジグソーパズルなど". The T&C does not satisfy the free license conditions required by Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia Foundation. Additionally, the T&C prohibits to use it for pornography ((4)イラストを公序良俗に反する方法で使用し、又は公序良俗に反する業務、活動に供する目的で使用はできません。また、公序良俗に反するか否かを問わず、アダルト雑誌やアダルトビデオ(その他、DVD、CD-ROM、WEBサイト等、媒体の如何を問いません)に関して、表紙、パッケージ、記事、映像、宣伝、広告、その他一切の態様による使用はできません。また、ポルノや風俗(合法・違法、営利・非営利、個人・法人、その他態様を問わず、性風俗に関する一切の事項を指します)に関する記事、映像、宣伝、広告、その他一切の態様による使用もできません。) . This restriction also seems to a deviation from the required free license conditions. Yapparina (talk) 23:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
I posted this image. I made a mistake in the image. I'm sorry.--逃亡者 (talk) 23:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, license incompatible. --whym (talk) 13:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep: I haven't checked them all, but a random sample suggests that these are in use on Spanish Wikipedia. Under COM:INUSE, Commons should not delete files that are used by other projects solely because they're alleged to be inaccurate. --bjh21 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Bjh21: They are used in Spanish Wiki because the uploading editor Santiago RD has placed them in the Spanish Wiki template es:Plantilla:DOM. Those flags are not "inaccurate", they are completely fake, they are a hoax. I am sure that COM:INUSE is not meant to protect fake information just because the uploading editor is smart enough to use the uploads in some Wiki. --TU-nor (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Santiago RD has uploaded hundreds of non-existent flags they have created themselves. I find it difficult to accept that we cannot remove them just because other users in good faith have believed they were real and used some of them in articles. --TU-nor (talk) 07:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndiaTalk✉ 07:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Various versions of these flags have been uploaded in the past and subsequently deleted as fictional in multiple DRs over the years. The main seeming to be Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. So these images should be re-deleted as OOS since there apparently aren't any actual flags for municipalities of the Dominican Republic to begin with. Although I'm more then willing to remove any from the deletion request where there's evidence of it actually being used IRL.
Hi, although I appreciate your concern, I don't think every image should just be deleted. Regarding your statement of no "actual flags for municipalities of the Dominican Republic", I disagree; many US municipalities use white flags with the seal and no one says they aren't "actual flags".
Every image (usually ending in ".gif") on Flags of the World I can confirm the existence of. Most are created by FOTW member Randy Young, who is indeed quite reputable. Sadly, I can't confirm the existence of flags for: El Seibo Province, Castañuelas, and Hondo Valle. Now, I can't give you proof regarding the Puerto Plata variant I submitted, but I can tell you I saw this flag quite often; you'll find it somewhere. Perhaps if you search ayuntamiento municipal puerto plata on Google Maps, you'll find it beside the DR flag. Flagvisioner (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I think the difference between flags for US municipalities versus these images is that the flags for US municipalities are actual flags used by the local governments. Not just digital files that can only be found on Wikimedia Commons or similar sites. Per at least Google's definition of a flag "a piece of cloth or similar material, typically oblong or square, attachable by one edge to a pole or rope." Not that you can't have digital versions of flags, but they should at least exist IRL and outside of Wikipedia to qualify as educational. Otherwise it's just a random image with a solid colored square background, which you'd have to agree isn't a flag and doesn't intrinsically have any educational value. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, all of the ones I back up have sources on FOTW, linking to an image (sometimes dead). Example is Duvergé, at https://m.facebook.com/202082586503881/photos/a.453801911331946/990152507696881/?type=3. Flags of the World is a quite a reliable source for flags; it functions like a Wikipedia for flags while maintaining reliability through its mailing list, where editors and contributors review information to try and ensure its reliability. I should also add that its likely San Pedro and Puerto Plata provinces might have no flags; I can’t find any images, which the Dominican Republic editor on FOTW has also stated. Flagvisioner (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
@Flagvisioner: According to the Flags of the World website content from there is copyrighthed. So what's your basis for thinking we can use images from it to begin with even if its supposedly a reliable source for flags? One of the problems with this is that we clearly can't even know who made the flags, where they came from, or if they are copyrighted or not if they are non-official/fictional and sourced from a copyright website. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, as I said in my last post, Flags of the World functions like a Wikipedia for flags while maintaining reliability through its mailing list, where editors and contributors review information to try and ensure its reliability. FOTW always assumes contributors’ very specific interpretations of drawings are copyrighted, though not really the case most often. Also, it is very easy to see who submitted specific information about a flag, as the date of posting and contributor’s name is next to every image/piece of info. Obviously, the images come from https://crwflags.com/fotw/flags/; you can click on the map to be directed to the page of any country. I am assuming you clicked on the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé, which can be seen being held by government employees that work with the municipality; it should be noted it has a nice gold fringe and quality, showing it is meant to be used in a government office. As such, I’m not sure what you mean by “we clearly can’t even know”, you can easily find this by clicking on one of the over 100,000 pages on Flags of the World. Flagvisioner (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I am assuming you clicked on the link which leads to an image of the flag of Duvergé... I assume you mean this link since you didn't specify. I don't see an image of anyone holding the flag in that link. Let alone any government employees that work with the municipality. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
The "flag" is pretty heavily, if not exclusively, comprised of the municipal shield for Duvergé and there is no general clause saying works created by the government of the Dominican Republic are PD. Obviously you can't just take a previously copyrighted image, put a square blue background behind it, and then claim a copyright to it. That's not how things work. So is there any evidence that the shield of Duvergé is in the public domain to begin with? Otherwise it shouldn't be hosted on Commons regardless of how things are on FOTWs end. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
unlike that own work. Probably from the family album Estopedist1 (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Artworks, book covers & old photographs. Unlikely own work, all on subject of "art in Sri Lanka" appears to be a gallery uploaded for promotion of certain artists.
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Historical book, articles, photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Je ne savais pas qu'il serait visible publiquement Prehistoricplanes (talk) 07:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not only 'photographer unknown', year of publication is unknown. And from this story it looks like it wasn't published until recently. Retired electrician (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; source link states "Copyright Status - Unknown". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not only 'photographer unknown', year of publication is unknown. Of many Hemingway-at-the-bullfights photos, this one does not show up on Google, so it probably wasn't published until recently. Retired electrician (talk) 07:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Per source link, copyright status unknown. Insufficient information to asses copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted rather poorly done "shapes" as well, if some can even be called that. No in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent, unusable PM3 (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Lyokoï. (Doesn't seem bad to me either. Creation of alternative versions are welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, like "Brücker" PM3 (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
"Brücker" and "Brücke" are not the same words. The first is a surname, the second German for "bridge". It is simply wrong to say "Brücker" instead of "Brücke". --PM3 (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, just can you stop? You are in bad faith, there. Lyokoï (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on wikt:fr:Brücke. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Bjh21; in use. Creation of better/alternative versions welcome. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete uploader has no copyright to this stamp image which is copyright for 50 years after issuance per inherited crown copyright. Ww2censor (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
User:GmigliavaccaCategory:Commons User template with namespace: Unfortunately your argument, on the talk page, bears no weight here on because Fair use of copyright images is totally forbidden on the commons. Your examples are for copyright images that are used under the fair use doctrine, so while you may not agree with the policy, that is the way it is and it is unlikely to change. You will note that a few language wikipedias do allow some very restrictive use of copyright images, known as "non-free media", such as stamps, however the criteria is much stricter than fair use. For instance on the enwiki, all of the following 10 criteria listed at non-free policy guidelines MUST be met to allow use of images such as stamps. If you care to review some previous stamp deletions, there is a category of several hundred of them: Ww2censor (talk) 10:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False source, false license; I do not believe that User:Gmigliavacca is the creator of and copyright holder of this stamp. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete uploader has no copyright to these stamps which are copyright for 50 years per inherited crown copyright. Ww2censor (talk) 14:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted I do not believe that User:Gmigliavacca is the creator of and copyright holder of these stamps. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on wikt:fr:Zukunft. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no German word "stärk". PM3 (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
I was in error here, the form "stärk" of "stärke" actually is valid. (Strange that I missed that, as native German speaker.)
But there is also some French accent here, so I keep up the deletion proposal for poor quality. --PM3 (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on wikt:de:stärk. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent and wrong pronunciation, like "stärker" PM3 (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on wikt:de:stärke. Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete files that are in use just because they have unusual accents. --bjh21 (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Strong foreign accent PM3 (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on wikt:de:stärken. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wiktionary is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Bjh21; in use. (Creation of better/alternative versions is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted. One or 2 might have possibly been in scope if they had sufficient info but they didn't. Several others were clearly photos of images in a book, likely DW copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) OTRS received from Matt but has issues. Ticket:2019071810007171. Not sure whether is the copyright holder. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are all public graffiti or mural works, not in a museum or other place, I believe there are free from copyrightVgrigas (talk) 17:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image.
Comment: The camera metadata says 'Finally the camera metadata says “@2013 Linda Rae Duchaine”. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Admin Jameslwoodward or Revent will tell you same thing about the reasons the public Domain Mark flickr template license is not accepted on Commons. You can ask them why. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
keep out of process, make a new DR every year or so. metadata does not trump explicit license. how do you copyright a photo taken in 2017 in 2013? i.e. the wrong date tends to undermine the claim. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: This has to do with the flickr license which is Public Domain Mark. The metadata is just a warning that the copyright owner retains copyright over the images...unless he/she changes the flickr license. A Public Domain Mark (PDM) license on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies because the flickr copyright owner retains full copyright over the images. Please see this Deletion Request for the Admin's clarification: the Public Domain Mark license can be revoked at any time. That's why Commons cannot accept this license. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment if you cannot nominate these photos the right way don't do it at all. they have a category, nominating by user is sloppy to the point of incompetence.
it is hard to believe that you would reject the good faith "public domain" declaration of the flickr user. your "licensing policies" do not have a consensus. provide the policy consensus where commons decided on the paradoxical - "public domain is not public domain".
Good faith is not sufficient when the copyright owner has a copyright notice clearly posted in the camera metadata for each photo. There was never any COM:OTRS permission from the copyright owner and so she can launch legal action against Commons at any time. As Admin Woodward stresses, the Public Domain Mark flickr 'license' can be revoked at any time and that Commons cannot accept this license due to this problem. COM:PRP should apply here. The other Admins rejected this license at present so as a non-Admin trusted user I have to follow their decision. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
PS: This image is PD (under US law) despite the PDM license since it is a US government image but the images under DR are by a private individual. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
good faith is sufficient. these are low risk items. there is a far higher chance of copyright vio with an false "own" or "PD-USGov" or FOP germany, than PD uploader. what is the number of DMCA take downs of PD items? is it less than FOP germany? the other admins did not have a consensus, they and you only have your strongly held views unsupported by facts, only an ideology of license purity. we have 300000 items with no metadata, maybe we should improve those licenses and sources, and the existing files with PD, before increasing the standard for new uploads.
why don't you cleanup the metadata of the USGS image rather than persist using the the broken use of information template? "Photos were taken with a system developed by Dr. Anthony G Gutierrez (Tony.Gutierrez@us.army.mil) and taken by Brooke Alexander, Sue Boo, Heagan Ahmed and Sierra Williams." what makes you think all those people were works for hire? were not some of them contractors? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
@Slowking4: That's been discussed before.... Alexander and the others were interns, and so 'employees' under US law. - Reventtalk 19:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: When these images are sourced to a US government site, they would be PD if the metadata says US Navy, US Air Force, USGS, etc or generally sourced to a US government site. But when when an account linked to an individual person has a PDM license, it was the Admins who decided to delete the image, not me. I am not an Admin. In this image it says you can contact someone at usgs.gov at the bottom. So its certainly US Government..as in US Geological Survey. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
you realize how many thousand images have been deleted from NASA website as "contractor"? or even ESA : "Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons" - and some have been deleted and put back . maybe we need an OTRS to USGS to establish who is an employee and who is not?
do not evade responsibility for your deletion nominations. the blithe assumption of US website = US Government is equivalent to flickr uploader used PD tag = PD own. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete, unless the Flickr account owner licenses the images. The public domain mark, and it's use on Flickr, has been discussed repeatedly, multiple places. There is a clear community consensus that we cannot accept it, because it is not a license, and we cannot 'pretend' that people who apply it to their own works are granting a license. - Reventtalk 20:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: In this case, the credit line in the camera metadata was given to NASA and the images are sourced to a NASAHQ Photos account. The copyright owner is explicitly named as '(NASA/Bill Ingalls)' which implies that Ingalls did the photography for NASA or NASA gave credit to Ingalls. In the undeletion request, it is clearly stated that "However, per Ingalls' own twitter account, he is a "Project Mgr and Sr NASA Photographer based in Washington, DC, but often found in other corners of the world". So, he is a NASA employee, but does some of his own photography on the side. That is perfectly fine, but he's still an employee, and his NASA work is therefore PD-USGov-NASA." So, Ingalls work is PD.
If you wish to change Common's policies on a completely different issue like Public Domain Mark, this is not the right forum. PDM just Cannot be accepted from a private person's flickr account because the copyright owner, Linda Rae Duchaine here who states a claim of copyright over her images in the camera metadata, can Revoke permission at any time. How can Commons use these images? --Leoboudv (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Notice: Public Domain Mark 1.0. What is it, and what are the legal implications?
The tools also differ in terms of their effect when applied to a work. CC0 is legally operative in the sense that when it is applied, it changes the copyright status of the work, effectively relinquishing all copyright and related or neighboring rights worldwide. PDM is not legally operative in any respect – it is intended to function as a label, marking a work that is already free of known copyright restrictions worldwide.
It is a statement without any legal effect. The creator [Flickr user] can at any point change their mind and remove the PDM, and that it was previously applied means nothing, since they have not actually given up their rights, or licensed the work. PDM is not a legaly binding release which is non-revocable, which is needed to be stored on Commons. If someone changes a work from PDM to ARR, any use of it by us, or anyone else, is a blatant copyright violation.
It is a label. I think so, Creative Commons think so and it clearly says so. It s not a release of copyright. Our discussions if it is similar to other licenses or {{PD-author}} or not, is a non-question, since it is a revocable label. That's it.
With this announcement Flickr users will be able to choose from among our six standard licenses, our public domain dedication, and they will also be able to markothers’ works that are in the public domain.
Deleted: per nomination - obvious case. --Jcb (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files are on Flickr with the 'Public Domain Mark', which is not a valid license for Commons, see Template:Flickr-public domain mark since they can be revoked by the copyright owner at any time. As long as the license is not changed at source, we cannot keep these images.
Comment: PD Mark images are not accepted on Commons since the copyright owner can revoke the license at any time. This issue has been decided by numerous Administrators to protect Commons from any legal problems. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
comment you do not have a consensus for "This issue has been decided by numerous Administrators". your "revocable" is a theory only, there is no case where it has been here. there is no DMCA of a PDM. you are making up legal problems where none exist. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
@Slowking4: The matter was the subject of a six-month long RFC in 2015, as well as several discussions on VP/C since. The consensus of the wider community has always been that the PDM is not acceptable. - Reventtalk 04:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
a bad close is not a consensus - what wider community? i see a clique of deletionist admins who rule by fiat. you dare call it community? this is why commons is hated and you are hated. come to wikimania - then you will see a community, if you dare. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 04:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
vk The is no doubt that the original photographer is the one putting these on Flickr, nor is there doubt that they intend them to be public domain. I have sent an advisory Flickrmail as below. With regard to the claim that a decision was made to "protect Commons from any legal problems", I find this an odd statement as there literally can be no legal problem for either Commons or volunteers who make the upload in good faith. @Leoboudv: could you link to where you have seen this stated? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Many of your Women's March photographs were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (making them available to use in Wikipedia articles and elsewhere), but were challenged as they used the Public Domain Mark rather than CC-0 or a CC-BY release.
Could you either change the license away from PDM to CC-BY or CC-BY-SA licensing, or just email me back to confirm your intention was the same as a CC-BY release and are happy for the images to be on Wikimedia Commons with this license?
The relevant discussion for deletion was at commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Victorgrigas
Changed to Delete based on a Flickrmail received to my account this morning - (extract) "I do not want my photos on Wikimedia Commons at this time. I have removed them from Flickr to prevent further confusion." If the links given as sources on these images are followed, they are now '404' pages. --Fæ (talk) 08:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
It was mentioned in this Deletion Request here and I believe that Jcb and Josve05a have the same understanding. I will be away on Thursday for a seminar. I am following Common's rules by filing this DR and I did not determine the rules on PD Mark. I too was warned not to pass such images some time ago. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
In the referenced DR, PDM was mentioned, but nobody described it as a legal problem for Commons. Though we may gain a consensus for policies to handle the uncertainties, my understanding still is that uploads in good faith pose no tangible legal risk to the uploader, nor to the WMF or Wikimedia Commons project. Simply put, if the Photographer is the Flickrstream owner and they wish to change the license, then there will be an issue of whether the license is revocable or ever meaningful when applied to the photographer's own works. As it would be the copyright holder changing their mind, they would be free to request take-down or deletion, however there never has been a case of a claim of damages going to court for a verifiable PDM license being used to rehost an image, nor is it really conceivable that there ever will be, so long as reusing parties are doing so in good faith. Consequently, we could, say, wait for an indefinite period to see if the Flickrstream owner replies to my email, and evidence of that effort to determine copyright would be sufficient legal protection against future claims; so deleting these files within 7 days may be precautionary but logically and legally is not a necessity. --Fæ (talk) 20:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: The basic issue is if a license on flickr is revocable as other Commons Admins state then it would be a legal problem for Commons to use it. That is why the other Admins decided not to use PD Mark licensed photos. Of course, you are invited to flickrmail the copyright owner to change the license if you wish to CC BY (Attribution), CC BY SA (Attribution-ShareAlike)or CC zero (public domain dedication) if you wish. I saved some images in the past but there are hundreds of anti-Trump protest images on Commons already. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
you mean it is revocable like a flickr user can change their CC-BY license? gosh i guess we can confirm the status at upload and move on. why should PDM be any different? there is a higher legal risk of a "FoP Germany", since there has been a case of a DMCA takedown there - unlike PDM. you are arguing about risk with no data whatsoever.
"other Admins decided" - are you saying admins are the deciders, and we just report on what they do? do admins trump consensus? maybe we should revise the process page. maybe the admins should discuss this on a locked page and just inform us what images to keep and delete. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 23:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: Once an image passes review with a generic CC-BY, CC BY SA or CC zero license, the image is considered passed for life no matter if the copyright owner changes the license at a later date...unless it is a copyright violation or if there are COM:FOP issues. So, Commons can keep the image forever.This image was definitely CC BY at upload even though it is now CC BY NC SA today at the flickr source in 2017 because it was uploaded in 2005 with a FlickLickr bot...that could only upload freely licensed CC BY images at upload. Hence it is not revocable today and Commons can keep it despite the copyright owners change of license with a NC (Non-Commercial) restriction. With PDM, the license is revocable, so its not really a license--more like a label. The copyright owner can remove the use of that image with a PDM license at any time simply by changing the license to say 'All Rights Reserved.' A PDM license has no legal effect. I think most normal Admins have the same understanding of the problems of using PDM labelled/licensed photos. Thank You and I will be away on most of Thursday in Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
its a funny thing, the flickr bot also approves PDM such as this one File:Library of congress panel 2140020.jpg. i guess it is not revocable. you have no example where an uploader has changed the "label" - why make stuff up? we have no case law about changing CC-BY licenses, so we do not know the "legal effect" of insisting they are irrevocable. all you have is some tl;dr boilerplate. hey- take all year off, you will not be missed. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: You would have to ask the flickrbot designer this, not me. Stop being a troll. I won't nominate your image for a DR since its clearly your own image. The flickreview bot never marked your image since you uploaded it with Upload Wizard Extension So, the Upload Wizard Extension bot programmer hasn't clued in that PDM images shouldn't just be passed without review. Lucky for you. As for me, I am a volunteer and I am doing my duty as a marker. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
it is just as much PD as the current case. apparently the admins who decided, have not decided to inform the wizard devs at the WMF to change their allowed licenses, but they screwed up the flickr2commons since that is java. lol. don't leave the barn door unlocked. "duty as a marker" = troll - have you ever taken a picture? why are you here if you have not? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps the closing Admin who decides this case will decide to send a message to the Upload Wizard Extension programmer about PDM. Or Admin Revent who knows about the PDM issue will close down this 'loophole' as you correctly note. Have a good day, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@Revent: Thanks for your reply here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Update: According to Fae who flickrmailed the copyright owner, Jillian Sallaway has rejected the use of her PD Mark images on WikiCommons and deleted all of them on her flickr account. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
yeah maybe we should suspend all transfers from flickr, since uploaders there in general do not consent to the use on commons. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: We can them nicely if they agree to change the license. But the problem is this set of images is very replacable as there are hundreds of women protesting Trump. If the copyright owner says no and doesn't change a license and make it free, then we cannot use the photo. I have had other people agree to change licenses for their images here Some of these images were taken in the Cairo Museum before this Museum banned all photography in their museum so they are not replacable today. The Egyptians also ban all photography in the tombs of the Valley of the kings today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
no, the problem is, commons is not a safe space that honors personality rights, and people might well doubt good faith reuse. emailing people on a one on one basis is not a way to run an image repository, it is bush league. yeah "very replacable" = "once you're seen one protesting woman you've seen them all. so let's just clean out the category of all shots not in use. and we can always farm flickr for more" you have a somewhat smaller vision of commons, i.e. a walled garden necessary to support wikipedia only. i'm beginning to agree with you, maybe i should take all my uploads to english, and "do not transfer to commons" Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 23:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: It was the Admins that decided that Public Domain Mark is too risky. I didn't even know about this decision until I was warned not to mark PDM images. So, I'm just following their decision here. An image doesn't have to be in use on wikipedia to remain on Commons forever. Thanks for your time and Goodbye, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
it was the admins who closed a discussion against consensus. i'm just not following their corrupt practices here. and you should expect images to go elsewhere forever. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These images are from 1970! Victorgrigas (talk) 16:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept historic photos, don't see any BGLP issues here. Multichill (talk) 20:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep The King Trump ones are high-quality caricatures with quite some meaning. This is in contrast to this "caricature of Donald Trump" that people here are seemingly desperate to keep and which is entirely inappropriate, not a caricature, and not useful or educational but out of scope. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Personal art and AI art is deemed out of scope. --P199✉ 14:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination + self-promotion + unused. —Tulsi Bhagat (contribs|talk) 03:59, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination + unused + self-promotion. —Tulsi Bhagat (contribs|talk) 04:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination and missing evidence of permission. —Tulsi Bhagat (contribs|talk) 04:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These images were uploaded by Boxingfan1995, who has a long history of uploading copyvios. They are all small resolution and lack metadata, so I suspect they were grabbed from the internet. (Also I do find it unlikely that they were in the Netherlands to take that photo of Crysencio Summerville, in Argentina (presumably) for the photo of Rodrigo de Paul and in the commentary suite for the Birmingham vs Leeds game in December 2019 (I think) for that photo of Patrick Bamford.) Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 223.62.188.65 00:28, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP if you want to talk to me ewhain@icloud.com send me email 211.248.183.181 01:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 02:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Túrelio: , You said "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless", I don't agree for the reasoning since there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. also, as I said in previous DR, this video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope), not privacy things. also it has archived pagehtml code of license info (cc license is irrevocable)Puramyun31 (talk) 12:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand that the claimant wants it deleted for privacy issues. And a CC license (as any other) is only irrevocable if it had been legitimate. As I understand it, the latter is disputed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Túrelio: the claimant seems not a videographer of the video, but seems the depicted person. your comment "stripped of its sound-track, is useless" That seems nonsense, there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition, so in scope (not such as a simple selfie video)). Puramyun31 (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Is it copyvio? No, licence been verified.
Is it out of scope? No, it shows a beauty pageant.
So the remaining question is, whether Commons should delete the video because the (alleged) subject depicted wants it deleted.--Roy17 (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Roy17, as I stated above: AFAIK, the license on YT has not been verified, but just recorded. We have scores of uploads from Flickr with at-time-of-upload recorded CC license, which we nevertheless deleted, after we found that the Flickr-user had wrongfully claimed a free license for not-own images. --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep If the YT video was deleted and the uploading YT account was not blocked, I think that deletion reason was unrelated to copyvio. Ankry (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a copyright issue as the nomination claims, but a personality rights issue. That page doesn't say much for South Korea specifically, so it is unclear to what extent permission is needed. Personality rights was discussed slightly on my talk page previously at User talk:Explicit/Archive 1#Question on public photograpy in South Korea. There are apparent exceptions, but again, we don't have any information on that. However, MuscleMania at least appears to be broadcast online by MAXQ on YouTube and Naver TV. Not to mention all the press photos. Don't you kind of have to... waive your personality rights to compete in this event to begin with? ƏXPLICIT 09:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Video was published under a free license on YouTube. Ruthven(msg) 20:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 223.62.162.83 05:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
i am the model in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 223.62.188.65 00:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Dont make me upset.
i am the woman in the vidio. You stole my photo and video my name without permission. The first uproader to Youtube , cocoviking, is currently in litigation with unauthorized portrait use. so you should delet this page ASAP 211.248.183.181 01:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Attribution: COCO VIKING deleted this vedio but you are distributing deleted videos 211.248.183.181 00:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep this video depicts usual public activity, not privacy things. also it's uncertain what the ip user is truly the person of the video (video source info is archived) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Original video is gone from YouTube; per nominator the YouTube uploader lacked permission. YouTube upload may have been under a false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete unless the dubbed in music in the sound track can be shown to be free licensed; apparent copyright violation through derivative work. (This is regardless of other potential problems in the deletion request.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
@Infrogmation: I uploaded sound removed-version of File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm. also as i said above, this video depicts usual public contest event, not privacy things. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
The sound is intact in the linked nominated video. Regardless of whether or not you uploaded a different silent version, this version with sound should be deleted as a copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
@Infrogmation: the overwriting error of this video File:머슬마니아 함슬옹.webm is fixed. sound-removed version now. sound removed version is Keep per as i said above. sound-included version uploaded was an unintentional mistake. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
p.s.: The ip user added apparently threatening comment which contains offensive words at my talk page. (you must be "crazy"...) If such comments are added repetitively at the pages related this discussion, the comments can be considered a legal threat. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: the version without sound. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am the woman in this video. You do not seem to understand what I am saying. I hope you read my article correctly and deal with it as soon as possible. When YouTube's first uploader of this content, a distributor named 'Cocovking' deleted my video for legal reasons, what rights does it distribute? Erase the following two videos. Delete them quickly. You have not answered or deleted them. I will sue legally. 211.248.183.181 16:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment Discussion on deletion of this image is still open. No need to repeat the same information. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Puramyun31 is illegally copying and distributing the video. 222.110.175.215 03:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
You are in error in more ways than one. Not User:Puramyun31 is distributing the video, but Wikimedia-Commons is. Though Puramyun31 uploaded this video-file from Youtube, when it was offered on Youtube under a free license, he/she has neither authority nor ability to delete it from Wikimedia-Commons. This requires an administrative action, which might be taken (or not) after a decision has been made. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
In case we want to decide this case on-wiki, I support deletion, as this video, which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless (and actually unused). --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Túrelio: , You said "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless", I don't agree for the reasoning since there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects. also, as I said in previous DR, this video depicts usual public activity (fitness contest, a sports competition), not privacy things. also it has archived pagehtml code of license info (cc license is irrevocable)Puramyun31 (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Video was removed from YouTube, an no way to check the license (neither on the archived versions). Ruthven(msg) 20:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
"Enora Malagré story" implies that this is a screenshot from the person's account on social medias (which seems to be the case given the quality of the photo and the way it is taken, which seems like a selfie). No authorization. Titlutin (talk) 01:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Taken from facebook (FBMD on Metadata); small sie, low-res, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Still copyrighted, Said died in 1964. —Racconish💬 05:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: free in Egypt, but not free thanks to the URAA; also picture frame is a 3D element. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is not own work, but the logo of Niaje.com, it is too complex to be copyright free Vera(talk) 05:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Author (in EXIF) differs from uploader, permission should be given via OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Please explain me the reason for deletion of this file.Risu43 (talk)
@Risu43: Metadata states that ASHRAY GOYAL is the author. If you're him, please send the permission to COM:OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Facebook image - --Begoon 14:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination, also web images are older than ours. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not an own work. 186.172.189.10 21:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The image is copied directly from the source, which is a blogpost on a site operated by the Ministry of Defense. As such, this work may be copyrighted under Singapore law, which does not explicitly put government works in PD. Syed(talk) 08:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: the license claims this to be below the TOO, but I couldn't find anything about the threshold in Singapore. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Please explain your rationale without buzzwords, blacklisted where? Atlantic306 (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep as no proper detailed rationale with proof of the allegations has been given. The flickr account is still active on flickr and ShappeAli in his sockpuppet appeal has stated that the flickr account is owned by friend of his who is a photographer for a local news magazine,Atlantic306 (talk) 18:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Very low-q photo of another photo or video (raster visible) -> not own work Retired electrician (talk) 08:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Superseded versions of Latvian municipality locator maps
The following maps are unused and they have an odd border. Better quality maps using the same styles are available in the same category.
Agree. I made those poor quality maps 10 years ago, they are no longer used. Destroy them. --Turkmenistan (talk) 09:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Enlace corregido. --Cuidro (talk) 19:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: link was corrected. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Question. Do you understand that all NASA images are in public domain regardless of when they were published? Ruslik (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: I do and I don't see NASA images (except perhaps File:Mars (Mariner 9).jpg) nowhere, especially in the file description. Perhaps you should name which are NASA images and put the appropriate tag on them. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
This is your problem, not mine. Until you do your homework I will Oppose all deletions. Ruslik (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: You may oppose what you want but I dont think your advice will be followed unless the uploader gives a proper license for these work. Please note it's his/her own problem to provide the correct licenses for the works he/her uploads. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete These uploads are not Patrick Rogel's homework rather from Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata. You can find the NASA files at the plant genus! category "Nasa" with false attribution and licence. All other ones are probably not from NASA and we need the authors' permission via OTRS. Additionally all files are heavily over-categorized. The uploader have to correct that, not Patrick Rogel! --Ras67 (talk) 21:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted DW/incorrect license. Works by this artist are not yet in the PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Rather good photo. While we have a good number of photos taken on the Brooklyn Bridge, few capture the city skyline well in the same shot. It would be an even better photo without the posed couple, but illustrative of the reaction of visitors to landmark location. (If kept, a more descriptive title would be better, but that's not a deletion issue.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus for deletion. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Poor quality photo with person’s eyes almost closed and very unfavorable mimics. This person has more photos, no need to keep this. Rafał Komorowski (talk) 10:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. We have a number of good photos of this person; no need to keep this very poor photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: OTRS received. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 18:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination, also differing qualities, partly watermarked. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment There is an article about the depicted person in English Wikipedia: en:Kendra Erika. If she's notable and that article stays, I suppose the photo could be used there? Gestumblindi (talk) 21:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: in use. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FoP for 2D artwork in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by あにまる大王 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: ブロック済みYann (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete as probable dw of a copyrighted photo due to the uploader's history. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
To remove, useless--Accomer (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Weak keep It's currently in use in various Wikipedia language versions (though apparently in most or all cases added by the uploader), and it's such a minimalistic drawing reduced to a few lines that I'm not sure it would count as a derivative work of a specific photograph. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by 76.79.221.123 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously not own work. This uploader has a habit of scanning Japanese books and magazines and uploading images such sa this antique image as "own work." The spine crease of a book is evident in the middle right of this image from which it was apparently scanned. Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 13:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Dubious license claim, at very least DW with no info on source image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by 76.79.221.123 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously not own work. Low quality scan of magazine or book with spine fold obvious in center right of image. Described by the uploader as an image stored in the annals of a private temple in Japan. Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 13:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by 76.79.221.123 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously not own work. Low quality scan of magazine or book with spine fold obvious in center right of image. Described by the uploader as an image stored in the possession of a private temple in Japan with no source of verification provided. Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 13:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted DW; no info on source image, dubious license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete this has a false source (true source is https://colnect.com/en/stamps/stamp/447924-Praying_Mantis_Mantis_religiosa-Moths_Butterflies_and_Insects-Mali) but there is no evidence the author released this under the license given. The artist is Jean-Louis Puvilland but I cannot find any birth or death record for him. The general Mali term of copyright is 70 years pma, which even if he died the year this was designed, would mean it is in copyright until at least 2065. Ww2censor (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Maybe you are right. Though, it can be known work, published on stamp later to commemorate its author. Still I would not oppose deletion.--Brunei (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Brunei: Is there any evidence the main image is older and was published elsewhere that could place this into the public domain? Who is it commemorating? It's just an illustration of an insect of which there were several stamps designed by the same artist (see this and this page for more examples). Ww2censor (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
I see you are a big man in philately.:-) I agree, it should be deleted.--Brunei (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Brunei: I don't know about a big man but I have been dealing with stamp copyrights for many years both here and on the enwiki for over 10 years.
Deleted Uploader unlikely to have authority to license the stamp; no information on copyright status of original image of which this is derivative. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted orphan photos of person, no indication of in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted Artwork might have been in scope had it actually been free licensed, but as the artist died in 2009 it is still under copyright by his heirs. (If there is actual permission to free license images of the art by the copyright holders, forward to Commons:OTRS.) I have left the one image which is of the artist rather than the art. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P199✉ 17:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P199✉ 17:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: While in scope as they were in use there is no evidence that permission was granted for them to be under that license. So, per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The reupload was because since i have the original files, when i uploaded, i noticed it was too big, covering the whole article so i had to resize it and re upload, only that. Hurungudo (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Evidence confirms undisclosed paid editing. Likely these images were given by the subjects to this user to be uploaded. Thus why the exif data is missing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
per Doc James in previous DR nom. I think it is better to delete the files per COM:PCP as Hurungudo might not be the actual photographer. If it is Hurungudo's own work, he/she should send the full file to OTRS for verification. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Considering the upload history of the user, all files are likely copyright violations. The PaperBag logo might fall under COM:TOO, but I am not sure about South African laws.
Deleted, but two are kept as ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
i want to use my name and its my photo... so please delete it right now. Technoashish (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep, insufficient rationale. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD/F10. —Racconish💬 16:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: as above, minus one. ~riley(talk) 22:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright license violation Betakiller (talk) 15:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by another. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright license violation Фон Бегор (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by another. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment A quick google suggests person shown is a professional singer of some note, although they appear not to have a Wikipedia article. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P199✉ 18:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. P199✉ 18:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Film shot in Germany. Any reason for U.S. law to apply? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The film was partially shot in Germany. link Hmm.. why was not this picture removed? It comes from the same movie. No one has reported his removal for six years. Mike89 (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep The film includes some incidental "location shots" in London and Germany, but the vast bulk of the filming was shot on the Universal Studios lots in California, USA. (see eg ) Indoor shots such as this photo would have been in studio. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 18:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This a screenshot of software copyrighted by Microsoft. Ostrzyciel (talk) 20:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: simple graphics and text, no copyrightable elements shown. P199✉ 18:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Encik Tekateki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:OOS / COM:NOTHOST Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion whether this image might indeed be useful und thereby in COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS, not an image of a genuine indigenous Guane, but just a girl dressing up. P199✉ 18:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Strong French accent, unusable PM3 (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on en:European Space Agency. Under COM:NPOV, a file that is in use on Wikipedia is not eligible for deletion for reasons of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï and bjh21. --Majora (talk) 03:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronounciation, like "Mont" PM3 (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. It's maybe unusable for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, like "Hauptstädter" PM3 (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
"Hauptstädter" and "Hauptstädte" are two different words with different meanings. It's simply wrong to say "Hauptstädter" instead of "Hauptstädte". --PM3 (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, just can you stop? You are in bad faith, there. Lyokoï (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, like "Wasserbomber" PM3 (talk) 14:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, like "panthestisch" PM3 (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it sound wrong for you, but not for me. Lyokoï (talk) 18:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, emphasis should be on last syllable PM3 (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have different emphasis that you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong emphasis and intonation, first syllable should be emphasized, and cadence betwen first and last syllable should be much larger. Sounds like singing. PM3 (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, like "Füßer" PM3 (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
The word "Füßer" simply does not exists. This is not understandible. --PM3 (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, just can you stop? You are in bad faith, there. Lyokoï (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong emphasis and pronunciation, like "Bahnhöfer". Emphasis should be on first syllable. PM3 (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, like "Höfer" PM3 (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong emphasis, emphasis should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong timing, all syllables should have equal length PM3 (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong timing and intonation. All syllables should have equal length, and down cadence should be much larger. PM3 (talk) 14:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Emphasis on first syllable is missing, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Very poor intonation, tone should decline PM3 (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronunciation, like "frein" PM3 (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent PM3 (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong intonation, should decline more, sounds like singing PM3 (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong intonation / emphasis on first syllable is missing PM3 (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent PM3 (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent PM3 (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong intionation and emphasis; emphasis should be on second syllable PM3 (talk) 14:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong emphasis, should be on second syllable PM3 (talk) 14:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Missing emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent, wrong emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong emphasis, should be on first syllable PM3 (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Wrong pronounciation, separation between "Stasi" and "Akten" is missing PM3 (talk) 14:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
French accent PM3 (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. File in use. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Missing emphasis on first syllable, and wrong pronunciation like "Zuckefest" PM3 (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a bad argument. Lots of people have another accent than you. Lyokoï (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this file is to inform about the correct pronunciation of the word, in Standard High German, and it fails to do so. The pronunciation is wrong. I can tell, because I am German. --PM3 (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, it's not the purpose of this file, absolutely not, never. It's not the goal of lingua libre. All languages have variation, even with learner and foreigner accents. So stop try to normalyse that. Thanks. Lyokoï (talk) 09:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Lyokoï. Part of a set that shows the variation in language. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: licenses invalid, since the government agency was not filled in. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not found at URL. German watermarked, unlikely to be a Polish work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author dies in 1982. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is not the real logo of the Tamako Market series or movie. The colours don't even match. Thibaut (talk) 19:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The logo with the bird would be Fair Use so I decided to use the Japanese and Western letters only. If you are able to generate it in a better way feel free to do so. Thanks for reading. --Goroth (talk) 21:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The Western letters are from the fansub, they are not part of the logo.
I can understand the fair use argument since apparently dewiki don't seem to accept local upload of logos as fair use, but instead of butchering the original logo, you could have just kept the pink background, the correct font colours and remove the bird, then you would have a logo closer to the original (even though I don't really like modified logos of anime and other artistic works, but anyway).
Unfortunately I'm not a vectorization expert, so I don't know how I can generate a better SVG file. --Thibaut (talk) 22:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
NIC is national informatics centre, which is a domain used by Federal and state governments in India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editormallu (talk•contribs)
@Editormallu: It contradicts the copyright notice. Besides "the user must acknowledge the provider, source, and license of data by explicitly publishing the attribution statement, including the DOI (Digital Object Identifier), or the URL (Uniform Resource Locator), or the URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) of the data concerned." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel: This file licensed under the Government Open Data License - India (GODL) which is mentioned along with the file. Also proper URL is also provided for the data.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Editormallu (talk•contribs)
Deleted: not found at the source site anymore, COM:PCP. --Sebari–aka Srittau (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)