Commons:Deletion requests/2025/06/17
June 17
File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 06.jpg
Per COM:FOP Uzbekistan, there is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan. The design is gorgeous, but unfortunately also far beyond the threshold of originality in the United States (and likely Uzbekistan, if we have any case law on the subject). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- First read this law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. It says: results obtained by technical means intended for production of a certain kind of work without the performance of creative activities by a person directly aimed at the creation of an individual work. Thanks. Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- The full quote is, "The following shall not be objects of copyright: ... results obtained by technical means intended for production of a certain kind of work without the performance of creative activities by a person directly aimed at the creation of an individual work." That basically means that works under an undefined threshold of originality (i.e., purely functional) works do not attract copyright. That covers items such as File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 04.jpg and File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 01.jpg. However, the item in discussion here features a brick road, a tower, and various elements of what look like mosque design (minaret, windows, dome). There is a lot more creativity involved than a mere "technical" design. Mass production, which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- "...which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design", the design of Uzbek banknotes and postage stamps also includes mosques, towers, etc. According to your definitions, they can also be considered the work of a designer. Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 02:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- EVerything can be considered the work of a designer. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, everything can. The only reason Uzbek banknotes are not considered copyrighted is because of a separate term in the copyright law, i.e., symbols of the state. See COM:CUR Uzbekistan. In other countries, currency may be copyright protected; the United Kingdom is a fairly prominent one. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- EVerything can be considered the work of a designer. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- "...which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design", the design of Uzbek banknotes and postage stamps also includes mosques, towers, etc. According to your definitions, they can also be considered the work of a designer. Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 02:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- The full quote is, "The following shall not be objects of copyright: ... results obtained by technical means intended for production of a certain kind of work without the performance of creative activities by a person directly aimed at the creation of an individual work." That basically means that works under an undefined threshold of originality (i.e., purely functional) works do not attract copyright. That covers items such as File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 04.jpg and File:Kanalizatsion quduq qopqogʻi. Toshkent, Chilonzor k. 01.jpg. However, the item in discussion here features a brick road, a tower, and various elements of what look like mosque design (minaret, windows, dome). There is a lot more creativity involved than a mere "technical" design. Mass production, which you argued at QIC, does not negate the creative elements of the design. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ben Huan 1950s.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 04:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ben Huan about 1950s.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 04:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Port ymuiden (114) - Flickr - indyraf.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Not seeing anything suspicious about this Flickr stream. Seems like a valid PD mark. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Waterfall-Austria - Flickr - chachasarra.png
This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Not seeing any evidence which would make me think this is not a valid PD mark. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Danryckert.png
This file was initially tagged by Incall as no source (No source since) Krd 05:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Chen Yingning 001.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yuan Ying.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Чирхалю.jpg
The illustration is taken from a 1947 magazine article (https://djvu.online/jpg2/E/6/p/E6p6HEIQtxuKi/052.webp). The author of the article (Н.А. Нагинский), died in 1961. It is estimated that it will be transferred to the public domain no earlier than 2036. Borealex (talk) 06:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:LaiGuo.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Yu Junbo.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Liu Dezhi.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Ailing 1935.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Huangdan2060 The URAA would likely not apply if the work were first published in China (and not published in the US within 30 days) -- the Chinese copyright would have expired in 1986, assuming immediate publication. But the image was taken in France, and if it were published there (and not published in the US within 30 days) the URAA would apply. If there was simultaneous publication in the US and some other country, then the URAA would not apply, but the image would have received a "normal" US copyright, and could have become public domain due to lack of compliance with formalities. Any idea on when/where this was published? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Zedong and Xu Teli 1936.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom, per the Carleton College , this photo is part of US photographer Haldore Hanson's collection (taken in 1938 during his trip in China). The collection was donated to the college in 1992, so assuming it was unpublished before, then it will enter PD in 2063 (life+70). Tvpuppy (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Tan Bing'e.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Qian Weichang 1946.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng 1952.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng 2.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng in 1952.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Desheng.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Liu Chunquan.jpeg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:立皇嗣宣明の儀のお写真 1.jpg
我上傳此檔案,但不確定版權,請求刪除以避免任何版權問題。I uploaded this file but I’m not sure about the copyright status. Requesting deletion to avoid any copyright issues. SophiaTrista (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:立皇嗣之禮,2020年11月8日。.jpg
我上傳此檔案,但不確定版權,請求刪除以避免任何版權問題。I uploaded this file but I’m not sure about the copyright status. Requesting deletion to avoid any copyright issues. SophiaTrista (talk) 06:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:立皇嗣宣明の儀のお写真 2.jpg
我上傳此檔案,但不確定版權,請求刪除以避免任何版權問題。I uploaded this file but I’m not sure about the copyright status. Requesting deletion to avoid any copyright issues. SophiaTrista (talk) 06:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Bai Mao Nv 1950.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 3.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 4.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 5.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 6.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 7.jpg
This photo was taken by Chinese photographer Lv Houmin (吕厚民), who died in 2015, so this photo is not in the public domain. Image also still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin 8.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mao Yuanxin younger.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Zhixin younger.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Zhang Zhixin younger 2.jpg
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA. Huangdan2060 (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Divine (cropped).jpg
Bórrelo por favor. 191.126.167.104 11:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Porqué? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photos-Celebs-attend-the-GQ35-Most-Influential-Young-Indians-909-2.jpg (thumbnail version of that one). --Platonides (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Divine (cropped).jpg
Please this this is wrong information of rcprashant Rcprashant (talk) 07:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
File:The struggle for supremacy.jpg
I am the uploader and I no longer want this file to be published. I mistakenly uploaded this file here. MdRezwanulAlam (talk) 09:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Not recently uploaded and this is within scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Tables of x-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetry interest (IA tablesofxraymass5632hubb).pdf
In copyright per - https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/voyager_17297215. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Niko Galešić.png
This file was initially tagged by CennoxX as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: License review NOT passed: Author is using all rights reserved. REAL 💬 ⬆ 11:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep The video was previously published under the Creative Commons Attribution (3.0 Unported) license on YouTube at https://web.archive.org/web/20250110002306/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8McUlG8WIE. Although YouTube allows users to change the license on videos, Creative Commons licenses are legally not revocable REAL 💬 ⬆ 11:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Logo FuniviaVallvidrera.svg
{{Fake SVG}}, vector logo available: File:Fvallvidrera.svg. Leyo 12:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Hafiz Saad Hussain Rizvi.jpg
If the uploader is really the copyright holder of this image, supposedly from 2020, it's very strange that they chose to upload a copyvio last year at File:Saad Hussain Rizvi.jpg. And despite that image being swiftly deleted and editing the person's biographical article many times since, it's taken them until now to upload this image. According to tineye, published in many places before this upload. 2A0A:EF40:D72:F801:817C:5401:FEEB:8E8 14:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:StateLibQld 1 119800 Oxfordshire (ship).jpg
This image of HMHS "Oxfordshire" is too damaged to be usable. Wikimedia Commons has enough images of the same ship, in better condition. Motacilla (talk) 14:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Spusu Italia (screenshot CellularZ).jpg
screenshot of software Gambo7 (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Possibly PD text simple, but unused. Scope? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
File:SAngel1F.JPG
Incorrect IP rights, no owner of image rights. Fashionenterprise (talk) 16:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Request by uploader. File on Commons since 2009; no earlier versions seen in reverse image search. @Fashionenterprise: Could you explain? Were you the photographer? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:24, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I am not the photographer or owner of this image. I found the image on the internet and uploaded as my own work. Fashionenterprise (talk) 09:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Resending. Please remove as I am breach of copyright ownership as I did not own the image. Fashionenterprise (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Kathedralbasilika St. Maria, Trujillo, Peru (Catedral basílica de Santa María)Stammsitz des Erzbist com google android apps photos AlbumActivity.jpg
Doppelt und Fehler in der Dateiinfo Juniperi (talk) 17:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Wo ist das Duplikat dazu? Fehler in der Bildbeschreibung oder falsche Dateinamen können rasch behoben werden. Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment The duplicate is File:Kathedralbasilika St. Maria, Trujillo, Peru,.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 18:24, 21 June 2025 (UTC)