File:Kevin Wall PTK.jpg

This file was initially tagged by MKFI as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.ptkcapital.com/person/kevin-wall-2/ but the image at that source is a cropped version of the image uploaded here. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 01:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@Morgankevinj: the image at the page is simply cropped by setting margins; if you open the image in full you can see it matches the file in Commons: https://www.ptkcapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KevinWall_2-2000x1333.jpeg. MKFI (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per MKFI. --MorganKevinJ^(talk) 10:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:New Flag 2.jpg

Lo subí por error Bastian57 (talk) 12:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: Uploader's request. Your next try will be treated as vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 13:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Trewartha Climate.png

Lo subí por error Bastian57 (talk) 12:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: Uploader's request. Tu próximo intento será tratado como vandalismo. --Achim55 (talk) 13:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Japan Alternative Flag.png

I uploaded it by mistake Mattia D'Alessandro (talk) 18:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:The cast of No Way Home at the world premiere of the film.jpg

The editor uploaded the image from Getty Images but the license he/she added implied it was released under Creative Commons Centcom08 (talk) 09:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:44, 25 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Promo/press photo --Krdbot 19:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:PRI 185183497.jpg

Copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 11:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Blackcat at 12:55, 25 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): https://img.asmedia.epimg.net/resizer/PiUr9xp8ewUj5upTF5GpX744cxs=/644x362/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/diarioas/HYJZRC4X2JMVZO3EQ6Z3YP2AAU.jpg --Krdbot 19:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:TELEMMGLPICT000000287790881 trans NvBQzQNjv4BqOgTBaXjU4JPktt1PcqAKMvipp6I7Wmq8QJJkq5qiFBM.webp

Copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Blackcat at 12:51, 25 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_hausa/0380/production/_123669800_mediaitem123669799.jpg --Krdbot 19:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Skysports-chelsea-ngolo-kante 5528260.jpg

Copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Blackcat at 12:52, 25 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/12420477/ngolo-kante-chelsea-midfielder-tests-positive-for-coronavirus --Krdbot 19:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:PTKM-1R-Top-attack-Anti-tank-mine.webm

Per Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#roe.ru_licence, the site's licence (which is not CC-Attribution) is not compatible with Commons:Licensing as it makes no reference to derivative works. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Recreted deleted content. UDR underway, but unlikely to succeed. --Yann (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Nefdel’egliseSaint-PierredeCholet.jpg

Inadapté, erreur d’image Ambroise49000 (talk) 16:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

{{speedydelete|<erreur d’image>}} Ambroise49000 (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:James Hetfield screenshot.jpg

Coppied from https://www1.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Live+Earth+London+Show+bCAfzy506gHs.jpg Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola _talk 22:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Cricketer Rajat Patidar.png

nothing from the uploader to show they own the image Lugnuts (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Túrelio at 19:24, 25 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: https://bcciplayerimages.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/playerheadshot/ipl/284/5471.png https://www.iplt20.com/teams/royal-challengers-bangalore/squad-details/5471/2021/9 --Krdbot 01:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Mohsin khan.jpg

nothing from the uploader to state they own the image Lugnuts (talk) 18:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Yann at 21:09, 25 May 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 01:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Invasion of Yugoslavia lines of attack Why We Fight no. 5.jpg

Copyright violation Taisai429 (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Eligible for deletion: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/1/14/20220525111655%21Invasion_of_Yugoslavia_lines_of_attack_Why_We_Fight_no._5.jpg
  • source is probably: H.E.Stier (dir.), Grosser Atlas von Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, ISBN 3-14-100919-8
• Not eligible for deletion: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/1/14/20220519213806%21Invasion_of_Yugoslavia_lines_of_attack_Why_We_Fight_no._5.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taisai429 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy keep no evidence whatsoever has been provided by the nominator to show that this was the first instance of publication or that it is a copyvio. The film series was first published in 1943 by the US Army and the image is a screenshot from the film which shows maps created by the US War Dept. The image is clearly covered by PD-USGov-Military. Perhaps Taisai429 could actually do some WP:BEFORE *before" they nominate files? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
  • The film series was Not eligible for deletion. Please read my comment. This is an issue where a benign image sourced from Why we fight was later overwritten by a piracy image.--Taisai429 (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio deleted. --Yann (talk) 07:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Paul Bartlett Ré Peace Prize 2022.jpg

The photograph is copyright to BAMBINO but uploaded by Dr. Paul Harrison. It has a watermark and EXIF data for BAMBINO. Theredproject (talk) 02:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

This photograph File:Paul Bartlett Ré Peace Prize 2022.jpg is absolutely mine; as I am the owner and proprietor of Bambino Studio. I have also shared an evidence [to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org vide Ticket#: 2022052510009537] by submitting an undertaking on the official letter head of Bambino Studio via our official email id. Please check that email and do the needful accordingly. And please do not remove this photograph, as it absolutely belongs to my own work. Dr Paul Harrison (talk) 15:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• There is an VRTS email received for “File:Paul Bartlett Ré Peace Prize 2022.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022052510009537. —MdsShakil (talk) 18:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

  Dear Sir, I have responded the VRT agent's question. Please check and do the needful. Dr Paul Harrison (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• I have just accepted permission for “File:Paul Bartlett Ré Peace Prize 2022.jpg” under ticket:2022052510009537. —MdsShakil (talk) 07:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

  Dear Sir, I have uploaded a revised version of that picture in order to replace it with newer one but the following template is still appearing with the same statement [This media file has been nominated for deletion since 25 May 2022]. Kindly do the needful for remove the deletion process. Dr Paul Harrison (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: VRT permission has been received and accepted. --De728631 (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Esther and Her Volcano - Philippines - Mar 2014.jpg

Unused personal vacation photo, out of scope. Already innumerable images of this volcano on Commons anyway. P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: uploaders request. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Theresa Pickett.jpg

copyright violation Animati (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Uploader placed a speedy deletion tag claiming that it is a copyright violation that they obtained from https://theresasreviews.com/elsa-frozen-halloween-costumes/ that article is dated October 12, 2014. The image was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons on July 1, 2014 which is three months prior to when that article was published. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 01:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MorganKevinJ^(talk) 11:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Theresa Pickett.jpg 2

Copywrite issues -Images appears at https://theresasreviews.com/brushalot-tooth-fairy-kit/ Animati (talk) 11:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MorganKevinJ^(talk) 11:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Theresa Pickett.jpg 3

Image is a copyright violation because it was published elsewhere previous to being on Wikipedia https://theresasreviews.com/new-headshot/ - ~~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Animati (talk • contribs) 11:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 Delete, that page is from "May 25, 2014". Also per uploader request.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Will it be deleted? Animati (talk) 23:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Still this seems a little off. The EXIF from both the image at that source and the image on commons states that the image was taken on June 30, 2014. That is a month after the time that source claims the image was published and 1 day prior to when it was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 02:17, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

@Morgankevinj: Please check your math.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

It seems the article's date has been updated. Please review and delete. Animati (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

@Animati: http://web.archive.org/web/20220525113128/https://theresasreviews.com/new-headshot/ then.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Jeff, couldn't this please be deleted because of uploader request? Animati (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: com:revoke. --MorganKevinJ^(talk) 20:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

File:شهادة تقدير محمد بن مروان أورفه لي من قبل شركة وانغ كانغ السعودية للسيراميك المحدودة.jpg

because it is containing a private infomations Mhdourfali (talk) 11:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

because it is containing a private information Mhdourfali (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 23:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

File:شهادة تقدير محمد بن مروان أورفه لي من شركة وانغ كانغ للسيراميك السعودية.jpg

contain private information. 77.44.177.11 11:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Contain private information (phone numbers) 77.44.177.11 12:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 23:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Theresa Pickett1.jpg

Image was published previous to being on Wikipedia at https://theresasreviews.com/new-headshot/ Animati (talk) 11:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Morgankevinj at 23:49, 28 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 07:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

File:George E. Koronaios.jpg

I uploaded this picture by mistake. I have already upload it in black and white contrast on my personal account. George E. Koronaios (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:George E. Koronaios.jpg

I uploaded a newer image of myself for my personal page in Wikimedia Commons (File:George E. Koronaios (2022).jpg). I think this one should be deleted as obsolete. My apologies for the inconvenience. George E. Koronaios (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:20210307042255 IMG 9836 (1).jpg

Likely a personal photo. Unused. Out of scope. Hulged (talk) 03:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:67D3FC9E-A4EF-4EBD-964A-DFC7DE.jpg

Personal photo. Unused. Out of scope. Hulged (talk) 03:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:2

More OOS junk

• File:Laith hitem334.jpg
• File:Mohamed0155.jpg
• File:صورةوليد شلال.jpg

Dronebogus (talk) 05:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:2

OOS crap junk

• File:Diyar tami.jpg
• File:Laith hitem334.jpg
• File:Mohamed masor ab.jpg
• File:Mohamed0155.jpg
• File:صورةوليد شلال.jpg

Dronebogus (talk) 10:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:2

Stupid OOS selfies

• File:ABDULKERİM DIRBAS.jpg
• File:Amin salam4445.jpg
• File:Mohamed gomaa111.jpg

Dronebogus (talk) 00:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

 Delete per the nominator. Selfie SPA crap that's out of scope. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:2

More OOS junk

• File:ABDULKERİM DIRBAS.jpg
• File:Amaarqwerdjx24.jpg
• File:Amin salam4445.jpg
• File:Mohamed gomaa111.jpg
• File:الفنان رضا.jpg

Dronebogus (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

 Delete Out of scope. Llwyld (talk) 13:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:2

Oos crap junk

• File:Aziz+Amiri.jpg
• File:Oscar photography erbil.jpg

Dronebogus (talk) 11:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete on both as OOS. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:19, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:2

No evidence of permission.

• File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه سروش معاون اقتصادی.jpg
• File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه سروش معاون هماهنگی امور اقتصادی استانداری سیستان و بلوچستان.jpg
• File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه سروش.jpg
• File:دکتر ماندانا زنگنه.jpg
• File:ماندانا زنگنه در نشست توسعه سواحل مکران.jpg
• File:ماندانا زنگنه سروش معاون اقتصادی استانداری سیستان و بلوچستان.jpg
• File:ماندانا زنگنه.jpg
• File:مزیت شهرستانی روستایی کتاب.pdf
• File:مزیت ها، قابلیت ها و مشوق های سرمایه گذاری.pdf
• File:نشست اقتصادی ماندانا زنگنه سروش و هیئت اقتصادی میز ایران در پاکستان.jpg
• File:کتابچه فرصتهای متقابل سرمایه گذاری با افغانستان.pdf

Dronebogus (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Hans C. Marcher.jpg

1. Clearly promotional (see print, uploaded for a recently deleted article on deWP), 2. Copyvio possible (a selfie —see name — in this quality? doubt it.) KlausHeide (talk) 08:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Fwaid.pdf

out of scope, personal bio data Afifa Afrin (talk) 10:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:LibreApp logo.jpg

• also file:LibreApp-simplificado.jpg
  Unused logos of probably non-notable app. Likely out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Savannah banda (Chile).jpg

Promo photo of non-notable band (not found neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Emad abohsuuein14789.jpg

Out of scope junk Dronebogus (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Theresa Pickett.jpg

Animati (talk) 11:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: deleting a DR page? Something must have gone wrong here. --Rosenzweig τ 04:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Brinkheurne-deslingeweg-220747.jpg

wrong file uploaded Pimvantend (talk) 12:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: Uploader's request. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Mizeri.1990.DUAL.BDRip.XviD.AC3.-HQCLUB.ogg

upload by Mistake Vegas545 (talk) 13:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: test upload, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Mizeri.1990.DUAL.BDRip.XviD.AC3.-HQCLUB.ogg

upload by Mistake Vegas545 (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: test upload, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Polo Horses Edit 2.jpg

unused private artwork, no educational value - out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 16:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Rigoletto Park Kyung Jun.jpg

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Keep – It's a good illustration of the title role in Verdi's opera Rigoletto. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

   I withdraw my nomination -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Deputado Sergio Fernandes.jpg

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination now in use --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Evernorth Logo.png

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I created this image for use in a newly created article about a major US corporation. Widgetkid (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

I used the article about the company's competitor, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optum as a guide, including the use of the Optum logo (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Optum_logo_2021.svg). Widgetkid (talk) 22:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination now is use -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Briana Amira (talk · contribs)

Unused low-res images of random and nondescript vegetation (and puppy), no meaningful description or location, no educational use, unusable, out of scope.

• File:Farm life is the best life.webp
• File:The magical nature.webp
• File:Puppies make's your life happy.webp
• File:Nature's mystery.webp
• File:The is beautiful isn't it.webp

P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:3phenothiazine syntesis.jpg

Incorrect, {{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Phenothiazine synthesis 3.svg. Leyo 14:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete. The chemical structure on the right is incorrect and there is a good replacement. Marbletan (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Bufalina.gif

{{BadGIF}}, incorrect, replaced by File:Bufalin.svg. Leyo 14:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete. The chemical structure is incorrect and there is a good replacement. Marbletan (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete Low-quality chemical structure in wrong file format, replaced by high-res version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:LeeGuitars.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo copied from Lee Guitars. See watermark. 2010 in-use upload, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Nessma El Jadida logo.png

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Astana (8376793097).jpg

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:FOP Kazakhstan King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:2021-Giffers-Ofenhaus.jpg

Der Bauverwalter von Giffers, Herr Sandro Jungo, hat mich (Fotograf des Bildes) darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass dieses Gebäude n i c h t das Ofenhaus darstellt. Hier handelt es sich um ein neueres Gebäude, in welchem die Holzheizung des Bauernhauses untergebracht ist. Somit ist dieses Bild falsch und muss gelöscht werden. Danke. Roland Zumbuehl, Arlesheim Roland Zumbuehl (talk) 06:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Das muss nicht notwenigerweise gelöscht werden. Man kann den Sachverhalt in der Beschreibung richtigstellen und die Datei umbenennen lassen. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hab's trotzdem gelöscht, da sich kaum eine sinnvolle Verwendung des Bildes denken lässt. Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 22:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: uploader request. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Mikko Salmi vuonna 2021.jpg

Found here before upload https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3683468111711051&set=ecnf.100001436941704 - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by El Club de Los Retro 2 (talk · contribs)

Old photos, not 2021 own work as he died in 2012

• File:Miliki1986.jpg
• File:MilikiPhoto.jpg

Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Grosser Stern - Frau Merkel (Great Star - Mrs Merkel) - geo.hlipp.de - 41406.jpg

The election banners are not permanently located in the public space, so FOP cannot be applied 220.246.138.212 07:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Kristofurbumsted.png

This image is not this users own work: https://www.digitalmuscle.com/master-archive/the-upset-of-the-year-chris-bumsted/ FiveXdollars (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Gianni Caprioli.jpg

File EXIF shows "Author Photographer:Jason Joseph Bonel Copyright holder Copyright:Jason Joseph Bonello". VRT permission from Jason Joseph Bonello needed. MKFI (talk) 08:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Hooke1665 (talk · contribs)

Suspected copyright violations: images of Rober Hooke trail are copied from https://www.yarmouth-harbour.co.uk/things-to-do/walking/robert-hooke-trail/. Map and information plaque are copyrighted. If the uploader is the copyright holder or is authorized to upload these, please send VRT confirmation.

• File:Plaque 8.jpg
• File:Kissing Gate.jpg
• File:St Agnes 2.jpg
• File:Freshwater Bay birds.jpg
• File:All Saints Church, Freshwater.jpg
• File:Fort Victoria 1a.jpg
• File:Co op monument 1a.jpg
• File:Blank Map.jpg
• File:179 Causeway.jpg

MKFI (talk) 08:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ahmed11224 (talk · contribs)

All of these photos are copyrighted (Clear copyright violation)

• File:89c0811elogo.png
• File:حماس في العراق.jpg
• File:الجماعة الإسلامية في لبنان.png

--Karim talk me :)..! 23:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Likely Flickrwashing, poorly screenshotted images uploaded to own Flickr account

• File:مصطفي طلبة.png
• File:حازم شومان.png

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

 Speedy delete per nomination. --Karim talk me :)..! 12:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ahmed11224 (talk · contribs)

Flickr washing. May be PD for some reasons, but real source, correct license and rationale must be provided.

• File:أول-هيئة-بالإسماعيلية.png
• File:الشيخ حسن أحمد البنا.png
• File:البنا وابنه.png
• File:عبدالرحمن السندي.png
• File:سيارة غنمها الإخوان.png
• File:عبد-الحكيم-عابدين.png
• File:حسن-البنا-خطيب.png
• File:الشيخ حسن البنا.png
• File:حسن البنا مع شباب الإخوان.png

Yann (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ahmed11224 (talk · contribs)

User blocked. Either wrong license, or plain copyvios.

• File:وجدي غنيم.png
• File:Freemasonry Masonic Blue Lodge Logo.png
• File:الشيخ عبداللطيف ابو قورة الاردن.jpg
• File:الشيخ مصطفى السباعي.jpg
• File:حسن البنا بعض الشباب الذين ألفوا إحدي شعب الإخوان بقري مدينة الشرقية.png
• File:حسن-البنا-يسمع-لأحد-الإخوان.png
• File:حسن البنا يخطب.png
• File:عبد اللطيف أبو قورة.jpg
• File:الحجاب.jpg
• File:الحجاب قديمًا.jpg
• File:صالح عشماوي.jpg
• File:Standard compressed mzawahiri.jpg
• File:محمد فرغلي أحد قادة الإخوان.jpg
• File:مذبحة سجن ليمان طرة 1954م.gif
• File:حسن البنا مع بعض الشباب الذين ألفوا إحدي الشعب بالشرقية.jpg
• File:سيد قطب خلف القضبان في المحكمة.jpg
• File:سيد قطب خلال محاكمته.jpg
• File:أحمد شفيق.jpg
• File:دور النظام الخاص بالإخوان في حرب 48.jpg
• File:الاخوان المسلمون في حرب فلسطين.jpg
• File:مقاتل من كتائب الإخوان المسلمين في حرب 48.jpg
• File:الإخوان في حرب 48.jpg
• File:أبو الأعلى المودودي وعبدالله العقيل.jpg
• File:حسن البنا ووفد أندونيسي.jpg
• File:سيد قطب يشرب خلال محاكمته.png
• File:سيد قطب يكتب في السجن.jpg
• File:حسن البنا يقابل وفد أندونيسي.jpg
• File:حسن البنا 2.jpg
• File:حسن البنا مؤسس جماعة الإخوان المسلمين.png
• File:حسن البنا يرتدي معطف.jpg
• File:حسن البنا وابنه.jpg
• File:الشيخ حسن البنا يخطب.jpg
• File:حسن البنا يكتب.jpg
• File:كمال السنانيرى.png
• File:عطا ابو الرشتة.jpg
• File:الإخوان في حرب فلسطين.jpg
• File:أول هيئة تأسيسية لجماعة الإخوان المسلمين.jpg
• File:حسن البنا يتحدث.jpg
• File:حرق مقر الإخوان عام 1954م.webp
• File:حسن-البنا-عند-تخرجه من دار العلوم.png
• File:الاخوان في السودان.jpg
• File:عبدالناصر يحيي جماهيره.jpg
• File:مبارك قائد القوات الجوية.webp
• File:مبارك والسادات.webp
• File:حسني مبارك في شبابه.webp
• File:اللواء طيار أركان حرب محمد حسني مبارك.webp
• File:جمال عبدالناصر يصافح مبارك خلال تعيينه مديرًا للكلية الجوية.jpg
• File:مصطفي السباعي.jpg
• File:حسن البنا مؤسس الإخوان المسلمين.png
• File:حسن البنا مع كتائب الإخوان المسلمين فى فلسطين.jpg
• File:زينب جبارة.png
• File:محمود عبدالحليم-modified.png
• File:محمود عزت في شبابه.png
• File:الملك فاروق وعائلته في إيطاليا.jpg
• File:بنان الطنطاوي.jpg
• File:مجموعة من الإخوان أعلنوا التطوع للجهاد في حرب فلسطين 1948م.png
• File:حسن البنا وسط جوالة الإخوان.jpg
• File:الإخوان والجوالة.png
• File:محمد بديع في الثانوية.png
• File:محمد بديع في شبابه.png
• File:سيد سابق.jpg
• File:حسن البنا مع صالح العشماوي.jpg
• File:عبدالرحمن البنا.png
• File:حسن البنا مؤسس الإخوان المسلمين.jpg
• File:الشيخ حسن البنا.jpg
• File:اللواء طيار محمد حسني مبارك قائد القوات الجوية.jpg
• File:محمود عبدالحليم.jpg
• File:سعيد رمضان.jpg
• File:علي خامنئي في شبابه.png
• File:شكري مصطفي أمير جماعة التكفير والهجرة.png
• File:حسن البنا وسط الزعامات السياسية.png
• File:جوالة الإخوان يرفعون راية الجماعة شرق القاهرة.png
• File:سيد قطب مع الشيخ البشير الإبراهيمي وعلي الطنطاوي ومحمد محمود الصواف.jpg
• File:سيد قطب في المحكمة.jpg
• File:حسن البنا يحفز أنصاره ومؤيديه.png
• File:حسن البنا يخطب ويحفز أنصاره ومؤيديه.png
• File:حسن البنا في أحد معسكرات الإخوان.jpg
• File:حسن البنا في المسجد.png
• File:حسن-البنا-عند-تخرجه.png
• File:الضباط الاحرار.jpg
• File:حسن البنا يخطب في الناس.png
• File:سيد قطب في تنظيم 65.jpg
• File:سيد قطب في السجن الحربي.png
• File:سيد قطب بالقفطان.jpg
• File:سيد قطب شابا.jpg
• File:سيد قطب.png
• File:سيد قطب.jpg
• File:حسن البنا في الحج.png
• File:أم السعد صقر.jpg
• File:الخديوي توفيق والماسونية.jpg
• File:حسن البنا قبل أغتياله.jpg
• File:حسن البنا.png
• File:حسن البنا في السويس.png
• File:المركز العام للإخوان المسلمين في الحلمية.png
• File:حسن البنا يرتدي زي الجوالة.jpg
• File:حسن البنا يخطب في الناس.webp
• File:سيد قطب في شبابه.png
• File:الامام البنا في الجامع الازهر.png
• File:حسن البنا يخطب في الجماهير خلال حديث الثلاثاء من كل أسبوع.jpg
• File:الإخوان المسلمون.png

Yann (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

• Some of these are colorizations File:حسن البنا يخطب في الجماهير خلال حديث الثلاثاء من كل أسبوع.jpg, some aren't.

Firstly the non-colorizations. AFAIK, these are invalid licences. In which case, delete.

The colorizations are a problem because they've been uploaded to overwrite their original sources. That needs to be reverted. But otherwise there's no reason to delete them. I'd be happy to see them kept, but split into separate files and identified as derivatives – if anyone has the enthusiasm to do that. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete invalid licenses and randomly upload, most of them are (anonymous author) and copyright law in Egypt : Other works that are either anonymous or pseudonymous (published prior to 1946) to be expired in USA, all of files published after 1946 and that mean it are not free. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 22:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete both colorisations and the non-colorisations – don't trust any of these licenses, many of which seem to be invalid. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 09:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

File:89c0811elogo.png

All rights reserved, see! --Karim talk me :)..! 21:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Túrelio at 19:22, 2 June 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ahmed11224: All of these photos are copyrighted (Clear copyright violation) --Krdbot 01:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Manish Rohith.jpg

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Lucky luke End of Legend (Short film).jpg

Screenshot of a copyrighted work Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Makedonski Brod Municipality (2012).svg

No educational value Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Speedy keep - used in many articles, no reason to delete. Yeeno (talk) 01:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Salvador-Ramos.jpg, File:Salvador Ramos.png

Unclear if this is an official driver's license photo or not (and if it is in the public domain). The image was pulled from a news blogging website (https://nowtrendingstory.com/salvador-romas-texas-uvalde-school-shooting/ ). Natg 19 (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Snow Keep - This source () lists the source as being the Texas Department of Public Safety. -- Veggies (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - the source needs a License Date. Otherwise, unfortunately it must be kept. Chesapeake77 (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Huh? Can you clarify your comment? User:Chesapeake77Category:Commons User template with namespace Natg 19 (talk) 20:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete - Works by state agencies are not necessarily in the public domain. Unless there is clear evidence that this image has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder, this should be deleted. Aoi (talk) 23:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
  • News organizations literally state that the Texas Department of Public Safety released this picture and credit the agency for it. (see above and ) It's quite literally the same situation as File:Devin-Patrick-Kelley-driverlicense.jpg. What "clear evidence" do you want? -- Veggies (talk) 23:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
    • I don't dispute the sourcing, and I don't dispute that the image is from the Texas Department of Public Safety. I am disputing the assertion that the image is in the public domain. While works of the U.S. federal government fall under the public domain, the same is not necessarily true of works by state governments. Indeed, the work of certain Texas state agencies are released to the public domain, but this is not true of all state agencies. Unless it is clear that the image has been released to the public domain or an appropriate license, it should not be hosted on Commons. Further, the Department of Public Safety may have released the image to the media for their use, but that does not necessarily mean that the image was released to the public domain.
    • I also note that the listed license for the file File:Salvador Ramos.png incorrectly asserts that the image is a work of the U.S. federal government. If these files are kept, the license noted on that image should be changed to something more appropriate. Aoi (talk) 00:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

@Natg 19 If it's supposed to be from a "Drivers License" but they can't even provide the date on the license, how do we know it's real? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesapeake77 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

• Snow Keep - I looked it up before updating to a better quality image as the blog quality was crap, and the 4 sources i found for it tagged it to "Texas Department of Public Safety" whose domain is dps.texas.Gov and thus falls under the PD Licensing.--Stemoc 02:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
• WRONG PERSON-- THIS IS THE WRONG "Salvador Ramos"

FYI' The image of the alleged killer is on CNN AND IT DOES NOT LOOK LIKE THE IMAGE THAT WE ARE DISCUSSING.

(Looks nothing like the "Drivers License photo).

(Boldface only added to emphasize important points)

Respectfully, Chesapeake77 ^{>>> ♥ Truth} 07:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

• SUPPORTING EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS THE WRONG "Salvador Ramos"--

Here is the CNN link that shows the alleged killers very elongated face. The OTHER Salvador Ramos picture (Drivers License) (See above and compare to the CNN photo) 'has a very rounded face.' These are two different people with the same name. The Texas Motor Vehicle office pulled up the wrong "Salvador Ramos" Link to CNN photo-- https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/25/us/uvalde-texas-school-shooting-salvador-ramos/index.html

Respectfully, Chesapeake77 (talk) 15:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Respectfully mate, its the same kid, He turned 18, had a driver's license for a year somehow cause in texas, you can get one once you turn 15 even if provisional at 16. but its still a licence, he may have gotten his full licence over the last 3 years so would look younger in his driver's licence which i feel he may be around 16, he was a cross-dresser to so may have made changes to his looks over the last 3 years and i can tell you that the person in that CNN link is the same as the person in the driver's licence image posted here..it may have very well taken him 2-3 years to grow his hair longer and since he is still below 23, he is a still growing and physically changing so will look different at 18 compared to what he looks like in his driver's licence... Stemoc 17:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

• Keep Stemoc has proven its public domain. It needs to be in the article also. Dream Focus (talk) 23:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

• MORE EVIDENCE THIS PHOTO IS THE WRONG "SALVADOR RAMOS"-- His grandfather said, in an ABC News Interview, that he (the killer) DID NOT HAVE A DRIVERS LICENSE, and DID NOT KNOW HOW TO DRIVE. NOTE: The photo being discussed (here) is from a Drivers License (SCROLL DOWN AND SEE SECOND ARTICLE)-- https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/texas-school-shooting/?id=84952985#84964595

The Texas PS Office pulled up the wrong "Salvador Ramos" from the States Drivers License records. The source shows the REAL KILLER HAD NO DRIVERS LICENSE.

Too many questions raised here. Reliability of source has not been sufficiently established. Chesapeake77 (talk) 11:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Maybe he didn't have a driver's licence but he had a learners permit for which one must register and thus why he looks young in the original image cause he may have been 15-16 in that image. I'm not sure how licences work in the US, but i know that even if you apply for a learner's permit, you still need to get your picture taken for registration, i don't have a full driving licence either but i have a 15 year old learner's license with a young picture of me lol..lets not dwell on images of how ppl looked when they were younger. Timothy McVeigh's driver's licence makes him look like a child, it doesn't make him a different person .. Stemoc 23:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

@Stemoc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesapeake77 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm not arguing with you, I'm just asking. You said-- "but he had a learners permit".

Do you have proof that he had a learners permit? And if so, please provide your source information.

Chesapeake77 (talk) 00:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

• Keep Reputable news websites continue to carry the image TGcoa (talk) 23:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

The large majority of reputable news websites do NOT carry it. Chesapeake77 (talk) 11:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Do not delete. This is history. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.175.8.66 (talk) 00:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Regardless of historical value, this is Wikimedia Commons. In a decade plenty of images of Salvador Ramos will show up when you search his name. ElijahPepe (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete he is deceased, a more recent and better picture could be found that could be used as fair use, if it is even needed in article. The fact that it is listed as from Texas Department of Public Safety, is probably accurate, but if they didn't publish it on their website, it doesn't automatically make it public domain. State agencies have a lot of personal information, but it isn't automatically public domain, especially if not published by them. Also only federal government works are automatically public domain, State by state they can make their own decisions. For instance in Texas' State Transportation Code p. 2974 section Sec. 1001.007, they reserve the right to make things copyrightable. WikiVirusC (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

  and in this case, they released this image on a free license so its allowed, sure they won't release images of the few million drivers they have in Texas but since they own the rights to those images, they can choose which and even all if they choose to release it into the public domain though that will not happen. The image is very important to what happened at that school and posting fair use images of his will usually lead to people posting images which are not good enough for the project as a whole, this image's right has been waived and released by a state organization and thus should be deemed usable, if anything your link has made the case for keeping this image even more... Stemoc 02:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: as per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-TXGov. --Yann (talk) 10:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Template:PD-TXGov

Bogus PD license and rationale. The "Public Information Act" (Texas Code, Chapter 552) on which the template is purportedly premised relates to access to information (i.e., accessibility, as in not withheld as confidential) and has nothing whatsoever to do with copyright status. While this is plain from the language of Chapter 552 itself, Texas Code, Chapter 403 explicitly allows the comptroller of public accounts of the State of Texas "[to] apply for, register, secure, hold, and protect under the laws of the United States or any state or nation: [...] copyright" (§ 403.0301). As a state-level test, consider that the Office of the Texas Governor includes the policy "All photographs and videos are copyrighted and may not be used without permission." As a county-level test, consider that Tarrant County explicitly includes "Copyright 2001-2022 Tarrant County, TX". As a city-level test, the City of Uvalde explicitly includes "© 2022 CITY OF UVALDE, TEXAS". This is the same conflation that led to the erroneous creation of the now deleted PD-MNGov. Эlcobbola _talk 19:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 20:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

There is a Harvard site which collects information related to state government copyright; Texas is "yellow" there, which is better than many but no real explicit indications, so we assume copyrighted status. The Texas State Archives and Library Commission website may be different, but nothing we can assume state-wide.  Delete. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete unless the license can be clearly demonstrated to be valid per some Texas statute or Texas case law. As I posted at COM:VPC#PD-TXGov, the license appears to have been boldly created without any discussion or vetting. I'm not sure how Commons deals with the creation of new copyright licenses, but it seems there should some discussion before a license can start being used. As Clindberg mentioned above and as I mentioned in my VPC post, Texas is listed as a "yellow" state (unclear copyright status) by the Harvard website about US state copyrights. California and Florida are listed as "green" states (employees works are presumed to be PD) by the same site and the long-standing consensus here at Commons seems to be that {{PD-CAGov}} and {{PD-FLGov}} are OK. If Texas can be added to that list, then great; however, I think there needs to be a consensus established that it can. This license appears to have been created primarily to facillitate the uploading of File:Emma Presler's mugshot 082621.png to Commons. The creator of this license template and uploader of the that mugshot photo is the same user and all of their Commons contributions (and all of their English Wikipedia contributions) appear to be focused on this license and that file. The file isn't currently being used in any articles on any language Wikipedia; so, it's not clear why it was uploaded. There are, however, other files using this license listed in Category:PD Texas and all of them appears to be mugshot photos, except one. Since this DR is technically about the license template itself, I'm not sure whether discussing individual files is appropriate. If the consensus, though, is this license isn't OK for Commons (for whatever reason), the files in the PD Texas category will need to be resolved. If they can be relicensed and kept, then great; if not, they they probably need to be deleted. Finally, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dell Chromebook 3100 2-in-1.jpg may also need to be revisted since the primary justification for keeping the file seems to be that logo shown in the screenshot is "PD-TXGov, and that justification will no longer be valid if this license is deemed to be invalid. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete per above, template is based on unsupported assumptions that evidence indicates are wrong. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom, immature assumption by a newbie. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete See also {{PD-US-patent}} for another example where "publicly accessible information published by the government" does not necessarily entail public domain in the United States. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 14:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. Nosferattus (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Can someone take a peak at {{PD-TNGov}}? This looks to me like another case of someone misunderstanding the difference between public record and public domain/deciding all states operate like Florida, but I would like someone else to check it out. Elisfkc (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

  @Elisfkc: Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-TNGov.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete improperly equating public access to public domain. WikiVirusC (talk) 01:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, and above comments. --Yann (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:Humanoid robots

Per COM:TOYS

• File:BUDDY le robot émotionnel.jpg
• File:Dinsow mini.png
• File:Dinsow model 3.png
• File:Dinsow model1.jpg
• File:Dinsow Model2.jpg

— Racconish ^💬 11:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 07:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by User:Mineitupmineitup v2

• File:JTHHDFDFGNGHJJHHFDVDFGGFJHGH.png
• File:GFDHDHFDFDFDHFGJHFGHSD.png
• File:DHGFHGDFGDFDHGFH.png
• File:DFGGGHGJGHDFDSJHGH.png
• File:Screencapture-nytimes-elections-2016-results-president-2022-04-25-03 38 08.png
• File:GDFHFGJHFGHFGGF.png
• File:Rigjdfigfduhgfduhgf.png
• File:Gfhdgdfgrgtrgfdhg.png
• File:FDJGDFNOGDFNJGDFOGFDH.png
• File:HGFHGFGU9RTGYFDHGFGUHFGHHGF.png
• File:GFGEHIJGJHFDTGFDIGBRF.png
• File:BVDBGFHGFHFGHFGHF.png

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. User is blocked permanently.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Mineitupmineitup --Jahobr (talk) 20:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 09:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Srivijaya Flag.png

This the 4th or 5th time this file has been reuploaded and claimed as Srivijaya flag (which is not, this is a modern forgery of Srivijaya flag). The information is fraud too, it is claimed as own work. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Srivijaya&action=history Surijeal (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Lucky luke End of Legend.jpg

Screengrab of a copyrighted work Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Летное поле.jpg

COM:DW of mural - per COM:FOP Russia, no FoP for artwork Эlcobbola _talk 20:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fitindia at 11:30, 21 June 2022 UTC: No permission since 13 June 2022 --Krdbot 19:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Pascal's wager.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:South Wales Valleys Map.png

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 12:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Maaspoort Den Bosch.jpg

copyvio see metadata that clearly state "Copyright 2020, Robert Verboon Fotografie, all rights reserved" Hoyanova (talk) 13:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:DV FW 22 milan.jpg

Extremely unlikely claim of own work. The uploader was adding copyvio images of Versace from Vogue and other sources last week, but has now remembered that they were at the Versace Fashion Show back in February where they took this picture? I can't find a hi-res original but other versions of this photo exist on the web. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Uploader is now claiming to actually work for Versace and to be uploading it on behalf of photographer Andrew Archeos under a CC licence. I've pointed them at COM:VRT. --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: already deleted by another admin. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Libresse Márka Logó.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Orihus.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:THPT Việt Vinh.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Денисов, Александр Петрович.jpg

wrong date, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 16:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 Delete Per COM:PRP. No original author and source. Questionable copyright status. --Smooth O (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Pozos Naturales Serranuyoc Bajo.png

Source (google.maps.com) is too vague to verify if CC-BY-SA claimed by uploader is valid. Also, details of author are missing. GeoWriter (talk) 16:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Kersten~ptwiki (talk · contribs)

GoogleMaps CopyVio

• File:FE Palmito.jpg
• File:PE Palmito.jpg

Enyavar (talk) 16:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Velachery to Guindy - Share Auto Route Chennai - ShareAutos.png

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Shipping Containers.png

No indication of freeness at source. Letartean (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Don't be a... campaign (51208413821).jpg

Commons:Derivative works from clip art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Keep No evidence offered that this simple sketch uses clip-art. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Oliver north 2024 victory.png

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Electoral College 1940 Alternate TNO Lore.png

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Muhammad Yusuf.pdf

Article page as PDF, out of project scope. Achim55 (talk) 20:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Здание трц.jpg

downloaded by mistake Ekavolk (talk) 21:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Здание трц.jpg

файл загружен случайно Ekavolk (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Busto da Princesa D. Isabel (1888-02-25).jpg

While the bust is probably in the PD, the photo showing it is taken from a web site and probably not in the PD. I also don't see any evidence for the CC license it was uploaded with. Rosenzweig τ 00:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep. Commons doesn't recognize the copyright of museums over photos of PD works of art. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Where did you get that idea from? We generally say that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional works (like posters) don't generate a new copyright, see our tags {{PD-Art}} and {{PD-scan}}. But that is not true for photos of three-dimensional objects like this one. --Rosenzweig τ 12:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Addressed in the other thread. Go ahead and delete all photos of sculptures by museums that weren't provided to Commons by the museum, then... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Coroa Imperial de d. Pedro II.jpg

This photo was taken from a web site and uploaded here with a CC license. I don't see any evidence for that CC license on the source web site. Rosenzweig τ 00:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep. Commons doesn't recognize the copyright of museums over photos of PD works of art. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Where did you get that idea from? We generally say that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional works (like posters) don't generate a new copyright, see our tags {{PD-Art}} and {{PD-scan}}. But that is not true for photos of three-dimensional objects like this one. --Rosenzweig τ 12:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment This is my experience as a regular on COM:FPC. The fact that a museum claims copyright over a photo of a painting by Rembrandt is considered irrelevant. But I guess that applies to paintings and nothing considered 3-dimensional? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes. Paintings are covered by the {{PD-Art}} tag. Sculptures are not. --Rosenzweig τ 09:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

OK, thanks for explaining. I don't really get the reason for the distinction, but whatever; what's law is law. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Tony Marshall assinatura.jpg

This is a scanned autograph card of a German singer from ca. the 1970s or 1980s. This is neither under the CC license it was uploaded with nor is it in the PD. Rosenzweig τ 00:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:52, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Whakapirau - panoramio.jpg

low resolution and out of focus, thus has no educational value Schwede66 00:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep. Digital photo from 2006. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
• Whakapirau is the Māori name of the populated place of w:en:Wellsford. Looking at Wellsford's Commons category, there is hardly images of it. There are only 5 images (from 1911, 2007, 2009, 2013, and 2018). So unless someone uploads a 2006 image of it, I will lean to  Weak keep. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Sorry, I might have mistaken it with Wellsford, Whakapirau is the name of a town to the northwest of it on Arapaoa River, per Google Maps searching. Strangely there is no enwiki article on it. Still  Weak keep if this is the sole 2006 image of Whakapirau on Arapaoa River available here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Kept: per User:JWilz12345. Renominate if ever more and better alternatives are uploaded. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Poland can into the European Space Agency.png

Non-free comic Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 03:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Speedy keep - The website licenses its comics under CC-Zero, and a license reviewer has confirmed this. No reason to doubt its free status. Yeeno (talk) 04:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Speedy keep - Per Yeeno's given reason. -Vipz (talk) 10:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Speedy keep - Per Yeeno's given reason, as well. Mycranthebigman (talk) 20:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Dr. Stephan Spiech (talk · contribs)

Historical photos and pulications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

• File:Pearls of Ukraine - Rückseite.png
• File:Porträt von Stephan Spiech.png
• File:Porträt Stephan Spiech.png
• File:Книжка з нотами до Божественної Літургії Степана Спєха.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Roy moore official portrait (cropped).jpg

This is not originally from Ballotpedia, and the source makes no mention of a license Putitonamap98 (talk) 06:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

You should nominate the main version of the photo, not the cropped version. 2601:58A:8000:DE10:44DC:ADC0:62A:81F8 15:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

License seems to be invalid. Moore was a state judge, not a federal one, so the federal license seems to be incorrect. Curbon7 (talk) 00:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: 16:26, 24 July 2022, by Yann. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Deborah Lehr.jpg

COM:Derivative work: picture of a painting. VRT permission from artist Ned Bittinger needed. MKFI (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Maest1 (talk · contribs)

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Likely professional photoshoot.

• File:Nahmadkhan.jpg

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: not notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Daisuke-Yokota 02-copy-copie-820x550.webp

Copied from https://purple.fr/diary/daisuke-yokota-winner-of-the-emerging-photographer-award-at-photo-london-at/ (it even has the same filename); the permission of the photographer credited there (Flo Kohl) is needed. Hoary (talk) 08:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Foto José O. Valderrama.jpg

La página desde la que se ha descargado esta foto no cuenta con la licencia Creative Commons Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 09:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Derecho in Brampton.jpg

This is unlikely a photo of the thunderstorms hitting Brampton, ON, the timing is wrong and the base of the clouds too high for Ontario storms. Looks like a capture in the US Prairies. Furthermore the uploader is not the author, the permission is doubtful. Pierre cb (talk) 13:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: look likes Ontario road signs, but copyvio anyway. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Fath-Ali Khan.jpg

Looks like someone took a picture of a computer image from his phone. Nothing suggests that this is free work, as the copyright status and where this source is from is not explained in the Azeri wikipedia, where this image was taken from. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Nacimiento de un bebé.jpg

Unknown source and licence, see 1100+ TinEye matches GeorgHH • talk   15:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hatta-Dubai.jpg

Wrong information and author. I am Rjsb0192 (talk) 16:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:MarkHDurkan2022.jpg

wrong author, copyright violation. see exif data. Xocolatl (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Pinwheel Twist Beatles.webp

What about the copyright? Mark Lewisohn is the author... Xocolatl (talk) 16:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete, no evidence of permission. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:H2O85727-Modifier.jpg

The copyright for this image is unclear. Also is it a real picture or CGI ? Hektor (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination: on FB prior to upload to Commons, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hubly in Bahamas.jpg

Uploaded by a Commons user who is probably not the copyright holder. This photo is found on Instagram and was probably taken by someone else instead of the uploader. The same uploader has uploaded photos of Kelli Hubly in the past which are now deleted, probably similar to this one. Iggy the Swan (talk) 18:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: 10:37, 24 June 2022, by EugeneZelenko (Copyright violation). --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Diet Rite 64 (8178111800).jpg

Copyright 1964 clearly visible, which means it's still copyrighted today. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 18:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Files in Category:Beelden in Leiden 2015

freedom of panorama only applies to works that are permanently on exhibition. As this is a temporary exhibition these works are not free from copyright restrictions.

• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19437251598).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19438669289).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19438674749).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19438679089).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19438681539).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19599089736).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19618224672).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19618227192).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19625262195).jpg
• File:'Beelden in Leiden' 2015 (19625271575).jpg
• File:Anna Kolbe - Secret Garden.jpg
• File:Guido van der Linden - Descendant.jpg
• File:Guust Persoon - Zaaien in de schaduw 2.jpg
• File:Guust Persoon - Zaaien in de schaduw.jpg
• File:Jordan Herregraven - Gemengde techniek.jpg
• File:Maaike Knibbe - No problem.jpg
• File:Marit Zandbergen - Waar dwarrelen je brengt.jpg
• File:Marleen Hartjes - Apollo en Daphne.jpg
• File:Miriam Knibbeler - Ortus 1.jpg
• File:Miriam Knibbeler - Ortus 2.jpg
• File:Twan Berendsen - Intoxication side.jpg

Vera ^(talk) 19:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Category also deleted, since it is now empty. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Noureddin Esheni Qudejani.jpg

Per fawiki - the source is http://takhtefoulad.ir/TakhteFoolad/Pages/Mashahir.aspx?ItemId=1139 . I can't find any evidence on that website of a free license. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Bab al-Bahr depiction.jpg

The file is an official stamp and is not the work of the uploader. There's no indication that Algerian stamps are public domain (see Commons:Stamps); if they are, then the file information should be modified accordingly instead. Image was most likely taken from here: https://colnect.com/en/stamps/stamp/349111-Casbah_in_Algeria_-_Porte_Sarrasine_-Bejaia-Casbahs_of_Algeria_2012-Algeria R Prazeres (talk) 20:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hammadid object .jpg

The file is identified as the uploader's "own work" but it's almost certainly copied from a book or similar published source, as it contains a caption and is identified as a numbered figure, which only makes sense if it came from a book. Note: uploader has uploaded copyrighted images en masse in the past, due to a misunderstanding of the rules and this seems to have been uploaded back then (see their user talk page history if relevant or our discussion here). R Prazeres (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Follow-up: I've just found the source of the image, from a 2014 book not in the public domain (source: https://www.academia.edu/36615922/The_Use_of_Muqarnas_in_Hammadid_Art_Some_Preliminary_Observations). R Prazeres (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hammadid Palace Drawings.jpg

The file is identified as the uploader's "own work" but it's almost certainly copied from a book or similar published source, as it contains a caption and is identified as a numbered figure, which only makes sense if it came from a book. (If the book is somehow in the public domain, then information to that effect needs to be added.) Note: uploader has uploaded copyrighted images en masse in the past, due to a misunderstanding of the rules and this seems to have been uploaded back then (see their user talk page history if relevant or our discussion here). R Prazeres (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hammadid Qasr al-Manar.jpg

The file is identified as the uploader's "own work" but it's almost certainly copied from a book or similar published source, as it contains a caption and is identified as a numbered figure, which only makes sense if it came from a book. (If the book is somehow in the public domain, then information to that effect needs to be added.) Note: uploader has uploaded copyrighted images en masse in the past, due to a misunderstanding of the rules and this seems to have been uploaded back then (see their user talk page history if relevant or our discussion here). R Prazeres (talk) 21:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hammadid Dar al-Bahar.jpg

The file is identified as the uploader's "own work" but it's almost certainly copied from a book or similar published source, as it contains a caption and is identified as a numbered figure, which only makes sense if it came from a book. (If the book is somehow in the public domain, then information to that effect needs to be added.) Note: uploader has uploaded copyrighted images en masse in the past, due to a misunderstanding of the rules, and this seems to have been uploaded back then (see their user talk page history if relevant or our discussion here). R Prazeres (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hammadid family tree.jpg

The file is identified as the uploader's "own work" but it's almost certainly copied from a book or similar published source, as it contains a caption and is identified as a numbered figure, which only makes sense if it came from a book. (If the book is somehow in the public domain, then information to that effect needs to be added.) Note: uploader has uploaded copyrighted images en masse in the past, due to a misunderstanding of the rules, and this seems to have been uploaded back then (see their user talk page history if relevant or our discussion here). R Prazeres (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Follow-up: I've just found the source of the image, from a 2014 book chapter not in the public domain (source: https://www.academia.edu/36615922/The_Use_of_Muqarnas_in_Hammadid_Art_Some_Preliminary_Observations). R Prazeres (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: likely ineligible for copyright because it is not a “literary work", but also plain text that should be in wikimarkup if needed. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Aliaa R Rafea.jpg

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Aliaa Rafea gave me the permission to upload her photo 2001:16A2:CBFF:8500:300E:CA14:F5F1:E814 02:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:La Red Nacional de Mujeres Comunales de Colombia.pdf

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Azul y Amarillo Limpio y Negritas Programa de Vacunación Salud General Banner.jpg

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Used for self-promotion Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:3li.jpg

Watermarked to its owner; not the creation of the uploader Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Como las chicharras.jpg

Appears to be a copyrighted album cover, but I can't pinpoint the source Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Fred Perry logo (square).png

Unused personal work by a Wikimedia user. This is not Fred Perry logo (see here and ticket:2022052510006951). Ankry (talk) 21:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Sun Yatong 1.jpg

The person who provided the photo impersonated Sun Yatong, not Sun Yatong herself. Therefore the license agreement is invalid. Thyj (talk) 03:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Sun Yatong 2.jpg

The person who provided the photo impersonated Sun Yatong, not Sun Yatong herself. Therefore the license agreement is invalid. Thyj (talk) 03:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Logo Rond PP 2021.png

doubolon Aminasall (talk) 16:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

ce logo est un doublon la bonne version est déja disponible en ligne Aminasall (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Logo MPR Rectangulaire plus texte à droite plus.png

doublons Aminasall (talk) 16:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

ce logo est obsolete la nouvelle version est déjà en ligne Aminasall (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

OBSOLETE Aminasall (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Superman shield.svg

The image may, in fact, meet the minimum threshold for originality because the "S" is in serif. 70.124.147.243 23:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: below COM:TOO USA IMO. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Duplicate editions of books by Trinidad Pardo de Tavera

• File:Reseña histórica de Filipinas desde su descubrimiento hasta 1903 (IA resenahistoric00pard).pdf as an inferior version of File:Reseña histórica de Filipinas desde su descubrimiento hasta 1903 (IA afj2161.0001.001.umich.edu).pdf which is more "complete"
• File:Plantas medicinales de Filipinas; (IA plantasmedicinal00pard).pdf as an inferior version of File:Plantas medicinales de Filipinas (electronic resource) (IA b20408602).pdf with reasons above
• File:The medicinal plants of the Philippines (1901).djvu as an inferior version of File:The medicinal plants of the PHilippines, by T. H. Pardo de Tavera ... tr. and rev. by Jerome B. Thomas, jr (IA cu31924050881592).pdf

The former files are of the same editions (or appear to be of the same editions by skimming through them) with the files they supersede. If not, the latter files are more complete scans of the former, featuring more pages. --Poppytarts (talk) 14:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Both copies should be kept of the first file nominated for deletion [Reseña histórica de Filipinas desde su descubrimiento hasta 1903 (IA resenahistoric00pard).pdf]. It is not "more complete" as you stated and should be kept. Both files have the exact same 80 pages. Perhaps, by "complete" you are referring to what appears to be the authors autograph on the book copy you want to keep. That autographed copy is great, because it provides an authors' signature for public interest and potentially usable on wikidata. However, that copy is an inferior quality compared to the nominated file. Many individual letters in the text are partially missing. Commons should keep this copy and all copies with author autographs or other hand-written dedications of interest. The copy nominated for deletion should not be deleted, because it is a better quality copy and the "title page" does not have the hand-writing on it. A "clean" original title page has value. Thanks -- Ooligan (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Kept: all three, first one: per discussion, second: I'm not so sure this is "inferior", third: in use at Wikisource. --Rosenzweig τ 23:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Controcorrente.jpg

This file was initially tagged by StomboyCarGeek as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted screenshot from TV. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: below COM:TOO Italy. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Controcorrente.jpg

Tagged "{{Cancella subito|motivo=Immagine non necessaria}}" by User:Italia6. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Question Non necessaria per quale ragione? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

  FILE non utilizzato più sulla pagina wikipedia Italia6 (talk) 04:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

• E poi? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Interracial oral sex, 69.jpg

pornography YitzhakNat (talk) 22:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Interracial oral sex, 69.jpg

low quality and I think its fake. will says 👋 Willbill6272 (talk) 01:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Not low-quality. What looks fake to you? We don't see any genitals, if that's what you mean, but the position is shown. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

 Delete Nah, I disagree with Ikan Kekek, this one *is* low quality. Weird camera angle, poor lighting, too tight a crop. I don't see this one ever being used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete there are definitely better images available compared to this one. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Category:69 (sex position) has 12 files in it, and five with straight partners, and the only one that has non-White people in the photograph. I see no reason to quibble about crop and camera angle with that limited a selection. As I've groused about before, Category:London Bridge has 14 subcategories and 279 photos in the main category. Why are we purging files from a category with 12 photographs?--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

 Keep I think it’s worth keeping for the PD license— if I’m not mistaken it’s the only modern photo with this license. Having a variety of licensing options enables wider use. Dronebogus (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Kept: no consensus to delete. Not a great photo, but ok to illustrate. We only have 10 photos, only a couple are much better quality. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ville de Pessac 2020.svg

This file was initially tagged by Thmsgrmd as Logo but Commons:TOO France is not clear on how text logos are treated. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 00:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: this should be simple enough to be below TOO France. --Rosenzweig τ 09:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Michael Sukkar HighRes.png

See No evidence this is a free-to-use image. 110.32.34.190 02:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

File:2022-5-6 Meg flowers edit.jpg

Duplicate of File:2022-5-6 Flowers from Megan.jpg Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Hammadid ceramic.jpg

File is not the uploader's own work, it's taken from an external website (source: https://islamicart.museumwnf.org/database_item.php?id=object;ISL;dz;Mus01;42;en). Note: Since this is a mostly two-dimensional historical work of art, possibly the image does not meet threshhold of originality. If so, deletion may not be needed, but file information should be modified. I'm not sure how to judge. R Prazeres (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, not 2D IMO. --Rosenzweig τ 04:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

File:秦岭-淮河线.PNG

This map shows areas that have always been outside PRC control as if they are integral parts of the PRC in an unqualified manner. Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 Keep This work seems to me that it could serve a realistic educational purpose. According to automatic translation software, the description reads "Qinling-Huaihe line (red line part)," which I believe makes it fall within COM:SCOPE. Could a Chinese-speaking user weigh in on this issue? --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: would be in scope, but unused and very crude; File:Qinling-Huaihe-line.svg does the job much better. --Rosenzweig τ 08:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Studebaker.svg

This file was initially tagged by Андрей Перцев as Fair use (Non-free use rationale) and the most recent rationale was: logo| Article = Studebaker| Use = Brand| Used for = | Owner = Studebaker, designed by Raymond Loewy. | Website = | History = In use from 1964 to 1968| Commentary = | Description = Studebaker's "lazy S" logo. Used by the now defunct automaker in its final years of production. | Source = Original art by user:stude62| Portion = All| Low resolution = Yes| Purpose = | Replaceability = Not replaceable, copyrighted image. May also be trademark protected.| Other information = While this logo somewhat resembles the original designed by Raymond Loewy, it is actually a 21st century stylized version of the original logo. 1960s US logo, possible {{PD-US-no notice}}? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, King of Hearts! That's what I meant. This is exactly how it is in the English Wikipedia.--Андрей Перцев (talk) 15:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Comment: I suspect that the logo is not in the public domain since it looks like the company (or its parent) was bought out several times and should now be owned by Eaton. Perhaps the logo should be moved back to the English Wikipedia? (I'm not entirely familiar with Commons policy. At least in the US fair use should still apply. Also, it looks like the Spanish wiki also uses this file.) --Stux (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Kept: in my opinion below COM:TOO USA per the examples there. --Rosenzweig τ 11:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Jayamohan.jpg

The source was uploaded on 21 February 2022, but the there are copyright protected version exist since 2018, see Image 1 and Image 2 Also, it does not have proper EXIF in CC source, and watermark seems naive. It's a copyvio. ~AntanO4task (talk) 17:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Both sources you have given to prove copyvio are violating copyright laws. (While first website is just a data stealer for ad revenue)this is from 2016 and author himself mentions that photos displayed in this post are bought by him. And Tamil wiki, online encyclopaedia for Tamil culture, where the uploaded image is sourced from is run by him and his friends. So, anything published in Tamil wiki, under CC 4.0, about the author Jeyamohan is certainly free from copyright issue -CXPathi (talk) 03:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Original source is copyrighted and the 2nd source is CC 4.0. The current uploader as well as the uploader who uploaded under CC 4.0 is not "owner" of the image. So, the file is simply copyvio. --~AntanO4task (talk) 03:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. If the copyright owner is ok with this file being uploaded under a free license to Wikimedia Commons, please send an e-mail with a permission to COM:VRT. If the permission is accepted, the file can be restored. --Rosenzweig τ 12:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

File:سکه منسوب به فتحعلی خان افشار.jpg

Not own work, clearly taken from a coin website, which makes the copyright status uncertain. Many coin sites have copyright claims on these coins. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio, see from 2020. --Rosenzweig τ 21:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Jorge Burgos Varela, ministro de defensa.jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gabinete de Michelle Bachelet (2014).pdf this image should be deleted as well Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep File was deleted as unused, not because of the license. Furthermore, the privacy policy of Michellebachelet.cl at the time of the publication of this file indicated "apoyamos el uso y creación de obras derivadas a partir de la los contenidos de propiedad de este Comando (elementos de diseño e imágenes), siempre que estén destinadas a apoyar y difundir la candidatura de Michelle Bachelet. Para eso, se permite que los contenidos editoriales, gráficos y fotográficos publicados michellebachelet.cl puedan ser utilizados por los usuarios, en el marco de la Licencia Reconocimiento – Compartir Igual 3.0 Chile de Creative Commons." As a result, this picture is free to use. --Bedivere (talk) 21:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- was deleted as unused before; license is valid. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Jorge Burgos 2014 (4x3 cropped).jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gabinete de Michelle Bachelet (2014).pdf this image should be deleted as well Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- was deleted as unused before; license is valid. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

File:高柳明音.png

Akane Takayanagi Hae dislikes this image in various media (fan club sites, radio, etc.) (don't use YouTube's instant cutting) 122.196.195.246 03:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the youtube film is licenced CC-BY_SA. @122.196.195.246: you can take another screenshot of the film, upload as another file and replace it on the projects. This file can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 18:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

File:서울혜화초등학교 교표.png

잘못 올렸습니다 Wikihh1990 (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination and per uploader request. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Councillor Simon Phipps promotes the drive in cinema at Himley Hall (51203966252).jpg

Commons:Derivative works from clip art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

The poster depicted is also the work of the licensor, Dudley MBC. Any individual clipart item is de minimis. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Elements of arts may be made by 3rd party. You could crop/blank poster to keep rest of photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

We could do, but we don't need to because Any individual clipart item is de minimis. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Poster is one of main subject of image, so de minimis does not apply. Anyway, it's not necessary to illustrate article about person. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

I did not claim that the poster is de minimis (indeed, I pointed out that the poster depicted is the work of the licensor), nor that this image exists solely to "illustrate article about person", so your comment attacks a straw man on both counts. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Kept: kept the file after cropping. Deleted the uncropped version. --Ellywa (talk) 18:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Rosario Irlandés.jpg

This was uploaded to Commons by User:R Católico with a {{PD-Self}} tag, but as it turns out, that is not his photo. The file was taken from en.wp, where another user (User:Irendraca) had uploaded it (as File:Penal rosary.jpg), but (accd. to User:King of Hearts, who is an en.wp admin) never given it a valid license tag. So basically this file is unlicensed and must be deleted if it does not get a valid license tag. Irendraca didn't activate e-mail notification, so I'll put a note about this DR on both his user pages (User talk:Irendraca~commonswiki and en:User talk:Irendraca). Rosenzweig τ 15:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. No edits of user Inrendrace for several years. --Ellywa (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Pigsonthewing (talk · contribs)

Posters were created by 3rd parties. Copyrights may be transferred to city, but may be not.

• File:Schools Covid Poster Competition (51025915516).jpg
• File:Schools Covid Poster Competition (51025915441).jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Keep Highly improbable that copyright would not be transferred to the poster publisher by the terms of this competition. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the files are in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the files have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Joseph Goebbels.png

This file was initially tagged by Rosenzweig as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photographer is Heinrich Hoffmann, so this is still copyrighted. We have the B/W original with a proper Bundesarchiv license at File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1968-101-20A, Joseph Goebbels.jpg. The uploader's userpage suggests that they did the colorization themself. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: per remark of King of Hearts, uploader owns the copyright of this version of the image. --Ellywa (talk) 18:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Schloss Nieder Leschen.jpg

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Das Foto / Ansichtskarte ist aus den 1910 Jahren, es ist älter als 100 Jahre alt, also auch mehr als 70 Jahre. 16Exul82 (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep The scanned postcard is the source. --RAN (talk) 05:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: I found several images showing various copies of this postcard on the web, among them here one postmarked 1909. The publisher is named as Franz Riegner, Oberstephansdorf. From what I could find, Franz Riegner was also his own photographer, so the card is not anonymous. I could not find a date of death for him however, so I'll delete the file per the precautionary principle. It can be restored in 2030 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Hon. Mahendra Pal Chaudhry.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Stemoc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the images in that source category were taken off official websites of those countries thus not owned by the MOFA
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided and neither Google-Images nor TinEye yielded hits. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete - ofcourse there are no tineye/google reverse evidence for this cause this image was part of the Fiji Labour Manifesto/booklet back in 1999 and not on the internet as Internet didn't exist in Fiji back then (it was only available around 2004 onwards)....--Stemoc 09:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
• Comment - The Internet Archive has snapshots of the Fijian government homepage (fiji.gov.fj) as far back as 1998. The earliest snapshot for Mahendra Chaudhry, dating from October 1999, uses a different photo as his official portrait. There are also snapshots for Chaudhry's Fiji Labour Party from 2002, which use yet another photo. Joofjoof (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

  I have already told you, its pre-1999, possibly 1997-1998, was used by the party on their manifesto for the 1999 elections, i know because my family were Fiji Labour party supporters and we had their booklet back then, also in regards to the source of the image, if any admin loo ks through the other images posted there, nearly all are sought from somewhere else, the image for Australian PM then, Alexander Downer was on the Australia Govt website then, the image for NZ Foreign Minister Phil Goff can be seen here, image number 3 tagged as " Phil Goff in 2001, at the time Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade.", none of those images were taken by MOFA and even though i think both the Downer and Goff images are Ok since Australia and NZ both have creative commons licenses, the image of Terepai Maoate will also fail our Copyright criteria as Cook Islands Government have never had any creative commons licenses that i'm aware of... Stemoc 13:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

  OK, so if I understand your objections correctly:(1) The Fiji government must have used an older photo for Mahendra Chaudhry, instead of their official press photo. (2) Australia and New Zealand submitted their own photos, so the others must have done as well.

In that case: (1) Do you still have a copy of this manifesto published by the Fiji Labour Party? (2) The images for Downer and Goff can be verified using image search. The archived Cook Islands government website uses a different photo for Maoate. Joofjoof (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

• Update As it has been over 20 years since these events, I did some research. The FLP contested the 1999 elections as part of the People's Coalition. A copy of the coalition manifesto is held by a university in the US, with scanning offered. The manifesto does not use this photo. Joofjoof (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. It is thinkable the jp gov took the photo from a brochure or elsewhere, and it was not made by their own photographer. Therefore I decided to delete the image, which is not used on the projects, per COM:PRP. There are alternative photos available in the category. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 09:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)