Commons:Deletion requests/File:Libyan Uprising.svg
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Libyan_Uprising.svg
Потому, что это вранье 92.100.172.117 05:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
It is not truth at all 92.100.172.117 05:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: This request is purely disruptive. Nominator should at least be severely warned if not outright blocked. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep
- Not truth how? Provide your evidence, and we'll fix it. It's being continually revised as events progress. How is this reason for deletion? Kwamikagami (talk) 05:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Might be close to truth, but still a synthesis - "continually revised" based on bits of available info, but not a reliable snapshot. This isn't really your fault - info is limited, filtered and biased - who knows what happens there in RL. "We" know that one side is prevailing, but it's not enough for making maps detailed to "who runs this village" level. NVO (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- For the vast majority of population centres on the map (except for a few of the tiny desert towns that cause a fuss every time they are added), control is confirmed by multiple reliable sources. You evidently have no clue whatsoever as to the nature of the source-collecting that went into developing this map. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Might be close to truth, but still a synthesis - "continually revised" based on bits of available info, but not a reliable snapshot. This isn't really your fault - info is limited, filtered and biased - who knows what happens there in RL. "We" know that one side is prevailing, but it's not enough for making maps detailed to "who runs this village" level. NVO (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. I came here expecting to find that some enterprising person had put forth a slightly premature good-faith proposal to replace this image with an animated .GIF to cover the progress of the war and changes in territory and the like. Instead it's a dynamic IP editor who is apparently in denial over the outcome of the uprising against Gaddafi and appears to not be sufficiently fluent in English to explain his rationale. Strong support for Lothar von Richthofen's suggestion. It would be an embarrassment for Wikimedia Commons to appear to condone this type of disruptive behavior in any way, shape, or form. -Kudzu1 (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Speedy keep russavia (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2011 (UTC)