Commons:Deletion requests/2025/04/09

April 9

File:Brian Helgeland, April 2, 2013 (cropped).jpg

Grainy and obsolete; the wikis that previously used this file have switched to the higher-resolution File:Brian Helgeland (P040213CK-0212) (cropped).jpg. Yovt (talk) 01:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Deania hystricosum.jpg

The photograph does not represent Deania, and there is no indication of a CC license (credited to Erling Svensen). Megalotitan (talk) 02:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC) 02:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Winsome Sears portrait, 2022.jpg

Likely incorrect licensing issue. It is improbable that the Virginia ANG is the original owners/creators of this Lt Gov portrait. The image is also posted here: https://www.ltgov.virginia.gov/ Coqui002 (talk) 03:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Keep - Licensing seems to have been corrected months ago. Pantagraph (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Czech art made by Alfons Mucha.jpg

Out of scope: duplicate of File:Alfons Mucha - The Seasons (series), 1900.jpg. This isn't a precise duplicate, but it's much lower resolution and not in use. Omphalographer (talk) 03:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Colours look very different. Which version is the correct one? Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
@Ahgahatbauafahauaysbaja5gauayau: Would you tell us where you downloaded it? 0x0a (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Climate flags in European Parliament in Strasbourg (4029967480).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


This one shows the smallest amount of the building. If the flags themselves aren't copyright problems, how much further do you think this has to be cropped to be OK for Commons to host? If we saw only one story, would that be OK? I think it might already be de minimis, but I don't know how strict French law is on that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
 Keep, The flag is below the Commons:Threshold of originality. This cropped photo elements are 6 full windows and walls surrounding these windows. Windows are created by corporations for use in any building- they are utilitarian, therefore not copyright elements. The walls are a extremely small portion of a building and is de minimis per Commons:De minimis. -- Ooligan (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Courtesy ping @Ikan Kekek. Ooligan (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. I hope your analysis is sound in terms of French laws on architecture. It certainly sounds sensible, but similar photos of Azerbaijan have been deleted as COM:DW copyright violations. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Climate flags in European Parliament in Strasbourg (4029210911).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


Flags (the focus of the photo) are not copyright-protected. Perhaps we crop the image closer to the flags? SecretName101 (talk) 05:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Heathrow T2 - 2008-05-18.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


  •  Keep the graphic work isn't taken out of context, it's just part of the façade. Rkieferbaum (talk) 10:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep According to COM:DM UK, Copyright in a work is not infringed by its incidental inclusion in an artistic work, sound recording, film, or broadcast. It is clear from the shot title, composition, and (especially) the positioning of the lighting pole, that this is an image of the airport terminal building that incidentally includes an advertising poster. If the photographer was intending to photograph the poster, it would have been trival to compose and crop the shot to exclude the building and lighting pole; the fact they have not done so shows that was not the intent. -- Chris j wood (talk) 11:06, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Actor Soundararaja.jpg

No permission from the photograph — the uploader is the subject of this photo. 0x0a (talk) 03:59, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Secretary Kerry Signs Posted of Famed Vaccaro Photo in Saint Briac (14181120559).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep, PD-USmilitary as per IronGargoyle. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 08:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Migrant Workers Poster.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


  • Keep The creators of the poster and the image holder are both the same organization "WarOnWant," so "WarOnWant" created the poster and then released into the image into the public domain. So the image is licensed under creative commons. Des Vallee (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

File:80 years of Belfast buzzing (52203324555).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted book A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


 Comment The picture on the magazine is the Flickr user's own photograph - please read the description! Categorizing by the uploader would be helpful btw. Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Hoa Xuande.jpg

Copyright probably belongs to A24 and Rhombus Media and not HBO (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sympathizer_(miniseries)) Bremps... 04:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete per nom. It’s unlikely HBO owns the copyright to the trailer. Even if they did, I don’t believe the Max Polska channel is allowed to apply a CC license on it. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Hoa Xuande (cropped).jpg

Copyright probably belongs to A24 and Rhombus Media and not HBO (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sympathizer_(miniseries)) Bremps... 04:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete per nom. It’s unlikely HBO owns the copyright to the trailer. Even if they did, I don’t believe the Max Polska channel is allowed to apply a CC license on it. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
 Delete per nom and Tvpuppy — OwenBlacker (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Wolford fatal dress as a mini dress to cover the see trough part of a too thin jeggings.jpg

inaproppriate 2603:9000:70F0:440:B557:41B9:644C:4A45 04:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Absurd. There's nothing whatsoever "inappropriate" about a model shoot, and she's even fully clothed! But please pay attention: "inappropriate" is not a valid deletion reason, anyway! If you think it is, find it among Commons policies and link it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
     Keep. "Inappropriate" is not a valid deletion request. As far as privacy issues go, the uploader asserts consent, and did so before the delete request. The uploader emphasizes the importance of consent on their user page. What reason is there to doubt that the person depicted wishes to have their photo licensed on Commons? Jerimee (talk) 07:56, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
 Keep per above, not a valid deletion reason. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Privacy issue? But I don't think the model cares so much about it, so  Keep--A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Hmm (4500816664).jpg

low quality food image, blurry, no description Kritzolina (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:四結福德廟土地公模型.jpg

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:四結金身土地公 Sijie Golden Earth God - panoramio.jpg and w:zh:w:zh:四結福德廟#巨型土地公: Arthur Yang, the author, made this small sculpture in 2000, "used as a reference for the construction bidding of the larger sculpture on the roof."

Infringement of the sculptural copyright, and there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for all artistic works there that are not buildings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 06:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


 Delete per nom. Arthur Yang (w:zh:楊奉琛) passed away in 2015, so his works are copyrighted in Taiwan until 2066, and probably even later in US. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Jimmy Carter and Larry Wade.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Coppa grande.jpg and other Files of User:Gregorio Bianco

Personal files, unused, corresponding article on Italian Wikpedia was deleted or never released? Not relevant person. Xgeorg (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

--Xgeorg (talk) 06:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Een Carmen van het Noorden (1919).webm

Hans Nesna (1897–1958) was a co-director on this film, so it remains under copyright in the Netherlands until 2029. hinnk (talk) 08:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Глебов И.Н..jpg

Part of (self)adv contribution. Now out of use guess why. Some concerns about the license because this image travells across the Net e.g. https://www.koob.ru/glebov_igor_nikolaevich/ Bilderling (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Glebov IN.jpg

Part of (self)adv contribution. Now out of use guess why. Some concerns about the license because this image travells across the Net e.g. https://www.koob.ru/glebov_igor_nikolaevich/ Bilderling (talk) 09:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:J1 Heat map.png

"Own work" unlikely - this is a webmap screenshot.

Please provide name of the website under "source", and maybe also the method (how you received this mapping result) under "description". Otherwise this is probably falling under Copyright of the provider. All the best, Enyavar (talk) 10:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Sarah Lucas, Cigarette T s II (Idealized Smoker's Chest II), 1999.jpg

This is a photograph of a copyright-protected artwork Cigarette Tits (Idealized Smokers Chest II) by en:Sarah Lucas displayed at an art gallery in New York. The photograph appers to be taken by a different person (Andrew Russeth) and unlikely to be reusable with CC BY-SA 2.0 like it was originally licensed on Flickr. Samoasambia ✎ 10:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Bengaluru International Film Festival logo.jpg

Logo of organization, which is not covered under {{GODL-India}}. 0x0a (talk) 10:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

The film festival is organized by Karnataka Chalanachitra Academy which was formed by Government of Karnataka in 2009, and is a part of Department of Information and Public Relations, Government of Karnataka. Reference: https://dipr.karnataka.gov.in/29/karnataka-chalanachitra-academy/en. --2406:7400:107:497C:0:0:0:1 08:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Quedlinburg St. Servatius Orgel (01).jpg

the cruzifix in the middle is from de:Thomas Leu and still copyrighted, there is no FOP within buildings in germany and as it is a central element, de minimis isnt applicable Quedel (talk) 11:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Das geschützte Kruzifix ist zwar zentral in der Bildmitte, aber nach meinre Ansicht handelt es sich um Beiwerk im gemeinfreien Kirchenraum. Z thomas 16:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
 Keep Along the same lines as Z thomas, I would compare this to photographs of the Louvre that necessarily include the Pyramid in the center of the photo. I'd consider the crucifix de minimis on the same basis that the Pyramid is in the former cases. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:St-wiperti 03 chorfenster.jpg

Permission needed for the modern window-art from early 2000, user was informed about permission (see disk) in 2015, no permission given until today Quedel (talk) 11:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

sorry, it is about the file, not the file talk! Quedel (talk) 11:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Fixed. --Rosenzweig τ 16:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Serraria da Alliança.jpg

because it's wrong and I'll put another picture Usuáriobarros (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Comment, uploader’s request but uploaded more than 7 days ago. @Usuáriobarros, can you explain what is wrong with the picture? Tvpuppy (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Oswaldo Payá.jpg

Just like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oswaldo Payá - Carlos Cuesta. Hazte Oir.jpg erivate work of copyrighted images Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Tuci Yuri.jpg

Copyviol from https://filmfreeway.com/NonabbassarelaguardiadotdotdotColpiscila Torque (scrivimi!) 12:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Residência do Aquilino Barros.jpg

I will update this photo to improve its quality, and I will use another account to do so. Usuáriobarros (talk) 12:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Canto das Novidades - Vista interior do Depósito.jpg

I will update this photo to improve its quality, and I will use another account to do so. Usuáriobarros (talk) 12:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Update by overwriting this image. --RAN (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Schwengelpumpe - panoramio (1).jpg

Redundant zu https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schwengelpumpe_Kleinschwarzenlohe.jpg => von mir hochgeladen

Dieses Foto kam durch einen Panoramio-Saugbot hierher. Das Panoramio-Bild mit Urheber 'Siegmar S' war ebenfalls ich.

Es befindet sich dadurch inkl. Kategorien nun doppelt in Commons, was keinen Sinn ergibt. Padd y (talk) 12:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Canto das Novidades.jpg

I will update this photo to improve its quality, and I will use another account to do so. Usuáriobarros (talk) 12:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Update by overwriting this image. --RAN (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Familia de Aquilino.jpg

I will update this photo to improve its quality, and I will use another account to do so. Usuáriobarros (talk) 12:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Aquilino Barros.jpg

I will update this photo to improve its quality, and I will use another account to do so. Usuáriobarros (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Update first and overwrite this one, too many people delete first and never make promised improvements. --RAN (talk) 23:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Margy Kinmonth in conversation on War Paint.jpg

Quality is no good when cropped, and background image is likely in copyright when uncropped. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:IAB flag on a MARCH.jpg

COM:NETCOPYVIO Reupload of previously deleted (today) copyvio of ameblo.jp/ohtsuka-mae/image-12835645235-15386654072.html Zinnober9 (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Estelle Binant

Académie des Sciences, Musée du Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers. Estelle Binant (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Our Boys' pop factory lorry, Briton Ferry, Wales.jpg

File originally uploaded to People’s Collection Wales, which released it under a Creative Archive Licence (non-commercial use only) Dogfennydd (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a non commercial research use so should be acceptable according to the terms and conditions stated here:
https://www.peoplescollection.wales/terms-use-and-privacy
Definition of non-commercial use:
Non-commercial research is that which is not for direct or indirect economic advantage. Commercial research would probably include, for example, research for the production of commercial training materials; research for paying clients; research for a book for which payment will be received
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vouliagmeni (talk • contribs) 2025-04-09T19:45:16 (UTC)
Wikipedia allows non-commercial (fair use) uploads but this file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, which is a repository of free images which allow for commercial reuse. See COM:L. Dogfennydd (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Des œuvres sculptées qui racontent l'histoire.jpg

watermark removed Bile rene (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Cordelia Cruises Logo.png

Certainly not Own Work as claimed. Probably above the low ToO in India. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

There isn't a low COM:TOO India if it's similar to COM:TOO US as stated, but this is fairly complicated and may be over it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Retrato de Jean Jacques Rousseau, por Allan Ramsay, en 1766, Galería Nacional de Escocia.jpg

Two higher quality and resolution versions of this portrait are available in commons as File:Allan Ramsay - Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712 - 1778) - Google Art Project.jpg and File:Allan Ramsay 003.jpg

In addition, it is not actually in use, even before I nominated it for deletion NeoGaze (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Hamidreza Nasrollahi tempo use.jpg

Better for uploading photos Hamidrezanasrollahi (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:United States Senate (Best Senators timeline) (Revised 2).svg

fantasy test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

I apologise for being ill-informed, but is there an actual guideline I have violated here? SuperWIKI (talk) 22:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Here is the relevant Commons policy: Commons:Project scope. Images uploaded to Commons should have an education purpose, but at the moment I don’t see any realistic use for this fictional senate diagram. Tvpuppy (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Alright, understood. While I personally don't agree with any removal, this is partially on personal grounds since I created the diagram for personal historical analysis and am actively using it at this time, but I don't think many would truly agree. Are there any substitute methods that can be used for this page (User:SuperWIKI/sandbox/All-Star Senate), then? SuperWIKI (talk) 03:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi @SuperWIKI: , to be honest I tend to semi-automatically request for deletion all files that are not of real-world parliament, given that fantasy diagrams are very often created by throw-away accounts for nationstates.net or similar projects. I did not specifically study your image.
Do you plan on using this image for a specific purpose ? Because there are many free image hosting tools on the internet (Flickr, Instagram, Pinterest, Imgur...)Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
I have a full sandbox page in place that I've been working on for some time. I've been using research from The Almanac of American Politics and historical blogs to learn about U.S. senators and their achievements, and assigning the most influential ones from each state into one body. While there are image hosting tools on the Internet, the set-up on my Wikipedia sandbox (which to my understanding is meant for experimentation) is heavily reliant on political party templates and diagrams built into the site.
As for the specific image, it is meant to display political party and faction distribution for my sandbox. I have no plans to use it on any other site. SuperWIKI (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Павел Павлович Гусев.jpg

Павел Гусев родился 23 июля 1930 года. 12 января 2025 года ему было бы более 94 лет. Человеку на фото намного меньше. Либо на фото совсем другой человек, либо фото сделано кем-то другим давным-давно и загружено с нарушением лицензии. Jim Hokins (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Dvorak Keyboard iOS.jpg

Picture of copyrighted computer software. TheTechie (talk) 15:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Peta Tua Kuno dari Nagari Koto Tangah Batu Hampa di (District Akabiluru) yang berada di Alam Minangkabau.png

Kesalahan sumber data, dan informasi GuciTigoAlua (talk) 16:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Logo GRANDIOS Nr 8 Klugheit.jpg

Please check if this meets threshold of originality and needs copyright holder's consent. 2003:C0:8F14:C400:751F:9006:2926:2943 16:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Pecos Gambusia.jpg

Appears to be an extremely low res version of File:Pecosgambusia.jpg, cropped weirdly and too small to be useful on Wikipedia Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Delete Commons prefers high resolution images. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:MExico City From Above 29.jpg


The user uploaded a series of some 47 images as "MExico City From Above". Reverse image search found many on instagram (eg sets at and - at sources some labeled Mexico City, some other parts of Mexico, many United States, and at least 1 Japan). I've already deleted the majority of images in the set as clear net copyvios found in reverse image searches. I think good faith has been forfeited, and the rest of the series should be deleted without need to hunt down where each individual image was yoinked from. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete. Commons user might be the same as the Instagram user, but COM:VRT is needed given that these images were posted on IG a few weeks ago. The obviously incorrect captioning is a problem regardless; these images certainly aren't all of CDMX. They're good photos and they could be useful if we had clear permission and knew what they were of, but that isn't the case here. Omphalographer (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
¡Viva México Kbrones! 2806:2F0:9101:B978:B96D:1EDB:5F00:8491 04:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

File:René de Ceccatty 2013.jpg

J'interdis l'utilisation de cette image, qui est mon portrait fait sans mon autorisation sur un lieu public Canpacet (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:René de Ceccatty 2013.jpg

Utilisation de mon image non autorisée Canpacet (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. A photograph at a film premier seems to follow COM:IDENT with regard to France. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Niño en construcción.jpg

OOS, low quality undistinguished photo of unidentified place Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

not unidentified currently
Avecus (talk) 22:13, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
@Avecus: "Av. Tecnológico" CDMX? Querétaro? San Lucas Tunco? Cholula? Puebla? Etc? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
OK, Metepec, Mexico state, that's identified now, thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

File:HL Damals – EF Fehling.JPG

Photographer Emil Bieber died in 1962, There is no known death date for Julius Rosenberg, the photographer out of Berlin, not public domain in Germany yet and too young for PD-old-assumed. Undelete in 2034. Abzeronow (talk) 18:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep The credit in the uncropped version is to E. Beiber studio, where did you get "Julius Rosenberg" from? The studio had several locations with several photographers. --RAN (talk) 23:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Julius Rosenberg was the owner and photographer of the E. Bieber studio in Berlin starting in 1910, per de:Leonard Berlin-Bieber. I have tried to find birth and death dates for him but had no success so far. The name is not that rare, and most Internet search results are about the Soviet spy of the same name who was executed in the US in the 1950s. --Rosenzweig τ 07:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
It has been made before 1893 in E. Bieber, Berlin. The original File:HL Damals – Lübecker Senatorenalbum – Emil Ferdinand Fehling.jpg was around, as you may easy see, 1893. FYI: de:Emilie Bieber. 1970gemini (talk) 08:45, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
@1970gemini: File:HL Damals – Lübecker Senatorenalbum – Emil Ferdinand Fehling.jpg says "before 1897" (not 1893), and I don't see a source for that date. The source for the photograph is named as "Lübecker Senatorenalbum". Is that a publication, or what is it? --Rosenzweig τ 16:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The Senatorenalbum is the book where all Senators of the Freien und Hansestadt Lübeck are honored untill the end of the Eigenstaatlichkeit of Lübeck. It exists since 1848 and became part of Schleswig-Holstein in 1937. Every new Senator, take a look at de:Liste der Lübecker Senatoren, got a place as they've been voted. e. g. File:HL Damals – Lübecker Senatorenalbum – Wilhelm Brehmer.jpg. Your hated File is from 1896. e. g. de:Carl Alfred Brattström . voted 1892, left 1899 for his work and died in 1911. 1970gemini (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
e. g. watch de:Johann Martin Andreas Neumann as well or the Daddy from Heinrich and Thomas Mann... 1970gemini (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
bevor ich es vergesse, da Du es ja offensichtlich liebst Leute vor vollendete Tatsachen zu stellen, siehe Sieveking, trägst Du Sorge dafür, dass das fragliche Bild umgehend nach dem Fristablauf undeleted wird. 1970gemini (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Ist bereits in Category:Undelete in 2033. --Rosenzweig τ 17:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
As Rosenzweig says, the Sieveking photo is already in the Undelete in 2033 because I had put it there as soon as it was established that Bieber was the photographer. I do care about restoring what is deleted (I also try to restore usage of files after I undelete them), even if it doesn't appear as such. As I mentioned to Yann on my talk page in discussing the photo, I am willing to upload a local copy to enwiki since enwiki only cares about US copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
You call it a "book", but say nothing about publication. So it is not a publication, but some kind of photo album? Or hand-written book because photographs were not yet common in 1848? And where do the years 1893, 1896, "before 1897" etc. come from? You make a lot of claims, but it's not really clear what they are based on. --Rosenzweig τ 17:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hast Du Dir mal die Mühe gemacht, die Liste der Lübecker Senatoren aufzurufen? Wenn ja, hast Du Emil Fehling gesucht und gelesen? Das Album befindet sich heute in dem Stadtarchiv, damals im Rathaus. Wenn Du Dir das Bild von Brehmer anschaust, wirst Du bemerken, dass es, z. B. am Übergang vom Kopf zum Hals, arge gebrauchsspuren aufweist... 1970gemini (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Wie wäre es denn, wenn du, statt hier Rätselraten und Schnitzeljagd zu veranstalten, von vornherein klar Daten benennst, anstatt hier süffisante Kommentare der Sorte "Hast Du Dir mal die Mühe gemacht" abzulassen? Ich sehe in besagter Liste, dass der besagte Fehling 1896 Mitglied des Lübecker Senats wurde. Heißt das zwingend, dass das 1913 veröffentlichte Foto schon 1896 gemacht wurde? Wenn ja, warum? Ist es in besagtem Album enthalten und dort datiert oder sonstwie eindeutig datierbar? Du schreibst trotz wiederholter Nachfrage nach wie vor nicht, was dieses Album eigentlich ist, nur wo es sich befindet bzw. befand. Lass dir doch nicht alles einzeln aus der Nase ziehen! Solche Informationen beizubringen, ist Sache desjenigen, der hier Dateien hochlädt. Und wenn die Informationen zur Datei mangel- oder lückenhaft sind, kann schon mal ein Löschantrag gestellt und ggf. die Datei auch gelöscht werden. Also bitte klare Fakten zu Herkunft, Datierung usw. des Fotos/der Datei und keine Schnitzeljagden und Rätselspiele mehr. Danke. --Rosenzweig τ 18:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Ohne persönlich zu sein, gebe ich mal folgendes zu bedenken. Als ich das im Vorjahr verwerkte waren alle zufrieden, Senatorenalbum. Alles war hinreichend.
Ist es kein Stadtbuch? (vom Rang eines Goldenen Buches einer Stadt; die lübeckischen Zeitungen verwendeten, wenn es keine neueren gab, deren Fotos) Wenn Du Dir die anderen erwähnten Bilder gedoppelklickt hast, wird Dir aufgefallen sein, dass diese spätestens im Jahr der Senatorenerwählung entstanden sind. Die dortigen Bilder von Bromme und Friedrich sind erbärmliche Passfotos. Nach Anfertigung der neuen Seite war es zwingend. Was wiederum bedeutet, dass das betreffende Bild, und somit auch der 1913 veröffentlichte Teilausschnitt, vor 1897 entstand. Warum! Die Leute könnten sterben. Bei de:Johann Paul Leberecht Strack sehen wir das Albumsfoto, in der Senatorenliste Das Bild seines Nachrufs.
Falls es Dir daran liegen sollte rumzustänkern, verweise ich gerne auf das Bild des Fehlings in einer Senatorentracht des Jahres 1813, welche sich die Senatoren zur 100sten Wiederkehr des Ereignisses anfertigen ließen. Ein Unterschied wie Tag und Nacht.
"kann schon mal ein Löschantrag gestellt und ggf. die Datei auch gelöscht werden" - Wirklich??? Für mich sieht es vielmehr danach aus, als wenn da jemand lange Weile hat und ne Menge heißer Luft ablässt. Die Bilder sind über 100 Jahre alt und wenn es fraglich gewesen wäre, hätte ich beim Urheber Unknown author geschrieben, und wir wären jetzt nicht hier. 1970gemini (talk) 19:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
"Als Nachfolger bestimmte sie ihren Neffen Leonard Berlin (1841-1931). L. Berlin gründete und betrieb ein zweites Atelier von 1890–1910 in Berlin. Im Jahr 1902 übernahm dessen Sohn Emil das photographische Atelier in Hamburg." 1970gemini (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
 Comment The uploader apparently thinks that the photo, though published in 1913, was actually taken in 1896, based on the fact that it is apparently part of an (unpublished) album collecting the photos of Lübeck's senators, arguing that those photos were usually made when or shortly after these persons became senators. In this case, in 1896. He also argues that there is apparently another photo of the man from 1913 or later (photographed wearing some special garb created for a centennial celebration in 1913) which he says is very different. So the 1896 date is based on comparisons and the assumption that the photo was made shortly after becoming a senator.
If that is correct and the photo was made in 1896 by E. Bieber in Berlin, the photographer would presumably be Leonard Berlin-Bieber, who died in 1931. I don't see any real evidence though. There may be some, but I don't see it in the uploader's contributions. It's hard enough to get any facts from these rambling answers anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Radium+ReelFX logo.jpg

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Vietnamese biometric passport.jpg

exact duplicatae of File:Vietnamese Biometric passport.jpg. false attribution Incorrect license. Bennylin (yes?) 19:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

What do you mean by ‘false attribution’???? 2402:9D80:22B:7FA0:B132:75AB:AEA3:5912 03:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
File:Vietnamese biometric passport.jpg​ license says: "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:" CC BY-SA 4.0 by User:Hieutrung19, while it should be Public Domain from Vietnamese government. Changed the wording to "Incorrect license". Bennylin (yes?) 10:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Charan Singh funeral procession at Delhi.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shaan Sengupta as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All rights reserved. See website policy.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there are conflicting statements wrt copyright on the source-website. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment : i am putting the quotation of the source website here

. “The purpose of the Charan Singh Archives is to widely disseminate the life and intellectual heritage of Chaudhary Charan Singh, hence we actively encourage use of the material on this website. We possess more archival material on Chaudhary Charan Singh that is not public, and we welcome those interested in Charan Singh’s ideas to collaborate with us. All archival material on this website are the property of the family of Charan Singh, Excluding photographs which are published CC BY-SA 4.0, all other documents from the Charan Singh Archives including books, booklets, articles and other archival material are copyright of the Charan Singh Archives. Thus, no material other than the photographs may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including digital usage, photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior permission of the Charan Singh Archives, except in the case of quotations in reviews and certain other non-commercial uses permitted by Indian copyright law. For permission requests, write to us, addressed “Attention: Request for License” at info@charansingh.org.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSlumPanda (talk • contribs)

  •  Comment The website policy states Unless otherwise stated, Charan Singh Archives and/or its licensors own the intellectual property rights for all material on Charan Singh Archives. All intellectual property rights are reserved. You may view and/or print pages from https://charansingh.org for your own personal use subject to restrictions set in these terms and conditions.
You must not:
Republish material from https://charansingh.org
Sell, rent or sub-license material from https://charansingh.org
Reproduce, duplicate or copy material from https://charansingh.org
Redistribute content from Charan Singh Archives (unless the content is specifically made for redistribution). Shaan SenguptaTalk 15:39, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File:上岡裕.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: promo/press photo No google images hits but metadata does say "Author: Shinji Kobayashi", which doesn't resemble the uploader's username. COM:VRT permission probably needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Festimove.jpg

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Widmer26 (talk · contribs)

COM:PCP - Several of their other uploads have been copyright violations. (There are other pictures of these subjects, and I've already replaced the usages of the church with photos by another uploader.)

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:FFC - Logo de la Fédération Française de Cardiologie .jpg

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

In scope, as we should expect a national cardiological association to be. The question is whether its logo is above COM:TOO France or not. It might be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Bouclesperles (talk · contribs)

Copie de https://cultureauto.fr/moteur-6-temps-porsche/

Habertix (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Katarzyna Trzaskalska (cropped).jpg

I am the author and I withdraw my consent under these terms. I want to share another photo that I am the author of Kazik2025 (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep: File:Katarzyna Trzaskalska.jpg was uploaded more than 11 years ago to https://www.flickr.com/photos/96799800@N07/8945686856/ by User:Fryta73 where it is still available under CC BY-SA 2.0. --Achim55 (talk) 06:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Kamar.jpg

Possible copyvio: Unrecognizable person, Seems to be a professional picture, Only upload of the user, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Pour la suppression : On ne voit même pas son visage donc il n’a aucune valeur encyclopédique pour illustrer l‘’artiste en question. En tout cas, on ne devrait pas avoir cette image en illustration principale de l’article du chanteur. Elryck (talk) 21:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Flag of NCaucasus Europe Bergkaukasien.jpg

Not used fictinal flag Yousiphh (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Flag of Free NCaucasus Europe 328pxl.jpg

Not used fictinal flag Yousiphh (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Priyansh Jadav.jpg

Image appears to be taken from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27040811/mediaviewer/rm2523015937/?ref_=tt_ph_3 where it is marked copyright of Priyansh Jadav John B123 (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Nordkauk Legion2.png

Wrong license Yousiphh (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Can you fix it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Victoire Finaz 2021.jpg

Copie de https://www.editions-tredaniel.com/victoire-finaz-auteur-5526.html (ou autre source) Habertix (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:State of the Map Africa 2023 Logo Design by Cijomon Ouseph 1.png

The giraffe pattern seems to be from Getty Images/iStockphotos (same company, different sites) according to Exif metadata. Is that pattern above COM:TOO? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

I guess the governing standard is COM:TOO Cameroon? Since that's a red link, that means no-one on Commons who might know anything about that country's TOO has divulged any information, but there's a risk that their TOO is that of their former colonial power, France, which would mean this is above their TOO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File talk:Nürnberg, Johannisstraße 13 20170821 002-2.jpg

Two file sizes of the same picture. Waschroom (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep I don't see why we should delete the file talk page. If this is about the actual file, File:Nürnberg, Johannisstraße 13 20170821 002-2.jpg: That is COM:INUSE and was already kept twice per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nürnberg, Johannisstraße 13 20170821 002-2.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 07:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File:استاد محمد معمار بستکی.jpg

Extra and unnecessary MemarBastak (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

That I dont know but it's not your own work, is it? 186.174.103.91 23:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Dallas Korol (Owner of TheTekkitRealm) in 2017.jpg

If you want to make self promotion take a selfie. This doesn't look like own work. 186.174.103.91 22:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Photographs by Jeff Walters

For photographs by Jeff Walters for the California State Legislature, more specifically those that have "Copyright holder" in the metadata as "Jeff Walters". Walters is a freelance photographer who has worked with the California State Legislature as an official photographer, but {{PD-CAGov}} specifically says "Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author". Somewhat similar of a situation to Marc Thomas Kallweit, another freelance photographer who did work for the State Legislature (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Curt hagman.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scottwilk portrait2013.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Travis Allen California Assemblyman.jpg).

These ones below are by Walters, but don't have "Copyright holder" data. Not sure if they should also be considered as Walter's freelance work or a work of the State Legislature.

reppoptalk 23:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Dr Hassan Kojori.jpg

Own work? 186.174.103.91 23:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)