File:Grubtheme sekiro.png File doesn't fulfil requirements for deletion

I believe that this file isn't eligible for deletion because it's author has released it on GitHub under a free license (MIT license) source and because this image doesn't contain any derivative work from the game Sekiro (also see: commons rule).

Thank you for participating in this discussion Kakučan (talk) 12:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose This is the only public repository of semimqmo on GitHub and they posted on Reddit that they just took this wallpaper from https://wallpapersden.com/sekiro-shadows-die-twice-art-wallpaper/2560x1440 where the author is not even credited. And maybe some people do not think of a software license applying to images  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   15:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose As noted in the deletion comment, there is no evidence that the creator of the image is the person who posted it with the {{Mit}} license at github. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

As you can see in this and this commit the final screenshot is composed of resources which automatically fulfill the commons rule of threshold of originality except this one (which is considered it to be not semimqmo's original work). I found this theory to be true but I couldn't find any license posted with this resource which leads me to think that John Devlin had given a permission to semimqmo to repost this resource under MIT license (otherwise semimqmo's repo on GitHub would've been taken down for copyright infringement). Thank you for your response Kakučan (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

I say again -- there is no evidence that Devlin has given a free license. The fact that GitHub has not acted against this post proves nothing. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Support This is free software. It would be very contrary to current practice that a non-free image would be distributed with it. So I think that the license applies to the whole package, which includes the code and the image. Yann (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Yann: According to gnu.org, the "MIT License" is really a confusing concept, as MIT (if it's indeed an abbr. of Massachusetts Institute of Technology) does published not only one license, they have Expat license, X11 license and/or MIT Zero license (though gnu.org also recommend to rename it to "Expat Zero license"), so which type of "MIT license" did the uploader mean to? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:09, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

  The issue is not really the license. It is whether it applies to the whole package or not. Apparently I am in minority here, but I think that in the evidence of the contrary, it does. Yann (talk) 18:57, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per 999Real, this request just looks like someone who says to license some files to be "CC BY(-SA)" but didn't specific which version of CC BY(-SA), or says to license as "BSD license" without how many clauses (4-clause, 3-clause, ... 0-clause) they used, unclear version details held me from supporting. I would also recommend to restart reviewing of files using {{MIT}} as license tag (or one of tags for multi-licensed). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

  This is not what I said or relevant. If you click the LICENSE file in GitHub it shows the exact license code (This is always how you put license in GitHub. It usually has the full license in plain text). Anyway I don't know why this is still open  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   10:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Js13kgames.png Js13kGames Logo

This is a logo for JS13K games. I am writing on behalf of the creators Andrzej and Ewa Mazur who wishes it to not be deleted. This image was being used on the wikipedia page for js13k also. Thank you for fixing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slackluster (talk • contribs)

 Support If this is the logo shown at the top of https://js13kgames.com Andrzej Mazur uploaded this file under CC0 in 2018  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   21:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Although Ewa Mazur is mentioned on the web site, Andrzej is not. This logo was uploaded by USER:Mypoint13k in 2021. The web site has "©2024 js13kGames & authors". If the owners of the site actually want the logo freely licensed here, they must do it with a message to VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

He is in https://github.com/orgs/js13kGames/people. He uploaded the logo on the website in a GitHub repository under CC0 in 2018  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   14:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Support This is free software. It would be very contrary to current practice that a non-free image would be distributed with it. So I think that the license applies to the whole package, which includes the code and the image. Yann (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Yann I don't think so. Aside from the explicit copyright notice which I cited above, the legal section of the web site has

"As a condition of submission, Entrant grants the Competition Organizer, its subsidiaries, agents and partner companies, a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to use, reproduce, adapt, modify, publish, distribute, publicly perform, create a derivative work from, and publicly display the Submission."

That is a free license only in the sense that no money changes hands. It does not include the right to freely license anything. Also, please remember that even in the case where the software may be freely licensed, the logo for it is often not. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

That is an agreement for entrants who submit games to the competition, not anything to do with the website itself, which in fact has no license on GitHub at all. However, one of the staff of js13kGames uploaded this logo in a different repository under CC0. The license in a GitHub repository applies to all the files in it unless otherwise noted, which has not been done so there  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   15:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

The license in a GitHub repository applies to all the files in it unless otherwise noted. Yes, I agree with that. Yann (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

@999real: This is not the same logo. Feel free to upload it under CC0 providing that source. Ankry (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Direct restoring, but  Support re-uploading a correctly licensed one, per Ankry, previous one might have differently designed shapes. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files in Category:Die Partei (Reutlingen)

About 30 files deleted as of arbitrary accusations, with no understandable comment Dulliman (talk) 02:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Just because you disagree with them doesn't make them arbitrary. And I understood the comments and close. Jim concluded these were out of scope posters. Abzeronow (talk) 03:23, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

@Dulliman Das Argument out of scope verstehst Du? Die Löschung ist begründet. Wikipedia ist kein Ort für politische Kampagnen. – Do you understand the argument ‘out of scope’? The deletion is justified. Wikipedia is not a place for political campaigns. Mussklprozz (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

@Dulliman: What should be taken into account for artistic works by non notable authors: educational value of the works by themselves, whether they were used elsewhere, quality of the reproduction, etc. There is a difference between educational works (e.g. File:Jupiter diagram.svg), works used during some notable events (e.g. File:Mai 1968. (Sans texte) - maquette d'affiche ? - non identifié - btv1b9018450b.jpg), and vanity works without any educational use. Yann (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

In this case the whole category seems to be "out of scope" ? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Election_posters_in_Germany_by_party Dulliman (talk) 11:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

This party doesn't have an article on Wikipedia? Yann (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harry Topham.jpg

These appear to be cropped images from an anonymous UK group shot from 1895 and the another group shot circa 1900 when these players were on the team. The consensus was to keep, they were deleted, then restored, then apparently deleted again. They should be restored. --RAN (talk) 04:16, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Hosting them here with false authorship / licensing is pointless. As nobody wanted to fix this information, their undeletion is also pointless. Following the recent restoration, neither the user requesting the restoration nor any of the users supporting the action did so for several months. Ankry (talk) 05:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment I rather support keeping these files. However the license, the date, the source, and the author should have been fixed after undeletion, and they weren't. If neither the uploader or you are able to do it, why requesting undeletion again? Yann (talk) 16:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• You have to notify me if you want me to fix them. I only noticed them undeleted and then deleted again when I posted this. I will fix them if they are undeleted. But someone has to message me that they are available to edit again. --RAN (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• You were notified, i.e. . Yann (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  In this case, I'd love to inform @Krd: , many of those files were re-deleted by this one citing e.g. "No license since 9 October 2024", if they don't against above rationale, I would support restoration again. I'd suggest no conflicts between adminships on such trival questions of licensing tags. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• We need a way to automate the task, rather than cut and paste the same license template 118 times. --RAN (talk) 00:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Yuhan Logo (ENG).svg

Below TOO in South Korea--Trade (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose The tree is not incidentally included. Per COM:DM South Korea. Thuresson (talk) 20:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment While the tree is not incidentally included per COM:DM South Korea, the object stated above may be fall with another PD-license, that is either {{PD-South Korea-anon}} (in case of creator of the work is unknown) or {{PD-South Korea-organization}} (in case of a work created on behalf of organization). As stated of two templates, According to Article 40, 41, and 42 of the Copyright Act of South Korea, a work that is anonymous or bears the pseudonym which is not widely known (unless the creator of the logo was publicly known) and works created on behalf of organization enter the public domain 70 years after publication when made public. (30 years before July 1987, 50 years before July 2013) In other words, organizational, anonymous and pseudonymous works made public in before 1 January 1963 are in the public domain in South Korea. In case of Yuhan willow tree logo, it was exist in various incarnations since the creation of the company in 1926, and the current incarnation of the logo, with circle included, was presumably created in 1956. 1959 advertisement and calendar of 1962 also included the current incarnation of the logo as well. I also believe that the actual creator of Yuhan Willow tree logo is unknown (apply {{PD-South Korea-anon}}), and if was publicly known, its copyright might be expired as well. Assuming that the current incarnation of the logo was created in 1956, it may be expired on 1 January 1987 (before its copyright term was extended to 50 years according to new law in July of next year, but is non-retroactive to works already expired). So, i suggest the file will be restored will change license. Yayan550 (talk) 00:30, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

File:碎-order.gif

In 2015, I uploaded animations illustrating the correct stroke orders for various CJKV characters. 7 of these were hit with deletion requests, of which 6 ultimately were kept (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). There is no reason that File:碎-order.gif should have been treated any differently. I thus come to request its undeletion, to rectify this inconsistency. —VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

was ist der Grund für den Löschantrag ?

danke für den hinweis .. stimmt ich bin relatvi neu auf wikicommons, doch die Fotos und Obejkte sidn von mir .. also 100% ©copyright by ©urgart ist der künstlerinnen name von Ursina Gabriela Roesch ..ist da die verwirrung ? Ursina Gabriela Roesch (talk) 06:49, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Tom Cat and Jerry Mouse characters.png

This excerpt was released by the YouTube channel of an official subsidiary of the copyright holder (Warner Bros. Discovery) under the CC BY license. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 01:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Deletion listing: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tom Cat and Jerry Mouse characters.png Deletion discussion for file from which this was extracted: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tom & Jerry - Enjoy the Eternal Cat & Mouse Game of Tom & Jerry on Cartoon Network India.webm -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

 Support Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tom & Jerry - Enjoy the Eternal Cat & Mouse Game of Tom & Jerry on Cartoon Network India.webm. MGM (now Amazon-MGM) is irrelevant to the case, so, wrong rationale to delete it.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Tom & Jerry - Enjoy the Eternal Cat & Mouse Game of Tom & Jerry on Cartoon Network India.webm

Check : File:Tom & Jerry - Enjoy the Eternal Cat & Mouse Game of Tom & Jerry on Cartoon Network India.webm. As we can see in its deletion request, it was deleted under a wrong premise. Tom and Jerry, even if created for MGM, it's a trademarked property of Warner Brothers. The file was uploaded by Cartoon Network, an American cable television channel and the flagship property of the Cartoon Network, Inc., a sub-division of the Warner Bros. Discovery Networks division of Warner Bros. Discovery.

So, as stated in the examples linked in the original deletion request, the file was uploaded to Youtube by the owner of the trademark under a compatible license.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 18:18, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, I'd love to notice the fact other WB-D divisions do usually release some of their content under Youtube's CC license, such as their Harry Potter videogames, Mortal Kombat, or official models of CN's characters.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 19:48, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

File:&pictures.svg

Please restore the following pages:

• File:&pictures.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Why you deleted File:&pictures.svg, please undelete. YehudaHubert (talk) 09:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

 Support This was deleted as out of scope, but see & pictures, so it is probably in scope. India does not appear to have a typography copyright, so I think this is PD there and it is certainly PD in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Oblivion PSP Menu Screen.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

• File:Rhalta Prison (Oblivion PSP).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
• File:Oblivion PSP Titlescreen.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
• File:Oblivion PSP Menu Screen.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: These screenshots are all taken by myself, I personally removed the EXIF data from the files to avoid attaching any of my personal information to the upload.

Note: The images may appear similar to those used on other sites due to the screen being static and not having any motion (title and menu images) 00Calico (talk) 10:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose These appear to be screenshots of a copyrighted game. The are not 00Calico's {{Own}} work as claimed and 00Calico has no right to freely license them. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Six Lane Cable Bridge.jpg

Sir I have created an article wikipedia about six Lane Ganga bridge 'who is in Bihar [India]. I want upload the pic . So that wikipedia can be better. So please undelete it. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaheed1931 (talk • contribs) 11:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

• Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

 Oppose This is a Facebook image which you have uploaded three times with two different file names, all of which is a violation of Commons rules. If you continue to break the rules here you will be blocked from editing. The fact that this image would make a WP article better is not important because we do not keep copyright violations of Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Sorath Rai Diyach.jpg

Please undelete this file because this not fair. This file image is not copyrighted and able to upload in public domain. You can check yourself by searching this image on search engine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extensive7 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@Extensive7: Who is the artist? Thuresson (talk) 18:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Meizu M6s.jpg

I accidently requested to delete this image i uploaded recently in wikimedia commons so i wanted to restore it because i added it to its corresponding wiki about it and i don't want the image disappear in the article. Thank you--WindowsBetas (talk) 16:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Who is the real copyright owner of this image? Thuresson (talk) 18:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:小出斉（ローラーコースター）.jpg

こちらの写真は、未発表のオリジナルの写真です、削除撤回を　どうぞよろしくお願い致します。かしいなつ 002 (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

This photo is an unpublished original photo, so we would appreciate it if you could retract its deletion.かしいなつ 002 (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@かしいなつ 002: The photo was previously uploaded to Wikimedia Commons as File:ローラー・コースター 2020.jpg in 2024 by 旧姓宮松雅子. Do you know who this user is? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

この写真は、昨日、バンドリーダーの方から、オリジナルなので、使用するよう、許諾を頂きました。

他のユーザーは存じ上げません。かしいなつ 002 (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Yesterday, I received permission from the band leader to use this photo, as it is an original.

I don't know of any other users.かしいなつ 002 (talk) 21:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Please restore as we have a permission statement for this image inかしいなつ 002 (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

ファイルは書籍やウェブサイトに載っていません。団体（ブルースバンド：ローラーコースター）が持っていて、自由に使って良いというものです。かしいなつ 002 (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

The files are not in any books or on any websites, they are owned by an organization (Blues band: Rollercoaster) and are free to use.かしいなつ 002 (talk) 21:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Adil Charkaoui

Hi, This is my own picture! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdChark (talk • contribs) 22:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)