Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/11
![]() |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
![]() |
|
|
File:Усольехимпром карта Усолье-Сибирское.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Dw no source since (dw no source since), but the file appears to be a derivative work of an open street map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: sourced properly after nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Dinner on Tuesday Lamb chops, sauted new potatoes, peas and beans with redcurrant jelly and mint sauce - cooked in the tent on a Campingaz Chef Folding Double Burner Stove and Grill (46940947225).jpg
RAETSZDTFZGKUHI 2001:16B8:18AE:8600:E92D:9CF6:E8FE:954C 10:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajesh Aanand (talk · contribs)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Rajesh aanand with friend.jpg
- File:Rajesh aanand with his wife madhulika Singh.jpg
- File:Aagra tour.jpg
- File:Rajesh Singh.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Chrysomelidae Ec2 2.jpg
Accidentally uploaded twice ChinchipeZC (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Chrysomelidae Ec 2.jpg
Accidentally uploaded twice ChinchipeZC (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Noseless craft.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Synthese von Maleinsäure.svg
Outdated chemical reaction equation. German image caption prohibits re-use on other Wikipedia projects. Superseded by newer version File:Industrial synthesis of maleic acid.svg, also to fix some layout and vector issues. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Rosace cathedrale strasbourg.jpg
Alek Savic.jpg 109.106.233.98 15:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep Aucune raison valable --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep nonsense ip mr.choppers (talk)-en- 16:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep Niciun motiv valabil -- User:Lucian GAVRILA Luciengav (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Blason vd femme.svg
I am learning to use a new program and I thought the black elements outside of the shield would not be visible. Please delete. Brookford (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:34, 11 April 2020 UTC: I am learning to use a new program and I thought the black elements outside of the shield would not be visible. Please delete. --Krdbot 19:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Navneet Chauhan Founder & CEO of KHOJinINDIA 02.jpg
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 13:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:06, 11 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Elizabeth Frazer.jpg
Poor resolution 76.187.211.251 22:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Heavily in use; we only have two photographs of the subject (see Category:Elizabeth Frazer). Please read COM:SCOPE for more information. --Ahmadtalk 00:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since)
The first version of this file and the source contains a caption on the bottom indicating CC-BY-SA (no version specified). Keep. pandakekok9 08:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Release CC BY SA. What was the claimed issue? Or you just checking? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The original was marked CC-BY-SA. Eindiran (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. Released as "CC-BY-SA" at the source, so the creator's intention to use this license is clear, but @Doc James: it would be great if you could ask the author to confirm the version used here (4.0) also at the source. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:37, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif
No license on the source website ComputerHotline (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Yes there is User:ComputerHotline. Look at the right hand lower corner of the image here. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to prolong a DR that will end in an obvious keep. Please carefully read the previous DR before nominating. pandakekok9 01:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
File:0 qgG6QfU2 NACyi0t.jpg
probably copyrighted cover --Killarnee (T•1•2) 18:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Neozoon at 04:41, 12 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 07:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Chibi-Robo series logo.png
No permission stated. Logo shows "TM". Logo is regarded as "non-free" at its source en:File:Chibi-Robo series logo.png and is available on EN-WP under "Fair use"-rules, which do not apply here on Commons. Is "Speedy Deletion" due to copyright-infringement warranted ? Archie02 (talk) 18:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the image for speedy deletion, uploader's request on uploading week). Taivo (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Elena Beuca in Hollywood.jpg
The file was uploaded for test, it isn't required anymore. Sagar Gulati (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
The file was uploaded for test, it isn't required anymore. Sagargulati (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar Gulati (talk • contribs) 17:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, source IMDB. --Achim (talk) 18:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
File:TV Series Dinosaurs Story by DNS.jpg
uploader claimed it as own work, while the image water mark says "(c) DNS studio animation" Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Florida by Piotrus 217.JPG
Bad quality image, blurred Aeroid (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Quality is ok unless you want to print a poster. Please show that we have a higher quality version from the same angle. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep until would be replaced by better quality version Julo (talk) 09:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Julo (talk) 09:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Florida by Piotrus 221.JPG
Bad image quality, blurred Aeroid (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Quality is ok unless you want to print a poster. Please show that we have a higher quality version from the same angle. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Julo (talk) 09:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Unniyarcha Painting.jpg
Copyright infringement: originally published at https://jithinaryan.artstation.com/projects/Q0X2E (Please note that bottom right corner of the image contains signature and name of the original artist. 99v (talk) 13:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:21, 13 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://jithinaryan.artstation.com/projects/Q0X2E --Krdbot 13:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Amber Marshall upload by WikiKarbar.jpg
Delete Source and author are correct, but no license given here, and no license at the source to indicate the image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyright vilotion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Heartland upload by WikiKarbar.jpg
Delete Derivative work of season 11 of Heartland. Copyrighted content. See this. Hammersoft (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyright vilotion. please use {{Copyvio}}. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Chris Potter upload by WikiKarbar.webp
Delete No license given here. Source is as indicated, but there's no evidence at the source that this image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyright vilotion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Steven Wilson - upload by WikiKarbar.jpg
Delete No license given here. Source is as indicated, but there's no evidence at the source that this image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 16:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyright vilotion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Kerry James - upload by WikiKarbar.jpg
Delete No license given here. Source is as indicated, but there's no evidence at the source that this image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 16:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyright vilotion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:JR West 683-0 Series Kinmoto W31.jpg
無断転載が確認されたため 49.250.67.222 00:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 17:05, 16 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
File:POL COA Brama (Oginiec).png
This version is not relevant. Current and the only version here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:POL_COA_Brama_(herb_szlachecki).svg Legalwizard 2018 (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk at 11:26, 17 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 19:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Atheta trinotata (Kraatz, 1856).png
Falscher Name URSchmidt (talk) 12:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep, @URSchmidt: It is not necessary to delete the photo, because the name of the image is wrong. You can use the template {{Rename}} and propose the correct name. Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 21:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep @URSchmidt: Ein falscher Name ist kein Grund zum Löschen, und bitte die Vorlage Rename noch einmal richtig einsetzen. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 00:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: It's not a reason for deletion. Use the template {{Rename}} to make the name change.Mazbel – 20:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
File:It is Earth's eye looking into which the beholder measures the depth of his own nature.JPG
Unused personal photo, no context/location, no educational use. out of scope; P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: neutral on this but the title violates Commons:Filenames. The uploader didn't indicate what mountain scenery is that and instead made the description "promotional." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:IT learning.PNG
Personal image, out of scope. Only used on userpage without meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:It uses warm colors and is very interesting! - 2014-04-28 16-40.jpg
Very likely not own work but screengrab (see remant of watermark in bottom right). P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. I got laughed at this weird title (also against Commons policies on filenames). Seriously, I saw the remnant "S" at the bottom-right corner.JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:It's a door in a virtual world I created 2014-07-06 20-10.png
Unused tiny icon, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination -JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:It's a thing! 2014-06-04 22-55.jpg
Unused personal photo without meaning, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:It's Not What You Know, But How You Think (8575593438).jpg
Unused personal photo, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:ITALIAN IKKUNAT 1.jpg
Unused personal photo, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cnr437 (talk · contribs)
Unused logo and detail photo without possible use, out of scope. And one screengrab.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reychelxp (talk · contribs)
Unused tiny icons, unusable, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Konon2 (talk · contribs)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. Many are not own works but scans or DW without proper attribution.
- File:SafouraFadigaGbb2013.jpg
- File:SafouraFadiga2013.jpg
- File:SAFGim96ConfIet2.jpg
- File:DembaDiop IMG 0904.jpg
- File:DDFLeaderCM2.jpg
- File:SAF013.jpg
- File:ITF01.jpg
- File:MarquisWhosWhoWorld1998SAF.jpeg
- File:FSafouraSAFCI-001.jpg
- File:MLF01.jpeg
- File:MarquisWhosWhoFinance20002001SAF.jpeg
- File:DDF0021.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acusticapuj (talk · contribs)
Unused low-quality diagrams and text image, unusable, out of scope. One screengrab without proper attribution.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:ITIL esquema de cursos.JPG
Unused promotional diagram, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:ITPLOGO.png
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ksandip (talk · contribs)
Unused personal photo and logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:New-itraveller-logo.jpg
- File:Ori-logo.jpg
- File:ITraveller.com logo.png
- File:ITraveller team.jpg
- File:Itraveller logo.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:IV Campeonato Nacional de Porrismo Medellin.png
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:IUNI.png
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TaylorHawkes (talk · contribs)
Unused screenshots, little educational value, out of scope.
- File:IVR - add outbound call elements.png
- File:IVR - add an options menu.png
- File:IVR - add a inbound phone element.png
- File:IVR - add a flow diagram.png
- File:IVR Designer - Selecting a Phone Number.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Iwata Nakayama.jpeg
Unused personal photo without meaning, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Even the Boat (21037353652).jpg
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Icecommtech (talk · contribs)
Out of COM:SCOPE people.
- File:Brian-and-Desire-Luzinda.gif
- File:Brian and Desire Luzinda.png
- File:Myco Chris.jpg
- File:Brian Biography.jpg
- File:Lukoma Hellen.jpg
- File:Sheilah Gashuma.jpg
- File:Brian and Angella Katatumba.jpg
- File:Brian and Judith Heard.jpg
- File:Brian and Jackie Chandiru.jpg
- File:Brian Morel and Iryn Namubiru.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Me in Spain enjoying .jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Me at the beach.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:MDesign.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Md. Anamul Hoque.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Mayne 1.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Masih Tajzai.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:MeetBrahmabhatt.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:MG 3016-copy.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mertgore (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Murat Özen.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ronaldo 00 (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Milanche037 (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Mikeotharan.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Michael Harvey Miller.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:MohandossMds.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Mohammadreza majidi.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Monir Hossain.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Moshe Reuven.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Multan Pakistan Haddid - panoramio - Haddid Uddin (2).jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Mukesh patwal.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Muhammad Farhan Nawaz Bhatti.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:MSUCH.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josejaquin (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work and OoS
Gbawden (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahri6279 (talk · contribs)
Uploaded by LTA. Globally locked. Lack of educational value and out of commons scope.
- File:數學vs物理vs愛情(色情).jpg
- File:Smallest k gt 1 such that Phi n(k) is prime, where Phi is the cyclotomic polynomial.jpg
- File:The 35 free hexominoes.jpg
- File:Repeating dozenal expansion of reciprocals of primes p less than 30 (decimal 36).jpg
- File:Pascal’s and Bernoulli’s triangle.jpg
Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all I agree with the nominator that these lack educational value. Indeed, they lack legibility. XOR'easter (talk) 22:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Servet34yavuz
unused and uncategorised files. Commons is not the private media repository. --Estopedist1 (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:ChampikaM.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:ChillyLilly.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernando de Gorocica (talk · contribs)
Estos archivos, ahora seleccionados y que he subido hace tiempo, no son ya de mi interés dado que mi nombre de usuario lo he creado con el propósito de subir solamente archivos relacionados con la ASTRONOMÍA. Desde ya muchas gracias por su atención. Fernando T. de Gorocica 04:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- File:En la Plaza Roja - San Basilio.png
- File:Roca y Pinturas Tehuelches.JPG
- File:Faro de Punta Mogotes.JPG
- File:Lago Roca. Panorámica.JPG
- File:Rio de las Vueltas. El Chaltén.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno V.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno VI.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno IV.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno II.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno. Trekking I.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno. Trekking II.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno III.JPG
- File:Lago Argentino. El Calafate.JPG
- File:Pinturas Rupestres Tehuelches.JPG
- File:Lago Argentino. Isla Solitaria.JPG
- File:Puerto Bandera.JPG
- File:El Chaltén o Fitz Roy.JPG
- File:Rio Las Leonas.JPG
- File:Elefantes. El Calafate.JPG
- File:Ventisquero Perito Moreno I.JPG
- File:Dinosaurios. Museo Interpretación Histórica de El Calafate.JPG
- File:Observatorio Austral Felix Aguilar.JPG
- File:Cerro Calafate (806 mts).JPG
- File:El Calafate. Panorámica I.JPG
- File:El Calafate. Panorámica II.JPG
- File:El Calafate. Panorámica III.JPG
- File:Conchilla en Cerro Calafate.JPG
- File:Cerro Calafate. Cima.JPG
- File:Cerro Calafate. Pendiente.JPG
- File:El Calafate. Lugar Histórico.JPG
- File:Rio Santa Cruz. Puente.JPG
- File:Rio Santa Cruz.JPG
- File:Cerro Calafate. Acantilado.JPG
- File:Laguna Horcones.JPG
- File:Puente del Inca y río Las Cuevas.JPG
- File:Olas. Mar de las Pampas.jpg
- File:Caracol y el Mar.jpg
- File:Estrecho de Magallanes. Hacia el Norte.JPG
- File:Cancha de Bochas. Valle de la Luna.JPG
- File:El Submarino. Parte.JPG
- File:Barrancas Coloradas.JPG
- File:Saurosuschus Galilei.JPG
- File:Límite con Chile.JPG
- File:La Esfinge.JPG
- File:Herrerasaurus Ischigualastensis.JPG
- File:Frenguellisaurus Ischigualastensis.JPG
- File:Erosión Hídirca y Eólica.JPG
- File:Acongagua.JPG
- File:El Castoral.JPG
- File:Barco Pesquero.JPG
- File:Mar Argentino.JPG
- File:Pinar en Mar de las Pampas.png
- File:Faro Querandí.png
- File:Cariló.png
- File:Playa y 121.JPG
- File:Jesús.JPG
- File:Pino y Luna Creciente.JPG
- File:En un Despertar.JPG
- File:Cebollas Vivas.JPG
- File:Corbeta 'María' de Bilbao llegando a la Habana.JPG
- File:Bahía de San Julián II.JPG
- File:Bahía de San Julián III.JPG
- File:Bahía de San Julián IV.JPG
- File:Cerro de Monte Cristo. Camino.JPG
- File:Villa Mantero.JPG
- File:Plaza Francisco Ramirez.JPG
- File:El Gená.JPG
- File:Colegio Nacional Urquiza II.JPG
- File:Colegio Nacional Urquiza I.JPG
- File:Pucará de Tilcara II.JPG
- File:Pucará de Tilcara III.JPG
- File:Pucará de Tilcara I.JPG
- File:Vid. Cultivo.JPG
- File:Valle de la Luna. Ischigualasto.JPG
- File:Ushuaia. Puerto.JPG
- File:Puente del Inca. Mendoza.JPG
- File:Uquía. Jujuy.JPG
- File:Isla de los Lobos. Beagle.JPG
- File:Nao Victoria. Magallanes-Elcano.JPG
- File:Iruya. Salta.JPG
- File:Rio Gallegos.JPG
- File:El Hongo.JPG
- File:Puerto de San Julián.JPG
- File:Paseo de los Pioneros.JPG
- File:Glaciar Marital III.JPG
- File:Glaciar Marital I.JPG
- File:Glaciar Marital II.JPG
- File:Faro Les Eclaireurs.JPG
- File:El Submarino.JPG
- File:Cerro de Monte Cristo.JPG
- File:El Centinela.JPG
- File:Casa de Adobe.JPG
- File:Bahia de Lapataia III.JPG
- File:Bahia de Lapataia II.JPG
- File:Bahia de Lapataia I.JPG
- File:Catedral de La Plata. Frente.JPG
- File:Puerto de Mar del Plata.JPG
- File:Vitraux. Catedral de la Plata.JPG
- File:Nubes en Villa Gesell II.JPG
- File:Mar en Villa Gesell II.JPG
- File:Mar en Villa Gesell I.JPG
- File:Nubes en Villa Gesell I.JPG
- File:Atardecer en Villa Gesell II.JPG
- File:Atardecer en Villa Gesell I.JPG
- File:Amanecer en Villa Gesell I.JPG
Fernando T. de Gorocica 22:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep No reasons for deletion. There are good and quality images. Vandal request. /St1995 23:42, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Vandal? Notice that the nominator is the uploader. But most of the files are too good for courtesy deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:16, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Estos archivos ahora seleccionados y que he subido hace tiempo, no son ya de mi interés dado que mi nombre de usuario lo he creado con el propósito de subir solamente archivos relacionados con la ASTRONOMÍA. Desde ya muchas gracias por su atención. Fernando T. de Gorocica 04:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep: You already given these files to the Community, and may still be in the interest of the Community, not just yours. Please provide a stronger reason for a courtesy deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep Puede que no sean de interés para la persona que subió estos archivos pero ello no significa que no sean de interés para el proyecto. No hay razón para eliminar esos archivos. --Jcfidy (talk) 12:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep: Frivolous/clueless rationale for a courtesy deletion. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no compelling reason for deletion given. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernando de Gorocica (talk · contribs)
I want to delete these files because they are no longer part of the Ptolemy Almagest star catalog that I uploaded on wikisource.
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 11.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 10.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 09.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 07.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 08.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 05.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 06.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 03.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 04.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 01.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO SUR 02.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 07.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 06.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 05.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 03.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 04.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 01.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VIII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 02.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 04.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 05.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 06.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 02.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 03.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS ZODIACO 01.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 12.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 10.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 11.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 08.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 09.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 07.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 04.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 05.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 06.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 01.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 03.png
- File:Almagesto Libro VII CATALOGO ESTRELLAS HEMISFERIO NORTE 02.png
Fernando de Gorocica (talk) 22:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:29087346 599293973766024 7862930983954153472 n(1).jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:@ SHIVAJI univesity NSS camp.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:ELM3REB.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Husam badran.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Omaralomair.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:ISMAIL QASIM.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Pandey bc.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hoca Osman İnan.jpg
Unsed personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Luichu.jpg
Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 18:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FireSphynx (talk · contribs)
Likely copyvios: EXIF shows transmission code or credit Marko Soonurm (compare to EXIF in other uploads by this user).
- File:Mummy Istambul.jpg
- File:SYWR.jpg
- File:Skippy.jpg
- File:Spikey Istambul.jpg
- File:Xia Istambul.jpg
- File:Dolly Anabelle Rokstop.jpg
- File:Dolly Anabelle Istambul.jpg
- File:Istambul SYWR.jpg
- File:Aladin istambul.jpg
- File:Faizah Istambuk.jpg
- File:Rokstop SYWR.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Lcta is dank.jpg
Unused file, a simple black rectangle. Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 01:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Arain wahin .jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Friend Birthday.jpg
bad upload and unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Soykot.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:תמונה של יוסי לוי איש תקשורת.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Oriri.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Image of Sanath Patil.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:HAMID JAMIL.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:NInVr28qdAY.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:INSÔNIA.pdf
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Este artigo é de muito importância para as pessoas que sofrem de INSÔNIA. Trata-se de uma técnica/processo que desenvolvi sendo extremamente benéfica para a cura da INSÔNIA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauricio Chaves de Aguia (talk • contribs) 22:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
File:INSÔNIA.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Angry remonstration about why their "article" was deleted on another wiki. --Green Giant (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Downloaddfgvb.jpg
Likely not own work: looks like screengrab. Unreliable uploader with all other uploads already deleted or marked for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + lots of Google search by image hits; it's available on many websites (e.g. here). Unlikely to be own work. --Ahmadtalk 18:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Cory Barlog firma.png
author request — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyStar (talk • contribs) 2019-01-19T20:24:22 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - file is in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Cory Barlog firma.png
This file was initially tagged by JohnnyStar as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request G7
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; the file is in use. --Ahmadtalk 18:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wanchai Ferry (brand)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.
- File:HK HMT 梭椏道 Soares Avenue shop DCH Food Mart Wan Chai Dim Sum night November 2017 IX1.jpg
- File:HK Wanchai Ferry Cantonese Foods a.jpg
- File:Wan Chai Ferry frozen dumplings at Guotai Dept Store airport branch (20190629175543).jpg
ƏXPLICIT 11:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Judi Rever.jpg
Not own workhttps://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/546081/in-praise-of-blood-by-judi-rever--narrated-by-justine-eyre/9780735278462 Rots61 (talk) 12:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Judi_Rever.jpg” under ticket:2020032710000147. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Ahmadtalk 19:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Un poco feliz.jpg
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:JSAN GROUP.png
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Valve Corporation
- File:In Valve office (12030318653).jpg
- File:In Valve office (12030412544).jpg
- File:In Valve office (12030867986).jpg
- File:Valve office (30276690796).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Master0606 (talk · contribs)
All photos are photos of automobiles taken from various websites.
- File:Cvbvxc.jpg
- File:Jfhdgfydfgb.jpg
- File:Airport vehicle.jpg
- File:Dreamliner edition.jpg
- File:Miurajjj.jpg
- File:Lp700-4 pirelli edition.jpg
- File:Sc18 alston.jpg
- File:Svj 63 roadster.jpg
- File:Svj-63.jpg
- File:J aventador.jpg
- File:Lp720-4 50th.jpg
- File:Lp770-4 svj roadster.jpg
- File:Lp770-4 svj.jpg
- File:Lp750-4 sv roadster.jpg
- File:LP750-4 sv.jpg
- File:Lp740-4 s roadster.jpg
- File:Lp740-4 s.jpg
- File:Lp700-4 roadster.jpg
- File:Lamborghini-Huracan-Sterrato-front-three-quarter-in-motion.jpg
- File:01-lamborghini-huracan-evo-gt-celebration-quail.jpg
- File:999-lamborghini-huracan-evo-1-thumb-960xauto-110008.jpg
- File:Huracanevo-1.jpg
- File:1450114775-huracan.jpg
- File:Lamborghini Huracán GT3 EVO.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Matthb1395 (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work, c.f. w:File:Benelli logo.svg on enwiki tagged as fair use
DannyS712 (talk) 00:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The round part of the logo is highly likely to be above COM:TOO. --Ahmadtalk 23:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:KilSan.mp4.jpg
personal pic of young not famous person (french article deleted: publicity) 90.5.52.190 05:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and it's also likely to be a copyright violation. --Ahmadtalk 23:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:MMSA App Available on both Google Play and App Store.png
No encyclopedic value 17jiangz1 (talk) 07:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Nikit.jpg
Unused personal photograph. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Antonio Busiello.jpg
Copyrighted by subject (see EXIF and also http://www.antoniobusiello.com/about), no evidence of release under claimed licence. Yunshui (talk) please ping me when replying; I'm rarely on Commons 10:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. No consent from the photogrpaher (who happens to be the subject). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + small. --Ahmadtalk 23:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Demi for Fabletics 2020 . jpeg.jpg
The file will be deleted because it will be deleted seven days. 76.189.163.233 12:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete: From https://www.fabletics.com/products/BLARE-ZIP-HIGH-IMPACT-SPORTS-BRA-BA2041931-0001. --Achim (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete copyright violation that was improperly licensed. SNUGGUMS (talk) 14:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete Per being a copyright violation, but original "reason" of 76.189.163.233 is completly bogus. Tm (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per comments, and I'll also delete File:Demi for Fabletics 2020 . jpeg (cropped).jpg based on the same reason. --Ahmadtalk 00:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Volkan Satar.jpg
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 13:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 15:22, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Raccordement mixtiligne-curviligne.jpg
Dans la nouvelle version corrigée que j'ai envoyée, celle-ci n'apparaît qu'en allant sur la page à télécharger et laisse donc l'aperçu de la première page au début...J'attendrai sa suppréssion pour faire un nouvel import. Je pense qu'il vous faudrait une technique qui écrase l'image précédente lors d'un nouvel import corrigé ou ayant un ajout. Bien respectueusement. Gérard Rondeau. GRDROND (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
((Désolé, la vraie page de CORRECTION est APPARUE DEPUIS, Comment ARRÊTER sa suppression...)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRDROND (talk • contribs) 08:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Deletion request withdrawn by the nominator/uploader as a mistake. See above and Bistro. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
File:Hanafuda 1-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure it's made clear above, but this picture (and the others A2569875 nominated) were stolen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2020/04/Category:SVG_Hanafuda_(image_set) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:240:2411:9F67:8830:EB27:CC3:2DB0 (talk) 14:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- 首先抗議妳的惡意推定,請你zh:WP:AGF。2016年前我還不了解怎麼樣叫做侵權,也還不熟悉維基百科的方針,且這部分握在最近五年極力改善,抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。 再來我當時製作該圖是僅有構想,所以我委託朋友提供可能的素材,由於對版權的不了解,當時我尚未查證該素材的原始來源,就將素材圖像描圖、拼湊後上傳。 當時我也曾擔心過版權問題 zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/求助/存档/2014年9月#問:請問自行繪製的花札svg矢量圖可以直接上傳至維基共享資源嗎?尋求過協助,但是當時我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯在沒有跟我的朋友查證素材來源, 但距今已經6年之久,此事詳細我已經記不清, 沒能查證素材來源確實是我的不對,但是抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。我錯在沒有跟我的朋友查證素材來源, 但距今已經6年之久,此事詳細我已經記不清, 沒能查證素材來源確實是我的不對, 當時客棧是因為 我誤認為 該花樣屬於花札傳統花樣,所以可以上傳。6年前在互助客棧的答覆 "它們網站並沒有svg圖像,該svg圖像是我自己畫的,但是是依照他們的圖",User:Outlookxp 的回應是 "那就可以。" ,因此我以為可以上傳, 現在是這事情的6年後, 你證明這些圖像有版權OK, 我也提刪了。 您還要必要繼續鞭屍、翻舊帳,惡意推定,故意翻6年前的事情惡意整我嗎? 再次聲明,6年前,我不熟悉方針,加上來源沒有仔細查證,所以我不確定是否構成侵權,於是上傳了該等圖像。 如今,您查證圖像確定侵權,那麼提交刪除事情不就解決了,有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? --A2569875 (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- You seem a little unhinged (unless Google Translate is doing you a disservice). I was only trying to provide context for why these pictures need to be deleted. I think it's you who need to read up on AGF. I'm not out to get you, I'm just trying to make sure these pictures (which you stole) are properly deleted.2001:240:2403:AA45:608A:7157:2D7B:EAD1 07:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- 你再亂扯些甚麼? 我早在一個星期前提交刪除這些條目了,難道不是嗎? 難道我申請這60張圖到Commons:Deletion requests是假的嗎? 你根本無視 然後開始攻擊我。--A2569875 (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- 你惡意不依照實際情況理解狀況、惡意不通情理。 我重新說明,在這個討論中,有編者認為"照著一張圖進行描圖產生另一張圖"(參照某圖自行繪製)或許可以不侵權,但並不確定,另一個聲明,我當時其實不清楚該部分素材的實際來源,故版權在當時是存疑的,但也沒人提出其他原因。 那麼如何確定侵權? 僅要找出其實際來源就可以確定是否侵權。 首先,很感謝您協助找出這些素材的原始來源,這6~7年的不確定版權有了結論,就是侵權。 這點我在一個星期之前就說明了,是誰無視了,就是上方那個ip用戶,你還敢說不是你要學習AGF? 回到正題,確定侵權了,我提交刪除肯定是十分妥當, 既然我都提交刪除了,你為何還要繼續開罵,挖我的舊帳 (翻舊帳、rake over) ? 我已經說了,我六年前還不熟悉方針與版權才會搞出這樁爛事,我現在是明白這些的,您硬要我搭乘時光機到6年前找到6年前的我並攻擊教訓我? 情何以堪? 6年前的我不清楚規則而違反了版權規則,我後面這六年都已經努力學習改善,你們不願看到這些進步只顧著繼續罵我,人都會犯錯,我不相信您從來沒有犯過任何錯。 User:和平奮鬥救地球說我現在已經不是以前那個樣子了,對規則熟悉許多,但問題是還是一堆人要說我2016年一直在違反方針。 我患有心理疾病,情緒控制有問題,我的行為對整個維基社群造成嚴重困擾,我很抱歉。 您們高興就把我Global lock吧 (如果真的Global lock我將會對維基媒體基金會發起及大規模抗議),反正你們眼睛眼看不到我6年來的改善,故您們認為我今天還是如同6年前般的爛人,不配編維基百科。--A2569875 (talk) 08:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- I haven't attacked or scolded you, I've only provided context. You submitted deletion nominations for the cards, yes, but the images haven't been deleted yet and you didn't outright mention why they needed to be deleted (at least not what I could judge from Google Translate). I could be wrong but it's my understanding you need a real reason to delete a picture once it's been released under a GDL or Creative Commons license and "I was the one who uploaded them" isn't necessarily enough.2001:240:2407:6153:C0A9:2701:7444:9219 08:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- 「you need a real reason to delete a picture ...... (省略) ...... isn't necessarily enough.」reply : 我想這道沒有必要。您已經充分證明我那些圖是由大量copyright元素拼湊而成。無論是偷、或是 "依樣畫葫蘆地" (這是成語せいご,我很難使得 Google Translate 翻譯出我的原意 "『
人のするのを見て、そのまねをすること手本のとおりにひょうたんを描く.そっくりそのまま模倣する』な" (很抱歉,我的 日本語 和 英語 都不好,根據ip地理位置資訊,您也許來自 東京,所以我複製了日漢字典中對 "依樣畫葫蘆" 的解釋) ) 照著圖描、或是SVG取樣等,都不再重要了。無論是否以GDL發布,這已經可以構成違反Commons的方針了。根據Commons:Copyright_rules Commons的方針,以及Special:UploadWizard中的說明「我們不接受來自其他人靈感的作品, ...... (省略) ...... ,即使你儘是參照他,然後自己畫的」。很明顯違規,管理員可以直接執行刪除。--A2569875 (talk) 10:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- 「you need a real reason to delete a picture ...... (省略) ...... isn't necessarily enough.」reply : 我想這道沒有必要。您已經充分證明我那些圖是由大量copyright元素拼湊而成。無論是偷、或是 "依樣畫葫蘆地" (這是成語せいご,我很難使得 Google Translate 翻譯出我的原意 "『
- 已使用zh:WP:TG ping @Shizhao: 來處理,應靜待答覆。 其說明道最晚2020-04-20會來處理。--A2569875 (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- I haven't attacked or scolded you, I've only provided context. You submitted deletion nominations for the cards, yes, but the images haven't been deleted yet and you didn't outright mention why they needed to be deleted (at least not what I could judge from Google Translate). I could be wrong but it's my understanding you need a real reason to delete a picture once it's been released under a GDL or Creative Commons license and "I was the one who uploaded them" isn't necessarily enough.2001:240:2407:6153:C0A9:2701:7444:9219 08:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- 你惡意不依照實際情況理解狀況、惡意不通情理。 我重新說明,在這個討論中,有編者認為"照著一張圖進行描圖產生另一張圖"(參照某圖自行繪製)或許可以不侵權,但並不確定,另一個聲明,我當時其實不清楚該部分素材的實際來源,故版權在當時是存疑的,但也沒人提出其他原因。 那麼如何確定侵權? 僅要找出其實際來源就可以確定是否侵權。 首先,很感謝您協助找出這些素材的原始來源,這6~7年的不確定版權有了結論,就是侵權。 這點我在一個星期之前就說明了,是誰無視了,就是上方那個ip用戶,你還敢說不是你要學習AGF? 回到正題,確定侵權了,我提交刪除肯定是十分妥當, 既然我都提交刪除了,你為何還要繼續開罵,挖我的舊帳 (翻舊帳、rake over) ? 我已經說了,我六年前還不熟悉方針與版權才會搞出這樁爛事,我現在是明白這些的,您硬要我搭乘時光機到6年前找到6年前的我並攻擊教訓我? 情何以堪? 6年前的我不清楚規則而違反了版權規則,我後面這六年都已經努力學習改善,你們不願看到這些進步只顧著繼續罵我,人都會犯錯,我不相信您從來沒有犯過任何錯。 User:和平奮鬥救地球說我現在已經不是以前那個樣子了,對規則熟悉許多,但問題是還是一堆人要說我2016年一直在違反方針。 我患有心理疾病,情緒控制有問題,我的行為對整個維基社群造成嚴重困擾,我很抱歉。 您們高興就把我Global lock吧 (如果真的Global lock我將會對維基媒體基金會發起及大規模抗議),反正你們眼睛眼看不到我6年來的改善,故您們認為我今天還是如同6年前般的爛人,不配編維基百科。--A2569875 (talk) 08:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- 你再亂扯些甚麼? 我早在一個星期前提交刪除這些條目了,難道不是嗎? 難道我申請這60張圖到Commons:Deletion requests是假的嗎? 你根本無視 然後開始攻擊我。--A2569875 (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- You seem a little unhinged (unless Google Translate is doing you a disservice). I was only trying to provide context for why these pictures need to be deleted. I think it's you who need to read up on AGF. I'm not out to get you, I'm just trying to make sure these pictures (which you stole) are properly deleted.2001:240:2403:AA45:608A:7157:2D7B:EAD1 07:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- 首先抗議妳的惡意推定,請你zh:WP:AGF。2016年前我還不了解怎麼樣叫做侵權,也還不熟悉維基百科的方針,且這部分握在最近五年極力改善,抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。 再來我當時製作該圖是僅有構想,所以我委託朋友提供可能的素材,由於對版權的不了解,當時我尚未查證該素材的原始來源,就將素材圖像描圖、拼湊後上傳。 當時我也曾擔心過版權問題 zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/求助/存档/2014年9月#問:請問自行繪製的花札svg矢量圖可以直接上傳至維基共享資源嗎?尋求過協助,但是當時我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯了,對不起,我錯在沒有跟我的朋友查證素材來源, 但距今已經6年之久,此事詳細我已經記不清, 沒能查證素材來源確實是我的不對,但是抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。抗議你們無視於我的改善還要翻舊帳出來鞭屍。我錯在沒有跟我的朋友查證素材來源, 但距今已經6年之久,此事詳細我已經記不清, 沒能查證素材來源確實是我的不對, 當時客棧是因為 我誤認為 該花樣屬於花札傳統花樣,所以可以上傳。6年前在互助客棧的答覆 "它們網站並沒有svg圖像,該svg圖像是我自己畫的,但是是依照他們的圖",User:Outlookxp 的回應是 "那就可以。" ,因此我以為可以上傳, 現在是這事情的6年後, 你證明這些圖像有版權OK, 我也提刪了。 您還要必要繼續鞭屍、翻舊帳,惡意推定,故意翻6年前的事情惡意整我嗎? 再次聲明,6年前,我不熟悉方針,加上來源沒有仔細查證,所以我不確定是否構成侵權,於是上傳了該等圖像。 如今,您查證圖像確定侵權,那麼提交刪除事情不就解決了,有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? 有必要對我人身攻擊嗎? --A2569875 (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 1-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 1-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 1-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 10-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 10-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 10-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 10-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 11-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 11-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 11-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 11-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 12-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 12-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 12-3 (Echigo-kobana).svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 12-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 12-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 13-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 13-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 13-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 13-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 14-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 14-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 14-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 14-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 2-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 2-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 2-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 2-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 3-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 3-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 3-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 3-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 4-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 4-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 4-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 4-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 5-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 5-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 5-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 5-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 6-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 6-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 6-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 6-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 7-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 7-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 7-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 7-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 8-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 8-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 8-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 8-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 9-1.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 9-2.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 9-3.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hanafuda 9-4.svg
我在2016年之前不理解維基百科方針,因此2016年之前我被各個維基媒體計畫多次封禁,但我2016-2020年間學習了多個維基媒體計畫方針,甚至在中文維基被社群選為資深主編,且我2016後上傳的圖像我保證全部都是自由版權,任何方針在2016年後我都有嚴守。 在當時(2014)只是有想把花札 SVG 化的想法,但太難畫是去委託朋友找資源拼湊組合,也感謝您將這些可能非自由版權的資源源頭給找出來。 我敢保證我2016-2020學會了大部分的方針,依現在的觀點來看,這種由多個可能非自由版權的元素拼湊成的圖像違反方針,應當刪除。 A2569875 (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:OePgzE1AlFM.jpg
Out of project scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Oregon
The files are images during the COVID-19 pandemic in Oregon, in which they are originally published with Public Domain Mark, which is not a valid license per COM:PDM. As a result, the files have no licenses, and should be deleted.
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 01.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 02.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 03.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 04.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 05.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 06.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 07.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 08.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 09.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 10.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 11.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 12.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 13.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 14.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 15.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 16.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 17.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 18.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 19.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 20.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 21.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 22.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 23.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 24.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 25.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 26.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 27.jpg
- File:Oregon Department of Transportation 28.jpg
廣九直通車 (talk) 11:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Traînage feuilleté.jpg
((J'ai réalisé quelques ajouts, or, hier je l'ai remplacé malheureusement à l'identique et il m'est impossible de le remplacer par le nouveau, je vais donc faire une nouvelle importation dont celui-ci deviendra un doublon, dans la mesure ou la manoeuvre soit réussie...J'ai essayé de le mettre à nouveau en import mais cela n'a pas marché non plus donc j'attend sa suppression pour l'importer corrigé.Je pense qu'il vous faudrait une technique qui écrase l'image précédente lors d'un nouvel import corrigé ou ayant un ajout. Merci pour votre compréhension. Gérard Rondeau.)) GRDROND (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Le 21 04 2020 MERCI DE BIEN VOULOIR prendre en compte MON DESISTEMENT de la demande de suppression car j'aurai du attendre le temps nécessaire que la page actualisée soit bien apparue. AVEC MES EXCUSES, Gérard Rondeau. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRDROND (talk • contribs) 08:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Deletion request withdrawn by the nominator/uploader as a mistake. See above and Bistro. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
File:LIQENI I RRAGAM FLORIAN AHMATAJ - panoramio.jpg
too small Albinfo (talk) 16:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, only 99×74 pixels. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Maternal Love by Emil Cedercreutz
- File:Äidin rakkaus puisto - panoramio.jpg
- File:Varsapuisto.jpg
- File:Varsapuistikko - Marit Henriksson.jpg
Published in 1928, author died in 1949. Not PD due to URAA until 1923. --Kissa21782 (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, will be undeleted in 2024. Taivo (talk) 18:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OlehPE (talk · contribs)
Out of scope, personal images.
Дима Г (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeansnove (talk · contribs)
Private / self-promoting images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Habertix (talk) 09:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Okansenavci (talk · contribs)
Professional photos claimed as own work. Unlikely as uploader is in the photos
Gbawden (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teleseguidor (talk · contribs)
Promotional. Out of the project scope.
Edslov (talk) 23:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Song deity statue wearing cord and plaque and mountain pattern armour.png
Three dimensional work (statue) copied from internet. An older copy from 2017/12/20 can be found for example at https://read01.com/3Gj2mM6.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=879317efbc54aeaab193ca2510fdebc9a5e5a69c-1586601542-0-AdEEcy5LCpMXHsiIx_yRig0TIF16BRhqhvou7dR3xZ7rjiLStTXxkPblZLegnmtiW_d5iv6_icYHYlCphas7N6XnaTwWPm08_HWqQyD36-jfjoWufUJkcP5Y3s3WmpgXJ-MPjgmuRd2B08eC_dh3bxT5vEG7xJtq52v5A5a9dcVhjKnDkVjO7GmIZfdXPimmT3ZK16SAJLAh-pKkbFBL9wdSxpeq3WjX9DBK_wBSCoslB0R4lQogsV280PrwL-QWBTazyvFb4GAeqvSQ6TC27NV4GTA0JgGqpjgLXI53eGEH#.XpGeS3JS_WV Gun Powder Ma (talk) 10:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Ming hand cannon with flash pan.png
Taken from internet. Older example from 2019-10-11 can be found at https://kknews.cc/zh-mo/history/56mjbr2.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=cb660cf13e401ee46977e84f793d054fa0115b35-1586601546-0-AdFkOQ8mOmD-_XDJgx_iagACE1GLlJV1kQX-_HVCUW1F3TRSwh9xSEYbJnR1hQuEwco0xzrbtnwggKllLWP_PXQU-VerGHRyAwAE7Llc_yfoAcB_DPVgsg2WGH12okhSsYdP7r31sKv4vq0HkYOy9xS3kh06YjbslCPmyDkvDn4V93W8XU1V81qvUV1LCmceE1tIXKYT0kF9B_4Z_FDi0i6rqXK1NlUZBoOhTPXC2Z7WSIPNhUhUwkEJ3Yq1oKjpWPnGRgIUm8yX6TS43GXejYJtsRKk_VGHXmxzbi92XddsU9Y69dDA3vKxPpd0w50RdQ Gun Powder Ma (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Whan spear.png
Violation of copyrights at Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/32499494@N05/15209603385 Gun Powder Ma (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Wu spear.png
Violation of copyrights of Mr Benjamin Daniels (May 24, 2018): http://www.wuyuescripts.com/artifacts.php Gun Powder Ma (talk) 11:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Han jian scab.png
Taken from this post from 2018-08-10 23:25. The image was cropped but the position of the reflection of the flashlight gives its identity away: http://mini.eastday.com/a/180810232556029.html Gun Powder Ma (talk) 11:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Han daos.png
Taken from this blog post from 2018-10-20 19:29. The image was slightly cropped but the position from which it was taken seems identical: https://club.6parkbbs.com/chan1/index.php?app=forum&act=threadview&tid=14181105 Gun Powder Ma (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue bronze container.png
Violation of Mr Benjamin Daniels's copyrights (May 26, 2018): http://www.wuyuescripts.com/wu-inscriptions.php [almost at bottom to be found] Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue bronze water container.png
Violation of Mr Benjamin Daniels's copyrights (January 20, 2019): http://www.wuyuescripts.com/wu-inscriptions.php [close to bottom] Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue bronze water cont.png
Violation of copyrights of Benjamin Daniels (May 26, 2018): http://www.wuyuescripts.com/wu-inscriptions.php and http://www.wuyuescripts.com/SHfuchaijian1a.jpg Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue bronze water beast.png
Violation of copyrights of Benjamin Daniels (May 26, 2018). Pic is taken from here and slightly cropped: http://www.wuyuescripts.com/wu-inscriptions.php and http://www.wuyuescripts.com/SHfuchaijian7.jpg Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue bronze beast.png
Violation of copyrights of Benjamin Daniels (May 26, 2018): http://www.wuyuescripts.com/wu-inscriptions.php and http://www.wuyuescripts.com/SHfuchaijian4.jpg Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue cup.png
Taken from here and watermark cropped away: https://k.sina.cn/article_1867082024_p6f49692802700iq10.html Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue bird model.png
Taken from here and watermarks cropped away: https://k.sina.cn/article_1867082024_p6f49692802700iq10.html Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue birdy.png
Taken from here and watermark cropped away: https://k.sina.cn/article_1867082024_p6f49692802700iq10.html Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Yue bird.png
Taken from here and watermark cropped away: https://k.sina.cn/article_1867082024_p6f49692802700iq10.html Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shazinsharaf (talk · contribs)
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=231441878257356&set=a.106073470794198
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. User has been warned several times. --Achim (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
File:5086094-m.jpg
What's that? --Killarnee (T•1•2) 18:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wjabc1996bingnan (talk · contribs)
Obviously not own-work.
- File:大原亮治.png
- File:Norio Suzuki Hiroo Onoda.png
- File:Hirō Onoda小野田宽郎石原里美.png
- File:Hirō Onoda小野田宽郎.png
- File:江户四十八手.png
Techyan(Talk) 12:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Uploader had a history of uploading files now deleted: User_talk:Wjabc1996bingnan JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cpitcher1977 (talk · contribs)
The claim to being the copyright holde of these images is dubious. All of these images are claimed to be own work and attributed to "James Ketchell" who is also the subject of the photos. The image EXIF for File:James speaking.jpg indicates "PIC BY STEWART TURKINGTON www.stphotos.co.uk 07778 334771". Already deleted now File:Jamescycle01.jpg also was a claim of own work by this uploader that had EXIF showing a copyright notice.
- File:James row boat.JPG
- File:James01.jpg
- File:James everest03.JPG
- File:James speaking.jpg
- File:James everest01.JPG
Whpq (talk) 12:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. File:Jamescycle01.jpg was deleted by @Túrelio: because: "Claimed as own work and also apparently is the subject of the photo which doesn't add up. EXIF states ANDREW BROOKES www.andrewbrookes.co.uk." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Paintings of Srboljub Kojadinović
Paintings of Srboljub Kojadinović (died 2018). No permission.
- File:Kojadinovi Srboljub, Balada o nerođenim Srbima.jpg
- File:Kojadinovi Srboljub, Obnova.jpg
- File:Kojadinovi Srboljub, Pariz, leta Gospodnjeg 2053.jpg
- File:Kojadinovi Srboljub, Objašnjavam neke stvari (Pablo Neruda).jpg
Smooth O (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Paintings of Milanka Dinić
Paintings of Milanka Dinić (died 2017). No permission.
- File:Dinić Milanka, Svet snova.jpg
- File:Dinić Milanka, Čarobni cvet.jpg
- File:Dinić Milanka, Anđeli nas nadgledaju.jpg
- File:Dinić Milanka, Začarano jezero.jpg
- File:Dinić Milanka, San.jpg
- File:Dinić Milanka, Izvor mudrosti.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mnmukustos (talk · contribs)
Permission from each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Kojadinovic-Srba-Foto-R--Krstinic.jpg
- File:Filipovic Ilija - Portrait.jpg
- File:Milan-Stanisavljevic-Portrait.jpg
- File:Dinić Milanka - portret umetnika.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Marzia Bisognin Kjellberg.jpg
Possible copyright violation and incorrect license. This Image may have been taken from a promotional photoshoot, https://www.instagram.com/p/BS4dZAEj6aG/ in 2017. Vistadan 16:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahkars Architecture (talk · contribs)
Artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Village oil on canvas(1980).jpg
- File:Life stilled oil on hard board 1980.jpg
- File:Meeting oil on hard board 1980.jpg
- File:Jander oil on canvas 1985.jpg
- File:Butcher in Parachinar oil on hard board 1980.jpg
- File:Blind baba in Kohat oil on hard board 1982.jpg
- File:Transformation (5 x 5 oil on canvas) 2014.jpg
- File:The toy story.jpg
- File:The race.jpg
- File:The passenger.jpg
- File:Reason of Malaise.jpg
- File:Healer.jpg
- File:GMO love 2030.jpg
- File:Guard and Brain.jpg
- File:Copy of Picasso, Dali, Gauguin and Holocaust.jpg
- File:Back to Square One.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#G10, and COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahkars Architecture (talk · contribs)
COM:SCOPE? Anyway artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Brain of Canaan man.jpg
- File:Ages and stages.jpg
- File:Age of pexalating God.jpg
- File:Horses relief.jpg
- File:Fiber glass gate.jpg
- File:Fiber glass door3.jpg
- File:Fiber glass door2.jpg
- File:Fiber glass door.jpg
- File:Roster Bicycle Junk( 1991).jpg
- File:Peacock Bicycle Junk.jpg
- File:Galloper (1990).jpg
- File:Lurey Bronzes & Stainless Steel (1990).jpg
- File:Mehboob.jpg
- File:Baba (1989).jpg
- File:Jander (1985).jpg
- File:Village (1980).jpg
- File:Stilled (1981).jpg
- File:Elders meeting (1980).jpg
- File:Butcher (1981).jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahkars Architecture (talk · contribs)
COM:SCOPE? Anyway artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:The race1.jpg
- File:Unseen Signs.jpg
- File:Kings dog and the pigeon.jpg
- File:Art of Balancing inner tongue.jpg
- File:King of the new world.jpg
- File:Copy of Dali, Picasso, Gauguin and Hollow cast.jpg
- File:The toy story 1.jpg
- File:The only passage.jpg
- File:No Peace.jpg
- File:Kings dog and the new born.jpg
- File:The need.jpg
- File:Life is a molding factory.jpg
- File:GMO Lovers 2030.jpg
- File:Back to Square.jpg
- File:The Healer.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Village_oil_on_canvas(1980).jpg” under ticket:2020041910008662. --Ankry (talk) 07:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all (from both open nominations) as out of scope. Cabayi (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
File:The Avengers - Thor.jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in South Korea for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 07:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Captain America The Winter Soldier - Stealth S.T.R.I.K.E. Suit.jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in South Korea for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 07:52, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - Spider-Man.jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in South Korea for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 08:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Backyard wrestling action figure Samurai ksuh.jpg
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 08:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Epson Taiwan promotional models, Taipei IT Month 20151128b.jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted character Hello Kitty. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep Hello Kitty image removed now. --Solomon203 (talk) 07:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Tomer T (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Producer.jpg
Out of scope: unused file, possibly copyvio/spam Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 14:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 08:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Lewslo.jpg
Out of scope: made up superhero, no proof of "excistence" before this file. Dqfn13 (talk) 15:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:中村浩一(2020年撮影).jpg
A photo from Web site, probably. No Exif. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 51008f Shimoitabashi 20190627.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/lr7kIRud9ycHToH/status/1010361562828173312/photo/4 posted to twitter on 23 June 2018; the image on commons was slightly cropped, but is still the same photo (the fourth image in the gallery - train at the exact same spot on tracks, same dude driving the thing). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 18:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 05:02, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tokyu 5050-4000 series 4107f Fliner Rapid Express Seibu Ikebukuro line.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/KEROTETSU_photo/status/1076381443511570432/photo/2 posted to twitter on 22 December 2018 (2nd photo of the bunch) Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:45, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tokyu 5050-4000 series 4110f Shibuya Hikarie Tobu Tojo line.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/whitewing683401/status/1128867127299981312/photo/1 posted to twitter on 16 May 2019, even has the same watermark in lower left corner. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:45, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tokyu 5050-4000 series 4108f Fliner Express Tobu Tojo line.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/PASMOICOCA/status/1091929285122654211/photo/1 posted to twitter on 3 February 2019. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 19:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:45, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tokyo Metro 13000 Series 13114F 20190818.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/Tobu_11656F/status/1030473671150690311/photo/3 posted to twitter on 17 August 2018 (third image of the gallery). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 19:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:59, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 51004f Tokigawa Bridge 20200302.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/da1sya/status/713667451200745472/photo/1 posted to twitter on 26 March 2016 (first image of the gallery; the image on commons is slightly cropped and has the catenary shadow edited out, but it still is the same photo). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 05:02, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 51007f Tsuruse 20200226.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/itochanpicture/status/1127070719341281280/photo/2 posted to twitter on 11 May 2019 (second image of the gallery; the image on commons is cropped, but it still is the same image). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 05:02, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 51092f Rapid Express 20190804.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/nm1010205/status/1137542684946489344/photo/2 posted to twitter on 9 June 2019 (second image; image on commons is cropped) Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 05:02, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tokyu 5050-4000 series 4102f Rapid Express Tobu Tojo line.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/nm1010205/status/1106712944560070656/photo/1 posted to twitter on 16 March 2019 (first image of the gallery). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:44, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tokyo Metro 16000 Series 16111f Semi Express.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/Te5095/status/1173499522435014656/photo/2 posted to twitter on 16 September 2019 (second image of the gallery). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:44, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 50070 Series 51076F Local Ikebukuro.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/KbIxj/status/768370142442983424/photo/2 posted to twitter on 24 August 2016 (second image of the gallery; image on commons is cropped). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:44, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 50070 Series 51077F Fliner Ltd Express Tokyu Toyoko line.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/shimpa310/status/1018478225251434498/photo/1 posted to twitter on 15 July 2018 (first image of the gallery; image on commons is slightly cropped). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:44, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 50090 Series 51091F Rapid Express Tobu Tojo line.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/KbIxj/status/764262274789875713/photo/1 posted to twitter on 13 August 2016 (first image; image on commons is cropped). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 20:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:44, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 20400 Series 21422f 20190628.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/29taigengo/status/1139901866152779776/photo/1 posted to twitter on 15 June 2019 (first image of the gallery; image on commons has been slightly brightened up). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 21:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:43, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:TX-2000 Series 2168f 20200315.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/kosigaya_tetu/status/1239117552212512769/photo/3 posted to twitter on 15 March 2020 (third image in gallery; image on commons is slightly cropped). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 21:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:58, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:TX-1000 Series 1103f 20200315.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/kosigaya_tetu/status/1239117552212512769/photo/2 posted to twitter on 15 March 2020 (second image in gallery; image on commons is slightly cropped). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 21:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:58, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 06:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Le-long-ki.gif
“All Rights Reserved” per source page but uploaded as Creative Commons. Northern Moonlight (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:09, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: “All Rights Reserved” per source page but uploaded as Creative Commons. --Krdbot 01:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Cinnabar Moth.jpg
"photographed by Don Horne" requires COM:OTRS permission as nothing in this description, source or license appears to cover this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Don Horne’s photographic slides were donated to Manaaki Whenua − Landcare Research, and are made available under a CC-BY 4.0 international licence. The full image set is available in Wikimedia Commons under the same license." . That is a suficiant clear statement IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Anteon caledonianum NZAC04030891 - lateral.tif
No apparent own work. Odd file size & quality limits, no meta that shows uploader other than Photoshop. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
This is my work, (source http://nz-hymenoptera.myspecies.info/taxonomy/term/1174) from a specimen in the New Zealand Arthropod Collection NZAC04030891 nzhymenoptera
Kept: CC BY at link provided, own work credible. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Wedding of Štefan Sobola 1906.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Dw no source since (dw no source since) which is totally correct. But image dates to 1906 and possibly might be able to be kept with actual source and proper license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: bogus license, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Leosville Coat of Arms.jpg
Used only in self-promotional/hoax article at enwiki. No encyclopedic value. Out of scope. Also bundling the following by the same uploader for the same reason.
- File:The Flag of The Kingdom of Leosville.jpg
- File:District Map of Leosville.png
- File:Map of Leosville.jpg.png
- File:Official National Anthem of The Kingdom of Leosville.ogg
--Kinu (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Black-and-Tan-Virginia-Foxhound-Photos.jpg
Copyright violation of . Kinu (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Flag of provinces (Ireland).png
As things stand (since 2013) a duplicate of File:Four Provinces Flag.svg. It is virtually unused - the only one to last is on the user talk page from ages ago mentioning this particular file and minor adjustments to it. I manually replaced it with SVG in the few other cases. Aʀvєδuι + 21:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Tobu 11447f Local Minami-Kurihashi.jpg
possible copyright violation of https://twitter.com/29taigengo/status/1195658800125992961/photo/3 posted to twitter on 16 November 2019 (third image in gallery). Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Poblacht Aontaithe na hÉireann (Connacht, Uladh, Mumhan, Laighean).png
Unused tweaked copy of File:Four Provinces Flag.svg with the other provinces order than the original. It is neither the traditional order (Ulster, Munster, Leinster, Connacht), nor any other logical other than geographic one (which is never used). Order is not strictly described and may differ, however two blue parts (Munster and Connacht) always should be in the opposite and are never displayed one next to the other. Simply there is no need for that kind of flag especially when it is not used even by its author on his user page. We have a better one suited for purposes of Four Provinces. Aʀvєδuι + 21:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Anchietas Cobra.jpg
Copyvio from source website whose watermark is shown. Website states "© Copyright 2018. All rights reserved." Kinu (talk) 21:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:PAX Prime 2014
COM:DW of copyrighted characters.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:PAX Prime 2014
COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:PAX Prime 2014 (14938137480).jpg
- File:PAX Prime 2014 (15124790015).jpg
- File:PAX Prime 2014 (19960880935).jpg
- File:PAX Prime 2014 (19966029191).jpg
- File:PAX Prime 2014 (19966035641).jpg
- File:PAX Prime 2014 (19966040821).jpg
- File:PAX Prime 2014(19339887583).jpg
- File:PAX Prime 20146 (19774162169).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Counter-Strike bubble gum.jpg
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:P1010703 (5728280271).jpg
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Red Fraction Armageddon at Pax East 2011 (5520446809).jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:POL COA Brama (herb szlachecki).png
This version is not relevant. Current and the only version here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:POL_COA_Brama_(herb_szlach Legalwizard 2018 (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Brama (Oginiec) Crest textured.png
These image is useless for educational purposes, was uploaded erroneously. Legalwizard 2018 (talk) 23:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:RU COA Princely Mantle (blank).svg
This image is useless for educational purposes, was uploaded erroneously. Legalwizard 2018 (talk) 23:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Bruno Megret bordeaux (cropped 2).jpg
duplicates with File:Bruno Megret bordeaux (cropped).jpg Cheep (talk) 23:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Pakistan Army Structure.png
This photo chart contains wrong information about the Pakistan Army. 43.245.121.70 12:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well, if the IP has some reliable sources it can always share the info and help us update this chart from 2013. Noclador (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete, per nom. The Pakistan Army has no commands like Kashmir Command or Punjab Command, highest field formations are field corps; see this, this and this also, the army held corps commander's conferences. If there is any Kashmir Command or Punjab Command there would have been reliable things found by google searches. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.169.18.25 (talk) 04:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete, wrongly mentioned the structure of the Pakistan Army. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.67.156.88 (talk) 15:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Portrait-2006LightJacket-Large.jpg
This image has been with us since 2008, but the subject's recent upload of another image, claiming "own work" when it clearly is not, raises the question of this image. It is the only contribution of the uploader. It is small, has no EXIF, and appears in many places on the Web. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Sambandam (Concubinage).jpg
Copyright infringement: This is a well-known painting byT Murali (Chithrakaran). Only the original artist can give permission to use this image. 99v (talk) 13:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
This is not under any license , as user is posted it under free license on his blog http://chithrakarans.blogspot.com/2007/07/blog-post_17.html,also I have messaged him on and agrees to use it. It is posted in blog under free creative commons license ,anyone can check that.
- I have checked the said blog and nowhere in the blog it is mentioned that the painting is released under creative commons license. Unless the original creator of an artwork explicitly states that the artwork is released under creative commons license, it is still under copyright. So I suggest speedy deletion of this image.--99v (talk) 10:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Túrelio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Takahashi Fumiya.jpg
A copyrighted image from Web site, probably. Web page written in the source is not visible currently. But, "horipro.co.jp" is a Japanese talent agency Horipro's domain. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Sagis Auszug, Piesendorf.jpg
likely violation of copyright / vermutlich Urheberrechtsverletzung (+ wrong license /falsche Lizenz) Eweht (talk) 13:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BSchrödinger1887 (talk · contribs)
Film stills: copyrighted.
- File:The Walking Dead "The Tower" (Yumiko, Princess, Eugene, Ezekiel).jpg
- File:The Walking Dead Season 10 Episode 15 "The Tower".jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Alien Resurrection 04.jpg
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete As I already mentioned it here : "It's sometimes hard to know what we can or can't do with film props and costumes, but it seems obvious to me now that this is an example of unauthorized publication. I should check all my other uploads from the same museum. I suppose most of them should be deleted (but not all)." --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Arrivalogo.jpg
With the UK having a very low threshold of originality (Arriva based in Sunderland, so assuming UK is home country) the stylised A of the logo will be above this, thus the logo is not public domain in country of origin. ~~ Alex Noble - talk 14:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Rajaelajemiaofficial.jpg
Spam and out of scope Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 14:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:20171015-GG 750D 5625.jpg
Author says it has been mistakenly uploaded (fixed his/her request accordingly) Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 14:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Tomer T: "Je l'ai téléversé par erreur" ("I uploaded it by mistake"). --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination- furthermore a derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Mersat Logo.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:LogoIFU.png
Calligraphy is protected in Taiwan per COM:TOO Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mitar Sirov (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF data. Copyrighted crops of pictures from various websites. Here is at least one proof.
- File:Marko Gvero.png
- File:Bojan Dimitrijević.png
- File:Mirjana Mira Banjac.png
- File:Svetlana Ceca Bojković.png
- File:Nebojša Zelenović (politician).png
Smooth O (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by کجور (talk · contribs)
Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment File:مرتضی خان علیزاده کجوری.jpg (dated 1301 SH) is probably in public domain. Hanooz 00:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - bogus license, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:20200328 111004 052srisri.jpg
Suspicious of screen grab, no copyright status given, lack of camera metadata. Richard Avery (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Porte vaisseau alien.jpg
Author says it has been mistakenly uploaded (fixed his/her request accordingly) Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also a copyright issue (DW). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Temghar dam.jpg
Author says it has been mistakenly uploaded (fixed his/her request accordingly) Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Plod lesnika.jpg
Unlikely to be own work. Looks like photo from chocolate wrap or something similar. Smooth O (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, furthermore grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:1928 Malta.jpg
Doubtful the uploader took the image. No copyright information Richard Avery (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:10-место.jpg
Appears to be a screenngrab with no evidence of copyright status. Richard Avery (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:As teenage year for Track and field.jpg
Looks like a photo of a photo with no copyright status or description. No educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 17:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Empire state building12345.png
Likely not the user's own work. Their other files, from the 1930s, are claimed as "own work" or with no source/proper license. This file is low-res with no metadata, making it unlikely to be taken by the uploader. ɱ (talk) 17:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Likely copied from the internet, found here posted in 2010, earlier than the 2013 upload to Commons. ɱ (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Guardians of the Galaxy - Rocket (2).jpg
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Man of Steel - Superman.jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Guardians of the Galaxy - Rocket.jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:G.I. Joe - Snake Eyes.jpg
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 116.jpg
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:3d8f2a2aa4c4ffc87293001b6ee27c6b florcita.jpg
Out of scope --Killarnee (T•1•2) 18:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Xzsdc.jpg
bad upload but can be salvaged by being cropped Mjrmtg (talk) 03:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Aarambha shikshyalaya.jpg
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 03:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Man using black Apple Watch (Unsplash).jpg
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Icons copyright Apple Inc.
With the wearing of the watch being the focus, the collection of icons seems de minimus. Fæ (talk) 07:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Given the watch is the focus of the photo, and the icons take up a substantial part of the watch, I don't see how de minimus applies. --17jiangz1 (talk) 07:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well each icon is about 0.05% of the photo, and I'm not sure any are copyrightable, for example the calendar icon is numbers and the mail icon looks like the unicode mail symbol. It's all well under the DM norms.
- Again the focus is wearing a smart watch, not the miniscule things on the tiny watch face. --Fæ (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Fae. Individual icons are also below TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Finn Meier.jpg
Photo was taken from , likely not user's own work, no evidence of the CC license indicated. Cryptic Canadian 08:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Herms Niel.jpg
Dublios claim of own work. Copy of the same image (marked as non-free) is at English Wikipedia. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note The uploader responded here. It's clear from that comment that they do not understand copyright and that this is not own work. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Pour info,je sais ce qu'est un copyright, mais tout ce qui est sur Wikipédia est censé être libre de droits, c'est-à-dire que cette image peut être utilisée par tout le monde. De plus, ayant aussi importer plusieurs photos de ma collection, je n'ai jamais vu que l'on pouvant importer des images en y mettant des droits d'auteurs. Les seules licences proposées sont des licence sans droits d'auteur. Cordialement,--Camaro170 (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Camaro170
Autre info, sur la page anglaise de l'image (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Herms_Niel.jpg), il y a marqué que la permission est "fair-use" et, en-dessous de "permission", il y a marqué qu'on peut réutiliser cette image. Donc cette demande de suppression est totalement inappropriée !--Camaro170 (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Camaro170
Deleted: per nomination. Commons does NOT allow fair-use images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Bulma cosplay.jpg
This file was initially tagged by JohnnyStar as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request G7
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. Courtesy-deletion should be considered. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Estudiantes garífunas.jpg
This file was initially tagged by JohnnyStar as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request G7
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Julio Escoto y Helen Umaña.jpg
This file was initially tagged by JohnnyStar as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request G7
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Maho Tsukai no Yome cosplay.jpg
This file was initially tagged by JohnnyStar as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request G7
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Raúl César Arechavala firma.png
This file was initially tagged by JohnnyStar as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request G7
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Uploads by Din-Din
- File:Lhotapohřeb.jpg
- File:Opletalpohřeb.jpg
- File:Kafkova.jpg
- File:Hlavkovy.koleje.jpg
- File:Opletal14.jpg
- File:Gymnázium Litovel .jpg
- File:Tercie.jpg
- File:Rodina Opletalových .jpg
- File:Rodiče Jana Opletala.jpg
Based on their claim of own work for File:Jan Opletal.jpg (deletion request filed separately), I suspect that all of their other uploads are also false claims of own work and are not actually theirs to freely license. Most or all of them were previously published in black and white version at here (cached version as original site takes forever to load). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical images without proper source/author/permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Chagall Todesnachricht.1985.J.Gerner.jpg
The photo is a derivative work of a drawing that is probably made by Marc Chagall. He died in 1985. In Category:Marc Chagall there is a note about files created before 1917 may be free but there are numbers on the drawing indicating it is from 1985. If uploader have a permission from the family it should be sent to COM:OTRS. MGA73 (talk) 09:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
=== Die Grafik: Chagall Todesnachricht, 1985 von Jürgen Gerner war gedacht für die Wikipedia-Seite Skizzenbuch, die Seite behandelte u.a. die Spontanität der Gedanken von Künstern in ihren Skizzenbüchern. Die Seite Skizze tilgte diese Zeichnung, es ist mein Foto, meine spontane Zeichnung am Morgen der Todesnachricht von Marc Chagall zum Thema spontane Skizzen in Büchern. Kurz um, die Seite Skizzenbuch wurde gelöscht. Die Grafik war in einer Ausstellung Hommage an Künstler ausgestellt und zusehen. 16Exul82 (talk) 11:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination okay I read the text wrong. It is not drawing made by Marc Chagall but a drawing made by the oploader the day uploader reviewed the news about the death of Marc Chagall. --MGA73 (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Van der Palm's Translation of the Bible into Dutch.jpg
F1 issue Veverve (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image taken from website without permission or free license. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Blason-mgr-wach.svg
This coat-of-arms is falsified. No such coat-of-arms belongs to the priest in question. In fact, it looks nothing like a cleric's coat-of-arms. Elizium23 (talk) 10:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep. In use. Kathisma (talk) 22:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- What difference does that make? It's been removed from the French article which falsely displayed it. It's f-a-k-e. Elizium23 (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- It makes a difference, since being erroneous is not per se a motive to remove a file from commons. As long as it is used, a file is considered as "educationnaly useful" and therefore in commons' scope. The only reason to remove a used file from commons is to prove or strongly suspect that it is incompatible with commons licensing policy (copyvio, Fair use...). If you disagree with a coat of arms, you can edit it, add the template:disputed coat of arms or ask the uploader to provide his sources. Kathisma (talk) 23:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- What difference does that make? It's been removed from the French article which falsely displayed it. It's f-a-k-e. Elizium23 (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:5zoll Rattanball und 6zoll Rattanball.jpg
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Copenhagen City Hall Danmark.jpg
bad upload, may be salvaged by cropping Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Superseded by several better images in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:BloggerLiam am Maschsee in hannover.jpg
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Does not look like selfie, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And out of scope, not a meaningful contributor. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Covid 19 In The World.png
Redundant, unused, and obsolete. Replaced by File:COVID-19 Outbreak World Map-Deaths.svg through superseded-images policy, a normal deletion discussion process is made. I doubt any of wiki projects will ever use hard-to-update "per-day COVID-19 progress maps" like this, and as of this writing many external sources are not using Wikimedia Commons-provided maps, but rather are producing their own maps, like en:Channel NewsAsia or Earth Shaker Philippines. This deletion discussion is also in accordance to, and per precedent with, Category talk:Maps about the COVID-19 pandemic. Postscriptum: I'm not a deletionist with regards to Philippine FOP issues, but I think Commons is not a place for a bunch of not well maintained and obsolete COVID-19 map graphics. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilhermesantiagos
Low-re .png images, probably out of COM:SCOPE. Ericom Sandra de bot (talk) 13:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilhermesantiagos (talk · contribs)
Low-re .png images, probably out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Ailton Cristo curas e milagres.png
- File:Ailton Cristo milagres.png
- File:Ailton Cristo 3987.png
- File:Ailton Cristo 2001.png
- File:Ailton Cristo missionário.png
- File:Pastor Ailton Cristo.png
- File:Ailton Cristo 2020.png
- File:Amilton Rodrigues Cristo.png
- File:AiltonCristo.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Rickshaw on highway.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition + bad quality. KamauxKamau (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Plane in the Kenyan skies.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Mechanic and his favourite plane in background.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Mechanics working on an aircraft.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Motorbike rider on the highway during a sunrise.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Unfinished Cessna.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Awaiting skies.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Ready for the skies.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Limitless sky.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Bike rider from work.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phone call first.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Lagging lorry.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Motorbike stage.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Not a school bus.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Lined up in precision.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Sunset at a bus stage.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Logistic vehicles.jpg
Uploaded under wrong competition KamauxKamau (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Google Earth
Google Earth images are not OK per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Maps_&_satellite_imagery.
- File:Canton Google Earth Timelapse 1984–2018.webm
- File:Lake Urmia Google Earth Timelapse 1984–2018.webm
- File:Manaus Time-Lapse.webm
Wcam (talk) 13:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep These videos were uploaded to YouTube with a permissible licensed by a verified Google Earth account. The satellite imagery comes from Google, Landsat, and Copernicus. Google can license its own works however it wants, Landsat imagery is (if I'm not mistaken) public domain, and Copernicus imagery requires attribution, which is given on each file page. clpo13(talk) 18:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I do not agree. Google Earth uses a combination of free and copyrighted satellite imagery, making the videos in question derivative works. Yes, Google can license its own video however it wants, but it is the underlying non-free imagery (which Google did not create) that is problematic. --Wcam (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)- OK, in the source "Google, Landsat, Copernicus" are listed under imagery credit so the non-free component is credited under Google.
I withdraw my nomination. --Wcam (talk) 19:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Air Kokshetau 8.jpg
Not own work Rots61 (talk) 14:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. I must overrule the decision. I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet of Kristianmusic and will delete all his/her uploads. The file is very similar to those nominated for deletion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kristianmusic. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
File:AKUMOU.jpg
This is a blatant advert, the gentleman is the author of the book. Richard Avery (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
This is not an Advert. The User has just uploaded it as a user page picture for better information. User:Arpit1001 14:53, 12 April 2020 (IST)
Deleted: per nomination, not used and no meaningful contributions by this user. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Hyundai Accent Era.jpg
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:DCLARK-Online-Logo.png
Corporate logo, so very unlikely to be appropriately licensed. Per uploader's comment at enwiki here, it is not "own work" (since the uploader says they were "given permission"), so also invalid source. creffett (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie
This page's presence is confusing to users -- although it is clear that it is not policy, its mere presence here suggests that it should be obeyed. In fact, it is directly contrary to policy. There is nothing in the statute or case law that supports this point of view. In all cases, but most particularly with a modern point and shoot camera, the only creative input from a human is the exact framing of the image and the choice of the exact moment to push the button. Therefore, the only person who has any right to the copyright is the one who actually takes the picture. Ownership of the camera and verbal direction from the subject is irrelevant. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep, I get why it's confusing, but it could be solved by simply using a template stating that it has been rejected by the community or something similar. See: "Commons:Accreditation". The page has value, it just shouldn't be presented as having any authority. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep useful page which helped me as an OTRS agent. Make it an essay or userify it if needed, but don't delete it. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. --Krd 20:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete This page oversimplifies the relevant legal analysis to the point that it is inconsistent with Commons policy, copyright law, and the Wikilegal page it cites. It states opinion as fact without any justification in law or policy. Keeping it up as a Commons-namespace page, even with a clear tag saying not to cite it, only contributes to confusion and promotes misinformation. Since the sole author is now globally banned, I see no point to userifying it. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep Extensively linked to in discussions. Can be marked as a {{Rejected}} but should be kept for historical purposes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- If it is to be kept, it should be much clearer that it is not in line with Commons policy. - Jmabel ! talk 01:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep but mark as {{Rejected}}. Kaldari (talk) 02:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep (but mark as rejected). Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment can always move it to Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie proposal or Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie failed proposal to avoid confusion.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep and mark as rejected. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep but marked as rejected and kept only for historical purposes (and any other relevant warning). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep, would weak support rename. As long as it is made clear that this isn't policy, but don't see a very compelling reason for deletion. ~~ Alex Noble - talk 19:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment I wonder if the proposal should be re-attempted. meta:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership existed at the time of the proposal, but it wasn't linked on this page at that time and, as far as I can see, was not discussed in the proposal. Personally I have been against this policy, but now that I have read a statement about it by actual lawyers, I would support it. – BMacZero (🗩) 20:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think it depends a lot on the situation. If you're a skilled photographer and want a picture of yourself but left your tripod at home, so you set the settings manually, decide where to stand, decide where the bystander photographer will stand and how they will hold the camera, etc., then you have a very strong case that you own 100% of the copyright in the image. But simply handing your phone to someone is more of a grey area and will depend on a bunch of factors, like how much input you vs. they had on the creative decisions that went into the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep, mark rejected per above --DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep or rename, but tag as rejected and place a note saying what the true guideline is, or linking to a page that uses easily-understood language to explain the true guideline, like English Wikipedia sometimes does. (It's usually better to direct a person's attention to the right thing than just letting them get lost in the wrong thing that they've already been told is wrong.) A paragraph that summarizes meta:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership would be nice, even if the summary is basically "It's complicated, so don't upload those photos, because they'll probably get deleted immediately unless you can prove you had creative control or a license from the person who pushed the shutter button." --Closeapple (talk) 09:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: consensus if for keep. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Ksenia Mishina.jpg
Imported from a copyrighted website, no permission to use under free license from it or an author of the photo. website url DLU (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:All Ireland province emblems flag.svg
There is absolutely no reason for this fictional mash-up to be stored at Commons. It is not used anywhere and for 99% it won't be. There are Four-Provinces, All-Ireland flags that are in fact used, while this one contains a symbol and a colour for every single one used in for different coats of arms. And in the meantime it is a crime against both vexilology and heraldry. Aʀvєδuι + 20:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:The Flag of The Communist Republic of Hamiltonsland.png
No usefulness, out of scope. Kinu (talk) 21:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Arsho Ayvayan.jpg
Non-notable person, incomplete description, little educative value Richard Avery (talk) 22:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Brama (coat of arms) template.svg
Irrelevant version of the image. The current and only version now here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:POL_COA_Brama_(herb_szlachecki).svg Legalwizard 2018 (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:BIRD MAGNIFICENT FRIGATEBIRD SURINAM AMAZONE SOUTH-AMERICA (32202846773).jpg
Out of Commons scope: intrusive watermarking makes picture effectively unusable MPF (talk) 23:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Thongdrel-Jakar-Dzong-Tsechu2017.jpg
No freedom of panorama in Bhutan A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
-- Interesting. But the others are free ? How about this one? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guru_Rinpoche_Gomkora.jpg --JanManu (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
-- I do understand the fact of "no panorama view allowed in Bhutan". As the article about Thongdrel in the english version uses a similar photo I really do not understand why it can be used and mine not. As the whole article is an iconographic work about the art, it makes no sense to have the article without a photo of a Thongdrel. Don't you think? If we (Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons) agree to delete the photo one should a) finde a similar or b) delete the whole article.--JanManu (talk) 08:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree-ca.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 03:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- I do not agree:
- There is no need to delete this file because there are millions of files in Commons that are absolutely useless.
- Deleting this file is a coercion to use YOUR svg file that you has been created.
- The fact that it is a derivative work is not a criterion for its destruction. For example, there are thousands of png files derived from svg files that are still not deleted and even present in articles when their svg version exists (I have ordered thousands of articles in the field of medicine and I have verified this which I have just said). Perhaps, one of the reasons for PNG use is the best text (as such) display because the Wikipedia viewer (for svg drawings) is not good enough. One solution to this problem (ad that I sometimes use) is work with layers and assign a layer to "text to path".
- The multilingual versions you propose are the product of non-free programs (and not from the use of the Inkscape, an open source program), as I easily deduced (from their explanations) from a previous conversation. To modify with Inkscape a svg file (that you has been created with other program) is very difficult because Inkscape does not support "Conditional Group" edition.
- Localized (translated) versions allow tags usually better positioned, as are arrows.
- It is often necessary to make the page (according to Inkscape terminology) size for all possible languages larger than necessary, thus making article with worse visualization than it could be. For example, ideographic writing allows pages with less width.
- Jmarchn (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Jmarchn: I'll just address one point for now: "The multilingual versions you propose are the product of non-free programs". This is not the case. I just use a text editor, and it is quite easy to do – so your assertion of "non-free tools" certainly misses the mark ;) Cherkash (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - "other stuff exists" is never a valid argument here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree-de.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 04:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree es.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree-fr.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 04:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree gl.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Yablonov fortress. Reconstruction. Objects 01.jpg
Fake own work claim. Photocopy from board. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Схема является частью государственного регионального «культурно-исторического кластера «Белгородская черта», разработанного департаментом внутренней и кадровой политики Администрации Белгородской области». Проект получил поддержку Президента: Владимир Путин поручил правительству РФ выработать предложения по изучению объектов Белгородской засечной черты XVII века и организации туристического маршрута по ним.
- Раз это государственный проект, то он не охраняется авторским правом согласно статье 1259 части четвёртой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации № 230-ФЗ от 18 декабря 2006 года. И подпадает под лицензию {PD-RU-exempt}. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Це не «государственные символы и знаки — флаги, гербы, ордена, денежные знаки и тому подобное», тому шаблон не відповідає зображенню. Це інформаційний стенд з не «простими геометричними фігурами», а має дизайнерський елемент автора, автором якого ви не є, це сам макет, фотокопія якого використана в дизайні стенду, автором макета ви не є, ви є тільки автором фотографії, яка зображає похідні роботи принаймні двох інших авторів: дизайну та макету. Якщо ви є автором дизайну стенду і автором макету, докажіть це, надавши проміжні файли, скажімо верстки, чи створення макету. Інакше це все — фальшиві заяви, на які вам вже не один адміністратор вказував.--Микола Василечко (talk) 05:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- А кто вправе публиковать такое изображение, если правообладателем является государство? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- З якого це дива правовласником на дизайн і макет є держава? У вас є на це докази? Наведіть їх. Якщо їх у вас нема, значить правовласниками є дизайнер стенду і скульптор макету. --Микола Василечко (talk) 07:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Вы должны подтвердить 1) что правообладателем является государство и 2) что оно дало вам разрешение. В общем случае, если государство является правообладателем, вы не можете распоряжаться его интеллектуальной собственностью. Не путайте, пожалуйста, интеллектуальную собственность государства (где авторское право принадлежит государству) и отсутствие охраны (где государственные символы и документы вообще не подлежат авторскому праву). --PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Подскажите, фраза о том, что «авторское право принадлежит государству» — это из какого российского закона? И тогда получается, что ими распоряжаются исключительно чиновники? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Им владеет тот государственный орган, который владеет авторским правом. В вашем случае, скорее всего, им владеет государственный орган, который заказал исполнение этой афиши. Мне кажется, мы уже обсуждали это на форуме. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Пример: если государственная дума заказала архитектору рисунок, тогда государственная дума будет владельцем исключительного авторского права на рисунок. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Подскажите, фраза о том, что «авторское право принадлежит государству» — это из какого российского закона? И тогда получается, что ими распоряжаются исключительно чиновники? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- А кто вправе публиковать такое изображение, если правообладателем является государство? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Це не «государственные символы и знаки — флаги, гербы, ордена, денежные знаки и тому подобное», тому шаблон не відповідає зображенню. Це інформаційний стенд з не «простими геометричними фігурами», а має дизайнерський елемент автора, автором якого ви не є, це сам макет, фотокопія якого використана в дизайні стенду, автором макета ви не є, ви є тільки автором фотографії, яка зображає похідні роботи принаймні двох інших авторів: дизайну та макету. Якщо ви є автором дизайну стенду і автором макету, докажіть це, надавши проміжні файли, скажімо верстки, чи створення макету. Інакше це все — фальшиві заяви, на які вам вже не один адміністратор вказував.--Микола Василечко (talk) 05:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Вопрос: что считается на этой фотографии является «произведением науки, литературы или искусства»? Если архитектура, то это реконструкция крепости, спроектированной и построенной в XVII веке. Если схема взаимного расположения — то тогда «это изображение или изображённый на нём текст состоит только из простых геометрических форм и текста. Они не удовлетворяют порогу оригинальности». --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Изображение считается. Оно очень сложное и художественное. В данном случае вы хотели сказать, что реконструкция не должна вносить никаких авторских добавок, однако перед нами не реконструкция, а художественный рисунок. Давайте для примера вспомним, что происходит с авторским правом архитекторов в России. Хотя сами постройки, здания, свободны от авторского права и могут воспроизводиться, однако чертежи и рисунки архитекторов не охвачены свободой панорамы и не могут так же свободно воспроизводиться. Да-да: построенная крепостная башня свободна по свободе панорамы, а вот чертёж или рисунок с этой крепостной башней охраняется как творческое произведение. Поэтому прошу вас, пожалуйста, получите ответ не от нас, а от заказчика всего этого комплекса. Позвоните в государственный орган и узнайте, кто может дать вам лицензию. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Albero filogenetico.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 05:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree lv.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 05:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Where is already translation in Latvian? --212.3.193.198 16:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @212.3.193.198: Choose "Latvian" from the "Render this image in" drop-down menu under the image preview. Cherkash (talk) 22:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree hu.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 05:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree pt.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 05:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- The translation to Portuguese is embarissingly incomplete in this file. GoEThe (talk) 07:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @GoEThe: This is beyond the point of this deletion request: the point is, the same exact translation (however "embarrasingly incomplete") is in the multi-language file now – and so there's no reason to keep this file anymore. (And as an aside, if you want, you can update the multi-language file with a better translation, obviously; in case you don't know how, feel free to list the Portuguese terms on my Talk page and I can update it.) Cherkash (talk) 22:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree.ru.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 06:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Is it not the same file as the one which is supposed to be an already present 'necessary translation'? When I clicked on the 'details' of the 'Russian translation' file (necessary?), I got to the same file which is nominated for deletion. Anyone, please, to explain? Alexei Kouprianov (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexei Kouprianov: File:Phylogenetic tree.svg is a multi-language file that has a Russian translation embedded in it (among more than a dozen other languages). So there is no longer any need for a standalone Russian-only file. Cherkash (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- I can't see how (and whether) it works, so I leave the decision up to the administrators and rely upon their far greater technical expertise. Alexei Kouprianov (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexei Kouprianov: Just FYI: you can see how it works if you choose your language from the "Render this image in" drop-down menu below the multi-language image. Check it out! You can also see how the language-specific embeddings automatically work in a given Wiki's primary language: see e.g. the top image in the ru:Эволюция article. Cherkash (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- I can't see how (and whether) it works, so I leave the decision up to the administrators and rely upon their far greater technical expertise. Alexei Kouprianov (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexei Kouprianov: File:Phylogenetic tree.svg is a multi-language file that has a Russian translation embedded in it (among more than a dozen other languages). So there is no longer any need for a standalone Russian-only file. Cherkash (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree uk.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 06:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Phylogenetic tree km.svg
This is a derivative of File:Phylogenetic tree.svg which already has the necessary translation. Cherkash (talk) 06:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:John Wayne Gacy's clown suit (17104376201).jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for artwork, which both the painting and the costume qualify as. The costume is likely dated to around 1975 per the English Wikipedia article (so PD-US-not renewed would not apply). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Musée de la coutellerie - Nogent.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in France, the building is modern and the photo violates architect's copyright. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Zierpflaume 1.jpg
Versehentlich hochgeladen. Das Bild musste noch zugeschnitten werden. Zugeschnittenes Bild ist jetzt hochgeladen. Dieses ist überflüssig. Sciencia58 (talk) 11:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Ruby shoots Oswald.jpg
Claimed as {PD-US-not-renewed}, but uploader is unable to explain coherently what queries he used to conclude there was no renewal (see User_talk:Toohool), and page linked from description page asserts that copyright continued to be held by photographer in 2002, which implies renewal, EEng (talk) 12:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nominator apparently refuses to hear what I've told him, but I searched the copyright renewal database for the photographer's name, the newspaper's name, the names of the subjects who appear in the photo, and variations on those names, and found nothing. The fact that some people have paid for a license for the photo does not prove that it's still under copyright, it only means that some people didn't do their research, or simply chose to be "better safe than sorry". It's notable also that the nominator has apparently been putting a lot of thought into this matter, but is still unable to point to any renewal registration that might cover this image. Toohool (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please don't make this personal. It's not my job to demonstrate it's not PD; the question having been raised, it's your job to demonstrate it is. What exactly did you search? How do you know the names you listed above are the only ones in play -- how do you know it's not under "Knight Syndicate" or "Reuters"? Where is there anything explaining what the coverage of this database is in the first place? Arguing that something doesn't exist is by nature difficult, but it's the argument you need to make.If Commons practice is to accept an editor's statement that "I poked around a bit and didn't find anything so I guess it's PD", then that's fine, but I'd expect to find a policy or guideline somewhere saying that. I've asked you to point to that but you've not responded. That's why we're here. Perhaps some other editor can point to the pertinent guideline. EEng (talk) 21:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Do you have some reason to believe that the renewal would be listed under some other name? If so, please state it. Do you have some policy basis for your argument? If so, please state it. What part of my explanation of what I searched for did you not understand? And if you don't want to "make this personal", maybe don't start off a public discussion by calling an editor incoherent. Toohool (talk) 23:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Do you have some reason to believe that the renewal would be listed under some other name?
– Yes: the lack of anything you've pointed to saying that renewals, if they exist, will always be found by searching this database under the photographer's name or the name of the newspaper of original publication, which appears to be your assumption.Do you have some policy basis for your argument?
– Yes: the requirement at Commons:Licensing thatThe information given on the description page should be sufficient to allow others to verify the license status.
That means, at the minimum, that you tell others enough that they can repeat what you did and see what you saw.don't start off a public discussion by calling an editor incoherent
– I didn't call you incoherent. I said you've been unable to explain coherently what queries you used. And that remains the case. I've asked you over and over what your queries were (e.g.What exactly did you search?
, above) and even now you refuse to say. This is a real problem. For example, at we're told thatit's possible for a number of works by a particular author, or published in a particular magazine, to be covered under one blanket copyright that may or may not mention the individual pieces by name.
- As mentioned before, perhaps there's a guideline outlining what efforts the project considers sufficient for a conclusion of nonrenewal. If so that would solve the problem. EEng (talk) 02:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, but all of the above just amounts to you being ignorant about the topic of copyright renewal. Unless you're going to get more informed, perhaps we should leave it here and wait for some other people to weigh in. There are many people on Commons who are familiar with the topic. Toohool (talk) 02:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Do you have some reason to believe that the renewal would be listed under some other name? If so, please state it. Do you have some policy basis for your argument? If so, please state it. What part of my explanation of what I searched for did you not understand? And if you don't want to "make this personal", maybe don't start off a public discussion by calling an editor incoherent. Toohool (talk) 23:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please don't make this personal. It's not my job to demonstrate it's not PD; the question having been raised, it's your job to demonstrate it is. What exactly did you search? How do you know the names you listed above are the only ones in play -- how do you know it's not under "Knight Syndicate" or "Reuters"? Where is there anything explaining what the coverage of this database is in the first place? Arguing that something doesn't exist is by nature difficult, but it's the argument you need to make.If Commons practice is to accept an editor's statement that "I poked around a bit and didn't find anything so I guess it's PD", then that's fine, but I'd expect to find a policy or guideline somewhere saying that. I've asked you to point to that but you've not responded. That's why we're here. Perhaps some other editor can point to the pertinent guideline. EEng (talk) 21:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support. This editor doesn't seem to have a firm understanding of public domain. Even within the images he posts he references the periodical that published the image. This is one of the most famous images in the world taken while working for The Dallas Times Herald, he is still alive, this is most assuredly a copywritten image and not public domain. --WGFinley (talk) 02:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- @WGFinley: You mention a number of facts, but can you explain how any of them lead to your conclusion that the image is still under copyright? Or can you explain specifically why {{PD-US-not-renewed}} does not apply to this image? You mention the fact that the photographer is still alive, so it seems you may be thinking of the rules from the Copyright Act of 1976 or subsequent laws, which base the length of copyright on the lifetime of the author plus some number of years, but those apply to works after 1978. This work was published in 1963, so the Copyright Act of 1909 governs it, and that law provided for a term of 28 years, with an option to extend it. You can find a handy summary of all this in the Hirtle chart. Toohool (talk) 05:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Living author makes it much more likely copyright was renewed. You have repeatedly refused to specify how you determined PD in a way that allows your fellow editors to verify that determination; you just insist we should take your word for it. Right now numerous of your uploads are up for deletion at enwp, and it looks likely that a CCI will need to be opened. Not sure what the procedure is at Commons but something similar will likely happen here. EEng (talk) 02:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- The only thing that makes it more likely copyright was renewed was if the copyright was renewed. Which you're still not able to show. I haven't asked anyone to take my word for anything. I've already told you twice: "I searched the copyright renewal database for the photographer's name, the newspaper's name, the names of the subjects who appear in the photo, and variations on those names, and found nothing." Which part of that is unclear to you? Do you have any ideas of other queries that might turn up the renewal that you so strongly believe exists? Your only suggestion so far has to been to search for other random names like Knight Syndicate and Reuters, for no apparent reason.
- As for the deletion discussions on enwp, there are 2 of them (not "numerous"), and so far nobody in either discussion has put forth a plausible reason to delete either file. Toohool (talk) 04:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Living author makes it much more likely copyright was renewed. You have repeatedly refused to specify how you determined PD in a way that allows your fellow editors to verify that determination; you just insist we should take your word for it. Right now numerous of your uploads are up for deletion at enwp, and it looks likely that a CCI will need to be opened. Not sure what the procedure is at Commons but something similar will likely happen here. EEng (talk) 02:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- @WGFinley: You mention a number of facts, but can you explain how any of them lead to your conclusion that the image is still under copyright? Or can you explain specifically why {{PD-US-not-renewed}} does not apply to this image? You mention the fact that the photographer is still alive, so it seems you may be thinking of the rules from the Copyright Act of 1976 or subsequent laws, which base the length of copyright on the lifetime of the author plus some number of years, but those apply to works after 1978. This work was published in 1963, so the Copyright Act of 1909 governs it, and that law provided for a term of 28 years, with an option to extend it. You can find a handy summary of all this in the Hirtle chart. Toohool (talk) 05:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
For the last time -- the very last time:
- (a) What exactly did you search -- this literal, exact search strings you used? Other editors need to be able to repeat what you did and see what you saw, not just believe your statement that you did something or other, mumble, believe me.
- (b) How do you know that those are the only strings you need to search to establish non-renewal? Is there something that spells that out? How do you know the rights weren't assigned or transferred?
You keep saying you've responded to questions, but you've repeatedly refused to answer these. EEng (talk) 05:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- I found the following information: Library of Congress, and the link to possible restrictions. I'm pinging GRuban who is quite proficient in sorting through copyright issues. Atsme Talk 📧 14:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Adding another link. I'm thinking along the line that we id the image using the Library of Congress template. Atsme Talk 📧 15:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, while I have learned a bit about copyright, I can't give a decisive opinion here. I can say that:
- (1) I disagree with WGFinley that Toohool doesn't seem to have a firm understanding of public domain - the conversation on User_talk:Toohool#File:Ruby_shoots_Oswald.jpg actually demonstrates that Toohool knows quite a bit about copyright renewal. In most cases like this I'd side with him, I did a few cocatalog database searches and can't find a renewal there either. (Including all the Jackson Roberts in 1990 and 1991.) We can't prove a negative, it just doesn't work that way, but this is the best we have.
- (2) The Library of Congress is neutral, it basically doesn't say that the photograph is in the public domain, but that is just the default case. Caveat downloader.
- (3) However, EEng's and WFinley's points that this is one of the most famous photographs in the world, our article about the photographer, which is maybe half only about this one photograph, and the news article documenting that this is something the photographer is still making money from licensing, all imply we need to be more careful than usual. We don't want to make a mistake that could seriously hurt this person.
- The photographer is still alive, and, as above, actively involved with usage of the photo. Does someone want to write him an email asking for the renewal information? I mean, there is some chance he just won't answer, especially if he did forget to renew it, since he does have a financial interest, but it does seem we should at least try. If he gives us the renewal information that will at least settle the issue one way. --GRuban (talk) 16:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think contacting the photographer is an excellent idea. Obviously demonstrating a negative (I won't say proving -- we're looking for a reasonable level of confidence, whatever that is) is always difficult, but my point all along has simply been that, surely, there's some Commons guidance on what represents an appropriate level of effort in doing that. It can't be one editor saying, "I searched a lot of ways, but I can't be bothered to say what those were so just trust me." In particular, it seems that the question of knowing what the right names are to search, when we knows rights were transferred from the original owner, may be a very difficult one -- how do we know the owner isn't "RHJ Rights Holding Company"? EEng (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I question whether Jackson owns the copyright. The image came from Flickr with a CC-By-2.0 license, so Commons is clear of any infringement claims under that license; therefore EEng would be correct about PD status. LOC lists the image as "Dallas Times-Herald photograph, taken by Bob Jackson, from the Associated Press. The published image itself is here and it is copyrighted by the Dallas Times-Herald right on their front page. Jackson was a work-for-hire on assignment, and would not own the copyright. Then we have the following statement published in the Denver Post: Today, a print of the shot hangs above the TV in Jackson’s living room. In a safety deposit box in a Colorado Springs bank, the photographer keeps the original negative given to him by the publisher, Jim Chambers, who said, “I want Bob to make as much money off this picture as possible.” According to Stanford and copyright laws that were in effect before 1978, a work that was published without copyright notice fell into the public domain but the caveat in this case is that the Dallas Times-Herald owned the copyright and they did make note of it at publication in 1963. Even if DTH transferred their copyright to Jackson, if Jackson failed to note the word “Copyright” or a © (a “c” in a circle) with his name as the copyright owner, the work would enter the public domain. That rule was repealed; copyright notice is not required for works first published after March 1, 1989 (although works first published prior to that date must still include notice). The fact that people can now download different resolutions of that image from LOC, I would venture a guess and say it's iffy to call it PD but appropriate per the Flick'r license. Consensus will have to make the final determination to be on the safe side. I'm going to ping User:SphilbrickCategory:Commons User template with namespace since he is familiar with how best to handle these types of issues on Commons. Atsme Talk 📧 18:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- A few points:
- Some random person posting on Fickr with whatever CC license they feel like ("Taken on August 13, 2010" -- yup, got it) doesn't relieve us of liability (not that liability is what we're actually worried about -- what we're worried about is following our own rules and doing the right thing, as GRuban references).
- The LOC does not offer the image for download; quite the opposite, full resolution is only available by personal visit to the LOC. While (as someone noted) treating something as non-PD is LOC's default, you'd certainly expect LOC to make the effort to establish PD if that was possible, for reasons that must surely be obvious in this particular case.
Jackson failed to note the word “Copyright” or a © (a “c” in a circle) with his name ...
– I think none of has the expertise to know for sure what name would have to appear in the notice once the copyright is transferred. See my note above to GRuban.
- What's bizarre about this is that an enormous amount of editor time is being invested in one person's crusade to declare all kinds of things PD when we have perfectly good fair-use rationales for them already. EEng (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- A few points:
- Comment I located the original copyright registration for the photo from 1964:
JACKSON, BOB.
The President's accused killer as executioner's bullet pierces body. Photo. (In The Dallas times herald, Nov. 25, 1963, p. 1-A) Appl. author: The Times Herald Print. Co. d.b.a The Dallas Times Herald, employer of work made for hire. © Times Herald Print Co. d.b.a The Dallas Times Herald; 25Nov63; BB25474.- Hopefully this gives folks some more confidence, as it gives us even more ways to search that should locate the renewal record, if it exists: the title, the corporation's name, and the registration number. Doing keyword searches for the given title (or various combinations of words from it) finds no record of it, nor does "Times Herald Print" or "Times Herald Printing". Neither does the registration number (which should appear in the database as BB0000025474, as the number of digits is fixed as 10, but I searched everything from BB25474 to BB000000000025474 for good measure). Toohool (talk) 05:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thus very nicely proving my point, from the very beginning, that thinking you can just guess what you need to search is foolish. "Bob" indeed. EEng (talk) 13:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- That does give more confidence. But we should make an honest try to ask Mr. Jackson. I can't find a way to email him directly, but this article, was written 2 years ago by a person at the newspaper he used to work at and does have that writer's email, so I'm guessing she can get in touch with him. There is also probably his linked-in page, but it's not very active. We should decide who is going to try to reach out and how, so we don't get twenty people all writing slightly different queries. User:EEng? User:Toohool? Or I can do it if necessary, though I'm not as involved as either of these two, so might take more time to do it. The key point is "was the copyright on the photograph renewed, and would you be so good as to point us to the renewal record?" --GRuban (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's a fair request. I've sent an email to the Sixth Floor Museum about getting in touch with him, as they seem to have had a long-standing relationship with him. Toohool (talk) 05:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: USCO records for a renewal around 1992 are on line.Since the renewal would have been around 1992, I searched for entries from 1989 to 1993. I used "Bob Jackson" and "Robert Jackson" and got no hits. "Dallas Times Herald" and "Times Herald Print Co." got around 125 hits each, none of them relevant. I note that the paper ceased publication in 1991, the year before the renewal would have been required. It seems entirely possible that no one attended to the renewal. The assets of the Herald were bought by the Dallas Mrning News, so I also did a search on that and got 151 hits for the time period, none of them relevant. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Apple watch (29662630102).jpg
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Icons copyright Apple Inc. Regasterios (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Apple Watch, Kenwood.jpg
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Icons copyright Apple Inc. Regasterios (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Apple watch.jpg
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Icons copyright Apple Inc. Regasterios (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Apple watch.jpg
Photo grabbed from Instagram Solomon203 (talk) 11:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Solomon203: URL? —holly {chat} 23:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- See the metadata. Solomon203 (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion continues at Commons:Deletion requests/File:AirPods pro.jpg. —holly {chat} 18:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- See the metadata. Solomon203 (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader has a history of copyvio, they should contact COM:VRT with the original EXIF to verify it's theirs. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Raumansicht Sophie Innmann selfie 2017 spray paint, cans, lacquer, shell limestone, reinforced concrete PVC floor photo by Manuel Franke.jpg
contemporary artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
File:PL Zegadłowicz - Ballada o świątkarzu.djvu
Two copyvio: cover by Jan Mroziński (1899-1954) and preface by Jan Kuglin (1892-1972) Matlin (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Vagus nerve decompressed.jpg
Incorrectly attributed. Source is given as "Own work", yet attributed to somebody else. See also:
- File:Vagus nerve rootlets compressed by artery.jpg
- File:Patient positioning for MVD neurosurgery.jpg
Uploader appears to be the first author of this paper RoySmith (talk) 16:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Agi portrait.jpg
Undescribed anonymous person . Image has no educative qualities. Richard Avery (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Someone is building my Wikipedia page and this is the photo that will accompany it. Please do not delete. {subst:idw|File:Agi portrait.jpg|File:Agi portrait.jpg}} Baxterorsi (talk) 18:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Russian Princely hat (template).svg
Duplication. The same crown is part of this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:POL_COA_Brama_(herb_szlachecki).svg Legalwizard 2018 (talk) 23:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 10:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Zitzmannsbrunnenbach, Bettenhausen.jpg
Datei wurde überarbeitet und neu eingestellt Rudolf Simon (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Zitzmannsbrunnenbach, Bettenhausen.jpg
Dieses Foto wurde überarbeitet Nina Eger (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: kein Löschgrund erkennbar. --Krd 15:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Vello Púbico adolescente.jpg
Questa immagine mostra un pene ed esce subito su Google se cerchi "vello". 93.146.118.201 12:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Vello Púbico adolescente.jpg
@Achim55 and AntiCompositeNumber: Title of the image "Vello Púbico adolescente" (Pubic hair of adolescence) suggested that the subject is likely to be underage, potentially child pornography A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Info I have made a report to Wikimedia Legal team. However, I'm disappointed with their speed of handling reports concerning underage people. For example, this has been reported to WMF Legal team for more than two months, but still no action has been taken. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom, unless the file description states that the young man is of age (and I am not going to look). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: oversighted already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
File:2020-04-05 Jeremy Amadei amadeimusic street performance Deoksugung Stonewall Walkway.webm
Commons:Help_desk#about_the_copyright_of_music_performance Choikwangmo9 (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Audio removed per nomination: no evidence of permission for the musical compositions. There may be an implied license for the performance, but that wouldn't cover the compositions. There's no dispute evident about the video itself, so that's been kept. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File:2020-04-05 Jeremy Amadei amadeimusic street performance Deoksugung Stonewall Walkway.webm
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 10:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Bigbattel.jpg
No FoP in US for 2D artwork. This is a recent creation, possibly deletable as COM:GRAFFITI, and the sticker that is the focus is a logo of an organization that would own the license to it (the whole image here is a DR of it and no evidence of permission from the organization). DMacks (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File:JESC 2019 Map.png
Duplikat SkurczRajm09 (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Author request of unused content. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File:2015-05 SAT 02 MC SAM.jpg
Dieses Foto ist veraltet und entspricht nicht unseren Datenschutzvorgaben. Bitte löschen Sie dieses Bild. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter https://www.mc-sam.de 87.140.192.0 21:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Ja, das Foto ist 5 Jahre alt, unbestritten aber kein Löschgrund. Keine Ahnung welche Datenschutzvorgaben hier gemeint sind; gesetzliche als auch die von Wikimedia sind Sicherlich eingehalten. ...Sicherlich talk 03:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Achim, der Vorstand des MC SAM e.V. hat aber beschlossen, das dieses Bild veraltet ist und nicht mehr im Internet sein soll. Das Bild wurde damals NICHT von uns hochgeladen. Wir räumen nähmlich gerade die Suchmaschinen mit SEO auf. Außerdem gibt es 2-3 Personen die auf diesem Bild nicht darauf sein möchten bzw. wollten, weshalb wir uns auch für eine Löschung ausgesprochen haben. Vielen lieben Dank für Ihre Bemühungen, weitere Info hier: https://www.mc-sam.de — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.140.195.0 (talk) 08:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Der Vorstand des MC SAM e.V. kann überhaupt gar nicht beschließen und entscheiden, welche Bilder auf einem fremden Server liegen sollen und welche nicht, solange keine Verstöße gegen geltendes Recht vorliegen. Außerdem gelten die Datenschutzvorgaben, die ein Verein sich selber gibt, nicht zwangsläufig für den Rest der Welt. Also bitte mal unsere Policy konsultieren und einen Löschgrund nachschieben, danke. --Achim (talk) 09:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok, dann löschen Sie das Bild, weil die Informationen zum Bild unzureichend bzw. fehlerhaft sind. Uns ist gerade aufgefallen, das dies ein altes Mitglied war und deshalb dort MC SAM e.V. gestanden hätte gemusst. Bitte markieren Sie dieses Bild als unzureichend beschrieben und löschen es nach 7 Tagen, bei keiner weiteren Meldung. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.140.195.0 (talk) 10:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Unzureichende Informationen sind kein Löschgrund; wer mag kann die Bildbeschreibung ergänzen.
- Fehlerhaft ist was daran? Das Bild ist defacto unbearbeitet und an sich wohl kaum fehlerhaft, die Bildbeschreibung ist so sparsam; ich kann versichern, dass sie nicht fehlerhaft ist.
- das dies ein altes Mitglied war - Irgendwer ist also ein altes Mitglied? So alt sehen die Leute nicht aus und falls ehemaliges gemeint ist; das Datum der Aufnahme steht je dabei. (und es wird auch nicht behauptet irgendwer auf dem Bild wäre Mitglied des Vereins.)
- "deshalb dort MC SAM e.V. gestanden hätte gemusst" - hmm? Ich verstehe nicht was ihr meint, vomgs die Sprache her.
- Für mich ist weiterhin kein Löschgrund ersichtlich ...Sicherlich talk 23:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok, dann entfernen Sie die Löschungsanfrage. Der Kundenservice ist sehr schlecht und es werden krampfhaft Gründe gesucht die Wünsche nicht zu erfüllen. Sie sind sehr unfreundlich und nicht für solch eine Arbeit geeignet. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.140.195.0 (talk) 08:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Einen Kundenservice gibt es auf Commons nicht und daher hat Ihnen selbiger auch nicht geantwortet. Den Vorwurf der Unfreundlichkeit nehme ich mit Befremden auf. Die begründeten Widersprühche hinsichtlich Ihres Ansinnens erfolgte in höflichem Ton, die Begründungen waren ausführlich. ...Sicherlich talk 20:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Hakan Lindquist 300dpi Foto Petr Shorely.jpg
Is COM:GOF valid for the image uploaded in 2008? First image was uploaded in 2006 (see file history). Regasterios (talk) 13:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete for the 2008 revision. That's well past the time where evidence of permission is required. The 2006 revision is potentially allowable. It is before the 1 Jan 2007 cutoff date for COM:GOF, but it also doesn't comply with the requirements for evidence of permission starting 8 Jan 2006. So I'm leaning
Weak delete for the 2006 revision as well, unless more information is provided. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File:POL gmina Kobiór COA.svg
This coa is not valid; please see File:POL gmina Kobiór COA.png and official local administration page. There isn't any proof, that that composition was any historical form of coa. Matlin (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed, valid coa is available now: File:Herb gminy Kobiór.svg. Szczureq (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)