File:Varioriented flag.svg

Out of scope, not in use Dronebogus (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

 Keep It was used once and then was removed by a well known "not-being-used-then-delete" person. MikutoH (talk) 01:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Varioriented flag.svg

Flag with no source listed to confirm existence/real life use; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 03:52, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

 Keep per above. the same type of sabotage (or foul play, per Brainy J's comment) happened again. And it's used elsewheres, such as here and here. Also, reliability is not required to put sources, and you're replacing inappropriately the original source with a secondary/tertiary reference, as if File-namespace pages were Wikipedian articles. The same reasoning was used to delete File:Demiromantic Pride Flag.svg. These files can be deleted due to editors' lack of competence in looking at existing sitelinks, searching for photos, finding, and analyzing sources, and especially overvaluing enwiki projects over others, which doesn't always have rigid reliable source policies, or sometimes are just essays, like Wikidata. They certainly shouldn't be massively editing a multilingual project. MikutoH (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

I would encourage you to assume good faith before levying accusations against me when I have nothing to do with the original nomination. I do, however, stand by my original rationale for deletion per COM:EV. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 02:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

 Keep This flag is in use. Intervex (talk) 18:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Kept: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC)