File:Mural in Baltimore, Maryland LCCN2009634057.tif

No permission from the painter, and Baltimore is in the US so US law applies. CitationAuditor (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Mona Lisa Mural, Columbus, Ohio LCCN2010630104.tif

While the original Mona Lisa is public domain, derivative works like this are not. CitationAuditor (talk) 01:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep It is simply a reproduction of PD work rotated to fit space. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep I don't see enough differences from the original to merit a copyright. Scale and cropping are not usually enough for a copyright. - Jmabel ! talk 18:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep Exact reproductions are not copyrightable. --RAN (talk) 22:55, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Not an exact reproduction. It is much bigger.--CitationAuditor (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Rhino Mural Arlin Graff in Jackson Michigan.jpg

Painting is by Arlin Graff, but it seems he is not the uploader so we don't have permission from him CitationAuditor (talk) 01:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Bicicieta Sem Freio Mural Jackson Michigan.jpg

Seems to be no permission from the painter CitationAuditor (talk) 01:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Flowers and Butterfly Mural David Rice Jackson Michigan.jpg

No permission from painter known CitationAuditor (talk) 01:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Командир диверсионной группы Павлов Владимир.png

No darn danging way is this "own work" CitationAuditor (talk) 01:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Памятник солдату ВОВ. Пятигорск.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama for artworks in Russia (COM:FOP Russia). — Redboston 01:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Brent Hecht.jpg

Brent is not the photographer of Brent. 186.173.162.175 01:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

On what do you base that claim? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Flughafen Kattowitz Logo.svg

Possibly above COM:TOO Poland --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:36, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:A Classical Meitei painting of Meitei Princess Induprabha (alias Induprava), the Queen of Kachari Kingdom (Dimasa Kingdom) in modern day Assam.jpg

No Permission, Mr.work-shy (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

The source already describes it as reusable data. It's not an English language site, maybe that's why you think there's no permission. Haoreima (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

file doesn't explicitly stated permission or lisence of use, as per Wikipedia norm we assume it is copyrighted, unless file lisence mentioned @HaoreimaMr.work-shy (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Can you please quote the Meitei text on the page that provides permission please? Also are we sure the webpage is the author? —Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 12:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

@Matrix, I know the method(trick) to convert Latin script into meiteilon script

Copy it and paste on Google translate, in this way.

English(Latin script)--> Manipur(Meitei script) --> English (translation). Mr.work-shy (talk) 04:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

 Delete. The source web site contains what is very obviously a collection of images found online. Some of them bear watermarks for an art gallery web site, and there's at least one screenshot of Google Maps. I don't think we can make any assumptions about the copyright status of these images. Omphalographer (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Disappeared Tamil children of the final days of the war in May 2009.jpg

Freedom of panorama nonexistent in Sri Lanka, especially for banners. Also, the protest banner itself may be compilation of non-free images (of missing children), making it a non-free derivative. Furthermore, location unknown; I just mentioned Sri Lanka due to the subject (of the photo) itself. George Ho (talk) 04:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Reinhold O. Schmidt.jpg

Obviously not own work. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Organización de una conferencia Wikimedia en Perú - proceso, resultados y aprendizajes.webm

This file was initially tagged by Paula (WDU) as no license (No license since) Krd 06:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Sunrise outside of Burns, Oregon - Flickr - Bonnie Moreland (free images).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 06:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Luigi Alva.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete. not likely to be own work. Star Manatee (talk) 09:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Binary Rhyme - Jens Lindemann Ottawa Chamber Music Festival.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Romano1981 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:January Littlejohn joined President Trump at the Joint Session.webm

This file was initially tagged by Koavf as no license (No license since) Krd 06:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

• Delete These personal testimonies are not {{PD-USGov}}, since they are not the work of federal government officials in their capacity. In principle, these are copyright-able and the individual YouTube videos are not CC licensed.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:49, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep. Extemporaneous personal statements like this are not copyrightable by the speaker because they are not being put into a fixed medium by the speaker. The videographer would be able to have a copyright over the recording, but because this was recorded by a White House employee it is in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Część przednia.jpg

nonfree logo, no permission Krd 07:24, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep. Simple text in two typestyles. Clearly below the threshold of originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Adlershof Train Station Berlin at dawn.jpg

Qualität ist so schlecht, dass der Informationsgehalt des Bildes gegen 0 geht TeeKayEV (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Donald Trump state visit to Qatar, 2025-05-14 P20250514DT-1622.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I cropped out the building interior, and the remaining architectural elements in the background should be de minimis, so  Keep the cropped version and  Delete the previous version. Tvpuppy (talk) 01:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Files found with Special:Search/Montreal - 2017-10 Art

Similar to the United Kingdom, there is no freedom of panorama in Canada for non "works of craftmanship" such as posters and murals

• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 14.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 05.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 19.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 06.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 24.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 57.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 22.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 15.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 16.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 55.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 18.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 25.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 23.jpg
• File:Montreal - 2017-10 - 09.jpg

A1Cafel (talk) 10:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:HK MTR Tin Hau Station platform name sign n route sign June 2021 SS2.jpg

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:MTR PIDS about support athletes 28-08-2021.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Blur the screen then there will be no problem. (Ref: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jingxin Mansion (20200430144058).jpg) 〈興華街〉📅❓ 02:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Tabasco sachets, DFW, Dallas, TX, USA (6920173128).jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 10:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment The Tabasco Sauce logo and bottle design date back to the 19th century. I'll leave to others to decide if the plastic packets are over TOO. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep. As Infrogmation said, any copyright on the bottle design has expired. None of the additional text on the packets strikes me as copyrightable - it's all non-creative content like an ingredient list. Omphalographer (talk) 22:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep the packet and logo are below the Commons:Threshold of originality. NOTE - See all these same or similar logos here Category:Tabasco sauce that have not been deleted. -- Ooligan (talk) 20:17, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

File:SHIBUYA TSUTAYA 2025年1月29日の渋谷 202501291839 IMG 3858.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Just de minimis. ウィ貴公子 (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Clearly not. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

--Headlock0225 (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Image-iguersafene.jpg

probably not "own work" - see size and metadata Xocolatl (talk) 10:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Saida-neghza.jpg

https://www.instagram.com/p/DKHcoOEO6ab/ Xocolatl (talk) 10:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:London St Paul's Cathedral and City from Thames bank 2019-03.jpg

One of the most occluded, obstructed views of the Cathedral out of more than 50 from a similar position all on this website. Adam37 (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep, I did a quick look and I can’t find any other photos from this angle as you stated (which were taken from the bank and includes the pier). This might also be useful as a closeup picture of this pier, which also I can’t find any of. Tvpuppy (talk) 14:59, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

 Keep No reason for deletion. Not a typical documentary view but clearly within scope. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Rai urvashi jpg.jpg

https://www.instagram.com/urvashi_rai_page/ Xocolatl (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Judge Kearney.jpg

Per exif data unlikely pd-usgov. No permisison. Krd 11:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Franar8 (talk · contribs)

AI-generated COM:FANART of a specific actress playing a specific fictional character. File:HG Prompt.png clearly looks like Emma Watson despite the AI only being asked to render a young girl with long, voluminous, curly brown hair - either the combination of other cues somehow led it to use Harry Potter source material when drawing a female student in this context, or it was given a copyrighted input image, or there was some conversational context that isn't reflected in the prompt.

• File:Retrato a Mano de Hermione IA.png
• File:HG Prompt.png

Belbury (talk) 11:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Those images are an original AI-generated work created using a prompt that did not mention any copyrighted characters, actors, or media. The resemblance that user believes he see to Emma Watson (in only one of the two images listed: the first one does not resemble any specific person) is purely coincidental. No copyrighted reference material or actor likeness prompts were used during generation. Unless verifiable evidence is provided that a copyrighted image or character likeness was directly copied, this deletion request remains based on subjective interpretation rather than Commons policy. —Franar8 (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately, this is a thing which happens - image models are trained on a wide variety of images, often including copyrighted media, and can converge on outputs which are derivative works of that media when given a prompt which nudges them in that direction. For instance, asking an image model to draw an Italian plumber is very likely to generate results which look like the Nintendo character Mario; those images are derivative works of the Nintendo character, even if the user prompting the model did not intend them to be. The fact that the output was not "directly copied" from a copyrighted source is immaterial. Omphalographer (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

If the deletion request is based on the claim that one of the images resembles Emma Watson, then the logical and proportionate course of action would be to delete only that specific image, not both. The other image (the first one listed, "Retrato a Mano de Hermione IA") does not resemble any recognizable person, and there is no indication that it violates copyright or personality rights.

Commons policy does not require deletion simply because an image was AI-generated, nor based on speculation about training data. Deletion should only occur when there is a clear and demonstrable infringement. If only one of the two images raises legitimate concerns, then that image alone should be considered for deletion.--Franar8 (talk) 20:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

The other image also looks more like Emma Watson than your physical description of young girl with thick, voluminous, wavy light brown hair and straight-cut bangs [...] slightly imperfect front teeth alone would suggest, I assume for the same "Italian plumber" reasoning above. The image model's training data includes a lot of Harry Potter content which has taught it that people who wear this exact costume tend to have Emma Watson's face.

COM:FANART is allowed on Commons "provided it does not copy the specific realizations of the book cover illustrations, the movies, or the computer games". If an AI has on some level interpreted your request as being for a picture of Emma Watson playing Hermione Granger, we don't know how much it's drawing from specific realizations to do that. Belbury (talk) 14:02, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

I'd add that, if you're using ChatGPT, the images it generates may be based in part on any part of your chat session with the service - it's not limited to the most recent input. Any mention of anything related to Harry Potter, even tangentially (e.g. wizards, magic, British boarding schools) could potentially be enough to cue it to produce an output based on images from the film series. Omphalographer (talk) 03:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Daisy (2662073505).jpg

This was nominated before for having a really intrusive watermark, but even though I read through the thing, I'm not sure why this was kept. As I see it, this is just advertising for the photographer. It cannot be used for any other purpose. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:11, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Emfaniseis.jpg

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 12:45, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Alpha Unmanned Systems Logo.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 12:52, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Alokei logo.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 12:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Alola Logo.jpg

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 12:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Alqamartv.jpg

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 12:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Gatsby (1).jpg

this is an image of myself and my husband. I do not want this publicly available. The person who took this photo, Warren Rohner is a dear friend. I just don't want this image on this platform any longer Renewoodenberg (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep. Image is in use across multiple projects and the subjects of the photo are not identifiable. The file description can be edited. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Wappen-Sächs-Städte-DD.jpg

Wann und von welchem Glaskünstler sind diese Fenster erstellt worden? GerritR (talk) 13:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Der Bau des Gebäudes erfolgte von 1910 bis 1915. Die Glasfenster wurden gestaltet vom Architekten Ottomar Reichelt. Er ist bereits 1911 gestorben, daher bitte nicht löschen!- SchiDD (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Wegen Com:PCP musste das geklärt werden. GerritR (talk) 13:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Preparing Smegma.jpg

Caption is misleading, this is sexually charged. 141.157.19.244 13:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Tiles/captions can be changed, and human sexuality is within project scope. That said, rather midling snapshot; I'll let others decide if it adds anything useful to fellatio related topics. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Smegma Cleaning.jpg

Sexually charged 141.157.19.244 13:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Taste of Smegma.jpg

Sexually charged, borderline pornography. 141.157.19.244 13:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Smegma Sucking.jpg

Sexually charged, borderline pornography. 141.157.19.244 13:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Human sexuality is within project scope, but this is a poor quality snapshot. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Smegma Tasting.jpg

Sexually charged, borderline pornography. 141.157.19.244 13:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Human sexuality is within project scope. That said, midling quality image; I'll let others perhaps more familiar with what Commons has related to fellatio as to if this image is useful. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Smegma Sniffing.jpg

Sexually suggestive, pornography 141.157.19.244 13:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Scent of Smegma.jpg

Sexually suggestive 141.157.19.244 13:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Smegma Lover.jpg

Explicitly sexual, pornography. 141.157.19.244 13:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Savoring Smegma.jpg

Explicitly sexual, pornography. 141.157.19.244 13:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Kilkenny CoA.png

Ai generated image Kreuzecharmeur (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep User:Kreuzecharmeur previously nominated File:County_Limerick_Coat_of_Arms.png and other Coat of Arms files by myself for deletion. It has already been explained to Kreuzexharmeur that

1. that the files are NOT AI generated, they’re AI assisted. Meaning only portions of them are made in ChatGPT but the majority of the work is manually down in GIMP
2. Even if the files were AI generated, they are in INUSE for legitimate purposes
3. As per the file descriptions, everything done with these images is otherwise inline COM:AI guidelines

I would request that Kreuzecharmeur familiarise themselves with COM:AI, read the discussions in these deletion threads, and stop nominating files like these on the grounds of “AI generated” alone. CeltBrowne (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Learn how to draw coat of arms, we humans aren't disabled to draw, or keep these abominations to yourself; we don't need Ai generated images in Heraldry. Kreuzecharmeur (talk) 20:51, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment That by itself is not a reason for deletion; currently in use in multiple projects -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)

Why is it in use, though, when there are alternatives: File:COA IRL Kilkenny City.svg? Are those alternatives not true to the real COA? Is the AI-assisted one more accurate? Nakonana (talk) 16:52, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

File:COA IRL Kilkenny City.svg contains three errors per the official blazon (image 123);

1. The central tower is supposed to be capped by a spire the centre one the tallest and topped with the spire. File:COA IRL Kilkenny City.svg does not include a spire.
2. The central tower should not bear any arms on it (it's not mentioned in the blazon). File:COA IRL Kilkenny City.svg includes arms for some reason.
3. The man in the doorway of the central tower is supposed to be wielding a cudgel in his right hand In the doorway in the centre a man bearing a cudget in the dexter hand. In File:COA IRL Kilkenny City.svg I can't tell if that's a cudgel or simply the man's arm.

CeltBrowne (talk) 22:14, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Keep per above comments. Even if there is a better alternative, image is currently widely COM:INUSE, hence must be kept for now. Tvpuppy (talk) 18:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment, per IronGargoyle below, image is not in-use anymore. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

I've reverted IronGargoyle on the basis that the file they replaced this one with contains errors and does not correctly represent the stated blazon. CeltBrowne (talk) 00:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete. Image is no longer in use and is replaced with the long-used non-AI alternative. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

  You manually replaced it with an image which, as already noted in this thread, contains several errors. Furthermore, there are more considerations to the file being deleted than whether or not it is INUSE. A file in complience with COM:AI wouldn't be deleted on those grounds alone, as Commons:Deletion requests/File:County Limerick Coat of Arms.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Navan Coat of Arms.png demonstrates. CeltBrowne (talk) 00:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek, Omphalographer, and Infrogmation: the discussion from Commons:Deletion requests/File:County Limerick Coat of Arms.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Navan Coat of Arms.png is now being rehashed a third time (despite both being ruled as keep), with some users arguing for the deletion of a file on the grounds of partial AI use alone, even though that file is in compliance with COM:AI. CeltBrowne (talk) 00:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

  This seems like a content dispute that should be dealt with at sister sites. As long as there's a dispute (edit war?) about use, deletion is inappropriate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Arthur Herbert Thompson's Memorial Plaque.jpg

The photograph itself is not a crown work, and is probably recent (it could be from 2019 per the source), which means that it is still copyrighted. Renerpho (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm contacting the original uploader to ask for permission Crispybeatle (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Crispybeatle. If that doesn't work, we can also discuss if PD-art applies because the work is two-dimensional (I don't think it does, but the argument could be made). Renerpho (talk) 14:00, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Why exactly do you think that it doesn't apply? This is not a coin by the way Crispybeatle (talk) 15:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

"A mere mechanical reproduction of some other image, such as an unmodified photocopy or scan of a drawing, cannot attract additional copyright protection over and above that of the original, as it lacks originality: it is a bare copy, no more. That rule applies internationally and, on Commons, is normally taken for granted." I believe this applies Crispybeatle (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Scolopacidae - Lymnocryptes minimus.JPG

This is clearly an AI-generated image, and a poor one at that. Foodtastenice (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Weak keep. I don't think this is AI-generated - the image was uploaded in 2022, and image models couldn't generate something like this yet - but I agree that it looks really weird, especially the partially blurred background and the green halo around the bird. @Hectonichus - can you explain what happened here? Omphalographer (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

It is simply a photomontage of a Museum specimen. It is simply a photomontage of a Museum specimen. Is it unappropriate for Wikipedia?

File:Robert Schneider 2017.jpg

Copyvio: Uploader ≠ copyright holder. Christian Schoppe is an independent photographer, the CC 3.0 licensing would need to come from him, not from a Burda company account. 87.150.7.64 15:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:TrangPhap GalaMaiVang.png

Copyright concern, no evidence Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:UK short form birth certificate example.jpg

This birth certificate example is under UK crown copyright. Absolutiva (talk) 15:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I have no recollection of how or why I determined this to be PD. No objection to deletion. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:36, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Other files in Category:Birth certificates of the United Kingdom have similar PD claims and may need review as well. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep Keep a standard form with standard birth info is not copyrightable, it must contain some element of original writing, not just facts. Two people filling in the form would produce identical results. The same questions are on the form from 100 years ago. "Certificates are protected by Crown copyright so if they were reproduced in a published work, Crown copyright should be acknowledged." --RAN (talk) 22:18, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:YorkRegionalPoliceCommunityResourceCentre.jpg

The location has been closed. There is no more York Regional Police Community Resource Centre at this location. Supermaning (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep. All the more reason to keep a photo of what it looked like when it was open. Omphalographer (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your input. I understand the value of historical documentation. However, my concern is that the image may mislead readers into thinking the York Regional Police Community Resource Centre is still active at this location, when in fact it has been permanently closed.

If the image is to be kept, I suggest clearly updating the description or caption to reflect that this location is no longer operational, to avoid confusion. My original intent was to ensure the information presented remains accurate and current.

Thank you! Supermaning (talk) 15:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep per above. You are welcomed to rename the image and update the file description so that it reflects the current status more accurately. Tvpuppy (talk) 23:45, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Map Hudson County New Jersey municipalities.gif

File was created by a now-banned user in 2007 for file size and speed tests in comparison with File:Hudson County, New Jersey Municipalities.png. Wikipedia has long-since settled on preferring PNG, the creator's interest in speed testing attracted no interest in 2007 or in 2024. Daask (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Nelson Victor Carter VC birth certificate.JPG

This birth certificate is currently under UK crown copyright. Absolutiva (talk) 16:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

This appears correct. It is a modern extract produced in 2018. As a recipient of the Victoria Cross, Nelson Victor Carter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Victor_Carter is a notable individual. His date of birth, 6th April 1887, was misreported on various web pages as 9th April 1887. When contacted by members of his family to correct the situation sites refused to make changes as other pages also carried the same error (in a circular dependency). In order to break the circle I published this birth certificate in the most reputable, open place possible: Wikimedia Commons. I believe that the circle has now been broken. Jnicho02 (talk) 10:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Flag of The Association for Tradition and Culture "Niklot" (variant).svg, File:Flag of The Association for Tradition and Culture "Niklot".svg, File:Flag of the Nationalist Association "Zadruga".svg, File:Toporzeł symbol.svg

Copyrigh violation: those flags contain the symbol created by artist Stanisław Szukalski. It was once deleted from Wikimedia Commons: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Toporzeł.svg Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

is there specific copyright applied to the toporzeł symbol mustazik (talk) 08:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, it was created by Stanisław Szukalski, so of course it is copyrighted as any other piece of art. Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

1. SEE Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of The Association for Tradition and Culture "Niklot" (variant).svg
2. SEE Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of The Association for Tradition and Culture "Niklot" (variant).svg

File:Flag of The Association for Tradition and Culture "Niklot" (variant).svg, File:Flag of The Association for Tradition and Culture "Niklot".svg, File:Flag of the Nationalist Association "Zadruga".svg, File:Toporzeł symbol.svg

Copyrigh violation: those flags contain the symbol created by artist Stanisław Szukalski. It was once deleted from Wikimedia Commons: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Toporzeł.svg Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

is there specific copyright applied to the toporzeł symbol mustazik (talk) 08:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, it was created by Stanisław Szukalski, so of course it is copyrighted as any other piece of art. Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Topokrzyż.svg

Copyrigh violation: this flag contains the symbol created by artist Stanisław Szukalski. It was once deleted from Wikimedia Commons: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Toporzeł.svg Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Balon de la famille Rentz.jpg

Je suis le téléverseur de ce fichier et je demande sa suppression pour des raisons de confidentialité. Le fichier n’est lié à aucune page Wikipédia et n’a pas d’importance encyclopédique. Je souhaite le dissocier de mon compte personnel et de mes activités publiques. Eldric425 (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Singapore 1967 Birth Certificate.jpg

This birth certificate isn't public domain in Singapore after 70 years of publication. See COM:GVT Singapore. Absolutiva (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep a standard form with standard birth info is not copyrightable, it must contain some element of original writing, not just facts. --RAN (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Singapore 1979 Birth Certificate.jpg

Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Singapore 1967 Birth Certificate.jpg. Absolutiva (talk) 16:52, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Annunaki Marquez's Colorado Birth Certificate.webp

This birth certificate is in copyright by the State of Colorado. Absolutiva (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

What element or elements of this do you believe are copyrighted? - Jmabel ! talk 21:28, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

The complete elements, like borders and zoom-in objects. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Works by the US Government for vital records are not governments of the individual US states. Absolutiva (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

• • I'd be surprised (but not astounded) if anything significant there was not used before 1989; I'd guess those elements are all {{PD-US-no notice}} or possibly {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but I can't prove it. I https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/File:Sodjamarydeath.JPG see an online example of use in 2003], but I don't think I've seen a Colorado birth certificate issued earlier than that. If someone has access to such a document, we should check. - Jmabel ! talk 02:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep I agree with Jmabel, I am not seeing copyrightable elements, the state seal has been in use for over 100 years. --RAN (talk) 22:34, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Jubaland Birth Certificate.png

This birth certicate is not public domain in Somalia after 30 years of publication. Absolutiva (talk) 16:57, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep I am not seeing anything copyrightable, and the USA does not recognize Somalia copyrights. --RAN (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Arizona Certificate of Foreign Birth.gif

This birth certificate is in copyright by the State of Alaska. Absolutiva (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

• What element or elements of this do you believe are copyrighted? - Jmabel ! talk 21:29, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

  The complete elements, like borders and zoom-in objects. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Works by the US Government for vital records are not governments of the individual US states. Absolutiva (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

  • I'd be surprised (but not astounded) if anything significant there was not used before 1989; I'd guess those elements are all {{PD-US-no notice}} or possibly {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but I can't prove it. I see an online example of use in 2003, but I don't think I've seen an Arizona birth certificate issued earlier than that. If someone has access to such a document, we should check. - Jmabel ! talk 02:43, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep I agree with Jmabel, I am not seeing copyrightable elements, perhaps if it was higher resolution, the seal in the lower right might be, but for now is not discernable. --RAN (talk) 22:33, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Kinetic Kiwis Auftritt.jpg

possible copyvio (c) Emil Linnebach - would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Adrianus bonebakker 19112001.jpg

We're using an improved quality version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adrianus_Bonebakker_1911-2001.jpg Grijswit1017 (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

You were mentioning wikiportret as a source for improved the file, but you are the uploader and don't have access to wikiportret. What is the actual source for the replacement image? Ciell (talk) 21:34, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

File:G.E. Palade împreună cu Radu Iftimovici.jpg

probably wrong date, author, source... Xocolatl (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 22:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:George Emil Palade alături de Ion (Cuti) Juvara.jpg

wrong date, author, source Xocolatl (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep Now corrected. --RAN (talk) 22:39, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Părinții savantului. Constanța și Emil Palade.jpg

wrong date, author, source Xocolatl (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Bangujournal (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: these headshots both look fake - in both cases, there are obvious signs that the head was cut and pasted onto the body.

• File:Untitled design 20250529 164238 0000.png
• File:Untitled design 20250529 163729 0000.png

Omphalographer (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Open Society Institute (logo).svg

this logo is under copyright and should not be in the commons Magmasol (talk) 20:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Route Liverpool Car Attack.png

There is well enough creative content here from the Daily Telegraph for this to be above COM:TOO UK, even if it is using OSM data, the derivative contributions are clearly copyrighted. Isochrone (talk) 21:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Evening, I've got a more detailed map of the attack I've made which I could clean up, but it's not been published in the media. Do you know if there's any chance we could use it in lieu? The telegraph's one is quite lacking DannyDouble (talk) 21:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Fztou.jpg

Coprtight violation of an Instagram, Facebook R7 and more. Vitor Hello? 21:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Here the truth: https://lorena.r7.com/categoria/celebridades/Poze-do-Rodo-desabafa-e-pede-liberacao-de-bens-apreendidos-Pior-sensacao-do-mundo Vitor Hello? 21:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Delete not own work. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 17:22, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

@Heylenny Yees Vitor Hello? 22:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:US Embassy in Tegucigapa 2.jpg

This is not the US embassy anymore. Straggles (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep. All the more reason to keep a photo of what it looked like when it was. Omphalographer (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Sobrancelhas Design, Carolina Dieckmann 02 (modificado).jpg

Imagem não livre, tirada do vídeo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-lpj79tCdQ&t=2s Leandro M800 (talk) 22:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep The video was previously published under the Creative Commons Attribution (3.0 Unported) license on YouTube at https://web.archive.org/web/20230903212142/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-lpj79tCdQ. Although YouTube allows users to change the license on videos, Creative Commons licenses are legally not revocable  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   23:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Three top orders of the Covenant.jpg

Highly unlikely to be educational - there is a draft using this on en Wikipedia, but it's been declined. I don't think this passes muster. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 23:28, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Delete. That draft looks like a hoax, and it's going to be deleted soon. No reason to keep this. Omphalographer (talk) 04:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Trans World Airlines - TWA Lockheed L-1049A Super Constellation Star of the Seine N6902C in flight.jpg

1950s American photograph, the source indeed has a CC license but since the photographer doesn't appear to be Arizona State University the license is dubious. It probably is public domain by non-renewal but this needs to be checked. Abzeronow (talk) 23:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I also found this image on a magazine, published in 1950s

Magazine

From LOSTFLIGHT has a description (5th image): "During the early 1950s, TWA provided advertising photos of N6902C to companies that built aircraft systems for the Lockheed Super Constellation. In this case, B.F. Goodrich for providing wing and tail De-Ice Boots."

I don't see copyright notice on the magazine.

Also according to the website, TWA no longer use N6902C image on postcards or advertisements after the accident. I can be sure that it was published before 1956 or in that year. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

I will also confirm that I don't see a copyright notice, and I don't see a reason why TWA would renew copyright for that anyway in the late 1970s or early 1980s. Thanks for the supporting evidence. Abzeronow (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

This image maybe in the public domain. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

I replaced CC license by PD-US-no-notice, since no copyright notice on the magazine Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Singapore Certificate of Extract from Register of Births.jpg

Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Singapore 1967 Birth Certificate.jpg. Absolutiva (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:DND 419 birth certificate.webp

Date uncertain, probably Canadian crown copyright? Absolutiva (talk) 23:57, 29 May 2025 (UTC)